Data Protection As A Service Market Size and Share

Data Protection as a Service Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Data Protection As A Service Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Data Protection As A Service Market size is estimated at USD 21.37 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 62.90 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 24.10% during the forecast period (2025-2030).

Growth is propelled by a surge in unstructured data, zero-trust mandates, and rising board-level concern over ransomware exposure. Enterprises are rapidly replacing capital-intensive, on-premises backup hardware with cloud-delivered subscriptions that offer usage-based pricing and elastic scale. Sovereign-cloud investments, quantum-safe encryption pilots, and cyber-insurance requirements are converging to reshape product roadmaps, while vendor consolidation is compressing market structure and accelerating feature integration.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By service type, Storage-as-a-Service held 43.2% of the data protection as a service market share in 2024; Disaster-Recovery-as-a-Service is projected to grow at a 29.5% CAGR through 2030.
  • By deployment model, the private-cloud segment captured 43.7% of the data protection as a service market size in 2024, whereas hybrid-cloud adoption is expected to expand at a 31.5% CAGR between 2025-2030.
  • By organization size, large enterprises retained 64.4% share of the data protection as a service market size in 2024, while SMEs are forecast to advance at a 34.2% CAGR to 2030.
  • By end-use industry, BFSI led with 27.8% revenue share in 2024; healthcare and life sciences are on track for a 30.7% CAGR through 2030.
  • By geography, North America commanded 37.8% of 2024 revenue, whereas Asia-Pacific is anticipated to register a 31.4% CAGR to 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Service Type: DRaaS Accelerates Amid Cyber Threats

The Disaster-Recovery-as-a-Service segment recorded a 29.5% CAGR outlook through 2030, outpacing other offerings as leadership teams elevate ransomware readiness to a strategic metric. More than 70% of enterprises intend to integrate DRaaS with SIEM telemetry by 2026, enabling automated failover based on threat scoring. [1]Veeam Software, “Understanding Disaster Recovery as a Service,” veeam.com Continuous data protection streams shrink recovery-point objectives to seconds, appealing to finance and healthcare workloads where data loss equates to compliance fines. Storage-as-a-Service, though still capturing 43.2% of the 2024 data protection as a service market share, is evolving toward intelligent tiering and policy-based immutability that aligns with zero-trust architectures. Converged platforms now bundle BaaS, STaaS, and DRaaS under unified policy engines, easing procurement and governance.

While DRaaS enthusiasm rises, storage subscriptions remain foundational. Object-store growth stays strong due to AI model training sets and video analytics that balloon unstructured data volumes. In response, providers are pushing petabyte-scale deduplication and compression to control the footprint. Full-stack offerings from cloud hyperscalers now integrate autonomous threat scanning, meaning that ransomware reels only the affected blocks rather than entire volumes. Such feature alignment signals a longer-term move toward platform-centric purchasing in which recovery automation, data classification, and compliance mapping exist inside a single control plane.

Data Protection as a Service Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Deployment Model: Hybrid Approaches Balance Security and Flexibility

Hybrid models show the fastest expansion at 31.5% CAGR. Regulators endorse architectures that keep sensitive datasets on local private clouds while allowing burstable analytics in regulated public regions. These patterns are especially evident among European banks subject to the Digital Operational Resilience Act, which mandates documented contingency arrangements for third-party services. Policy automation selects storage targets based on data-classification labels, optimizing both latency and compliance. The data protection as a service market size for hybrid solutions is forecast to double by 2028 as enterprises modernize legacy tape archives into cloud-connected vaults.

Private-cloud deployments retain a 43.7% share, favored by defense, utilities, and healthcare agencies that must assert custody over encryption keys. Vendors supplying private-cloud appliances increasingly embed FIPS-validated HSMs, role-based access, and air-gapped configuration management. Public-cloud approaches remain popular among digital-native firms that value region diversity over full sovereignty. However, sovereign-cloud initiatives, such as the AWS European Sovereign Cloud, blur lines: they deliver public-cloud agility under local legal control, pulling regulated workloads into environments previously deemed off-limits. [4]Hewlett Packard Enterprise, “Zero Trust Networking for Private Cloud,” hpe.com

By Organization Size: SMEs Embrace Cloud-Based Protection

Rising cyber threats and limited IT staff push SMEs toward off-the-shelf SaaS backup portals that include preset compliance templates. Between 2025-2030, the data protection as a service market size revenue from SMEs is projected to climb at 34.2% CAGR, supported by managed service providers offering turnkey bundles. Simplified onboarding and consumption-based billing resonate with budget-conscious owners. Cyber-insurance questionnaires increasingly list the presence of immutable cloud snapshots as a prerequisite, nudging even micro-enterprises toward entry-level DPaaS tiers.

Conversely, large enterprises retain 64.4% revenue thanks to sprawling workloads, legacy mainframes, and stringent RTO targets. Many overlay DPaaS atop existing tape libraries for phased modernization, reducing forklift upgrades. AI-enhanced anomaly detection flags deviations in snapshot change rates, giving SOC teams early warning of encryption attacks. Vendors court this segment with SLA-backed availability guarantees and dedicated account teams that shepherd regulatory audits.

Data Protection as a Service Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By End-User Industry: Healthcare Accelerates Protection Investments

Healthcare’s 30.7% CAGR reflects electronic health record mandates, connected devices, and cross-hospital data sharing requirements. Hospitals deploy immutable backups and air-gapped recovery vaults to satisfy HIPAA and EU harmonized patient data directives. Telemedicine expansions drive edge-node deployments inside clinical sites, requiring local snapshotting that synchronizes to sovereign cloud regions. Clinical research teams benefit from policy engine integration that differentiates between identifiable patient information and anonymized study datasets.

BFSI leads overall spending with 27.8% market share, underpinned by high transaction volumes and new breach-notification timelines. DORA obliges European banks to test full-scale disaster recovery at least annually, driving DRaaS adoption. Insurers collaborate with DPaaS vendors to offer premium incentives contingent on completed recovery drills. Government and defense programs invest aggressively as zero-trust strategies dictate continuous verification across classified networks. [2]U.S. Department of Defense, “Software Modernization Implementation Plan FY25-26,” dodcio.defense.gov Finally, manufacturing and telecom firms rely on DPaaS to secure industrial Internet-of-Things telemetry, where downtime directly hits throughput.

Geography Analysis

North America preserves a 37.8% revenue share, anchored by robust cloud adoption and federal directives such as CISA Binding Operational Directive 25-01, which compels agencies to apply secure configuration baselines for SaaS. [3]Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, “Binding Operational Directive 25-01,” cisa.gov The Protecting Americans' Data from Foreign Adversaries Act restricts cross-border transfers of sensitive personal data, spurring demand for in-country vaults and key escrow. Enterprises prioritize compliance mapping features that generate automated attestation reports for auditors.

Asia-Pacific posts the fastest trajectory at 31.4% CAGR as digital-government programs in Japan, India, and Korea push data-localization rules. The Indian Digital Personal Data Protection Act codifies explicit localization for critical personal information, pressuring cloud providers to launch domestic recovery zones. Hyperscalers partner with domestic telecom carriers to establish sovereign facilities that allow foreign backup services while respecting legal custody constraints. Start-ups in Singapore and Australia roll out DPaaS offerings that combine secure local storage with global failover options, appealing to mid-market exporters balancing trade and compliance.

Europe remains a sophisticated adopter shaped by GDPR, DORA, the Cyber Resilience Act, and the EU Data Act, effective September 2025. National programs such as France’s Cloud de Confiance and Germany’s Gaia-X channel funding into federated, standards-based infrastructure that prizes transparency and vendor portability. Providers differentiate by offering in-region metadata processing, EU resident-only operations staff, and exportable audit trails. Sovereign options reduce regulatory friction, driving higher attach rates among public-sector entities.

Emerging markets in Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa register rising adoption from smaller bases. Gulf Cooperation Council governments finance sovereign-cloud platforms to diversify economies and lure fintech start-ups. Brazilian banks pilot quantum-safe encryption on cross-border replication links, anticipating future cryptographic requirements. African telcos deploy SaaS backup to protect rapidly expanding mobile money platforms, offsetting limited local data-center capacity.

Data Protection As A Service Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

Industry consolidation intensifies with the December 2024 absorption of Veritas enterprise assets by Cohesity, forming a USD 7 billion entity serving over 12,000 global customers. Rubrik allies with Cisco to embed backup telemetry inside the Cisco XDR console, illustrating a pivot toward integrated detection-and-response suites. Broadcom’s quantum-resistant host bus adapters foreshadow a hardware-rooted defensive layer that competitors must match. AWS debuts a European Sovereign Cloud, undercutting regional providers by pairing hyperscale economics with local legal control.

Mid-tier specialists such as Druva and Clumio court SMEs by offering agentless, SaaS-native protection that deploys in minutes. N-able’s Adlumin acquisition folds SOC automation into managed-service offerings, signaling MSP channel importance for long-tail growth. Verticalization emerges: providers launch healthcare-specific blueprints featuring HIPAA templates, while BFSI packages integrate PCI-DSS tokenization. Competitive differentiation now hinges on turnkey ransomware recovery guarantees, hourly SLA credits, and automated compliance evidence generation.

Platform convergence is evident as vendors collapse STaaS, BaaS, and DRaaS silos into policy-driven fabrics. Buyer preference trends toward single-pane orchestration that simplifies audit traceability. However, proprietary snapshot formats risk customer lock-in, prompting open API initiatives. Vendors that expose portable metadata and cross-cloud replication options may gain share as regulatory scrutiny of interoperability mounts.

Data Protection As A Service Industry Leaders

  1. IBM Corporation

  2. Amazon Web Services Inc.

  3. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

  4. Dell Technologies Inc.

  5. Cisco Systems Inc.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Data Protection as a Service Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • June 2025: AWS unveiled the AWS European Sovereign Cloud, operated solely by EU residents and governed under EU law.
  • May 2025: JetStor introduced Infinite, a data-platform-as-a-service integrating native protection and compliance tooling.
  • April 2025: HPE launched threat-adaptive security for HPE Private Cloud Enterprise, featuring air-gapped management to satisfy DORA requirements.
  • February 2025: OpenText released Core Threat Detection and Response, an AI-powered module that integrates with Microsoft Security.
  • January 2025: Broadcom delivered quantum-resistant network encryption for in-flight storage traffic, complying with CNSA 2.0 and EU DORA mandates.
  • December 2024: Cohesity finalized its USD 7 billion purchase of Veritas enterprise backup, creating the largest pure-play provider.

Table of Contents for Data Protection As A Service Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Stringent data-sovereignty regulations (GDPR, CCPA, DORA, etc.)
    • 4.2.2 Explosive growth of unstructured data across edge and cloud
    • 4.2.3 Board-level focus on ransomware resiliency
    • 4.2.4 Cloud-native cyber-recovery vaults tied to cyber-insurance pricing
    • 4.2.5 Sovereign-cloud build-outs in Middle-East and APAC hyperscaler
    • 4.2.6 Quantum-safe encryption pilots driving refresh of DPaaS contracts
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Hidden egress and API costs in multi-cloud storage
    • 4.3.2 Vendor lock-in due to proprietary backup formats
    • 4.3.3 AI-driven compression reducing backup volumes, delaying upgrades
    • 4.3.4 Data-residency clauses in bilateral trade pacts limiting cross-border DRaaS
  • 4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Industry Attractiveness – Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.8 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUES)

  • 5.1 By Service Type
    • 5.1.1 Storage-as-a-Service (STaaS)
    • 5.1.2 Backup-as-a-Service (BaaS)
    • 5.1.3 Disaster-Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS)
  • 5.2 By Deployment Model
    • 5.2.1 Public Cloud
    • 5.2.2 Private Cloud
    • 5.2.3 Hybrid Cloud
  • 5.3 By Organization Size
    • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises
    • 5.3.2 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)
  • 5.4 By End-User Industry
    • 5.4.1 BFSI
    • 5.4.2 Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • 5.4.3 Government and Defense
    • 5.4.4 IT and Telecom
    • 5.4.5 Retail and E-commerce
    • 5.4.6 Manufacturing
    • 5.4.7 Other End-User Industries
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Chile
    • 5.5.2.4 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Russia
    • 5.5.3.7 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
    • 5.5.4.3 India
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Australia
    • 5.5.4.6 Singapore
    • 5.5.4.7 Malaysia
    • 5.5.4.8 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
    • 5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.5.5.1.3 Turkey
    • 5.5.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
    • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.2.2 Nigeria
    • 5.5.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 IBM Corporation
    • 6.4.2 Amazon Web Services Inc.
    • 6.4.3 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
    • 6.4.4 Dell Technologies Inc.
    • 6.4.5 Cisco Systems Inc.
    • 6.4.6 Oracle Corporation
    • 6.4.7 VMware Inc.
    • 6.4.8 Commvault Systems Inc.
    • 6.4.9 Veritas Technologies LLC
    • 6.4.10 Asigra Inc.
    • 6.4.11 Quantum Corporation
    • 6.4.12 Quest Software Inc.
    • 6.4.13 NxtGen Datacenter & Cloud Technologies Pvt Ltd
    • 6.4.14 Hitachi Vantara LLC
    • 6.4.15 Acronis International GmbH
    • 6.4.16 Rubrik Inc.
    • 6.4.17 Druva Inc.
    • 6.4.18 Cohesity Inc.
    • 6.4.19 HYCU Inc.
    • 6.4.20 Backblaze Inc.
    • 6.4.21 Wasabi Technologies Inc.
    • 6.4.22 NetApp Inc.
    • 6.4.23 Zerto LLC
    • 6.4.24 N-able Inc.
    • 6.4.25 Arcserve LLC

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS

  • 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment
**Subject to Availability
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the Data Protection-as-a-Service (DPaaS) market as subscription-based cloud or hybrid offerings that back up, replicate, archive, and recover enterprise data across servers, endpoints, and SaaS workloads, while embedding policy management and encryption. According to Mordor Intelligence, revenues are counted on a recurring basis, net of one-time hardware or consulting fees, and cover Storage, Backup, and Disaster-Recovery-as-a-Service delivered globally to all industry verticals.

Scope Exclusions: Stand-alone on-premise backup software, professional services billed separately, and self-built private cloud instances are outside this scope.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Service Type
    • Storage-as-a-Service (STaaS)
    • Backup-as-a-Service (BaaS)
    • Disaster-Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS)
  • By Deployment Model
    • Public Cloud
    • Private Cloud
    • Hybrid Cloud
  • By Organization Size
    • Large Enterprises
    • Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs)
  • By End-User Industry
    • BFSI
    • Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • Government and Defense
    • IT and Telecom
    • Retail and E-commerce
    • Manufacturing
    • Other End-User Industries
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Chile
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Russia
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Singapore
      • Malaysia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • Saudi Arabia
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Turkey
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Nigeria
        • Rest of Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Interviews with CISOs, backup architects, MSP channel heads, and cloud-storage OEM product managers across North America, Europe, and Asia supplied real-world pricing tiers, retention policies, and seat penetration benchmarks. Surveys of SMEs in emerging hubs clarified willingness to shift from tape to DRaaS, closing gaps left by public filings.

Desk Research

We began by mapping the regulatory spine, GDPR, CCPA, India's DPDP Act, using publications from bodies such as the European Data Protection Board, NIST, and the FTC, which signal compliance-driven spending. Trade flows from UN Comtrade, breach tallies from the Verizon DBIR, and quarterly cloud revenue disclosures helped anchor demand and vendor share movement. Company 10-Ks, investor decks, and audited cloud ARR splits were then sifted to derive average contract values, which are vital in subscription models.

The desk phase also tapped paid datasets, D&B Hoovers for vendor financials and Dow Jones Factiva for deal news, alongside sector associations like the Cloud Security Alliance. This list is illustrative; many other reputable open and paid sources fed into data collection and cross-checks.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down construct starts with worldwide enterprise IT spend, layers in cloud adoption ratios, and applies workload-level backup penetration rates. Results are stress-tested through bottom-up roll-ups of sampled vendor ARR and average selling price multiplied by contract volume checks. Variables such as unstructured-data growth (exabytes), ransomware incident frequency, sovereign-cloud capacity, cyber-insurance premium trends, and hyperscale data-center footprint expansion feed the model. Forecasts employ multivariate regression blended with scenario analysis, letting us flex regulatory shock or pricing compression cases while keeping base-case CAGR realistic. Where supplier splits are opaque, regional channel checks guide allocation before final triangulation.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs flow through anomaly screens, peer review, and a senior analyst sign-off. Models refresh annually, and we trigger interim reviews when breaches over USD 100 million, landmark regulations, or mega cloud outages occur. A last-mile validation is done just before publishing so clients receive the freshest view.

Why Mordor's Data Protection As A Service Baseline Commands Deep Stakeholder Confidence

Published figures often diverge because firms choose different service mixes, pricing assumptions, and refresh rhythms, and because some roll broader security bundles into DPaaS totals.

Key gap drivers include rivals counting one-time hardware revenue, excluding SMEs from uptake pools, using static price points despite aggressive vendor discounting, or applying blanket growth adders without breach-volume correlation. Mordor's model instead tracks live subscription ARRs, updates conversion ratios quarterly, and weights scenarios by primary-research consensus.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 21.37 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 26.04 B (2024) Global Consultancy A Includes one-off appliance sales and license renewals
USD 38.81 B (2025) Industry Association B Uses list prices, limited SME sampling
USD 22.05 B (2023) Trade Journal C Applies straight-line CAGR, no regulatory scenario testing

Taken together, the comparison shows that Mordor's disciplined scope choices, variable-level audits, and rolling refresh cadence provide a balanced, transparent baseline that decision-makers can replicate and defend.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is driving the rapid growth of the data protection as a service market?

Rising ransomware incidents, stricter data-sovereignty laws, and the need to protect expanding edge- and cloud-generated data are key catalysts.

Which service type is expanding the fastest within DPaaS?

Disaster-Recovery-as-a-Service is forecast to grow at 29.5% CAGR between 2025-2030 as firms prioritize ransomware resilience.

How are sovereign clouds influencing deployment decisions?

Sovereign clouds let organizations keep encryption keys and data under local jurisdiction while accessing public-cloud elasticity, boosting hybrid adoption.

Why are SMEs accelerating their DPaaS uptake?

Subscription pricing, minimal upfront infrastructure, and insurer demands for immutable backups make cloud-delivered protection attractive to smaller firms.

What role does quantum-safe encryption play in future DPaaS contracts?

Early pilots suggest quantum-resistant algorithms will become mandatory for critical industries, prompting refresh cycles that favor vendors with compliant offerings.

How do hidden cloud fees affect total DPaaS cost of ownership?

Egress and API charges can inflate budgets; organizations increasingly deploy FinOps tools to monitor and optimize multi-cloud spend.

Page last updated on:

Data Protection As A Service Report Snapshots