Clot Management Devices Market Size and Share
Clot Management Devices Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Clot Management Devices Market size is estimated at USD 1.96 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 2.63 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 6.04% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
The current expansion rests on the mounting global cardiovascular burden, the steady rise of ischemic and thrombotic events, and a marked pivot toward outpatient, minimally invasive vascular interventions. Demographic pressure from aging societies, coupled with lifestyle-related risk factors such as obesity and hypertension, keeps procedure volumes on an upward trajectory. Technology pipelines that integrate advanced mechanical designs, artificial intelligence–guided imaging, and high-precision navigation reinforce demand by improving procedural success rates and safety profiles. Simultaneously, payer reform in key markets is widening reimbursement coverage for mechanical thrombectomy, easing the financial pathway for providers to adopt next-generation systems. These factors collectively position the clot management devices market for durable mid-single-digit growth through the decade.
Key Report Takeaways
- By product type, mechanical and percutaneous thrombectomy devices led with 36.87% of the clot management devices market share in 2024, while neurovascular embolectomy and thrombectomy devices are set to expand at an 8.59% CAGR to 2030.
- By end user, hospitals accounted for 66.69% of the clot management devices market size in 2024; ambulatory surgical centers are poised for 9.46% CAGR through 2030.
- By geography, North America retained 45.84% of the clot management devices market size in 2024, while Asia-Pacific is projected to advance at a 7.04% CAGR between 2025 and 2030.
Global Clot Management Devices Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rising Prevalence of Cardiovascular & Neurovascular Diseases | +1.8% | Global, with highest impact in North America & Europe | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Expanding Geriatric Population Base | +1.2% | Global, concentrated in developed markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Growing Preference for Minimally-Invasive Procedures & Shorter LOS | +1.0% | North America & EU leading, APAC adoption accelerating | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Increasing Reimbursement Coverage for Mechanical Thrombectomy | +0.8% | North America primary, selective EU markets | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| AI-Enabled Clot Imaging & Navigation Tools Broadening Addressable Sites | +0.6% | North America & EU early adoption, global expansion | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Rapid Adoption of Outpatient Thrombectomy Suites in ASC Settings | +0.5% | North America leading, limited international penetration | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Rising Prevalence of Cardiovascular & Neurovascular Diseases
Escalating incidences of stroke and myocardial infarction represent the most powerful catalyst for the clot management devices market. Global stroke cases are projected to rise to 21.43 million by 2050, a surge that will swell demand for safe, effective thrombectomy solutions.[1]Journal of the American Heart Association, “Global Stroke Burden Forecast to 2050,” ahajournals.org In Europe, ischemic strokes already account for 85% of all stroke events, sustaining adoption of advanced retriever technology.[2]HealthManagement.org, “Ischemic Stroke in Europe: Current Status and Future Challenges,” healthmanagement.org Metabolic risks compound the challenge: United States diabetes prevalence is forecast to climb from 16.3% to 26.8% by 2050, raising thrombotic complexity in day-to-day practice. Lower-middle-income countries highlight unmet needs, recording 77.93% recanalization rates with existing systems despite resource limitations.[3]World Neurosurgery: X, “Mechanical Thrombectomy in Lower-Middle-Income Settings,” sciencedirect.com Current devices resolve barely one out of two tough clots, opening the door for platforms like Stanford University’s milli-spinner, which achieves near-90% efficacy on difficult occlusions.
Expanding Geriatric Population Base
Population aging reshapes procedure volumes and device requirements. While age-standardized mortality from ischemic heart disease is falling in affluent nations, absolute patient counts are rising due to demographic momentum.[4]BMC Public Health, “Global Burden of Ischemic Heart Disease and Population Aging,” bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com Frailty, comorbidities, and elevated bleeding risk push providers toward highly controllable mechanical systems rather than systemic thrombolysis. FLASH registry data reinforce this preference: mechanical thrombectomy in intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism delivered 0.3% all-cause mortality at 48 hours. Device makers now engineer slimmer catheters and advanced steering tools to navigate calcified, tortuous vessels commonly found in older adults.
Growing Preference for Minimally Invasive Procedures & Shorter LOS
Hospitals and payers alike champion interventions that cut procedure time and ward days. In the FLASH registry, 62.6% of thrombectomy patients avoided ICU admission, signaling potential for rapid discharge workflows. Penumbra’s Lightning Flash 2.0 reports average device time of 24.5 minutes and a 2.4% major-adverse-event rate, metrics compatible with same-day discharge. Value-based payment initiatives such as the Transforming Episode Accountability Model (TEAM) launching January 2026 further reward solutions that trim total care costs while sustaining outcomes.
Increasing Reimbursement Coverage for Mechanical Thrombectomy
Expanded payment frameworks further accelerate adoption. CMS granted pass-through status to Medtronic’s Symplicity Spyral catheter effective January 2025, improving hospital margins on eligible cases. Boston Scientific’s 2025 reimbursement guide clarifies CPT coding for thrombectomy across inpatient and ASC sites, reducing administrative obstacles for providers. European markets display varied, yet improving, reimbursement for embolic protection and thrombectomy, broadening addressable procedure counts.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stringent FDA & CE Clinical-Evidence Requirements | -0.7% | Global, with highest impact in regulated markets | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Competition from Pharmacological Anticoagulants & Thrombolytics | -0.5% | Global, varying by clinical practice patterns | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| High Device Cost Pressures Amid Bundled-Payment Models | -0.4% | North America primary, selective international markets | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Litigation Risk Tied to Long-Term IVC-Filter Complications | -0.3% | North America concentrated, limited global impact | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Stringent FDA & CE Clinical-Evidence Requirements
Regulators now demand expansive safety datasets, lengthening development cycles and raising costs for novel systems. Europe’s new Medical Device Regulation strengthens post-market surveillance but has strained notified-body capacity, prolonging approvals. Temporary sales pauses—such as Johnson & Johnson MedTech’s Varipulse catheter in early 2025 demonstrate how quickly regulatory concerns can derail commercialization. In the United States, the FDA placed viscoelastic coagulation analyzers into Class II with special controls in May 2025, underscoring stricter oversight even for adjunct technologies. Large-scale studies, including the EXCELLENT registry with 997 patients across 34 sites, have become the minimum evidence bar for neurovascular devices.
Litigation Risk Tied to Long-Term IVC-Filter Complications
More than 11,000 U.S. lawsuits against filter makers like Cook Medical and C.R. Bard allege failures to warn about fractures, migrations, and vena cava perforations. FDA safety alerts spotlight these hazards, prompting physicians to limit filter use or favor retrievable models. Complex retrievals sometimes necessitating venous reconstruction inflate procedural risk and cost, and settlement liabilities weigh on R&D budgets. Litigation uncertainty, therefore, restrains investment in legacy filter lines and nudges innovators toward alternative protection strategies.
Segment Analysis
By Product: Mechanical Innovation Drives Market Evolution
Mechanical and percutaneous thrombectomy systems commanded 36.87% of the clot management devices market share in 2024 and remain the workhorse solutions across neurovascular, coronary, and peripheral territories. Their versatility, combined with rapid technical iteration, makes them a central pillar of provider inventories. The clot management devices market continues to benefit from platforms offering higher aspiration power, improved clot-capture baskets, and integrated imaging that elevates first-pass success. The EXCELLENT registry confirmed first-pass recanalization of 64.5% and final rates of 94.5% for EMBOTRAP devices, supporting broader guideline endorsement Stroke. Neurovascular embolectomy and thrombectomy devices are set to grow 8.59% annually through 2030, lifted by rising stroke volumes and efficacy data that surpass pharmacologic therapies. Academic-industry partnerships, such as Stanford’s milli-spinner achieving 95% clot-volume reduction, exemplify how step-change engineering will keep the segment on an upward trajectory.
Second-tier categories hold niche, yet stable, positions. Catheter-directed thrombolysis devices remain vital for massive pulmonary embolism and complex deep-vein thrombosis when purely mechanical options are insufficient. Embolectomy balloon catheters address small-caliber, lesion-specific indications, while IVC filters experience usage decay amid safety concerns and observer scrutiny. Nevertheless, the clot management devices market retains opportunities for value-priced retrieval filters designed for rapid extraction, provided long-term complication profiles improve. Across products, AI-augmented guidance software continues to gain traction, promising real-time visualization of clot characteristics and optimized device deployment.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By End User: ASCs Accelerate Outpatient Migration
Hospitals retained 66.69% of the clot management devices market size in 2024, due to their ability to handle emergent, multi-disciplinary cases requiring advanced imaging suites and round-the-clock staffing. Comprehensive stroke centers, for instance, still aggregate complex neurovascular work that needs rapid surgical conversion capability. Yet ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) remain the fastest-growing channel at 9.46% CAGR through 2030, propelled by payer pressure to curb facility fees and by patient preference for same-day discharge. FLASH registry data revealed that nearly two-thirds of pulmonary embolism thrombectomy cases avoided ICU admission, validating the clinical suitability of ASC pathways.
Procedural economics reinforce migration: ASCs can perform interventions at 144% lower cost than hospital outpatient departments, preserving margins under bundled-payment models. Device vendors now tailor support packages education, capital-equipment financing, and remote proctoring to help ASCs integrate advanced thrombectomy systems quickly. Specialty vascular clinics round out the end-user mix by handling chronic venous disease and offering retrieval services for indwelling filters, though their overall volume contribution remains modest. Collectively, these dynamics signal a gradual but definitive redistribution of the clot management devices market toward lower-acuity, lower-cost sites of care.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
North America remained the leading revenue contributor, capturing 45.84% of the clot management devices market in 2024. Robust reimbursement, widespread primary-stroke-center certification, and a mature network of ambulatory facilities underpin usage levels that outpace other regions. CMS pass-through approvals for devices such as Medtronic’s Symplicity Spyral catheter further strengthen the adoption pipeline. Nevertheless, legal exposures in the IVC filter segment create an undercurrent of caution among manufacturers, potentially curbing near-term innovation in filter design.
Europe delivers the second-largest share and records healthy mid-single-digit expansion. Despite implementation bottlenecks, the enhanced European MDR fosters improved traceability and data transparency, which are expected to stabilize clinician confidence over time. Reimbursement for embolic-protection and thrombectomy varies among the 11 scrutinized EU states, yet overall payment coverage is trending upward. High-quality clinical infrastructures illustrated by the 34-site EXCELLENT registry accelerate multicenter validations and post-market studies that feed national funding decisions.
Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region at a projected 7.04% CAGR for 2025-2030. Rising cardiovascular incidence, improving insurance penetration, and large-scale hospital modernization drive equipment uptake. Emerging economies show the starkest need–capacity gap: lower-middle-income settings demonstrated 77.93% recanalization despite limited resources, indicating sizable latent demand once procedural financing improves. Multinationals collaborate with domestic distributors and deploy mobile training labs to speed clinician adoption, while local manufacturers expand R&D to address price-sensitive segments. These factors make Asia-Pacific the primary geographic engine for incremental clot management devices market revenue over the next five years.
Competitive Landscape
Market fragmentation is gradually giving way to consolidation as diversified device companies acquire specialized thrombectomy assets. Stryker’s USD 4.9 billion acquisition of Inari Medical in February 2025 secures a front-row position in venous thromboembolism management and peripheral interventions. Boston Scientific’s USD 1.26 billion purchase of Silk Road Medical brings a carotid stent platform and access technology under its umbrella, signaling intent to build an end-to-end stroke-prevention franchise. Teleflex’s EUR 760 million agreement to absorb Biotronik’s vascular intervention division adds drug-coated balloons and a resorbable magnesium scaffold, broadening treatment options in peripheral arterial disease.
Innovation rivalry is equally vigorous. Penumbra’s Lightning Flash 2.0 combines algorithm-driven aspiration cadence with real-time audiovisual feedback, mitigating distal embolization risks. Terumo’s CDI OneView system, cleared by the FDA to track 22 vital parameters during perfusion, exemplifies the convergence of monitoring and intervention in a single session. Start-ups such as Sensome leverage high-frequency impedance sensing to classify clot composition in situ, potentially guiding device choice and energy parameters.
Competitive intensity is moderated by the sizeable clinical learning curve and regulatory burden; players with robust field-training infrastructure and broad reimbursement expertise gain a structural advantage. Meanwhile, white-space remains in AI-powered navigation and in price-tiered mechanical systems suited to underserved markets. Collectively, these dynamics position the clot management devices industry for continued consolidation alongside differentiated R&D plays that promise superior outcomes.
Clot Management Devices Industry Leaders
-
Boston Scientific Corporation
-
Edward Lifesciences
-
AngioDynamics, Inc.
-
Medtronic
-
LeMaitre Vascular Inc.
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- February 2025: Teleflex announced its agreement to acquire Biotronik's Vascular Intervention business for approximately EUR 760 million, enhancing its portfolio with drug-coated balloons, stents, and the Freesolve sirolimus-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffold technology.
- January 2025: Gore & Associates received CE Mark approval for the lower-profile Gore Viabahn VBX stent graft, featuring a 79-mm configuration and 6-F compatible options with a 1-F profile reduction for treating complex vascular diseases.
- November 2024: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services granted transitional pass-through payment for Medtronic's Symplicity Spyral renal denervation catheter, effective January 2025, to enhance patient access to innovative hypertension treatments.
- February 2024: Terumo Medical Corporation broke ground on a new USD 30 million, 64,000-square-foot manufacturing facility in Puerto Rico to meet increasing demand for its Angio-Seal Vascular Closure Device, with completion expected by summer 2025.
Global Clot Management Devices Market Report Scope
As per the scope of the report, the formation of a thrombus in a blood vessel is known as thrombosis (blood clotting). This stops blood circulation in an artery or vein. Clot management devices help to remove or dissolve blood clots and restore blood circulation.
The clot management devices market is segmented by by product (embolectomy balloon catheter, catheter directed thrombolysis devices, percutaneous thrombectomy devices, inferior vena cava filters, and neurovascular embolectomy devices), end-user (hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers and other end-users), and geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa, and South America). The report also covers the estimated market sizes and trends for 17 countries across major regions globally.
The report offers the value (in USD million) for the above segments.
| Embolectomy Balloon Catheters |
| Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Devices |
| Mechanical/Percutaneous Thrombectomy Devices |
| Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filters |
| Neurovascular Embolectomy/Thrombectomy Devices |
| Hospitals |
| Ambulatory Surgical Centers |
| Specialty Clinics |
| North America | United States |
| Canada | |
| Mexico | |
| Europe | Germany |
| United Kingdom | |
| France | |
| Italy | |
| Spain | |
| Rest of Europe | |
| Asia-Pacific | China |
| Japan | |
| India | |
| Australia | |
| South Korea | |
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |
| Middle East & Africa | GCC |
| South Africa | |
| Rest of Middle East & Africa | |
| South America | Brazil |
| Argentina | |
| Rest of South America |
| By Product | Embolectomy Balloon Catheters | |
| Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Devices | ||
| Mechanical/Percutaneous Thrombectomy Devices | ||
| Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filters | ||
| Neurovascular Embolectomy/Thrombectomy Devices | ||
| By End User | Hospitals | |
| Ambulatory Surgical Centers | ||
| Specialty Clinics | ||
| By Geography | North America | United States |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Europe | Germany | |
| United Kingdom | ||
| France | ||
| Italy | ||
| Spain | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| Japan | ||
| India | ||
| Australia | ||
| South Korea | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| Middle East & Africa | GCC | |
| South Africa | ||
| Rest of Middle East & Africa | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Argentina | ||
| Rest of South America | ||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current value of the clot management devices market?
The global clot management devices market is valued at USD 1.96 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 2.63 billion by 2030.
Which product segment holds the largest clot management devices market share?
Mechanical and percutaneous thrombectomy devices lead the market with 36.87% share in 2024.
What CAGR is anticipated for neurovascular thrombectomy devices through 2030?
Neurovascular embolectomy and thrombectomy devices are forecast to grow at an 8.59% CAGR from 2025 to 2030.
Why are ambulatory surgical centers important to future market growth?
ASCs deliver thrombectomy procedures at 144% lower cost than hospital outpatient departments, and their segment is expected to expand at a 9.46% CAGR through 2030.
Which region is projected to grow the fastest?
Asia-Pacific is expected to register the highest growth, with a 7.04% CAGR over 2025-2030 due to expanding healthcare infrastructure and rising cardiovascular disease prevalence.
How are regulatory requirements influencing device innovation?
Stricter FDA and EU MDR evidence standards increase development costs and timelines, favoring companies with strong clinical research capabilities.
Page last updated on: