Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Size and Share
Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Dynamic application security testing market stands at a current value of USD 3.61 billion, is growing at an 18.74% CAGR, and is forecast to reach USD 8.52 billion by 2030. This forward momentum reflects heightened enterprise recognition that perimeter defenses alone cannot block sophisticated runtime exploits, the wide-scale shift-left push of DevSecOps, the surge of API-centric architectures, and tightening regulatory pressure for supply-chain transparency.[1]Synopsys Inc., “Application Security Software (AppSec),” synopsys.com Continuous demand for cloud-native security tooling, pay-per-scan pricing innovation, and the integration of AI analytics into scanning engines further accelerate adoption while lowering the total cost of ownership across development teams. Vendors now emphasize single-pane platforms that merge dynamic testing with static and software composition analysis to cut alert fatigue, reduce remediation cycles, and improve developer productivity. Together, these factors sustain double-digit growth, intensify platform consolidation activity, and create new opportunities in business logic and API security validation.
Key Report Takeaways
- By component, solutions led with 69.04% revenue share in 2024; services are forecast to expand at a 21.41% CAGR through 2030.
- By deployment mode, cloud-based offerings commanded 74.59% of the Dynamic application security testing market size in 2024 and are advancing at a 22.94% CAGR through 2030.
- By organization size, large enterprises held 63.09% of the Dynamic application security testing market share in 2024, while small and medium enterprises are projected to grow at a 20.67% CAGR to 2030.
- By end-user vertical, BFSI captured 24.53% share of the Dynamic application security testing market size in 2024, and healthcare is progressing at a 22.73% CAGR through 2030.
- By geography, North America retained 38.71% market share in 2024; Asia-Pacific is set to expand at a 23.24% CAGR to 2030.
Global Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shift-left DevSecOps adoption | +3.20% | Global, with North America and Europe leading | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Rising volume of API-centric attacks | +2.80% | Global, concentrated in APAC and North America | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| AI-enabled exploit automation | +2.10% | North America and Europe, expanding to APAC | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Mandatory SBOM and supply-chain disclosure rules | +1.90% | North America and EU, with spillover to APAC | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Pay-per-scan pricing disrupting TCO | +1.70% | Global, with strongest impact in SME segments | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Low-code/no-code proliferation | +1.40% | Global, with enterprise concentration in North America | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Shift-left DevSecOps adoption
Development teams now embed security checks directly inside continuous integration pipelines. This change keeps vulnerabilities from reaching production and cuts post-deployment remediation costs that run 10-100 times higher than fixes applied earlier in the lifecycle.[2]Checkmarx, “DAST Documentation,” checkmarx.com Organizations that deploy mature DevSecOps practices recorded a 55% drop in release delays caused by security issues. Modern platforms, therefore, supply IDE plug-ins, pull-request automation, and contextual fix guidance so that security becomes an enabler rather than a gatekeeper. Wider realization of these productivity gains drives persistent demand for Dynamic application security testing market solutions that seamlessly integrate into developer workflows.
Rising volume of API-centric attacks
APIs overtook user-facing web pages as the preferred target for attackers hunting logic flaws, parameter tampering, and excessive data exposure. Financial institutions reported a material jump in payment-endpoint incidents during 2024, underscoring how microservices and third-party integrations multiply attack surfaces.[3]Federal Reserve Board, “Supervisory Cybersecurity Observations,” federalreserve.gov DAST engines responded by adding automated discovery of undocumented endpoints, parameter fuzzing, and business-logic emulation, helping security teams reduce hidden risk in sprawling microservice environments.
AI-enabled exploit automation
Machine-learning models now auto-generate exploit payloads at a scale that manual pen-testing cannot match, forcing defenders to upgrade detection speed and analytical depth. Research prototypes produced novel SQL-injection strings capable of bypassing standard filtering controls.[4]IEEE, “AI-Enhanced SQL Injection Payload Generation,” ieee.org AI-infused DAST platforms counter by ranking findings by exploitability probability and providing repair snippets, trimming false-positive rates, and letting engineers focus on high-impact flaws.
Mandatory SBOM and supply-chain disclosure rules
Executive Order 14028 and the EU Cyber Resilience Act require verifiable software bills of materials and continuous monitoring of runtime behaviour. DAST vendors have therefore launched supply-chain testing modules that spot malicious network calls and rogue component behaviour missed by static tools.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signal-to-noise (false-positive) fatigue | -2.30% | Global, with higher impact in resource-constrained SMEs | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Limited runtime / business-logic coverage | -1.80% | Global, concentrated in complex enterprise environments | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Scarcity of AppSec skill-sets | -1.60% | Global, with acute shortages in APAC and emerging markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Fragmented standards across jurisdictions | -1.10% | Global, with regulatory complexity in EU and APAC | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Signal-to-noise (false-positive) fatigue
Legacy DAST engines can flag thousands of issues per scan, yet more than 60% prove to be false positives in highly dynamic sites. Surveys reveal that 73% of developers invest more time triaging noise than fixing genuine bugs, discouraging continuous scanning. Newer platforms rely on behaviour correlation and machine learning to cut that false-positive rate below 10%, but many teams still wrestle with alert overload and under-utilize available scan capacity.
Limited runtime/business-logic coverage
Sophisticated multi-step workflows such as shopping-cart price manipulation or industrial-grade escalation remain hard to automate. Attackers increasingly target these logic pathways because automated scanners struggle to emulate legitimate multi-user scenarios, leaving blind spots. Vendors are now exploring user behaviour modelling and interactive testing hybrids to raise coverage.
Segment Analysis
By Component: Solutions Lead Market Consolidation
Solutions controlled 69.04% of Dynamic application security testing market size in 2024 on the back of integrated platforms that blend dynamic, static, and software-composition analysis. Vendor consolidation, illustrated by Checkmarx hiring core OWASP ZAP leaders, strengthens scan accuracy and widens language coverage. The services segment, projected to climb at a 21.41% CAGR, addresses acute talent shortages through managed offerings that supply round-the-clock scanning, threat intelligence, and compliance reporting. Professional services focus on onboarding, custom policy creation, and developer training, while managed services deliver continuous monitoring that scales with release velocity. Together, these trends reinforce platform-plus-services bundles that reduce operational complexity for both global enterprises and mid-market adopters.
Solutions further differentiate via AI-backed prioritization engines, pipeline integrations, and low-code scan orchestration. As customers demand consolidated dashboards that unify findings across dynamic, static, container, and infrastructure scans, platform vendors extend capabilities through acquisition or open-source partnerships. In parallel, service providers package outcome-based SLAs, promising defined remediation timelines that resonate with compliance auditors and executive leadership seeking measurable risk reduction.
By Deployment Mode: Cloud Transformation Accelerates
Cloud installations captured 74.59% market share during 2024 as organizations migrated monoliths into microservices and serverless functions that require elastic testing capacity. SaaS DAST solutions offer pre-configured policies, auto-scaling engines, and role-based portals accessible to distributed DevSecOps teams, eliminating on-premises maintenance overhead. With a 22.94% CAGR, cloud remains the fastest-growing deployment model and forms the primary route for green-field projects and SME rollouts. On-premises solutions persist in sectors with strict data sovereignty or air-gapped production zones, yet even these deployments now integrate with cloud-hosted rule updates and analytics modules via secure relays.
Hybrid deployments bridge legacy data center assets and new cloud workloads, enabling unified visibility. Platform vendors now provide policy-based scanning that dynamically directs workloads to on-premises, private cloud, or public cloud engines depending on sensitivity labels, ensuring compliance while maintaining developer agility. This flexibility cements the cloud as the operational backbone of the Dynamic application security testing market.
By Organization Size: SME Adoption Accelerates Through Pricing Innovation
Large enterprises retained 63.09% Dynamic application security testing market share in 2024 due to complex multi-app portfolios and stringent audit regimes. However, SMEs exhibit a 20.67% CAGR, fuelled by consumption-based pricing and self-service onboarding that sidestep hefty up-front licenses. Cloud-native interfaces guide teams through best-practice scans, automatically chain findings to ticketing tools, and provide wizard-driven remediation suggestions. Managed security providers also bundle DAST with fractional CISO services, satisfying regulatory benchmarks in finance and healthcare sectors.
Enterprise buyers continue to demand advanced capabilities such as custom risk scoring, API security pack add-ons, and integration with security orchestration tools. SMEs, by contrast, rank ease of deployment and pay-as-you-go predictability higher. Vendors that articulate clear entry tiers with seamless upgrade paths, therefore, stand to capture the broadest swath of the Dynamic application security testing industry revenue.
By End-User Vertical: Healthcare Emerges as Growth Leader
BFSI held 24.53% revenue share in 2024 as payment card data obligations, open-banking APIs, and high-value fraud targets drove early DAST adoption. Healthcare now leads expansion at a 22.73% CAGR, spurred by telemedicine, electronic health record digitization, and HIPAA-aligned data protection mandates. IT and telecom remain heavy adopters due to rapid feature releases and customer-facing portals that demand continuous runtime validation. Industrial and defense sectors bolster spending to safeguard operational-technology integrations now exposed through web dashboards and remote management APIs.
Retail and e-commerce rely on DAST to maintain PCI-DSS compliance, protect shopper credentials, and secure loyalty systems. Energy, utilities, and manufacturing sectors implement DAST to detect vulnerabilities in industrial IoT gateways and supply-chain management platforms. Collectively, these vertical trends propel cross-industry penetration of the Dynamic application security testing market, ensuring sustained double-digit growth over the forecast horizon.
Geography Analysis
North America captured 38.71% market share in 2024 due to mature security budgets, early DevSecOps uptake, and far-reaching federal data-protection mandates. United States federal agencies enforce stringent application-security guidelines under Executive Order 14028, while state-level breach-notification laws impose financial penalties that strengthen C-suite focus on proactive testing. Canada’s digital government programs equally amplify demand for advanced scanning in citizen portals and fintech applications.
Asia-Pacific stands as the fastest-growing territory, expanding at a 23.24% CAGR. China’s Cybersecurity Law and Data Security Law require critical-infrastructure operators to audit code continuously, spurring local enterprises to invest in scalable DAST tools. Japan’s Digital Agency promotes secure-by-design standards within public systems, boosting platform acquisitions among leading system integrators. India’s Digital India initiative and UPI transaction explosion create giant volumes of new APIs that must be tested at runtime, expanding the Dynamic application security testing market consumption.
Europe maintains steady growth under GDPR, NIS2, and the upcoming Cyber Resilience Act, which formalize software-supply-chain oversight. Germany’s Industry 4.0 rollout, the U.K.’s Open Banking push, and France’s SecNumCloud program all embed application-security requirements that favour integrated DAST suites. The Middle East and Africa witness rising adoption through national digital-government drives, while South America’s banking modernization fuels additional demand. Together, these regional dynamics ensure the Dynamic application security testing market remains strong global expansion prospects.
Competitive Landscape
The market remains moderately fragmented, yet consolidation has accelerated. Synopsys bolstered its Polaris platform with fAST Dynamic following the WhiteHat Security acquisition, thereby uniting SAST, SCA, and DAST under a single subscription. Snyk’s purchase of Probely expanded its developer-first scanner portfolio and exemplifies how platform vendors race to deliver one-stop security coverage. Checkmarx’s strategic partnership with OWASP ZAP underscores growing alliances between commercial providers and vibrant open-source communities.
Incumbents differentiate via AI-guided triage, zero-noise scan modes, and policy engines that auto-generate pull-request gates. Challenger brands appeal with API-first architectures, micro-plan pricing, and industry-specific templates that speed onboarding in healthcare or fintech. Managed security service providers increasingly bundle DAST data into broader application security posture management dashboards, creating fresh competition for standalone scanner vendors. Given that the top five suppliers hold an estimated 42% combined share, rivalry remains robust and fosters rapid innovation across platform breadth, usability, and pricing flexibility.
Dynamic Application Security Testing Industry Leaders
-
IBM Corporation
-
Micro Focus International PLC
-
GitLab
-
Veracode
-
Checkmarx
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- January 2025: Veracode acquired Phylum, obtaining a 92% stake to extend supply-chain security functions within its dynamic testing suite.
- December 2024: HackerOne Platform became available in AWS Marketplace, streamlining procurement and linking penetration-test findings to AWS Security Hub.
- November 2024: Snyk purchased Probely to bring cloud-native DAST and API security features to its developer security platform.
- September 2024: Checkmarx partnered with OWASP ZAP project maintainers, integrating open-source engines into enterprise modules.
Global Dynamic Application Security Testing Market Report Scope
Dynamic Application Security Testing is a program in which the application is tested in a production-like environment from the outside, unlike SAST. As DAST tools don't have access to the application's source code, they detect vulnerabilities by performing actual attacks on the web app, mobile app, and APIs, similar to a real hacker. The report includes an in-depth analysis of solutions and services offered by various vendors for mobile and web-based application security for large enterprises and SMEs across the globe.
The Dynamic Application Security Testing Market is segmented by deployment mode (On-premises, Cloud), Application (Web Application Security, Mobile Application Security), end-user vertical (IT and Telecom, Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance, Healthcare, Oil, Gas and Energy, Manufacturing, Government & Defense, Retail & e-commerce), organization size (SMEs, Large Enterprises) and geography ( (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Rest of World). The market sizes and forecasts are provided in terms of value (USD) for all of the above segments.
| Solutions |
| Services |
| Cloud-based |
| On-premise |
| Large Enterprises |
| Small and Medium Enterprises |
| BFSI |
| Healthcare |
| IT and Telecom |
| Industrial and Defence |
| Retail and E-commerce |
| Energy and Utilities |
| Manufacturing |
| Other End-User Vertical |
| North America | United States |
| Canada | |
| Mexico | |
| Europe | United Kingdom |
| Germany | |
| France | |
| Italy | |
| Rest of Europe | |
| Asia-Pacific | China |
| Japan | |
| India | |
| South Korea | |
| Rest of Asia | |
| Middle East | Israel |
| Saudi Arabia | |
| United Arab Emirates | |
| Turkey | |
| Rest of Middle East | |
| Africa | South Africa |
| Egypt | |
| Rest of Africa | |
| South America | Brazil |
| Argentina | |
| Rest of South America |
| By Component | Solutions | |
| Services | ||
| By Deployment Mode | Cloud-based | |
| On-premise | ||
| By Organisation Size | Large Enterprises | |
| Small and Medium Enterprises | ||
| By End-user Vertical | BFSI | |
| Healthcare | ||
| IT and Telecom | ||
| Industrial and Defence | ||
| Retail and E-commerce | ||
| Energy and Utilities | ||
| Manufacturing | ||
| Other End-User Vertical | ||
| By Geography | North America | United States |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Europe | United Kingdom | |
| Germany | ||
| France | ||
| Italy | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| Japan | ||
| India | ||
| South Korea | ||
| Rest of Asia | ||
| Middle East | Israel | |
| Saudi Arabia | ||
| United Arab Emirates | ||
| Turkey | ||
| Rest of Middle East | ||
| Africa | South Africa | |
| Egypt | ||
| Rest of Africa | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Argentina | ||
| Rest of South America | ||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How big is the Dynamic Application Security Testing Market?
The Dynamic Application Security Testing Market size is expected to reach USD 3.61 billion in 2025 and grow at a CAGR of 18.74% to reach USD 8.52 billion by 2030.
What is the current Dynamic Application Security Testing Market size?
In 2025, the Dynamic Application Security Testing Market size is expected to reach USD 3.61 billion.
Who are the key players in Dynamic Application Security Testing Market?
IBM Corporation, Micro Focus International PLC, GitLab, Veracode and Checkmarx are the major companies operating in the Dynamic Application Security Testing Market.
Which is the fastest growing region in Dynamic Application Security Testing Market?
North America is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR over the forecast period (2025-2030).
Which region has the biggest share in Dynamic Application Security Testing Market?
In 2025, the Asia Pacific accounts for the largest market share in Dynamic Application Security Testing Market.
What years does this Dynamic Application Security Testing Market cover, and what was the market size in 2024?
In 2024, the Dynamic Application Security Testing Market size was estimated at USD 2.93 billion. The report covers the Dynamic Application Security Testing Market historical market size for years: 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 and 2024. The report also forecasts the Dynamic Application Security Testing Market size for years: 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029 and 2030.
Page last updated on: