Cargo Shipping Market Size and Share
Cargo Shipping Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Cargo Shipping Market size is estimated at USD 14.73 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 18.47 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 4.63% during the forecast period (2025-2030). Fleet capacity additions remain brisk, with container ship deliveries surpassing 1 million TEU in 2024, pushing the global fleet beyond 30 million TEU. Growth stems from resilient South-South trade lanes, e-commerce–driven demand for high-frequency services, and accelerated alternative-fuel retrofits, even as operators confront EU ETS surcharges and volatile bunker prices. Competitive intensity tightens, the ten largest carriers now control 85% of global slots, and alliance realignments are reshaping schedule reliability goals.
Key Report Takeaways
- By ship type, Bulk Carriers led with 41.28% revenue share in 2024; Reefer & Specialized Vessels are projected to expand at a 5.67% CAGR to 2030.
- By vessel size, Panamax class held 36.71% of the cargo shipping market share in 2024, while Post-Panamax & Neo-Panamax forecast the fastest 4.65% CAGR through 2030.
- By cargo type, Dry Bulk accounted for 74.18% of the cargo shipping market size in 2024; Containerized cargo is expected to grow at a 5.41% CAGR between 2025-2030.
- By service type, Liner operations captured 77.12% of 2024 revenue, outpacing Tramp and Project segments with a CAGR of 5.93%.
- By end-use industry, Manufacturing commanded 34.15% share of the cargo shipping market size in 2024; Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare is advancing at a 6.12% CAGR.
- By geography, Asia Pacific held 46.55% of global revenue in 2024 and is expanding at a 5.11% CAGR.
Global Cargo Shipping Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-commerce-Led Demand | +1.5% | Global, concentrated in Asia-North America, Asia-Europe | Short term (≤ 2 years) | |
| Shifting Sourcing Patterns | +1.2% | Asia-Pacific core, spill-over to MEA, Latin America | Medium term (2-4 years) | |
| IMO Decarbonization Deadlines | +0.9% | Global, with EU leading compliance requirements | Long term (≥ 4 years) | |
| Rise of Multilateral and Plurilateral Trade-Agreement | +0.8% | Global, with early gains in ASEAN, MENA corridors | Medium term (2-4 years) | |
| Digital Freight Platforms | +0.7% | North America & EU early adoption, expanding globally | Short term (≤ 2 years) | |
| Near-port Manufacturing Clusters | +0.6% | MENA & ASEAN core, extending to South Asia | Long term (≥ 4 years) | |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | ||||
E-commerce-Led Demand for High-Frequency, Small-Lot Ocean Moves
Global e-commerce sales are set to reach USD 6.4 trillion in 2025, prompting retailers to value speed over pure scale. Container lots have shrunk and sailing frequencies risen by 30% since 2022, nudging operators toward 1,000-5,000 TEU vessels. Digital freight marketplaces now sit at the core of booking activity: 55% of large shippers have deployed at least two AI applications that cut documentation lead time by 60%. Asian exporters leverage these tools to deepen cross-border reach, lifting air-sea intermodal demand along niche corridors beyond traditional China-US lanes.
Shifting Sourcing Patterns Boosting South-South Trade Lanes
Manufacturers locating plants across Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia have re-channeled cargo into emerging port networks that reward flexible tonnage. African container throughput climbed 57% from 2010-2022 as Tanger-Med and Port Said evolved into key hubs.[1]“Container Traffic Statistics,” Tanger Med Port Authority, tangermed.ma In South America, agriculture-based exports grew, although climate disruptions such as Panama Canal droughts trimmed capacity. Collectively, these shifts heighten demand for agile Panamax and Handymax tonnage while dissuading the deployment of the largest boxships outside core East-West routes.
IMO Decarbonization Deadlines Accelerating Fleet Renewal Cycles
From 2028, ships over 5,000 GT must run on fuel that is 17% less carbon-intensive than VLSFO, adding daily carbon costs that could exceed USD 21,400 for a VLCC by 2035.[2]“IMO Strategy on Reduction of GHG Emissions from Ships,” International Maritime Organization, imo.org Carriers are responding with dual-fuel orders: Maersk contracted 17,480 TEU methanol-capable units and Evergreen placed six comparable boxships. The EU ETS expansion amplifies urgency, layering USD 170-210 per tonne on bunker bills for intra-EU voyages.[3]“Fit for 55: EU ETS Extension to Maritime Transport,” European Commission, ec.europa.eu Older tonnage faces rapid obsolescence, unlocking a multiyear order pipeline for yards proficient in alternative-fuel designs.
Rise of Multilateral & Plurilateral Trade-Agreement Pipelines
New trade pacts are redrawing cargo flows, opening corridors that bypass traditional chokepoints and shorten ocean transit. The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor, unveiled at the 2023 G20 Summit, is forecast to make cross-regional trade 40% faster and 30% cheaper by melding rail and maritime legs. Companies diversifying away from the Suez Canal already lifted Middle Corridor volumes 150% between 2022-2024, while ASEAN bloc initiatives stimulate intra-regional sailings that favor smaller, higher-frequency vessels. Simplified customs and lower tariffs enable just-in-time strategies that reinforce the appeal of liner schedules over ad-hoc bulk moves.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volatile Bunker Fuel Prices Surcharges | -1.1% | Global, with EU experiencing highest impact | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Rising Geopolitical Exposure of Key Chokepoints | -0.9% | Red Sea, Suez Canal, Panama Canal, Strait of Hormuz | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Port Congestion and Hinterland Bottlenecks | -0.8% | Global, concentrated in Asia-Europe corridors | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Carbon Levy–Driven Cost Pass-through Risk | -0.6% | EU & developed markets leading, expanding globally | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Volatile Bunker Fuel Prices & EU ETS Surcharges
Average VLSFO is projected to ease to USD 585 per tonne in 2025, but EU carbon permits push the effective outlay to USD 795 within European corridors. CMA CGM alone could incur USD 16.7 billion in ETS fees and USD 37 billion under FuelEU by 2050.[4]“Energy Transition: Alternative Fuels Road Map,” CMA CGM Group, cmacgm-group.com For some short-sea trades the cost of allowances may top USD 1,000 per tonne, compelling operators to fast-track alternative-fuel transitions. Geopolitical events further sway prices; sanctions-driven tanker rate spikes recently lifted high-sulphur fuel oil by 28%.
Port Congestion & Hinterland Bottlenecks
Persistent congestion raises waiting times and amplifies supply-chain risk. Shanghai and Ningbo recorded multi-day queues in 2024 as rerouted cargo from the Red Sea crisis overwhelmed berths, while strikes at Antwerp and Hamburg produced 7-10-day dwell peaks. North American hubs from Vancouver to Los Angeles logged rail dwell of 4-11 days, and African gateways such as Algiers extended anchorage delays to 14 days. Bottlenecks at the Strait of Malacca underscore the vulnerability of chokepoints as climate-related disruptions escalate.
Segment Analysis
By Ship Type: Bulk Carriers Lead Traditional Cargo Movement
Bulk Carriers accounted for 41.28% of cargo shipping market revenue in 2024 on the back of solid iron ore, coal, and grain flows tied to infrastructure and energy projects. Container Ships followed as e-commerce and just-in-time manufacturing favored scheduled liner lifts. Tankers retained a sizeable slice, buoyed by LNG trade as Qatar’s expansion program orders more than 40 carriers. General Cargo Ships preserved relevance for project cargo despite containerization’s advance. Reefer & Specialized Vessels are forecast to grow 5.67% CAGR by 2030, supported by pharmaceutical cold-chain needs and rising fresh-produce trade.
The historical 2019-2024 period saw large container vessels capture economies of scale, yet 2025-2030 growth is tilting toward mid-sized tonnage that enables schedule flexibility around volatile demand spikes. Fleet planners therefore balance capacity and port access, refurbishing older bulk units while specifying newbuilds with alternative-fuel readiness to safeguard asset life amid tightening emission caps.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Vessel Size Class: Panamax Dominance Faces Neo-Panamax Challenge
Panamax vessels held 36.71% of the cargo shipping market share in 2024, prized for compatibility with legacy canal dimensions and secondary ports. Handy/Handymax sizes cater to niche cargos and draft-restricted berths, offering owners steady albeit moderate earnings visibility. Post-Panamax & Neo-Panamax units, unlocking Panama Canal efficiencies, are set to expand at a 4.65% CAGR as East-West volumes stabilise and charterers seek scale plus fuel efficiency.
Ultra-Large Container Vessels, while cost-optimal on the main Asia-Europe trunk, confront berth constraints and alliance schedule revisions that emphasise reliability over sheer capacity. Consequently the cargo shipping market size for Neo-Panamax designs is forecast to outpace that of the ultra-large segment through 2030, driven by shippers’ preference for wider port coverage and reduced transhipment exposure.
By Cargo Type: Dry Bulk Supremacy Challenged by Containerization
Dry Bulk retained 74.18% of the cargo shipping market share in 2024, underpinned by steady mineral and grain trades essential for emerging-market industrialisation. Liquid Bulk—crude, LNG, LPG, and chemicals—remained significant, with LNG lifting on energy transition investment. Containerised cargo is projected to expand at a 5.41% CAGR, the highest among cargo types, as supply-chain digitalisation channels diversified goods into standardized boxes.
Container conversion of select agricultural and chemical streams enhances handling safety and theft reduction. Together with reefer container gains for perishable commodities, these shifts are realigning port equipment needs and terminal layouts. By 2030, containerised commodities are expected to narrow the gap with Dry Bulk, albeit without eclipsing its dominant share.
By Service Type: Liner Services Capitalize on Predictability Demand
Liner operators captured 77.12% of the cargo shipping market share in 2024, reflecting shippers’ reliance on fixed schedules for inventory control, and growing at a robust CAGR of 5.93%. Alliance realignments such as Gemini Cooperation target 90% schedule reliability, reinforcing the value proposition of predictable transit. Tramp operators remain critical for bulk commodities but face muted expansion amid containerization.
Project and heavy-lift specialists serve infrastructure rollouts and offshore energy modules, and their orderbooks lean toward multipurpose ships with strengthened decks and crane arrays capable of handling 200-tons lifts. Over the forecast horizon, liner operators are tipped to widen service portfolios with digital quoting and carbon-footprint dashboards, further differentiating their offering.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By End-Use Industry: Manufacturing Leads Amid Healthcare Surge
Manufacturing continued to top segment revenue at 34.15% of the cargo shipping market share in 2024, propelled by global automotive, electronics, and machinery flows. Pharmaceutical & Healthcare demand is set to grow by 6.12% annually to 2030 as cold-chain infrastructure scales to meet vaccine and biologics distribution. Food & Beverages, energy-intensive petrochemical moves, and electrical-equipment shipments round out key demand pillars.
Cargo shipping market size expansion within healthcare benefits reefer container deployment, commanding premium freight as temperature compliance is intertwined with product integrity. Simultaneously, nearshoring and regional supply networks in automotive and consumer electronics redistribute flow from traditional mega-haul lanes to shorter, high-frequency loops.
Geography Analysis
Asia Pacific held 46.55% of global revenue in 2024, underlining its combined exporter-consumer heft. Shanghai surpassed 50 million TEU while China’s top eight ports lifted volumes 7% to 224 million TEU. Manufacturing diversification into ASEAN economies is spurring intra-regional sailings that reduce single-country dependency. The region is also growing rapidly at a robust CAGR of 5.11%.
Europe ranked second but wrestles with cost pressure from EU carbon regimes and dockworker strikes that stretched Antwerp and Hamburg dwell times to 10 days. North America is leveraging nearshoring into Mexico and Central America; port capacity expansions and rail integration have cut intermodal delays, supporting balanced growth across import and energy-export segments.
The Middle East & Africa region benefits from large-scale port investments. South America’s outlook remains mixed; Brazil’s agribulk exports underpin demand, while Panama Canal drought shaved 30% capacity and constrained west-coast flows. Collectively these developments suggest that although Asia Pacific remains the anchor of the cargo shipping market, growth momentum is diversifying, giving rise to regional feeder networks and transshipment hubs that balance global supply-chain exposure.
Competitive Landscape
The ten largest carriers command majority of deployed slots, evidencing an oligopolistic structure. MSC has edged an active orderbook exceeding 2 million TEU, while Maersk is pivoting toward integrated logistics. Gemini Cooperation (Maersk + Hapag-Lloyd) targets 90% reliability, and Premier Alliance (ONE, HMM, Yang Ming) deepens East-West presence.
Strategic investments continues, ZIM allocated USD 2.3 billion to new tonnage in April 2025, CMA CGM floated its first 13,000 TEU methanol dual-fuel ship, and Evergreen’s methanol-ready orders signal fleet greening. Vertical integration is intensifying; DSV’s EUR 14.3 billion takeover of DB Schenker gives it nearly 160,000 staff across 90 nations, rivaling liners’ end-to-end ambitions.
Technology uptake differentiates leaders: CMA CGM applies AI to route optimisation and predictive maintenance, and 75% of major transport firms are piloting generative AI across documentation workflows. Carriers see decarbonisation as both compliance duty and pricing lever—green premium services fetch higher rates from ESG-focused shippers, partially offsetting rising fuel costs.
Cargo Shipping Industry Leaders
-
A. P. Moller-Maersk AS
-
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company SA
-
CMA CGM
-
China COSCO Holdings Company Limited
-
Hapag-Lloyd
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- April 2025: DSV completed its EUR 14.3 billion acquisition of DB Schenker, creating a logistics entity with projected DKK 9 billion in annual synergies by 2028.
- April 2025: ZIM announced a USD 2.3 billion fleet-expansion programme to refresh and upsize container capacity on key corridors.
- March 2025: CMA CGM unveiled its first 13,000 TEU methanol dual-fuel vessel in Singapore, underscoring commitments to sustainable propulsion.
Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope
Market Definitions and Key Coverage
Our study defines the cargo shipping market as the freight revenue earned by oceangoing vessels that transport dry bulk, liquid bulk, general, and containerized goods across international waters, covering liner, tramp, and parcel services. It spans every ocean-going ship class from Handy vessels to ultra-large container ships and includes embedded bunker and surcharge components that are part of the contracted voyage rate.
For clarity, we exclude inland barge traffic, domestic coastal cabotage, pure passenger cruises, rail or road legs, and terminal fees that are invoiced separately.
Segmentation Overview
- By Ship Type
- Bulk Carriers
- Container Ships
- Tankers
- General Cargo Ships
- Reefer & Specialized Vessels
- By Vessel Size Class
- Handy/Handymax
- Panamax
- Post-Panamax & Neo-Panamax
- Ultra-Large Container Vessels
- By Cargo Type
- Dry Bulk
- Liquid Bulk (Crude, LNG/LPG, Chemicals)
- Containerised (General & Reefer)
- By Service Type
- Liner (Scheduled)
- Tramp (Voyage/Spot)
- Project / Heavy-lift / Parcel
- By End-use Industry
- Manufacturing
- Food & Beverages
- Oil, Gas & Energy
- Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare
- Electrical & Electronics
- Others
- By Geography
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Rest of North America
- South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Russia
- Rest of Europe
- Asia Pacific
- China
- Japan
- India
- South Korea
- Rest of Asia Pacific
- Middle East & Africa
- Saudi Arabia
- United Arab Emirates
- Egypt
- Turkey
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East and Africa
- North America
Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation
Primary Research
We spoke with shipowners, freight forwarders, port planners, and bunker suppliers across Asia-Pacific, Europe, and the Americas. These conversations validated load-factor assumptions, voyage yields, and emerging decarbonization premiums that secondary sources only hint at.
Desk Research
We began by assembling time-series signals on global seaborne trade, fleet capacity, and freight pricing from UNCTAD, the International Maritime Organization, Clarksons Shipping Intelligence, Container Trade Statistics, and major port authority customs releases. Company 10-Ks, carrier presentations, broker indices, and reputable press updates furnished current spot and contract rate benchmarks that refine our base year.
Paid slices from D&B Hoovers and Dow Jones Factiva enabled our analysts to mirror carrier financials and news flow. This documentary trail forms the backbone of the model; many additional public and subscription sources were also consulted for data cross-checks and clarification.
Market-Sizing & Forecasting
Cargo volume in dead-weight tons is first reconstructed top-down from UNCTAD trade matrices and port throughput, which are then valued with sampled voyage and time-charter rates to size the revenue pool. Select bottom-up cross-checks, carrier fleet roll-ups, and average slot cost × TEU lift anchor the totals.
Key model drivers include GDP growth, TEU throughput, vessel delivery schedules, bunker fuel indices, Drewry World Container Index movements, and orderbook-to-fleet ratios. A multivariate regression projects demand through the forecast period, while scenario analysis captures shocks such as canal blockages or rapid fuel-price swings. Gaps in bottom-up inputs are bridged using regional averages confirmed during interviews.
Data Validation & Update Cycle
Mordor analysts compare model outputs with independent trade indices, flag anomalies for peer review, and refresh the workbook every year, issuing interim updates when events materially shift freight rates so clients always receive the latest view.
Why Mordor's Cargo Shipping Baseline Stands Up to Scrutiny
Published cargo-shipping figures often diverge because firms mix cargo types, units, and pricing yardsticks.
We lay out our scope and variables so users see exactly what is counted.
Benchmark comparison
| Market Size | Anonymized source | Primary gap driver |
|---|---|---|
| USD 14.73 B (2025) | Mordor Intelligence | |
| USD 16.57 B (2025) | Global Consultancy A | Includes coastal and inland barge freight; blends 2024-25 rates |
| USD 17.40 B (2025) | Industry Association B | Counts terminal handling and documentation fees as freight revenue |
| USD 11.89 B (2024, volume-based) | Regional Consultancy C | Converts cargo volume to value with a uniform USD/ton factor |
The comparison shows that small definitional shifts swing results by billions. By selecting transparent variables, revisiting them annually, and validating through both desk and field work, Mordor Intelligence delivers a balanced, repeatable baseline that decision-makers can trust.
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current size of the cargo shipping market in 2025?
The cargo shipping market generated USD 14.73 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 18.47 billion by 2030.
Which ship type holds the largest share of global revenue?
Bulk Carriers led all ship types with 41.28% revenue share in 2024, driven by iron ore, coal, and grain trades.
Why are liner services expanding faster than tramp services?
Shippers favor predictable, fixed-day sailings to support just-in-time inventory planning, giving liner operators 77.12% revenue share in 2024 and sustained growth prospects.
How will EU carbon regulations affect shipping costs?
EU ETS surcharges add USD 170-210 per tonne of bunker fuel on intra-EU voyages, raising effective VLSFO prices to roughly USD 795 per tonne for vessels serving European ports.
Which region contributes the most to cargo shipping demand?
Asia Pacific accounted for 46.55% of 2024 global revenue and continues to grow at a 5.11% CAGR on the back of manufacturing diversification and strong consumer markets.
What fuels are leading the decarbonization transition?
Methanol dual-fuel designs dominate current orders, with carriers like Maersk and Evergreen placing sizable contracts to meet IMO targets and secure future regulatory compliance.
Page last updated on: