CAR T-Cell Therapy Market Size and Share
CAR T-Cell Therapy Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Global CAR T-Cell Therapy Market size is estimated at USD 4.20 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 9.95 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 13.45% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
Uptake is accelerating as regulators permit use in earlier treatment lines, highlighted by the FDA's April 2024 clearance of Abecma after just two prior regimens, which broadens the eligible patient pool. North America remains the revenue leader on the back of established reimbursement, while Asia-Pacific is emerging as the fastest-expanding region thanks to dense clinical-trial activity and rising domestic manufacturing capacity. CD19-directed products continue to anchor sales, yet BCMA-targeted options are rapidly gaining momentum as earlier-line multiple-myeloma indications come online. Across Europe, point-of-care manufacturing hubs are cutting vein-to-vein time to roughly a week, giving early adopters a clear logistical advantage. Persistent shortages of viral-vector capacity and high production costs, however, are constraining throughput and keeping pricing pressure in focus.
Key Report Takeaways
- By target antigen: CD19 therapies led with 46.50% of car t-cell therapy market share in 2024; BCMA is projected to expand at a 14.10% CAGR through 2030.
- By cell source: Autologous products held 91.70% revenue share in 2024, whereas allogeneic lines are forecast to log the fastest 15.56% CAGR between 2025 and 2030.
- By product: Yescarta accounted for 37.99% of sales in 2024; Abecma is the fastest climber with a 14.96% CAGR to 2030.
- By indication: Lymphoma captured 54.50% of the car t-cell therapy market size in 2024; multiple myeloma is poised for a 14.45% CAGR to 2030.
- By end-user: Hospitals owned 66.57% of revenue in 2024 while academic institutes are on track for a 15.56% CAGR.
- By geography: North America led with 52.45% share in 2024; Asia-Pacific advances at 15.87% CAGR to 2030.
Global CAR T-Cell Therapy Market Trends and Insights
Driver Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Second-line LBCL FDA Approvals Accelerating Early-Line Uptake | +2.1% | North America & Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Decentralised EU Point-of-Care Manufacturing Slashes Vein-to-Vein Time | +1.8% | Europe, spillover to APAC | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Growing Burden of Cancer Worldwide | +1.5% | Global | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Allogeneic "Off-the-Shelf" Pipelines Lowering Cost-of-Goods | +2.3% | Global, early gains in North America | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Increasing Investment and R&D to Develop CAR T-Cell Therapy | +1.2% | North America & Europe, APAC emerging | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Medicare NTAP Expansion to Community Oncology Centres Broadens Access | +1.7% | United States | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Second-line LBCL FDA Approvals Accelerating Early-Line Uptake
Phase 3 TRANSFORM data show Breyanzi delivering a 45.8% three-year event-free survival versus 19.1% for chemo in second-line LBCL, prompting oncologists to move CAR T earlier in the care cascade [1]Bristol-Myers Squibb, “Breyanzi Demonstrates Clinically Meaningful Outcomes Across B-Cell Malignancies in New Data Presented at 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting,” . Earlier-line positioning expands the pool of fitter patients, raising response durability and reducing salvage-therapy use. Competitors are therefore re-designing trials to target second-line settings, intensifying label-expansion races. Payers are beginning to weigh long-term cost offsets from reduced relapse, which may ease reimbursement hurdles. Collectively, these elements reinforce double-digit growth in the car t-cell therapy market.
Decentralised EU Point-of-Care Manufacturing Slashes Vein-to-Vein Time
The Euplagia-1 trial reported 92% overall and 75% complete response rates using a seven-day on-site process in relapsed CLL/SLL. Rapid manufacture cuts attrition in fast-progressing cancers and lifts centre capacity without large capital layouts. Developers such as Galapagos and academic consortia are scaling modular clean-rooms that can be grafted onto existing hospitals, a model already reducing costs for payers. As regulators craft guidance on point-of-care quality control, firms with robust digital tracking are securing early site partnerships, speeding market penetration.
Growing Burden of Cancer Worldwide
More than 1,200 cell-and-gene candidates are in human studies, reflecting surging incidence and earlier diagnosis, particularly across rapidly urbanising Asian economies. Ageing populations and lifestyle shifts are pushing haematologic malignancy caseloads higher, fuelling demand for innovative immunotherapies. Governments in China, South Korea and Singapore are subsidising domestic manufacturing to curb expensive imports, a move that widens payer acceptance. This macro force underpins the long-run expansion trajectory of the car t-cell therapy market.
Allogeneic “Off-the-Shelf” Pipelines Lowering Cost-of-Goods
Allogeneic production cuts per-dose costs to roughly USD 4,460, compared with USD 95,780 for autologous lots, a 95% saving that attracts value-driven payers. Immediate availability is critical in aggressive diseases and in rural areas lacking apheresis capacity. Allogene Therapeutics is using CRISPR knock-outs to minimise graft-versus-host disease risk while site-specific integration boosts persistence. Although immunogenicity questions remain, the economic and logistical upside is considered pivotal for scaling the car t-cell therapy market.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Cost of Developing CAR T-Cell Therapy | -1.8% | Global, acute in emerging markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Vector GMP Capacity Bottlenecks Raise Lead-Times | -2.2% | Global, severe in APAC | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Limited Patient Eligibility | -1.4% | Global, pronounced in elderly populations | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Potential for Severe Side Effects | -1.6% | Global, regulatory focus in EU & US | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
High Cost of Developing CAR T-Cell Therapy
Autologous batches require more than 200 labor hours and carry list prices above USD 500,000, limiting uptake to high-income systems. Fragmented reimbursement in Latin America, the Middle East and parts of Eastern Europe leaves many eligible patients untreated. The economic burden has opened space for competing modalities such as bispecific antibodies, pressuring manufacturers to adopt automated closed systems or risk marginalisation. Programmes demonstrating outpatient feasibility and short adverse-event windows are best placed to convince payers of cost-effectiveness, but the constraint remains material for the car t-cell therapy market.
Vector GMP Capacity Bottlenecks Raise Lead-Times
A shortage of lentiviral production slots is delaying both commercial batches and pivotal trials, stretching lead-times and capping volume growth. Scale-up is capital-intensive and takes up to two years, so sponsors with captive vector suites enjoy a decisive edge. The scarcity is propelling interest in non-viral transposon systems and high-titre transient plasmid approaches. In parallel, firms are integrating vector plants to derisk supply, a trend evident in Kite's planned fourfold capacity jump by 2026. Until new capacity comes online, the constraint will temper the otherwise robust trajectory of the car t-cell therapy market.
Segment Analysis
By Target Antigen: CD19 Retains Scale as BCMA Rises
CD19 platforms generated 46.50% of revenue in 2024, reflecting first-mover approvals across diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and paediatric ALL. Within this slice of the car t-cell therapy market, long-term datasets now exceed five years, underpinning physician confidence. BCMA constructs, boosted by Abecma’s earlier-line label, are compounding at 14.10% through 2030, the quickest among current antigen classes. Dual-target programs that combine CD19 with CD20 or CD22 are entering mid-stage trials to combat antigen escape. Developers see potential to tap relapsed settings in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and mantle-cell lymphoma, broadening the car t-cell therapy market.
Next-wave antigen strategies aim to move beyond haematology. GD2 programs are gaining ground in neuroblastoma, while HER2 constructs progress in gastric cancer cohorts. Chinese centres have opened over 20 trials on CLDN18.2, reflecting local gastric cancer prevalence. Should multi-specific designs show persistence advantages, CD19’s share could erode, yet its entrenched installed base and manufacturing know-how support near-term dominance.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Cell Source: Autologous Dominates but Allogeneic Accelerates
Autologous inventories delivered 91.70% of 2024 sales, cementing their role as the backbone of the car t-cell therapy market size at present. The personalised workflow fits existing regulatory frameworks and boasts five commercially approved brands. Nevertheless, vein-to-vein times of 2–4 weeks and variable product quality present obstacles in high-grade lymphomas. Allogeneic projects, projected to log a 15.56% CAGR, offer batch production, lower cost-of-goods and immediate dosing, attributes welcomed by cash-strapped payers.
Allogene, Precision BioSciences and Caribou are employing gene-editing tools to cloak donor cells from host immunity, aiming to match autologous durability. Early data suggest shorter cytopenia periods, improving outpatient viability. If large Phase 2 outcomes replicate this profile, the car t-cell therapy market could tilt toward off-the-shelf models later in the decade. Autologous incumbents are hedging by licensing allogeneic platforms, signalling market convergence rather than sudden displacement.
By Product: Yescarta Leads While Abecma Picks Up Pace
Gilead’s Yescarta booked 37.99% global revenue in 2024 on the strength of adult LBCL and follicular lymphoma labels plus robust real-world evidence showing a 66.7% complete response in CNS lymphoma. Abecma, newly cleared for two-line-prior multiple myeloma, is set for the highest 14.96% CAGR to 2030. Cilta-cel has demonstrated an 89% overall response in real-world cohorts, sustaining demand across Europe and Asia.
Rivalry is shifting toward manufacturing prowess. Kite’s plan to quadruple cell-processing output by 2026 will ease slot scarcity. Bristol-Myers Squibb is piloting automated closed systems to cut labour hours. Novartis is reinvesting cash from Kymriah into next-generation constructs targeting solid tumours. Collectively, these initiatives shape the competitive intensity of the car t-cell therapy market.
By Indication: Lymphoma Dominates, Multiple Myeloma Surges
Lymphoma indications represented 54.50% of 2024 revenue, driven by mature reimbursement and broad label coverage. The car t-cell therapy market share should ease only gradually as multiple-myeloma programmes sprint forward. Abecma and cilta-cel together are underpinning a 14.45% CAGR in myeloma, aided by robust survival readouts. Leukaemia applications gained momentum after the FDA cleared obe-cel with a 55.3% complete-remission rate for adult ALL in November 2024.
Indication diversification is expanding into autoimmune diseases. Allogene's ALLO-329, a CD19/CD70 dual-CAR, is being studied in systemic lupus erythematosus, signalling a future addressable pool beyond oncology. Solid-tumour penetration remains challenging due to micro-environment barriers, yet early synovial sarcoma data with MAGE-A4 targeting show promise.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By End-User: Hospitals Still Core as Academic Sites Innovate
Hospitals comprised 66.57% of global sales in 2024 as they house intensive-care and apheresis units vital for cytokine-release management. Academic institutes, however, are forecast to rise at a 15.56% CAGR, reflecting grant-funded pilot projects and next-gen platform trials. Expansion to community centres is gaining steam following Medicare’s NTAP extension and new CPT codes effective January 2025..
The Froedtert & MCW network saved 432 bed-days through outpatient administration models, underscoring operational efficiency. Companies engineering lower-toxicity constructs and remote monitoring solutions stand to capture demand in ambulatory settings, a trend that will reshape service-mix within the car t-cell therapy market.
Geography Analysis
North America generated 52.45% of 2024 global revenue, reflecting early FDA approvals, 311 accredited treatment sites and robust private insurance coverage. New CPT procedure codes, effective in 2025, should streamline billing and accelerate adoption outside academic hubs. Nevertheless, access remains uneven; only 1 in 5 clinically eligible US patients currently receives therapy, creating white-space for mobile apheresis units and tele-monitoring services. Manufacturers with domestic vector plants and rapid-release testing enjoy smoother supply in light of persistent viral-vector bottlenecks.
Asia-Pacific is forecast to be the fastest-growing segment, advancing at 15.87% CAGR through 2030 as China surpasses the United States in registered CAR-T trials, tallying more than 300 by January 2024. Japan and South Korea are issuing expedited review pathways, aiming to domesticate manufacturing as a strategic healthcare asset. These developments place the region at the core of future expansion within the car t-cell therapy market.
Europe holds meaningful share with a distinct innovation edge in decentralised manufacturing. Seven-day point-of-care pilots in Belgium and Spain have proven technical feasibility and economic efficiency, positioning Europe as a living lab for rapid delivery models. Unified HTA rules slated for 2025 may harmonise reimbursement, yet country-level price negotiations still fragment uptake. Producers that couple modular clean-rooms with outcome-based pricing are most likely to penetrate price-sensitive systems. Collectively, geographic diversification cushions revenue streams and tempers region-specific policy risk across the car t-cell therapy market.
Competitive Landscape
The car t-cell therapy industry features a moderate concentration: the top five players commanded significant global sales in 2024. Novartis set the original benchmark with Kymriah but is now reinvesting cash flow into next-wave assets for solid tumours. Gilead’s Kite arm is quadrupling worldwide capacity by 2026 to secure leadership in LBCL and mantle-cell lymphoma . Bristol-Myers Squibb capitalises on Abecma’s earlier-line multiple-myeloma approval and is automating production to improve margin.
Strategic partnerships remain the dominant route to innovation. AbbVie pledged up to USD 1.44 billion to Umoja Biopharma for in-situ CAR-T vectors capable of generating modified T-cells inside the patient [2]“AbbVie and Umoja Biopharma Announce Strategic Collaboration to Develop Novel In-Situ CAR-T Cell Therapies,” . BioNTech invested USD 200 million in Autolus to co-commercialise AUTO1/22, diversifying beyond mRNA vaccines. These alliances blend biotech agility with big-pharma scale, accelerating multi-target constructs and solid-tumour applications.
Manufacturing remains the key battleground. Allogene is building a Newark facility capable of commercial-scale allogeneic production with TALEN-edited cells to cut cost and rejection risk. Meanwhile, CARGO Therapeutics is layering an allogeneic platform onto its autologous firi-cel to future-proof cost structure . Firms that lock in vector supply, automate QC and demonstrate outpatient-ready safety are poised to capture outsized growth as the car t-cell therapy market matures.
CAR T-Cell Therapy Industry Leaders
-
Novartis AG
-
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
-
Johnson & Johnson
-
Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc.
-
Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Kite Pharma)
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- January 2025: CARGO Therapeutics dosed 71 patients in the Phase 2 firi-cel study and unveiled an allogeneic platform aimed at curbing immune rejection.
- April 2024: Yescarta achieved a 94.4% objective response in CNS lymphoma per ASCO data
Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope
Market Definitions and Key Coverage
Our study treats the CAR-T cell therapy market as the revenue generated from commercially approved, genetically engineered autologous and allogeneic T-cell products that express chimeric antigen receptors and are supplied to treat hematological or solid tumors. The figures exclude companion diagnostics, non-CAR adoptive cell therapies, and hospital procedure mark-ups.
Scope exclusion: investigational CAR-NK or γδ-T products are outside the present scope.
Segmentation Overview
- By Target Antigen
- CD19
- BCMA
- CD22
- GD2
- HER2
- PSMA
- Multi-Target / Tandem
- Others
- By Cell Source
- Autologous
- Allogeneic
- By Product (Approved)
- Abecma
- Breyanzi
- Kymriah
- Tecartus
- Yescarta
- Others
- By Indication
- Leukemia (ALL, CLL)
- Lymphoma (DLBCL & Other B-Cell)
- Multiple Myeloma
- Auto-Immune Disorders
- Others
- By End-User
- Hospitals
- Cancer Care Treatment Centres
- Academic & Research Institutes
- By Geography
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Mexico
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Rest of Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- Japan
- India
- South Korea
- Australia
- Rest of Asia- Pacific
- Middle East and Africa
- GCC
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East and Africa
- South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
- North America
Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation
Primary Research
Field conversations with hematologists, payers, and manufacturing directors across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific helped validate treated-patient pools, average selling prices, and slot utilization assumptions. Surveys with designated centers of excellence bridged data gaps on real-world uptake and relapse retreatment rates.
Desk Research
Desk investigation began with oncology pipelines, biologics license application dockets, and post-marketing surveillance notes issued by the US FDA, EMA, and Japan's PMDA, which outline annual commercial volumes. Complementary insights came from sources such as the American Cancer Society, SEER incidence files, ClinicalTrials.gov enrollment data, and trade association white papers on cell-therapy manufacturing yields. Subscription databases including D&B Hoovers for company financials and Dow Jones Factiva for deal trends supplied baseline price and capacity signals.
Publicly available import-export logs, peer-reviewed journals on vector productivity, and Tenders Info contract awards for national reimbursement rounds added geographic nuance. The secondary source list is illustrative, not exhaustive, and many other public records were consulted for cross-checks.
Market-Sizing & Forecasting
Sizing starts with a top-down prevalence-to-treated-cohort build that multiplies relapsed B-cell malignancy incidence, eligibility share, referral rates, and verified therapy access. It then aligns revenue by applying region-specific average selling prices. Supplier roll-ups and sampled hospital charge-master checks act as bottom-up reasonableness tests before totals are adjusted. Core variables include the number of FDA-approved products, additional indications per label, median list price shifts, manufacturing slot capacity, clinical success-to-approval conversion, and payer coverage expansion trajectory. Multivariate regression supported by three-scenario ARIMA smoothing projects each driver through 2030, with gaps back-filled by analogous therapy proxies when reported data are sparse.
Data Validation & Update Cycle
Analysts compare preliminary outputs against independent incidence trends, quarterly manufacturer disclosures, and customs receipts. Any variance beyond set thresholds triggers re-verification with sources and senior review. Reports refresh annually, with off-cycle updates after material regulatory or pricing events before a fresh analyst pass reaches clients.
Why Mordor's CAR T-Cell Therapy Baseline Stands Firm
Published estimates often diverge because firms mix investigational revenue, apply different ASP ladders, or freeze refreshes for multiple years. Our disciplined scope and yearly recalibration keep figures anchored to products actually booked in audited statements.
Key gap drivers include the inclusion of vector contract manufacturing, counting compassionate-use volumes, or rolling hospital mark-ups into sales, which inflate several public numbers relative to Mordor's base. Currency conversion timing and the use of optimistic pipeline attrition also widen spreads.
Benchmark comparison
| Market Size | Anonymized source | Primary gap driver |
|---|---|---|
| USD 4.20 bn (2025) | Mordor Intelligence | |
| USD 4.65 bn (2024) | Global Consultancy A | Adds viral-vector contract revenue and point-of-care manufacturing fees |
| USD 15.75 bn (2024) | Industry Research B | Bundles trial-stage therapies and hospital procedure charges into market value |
For decision-makers, the comparison shows that Mordor's numbers rest on transparent variables traceable to treated patient counts and booked product sales, offering a steady, defensible baseline for strategic planning.
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current size of the car t-cell therapy market?
The car t-cell therapy market stands at USD 4.20 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 9.95 billion by 2030.
Which region will grow the fastest through 2030?
Asia-Pacific is expected to post the quickest 15.87% CAGR thanks to expanding clinical trial activity and domestic manufacturing build-outs.
Why are allogeneic CAR-T products attracting attention?
Novartis AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Johnson & Johnson, Sorrento Therapeutics, Inc. and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Kite Pharma) are the major companies operating in the Global CAR T-Cell Therapy Market.
Which is the fastest growing region in Global CAR T-Cell Therapy Market?
Asia-Pacific is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR over the forecast period (2025-2030).
Which region has the biggest share in Global CAR T-Cell Therapy Market?
Allogeneic “off-the-shelf” lines cut dose costs by up to 95% and enable immediate treatment, features that can ease payer pressure and improve access.
How are new CPT codes likely to change US adoption?
Effective January 2025, dedicated CPT codes simplify billing for community oncology centres, broadening patient access beyond large academic hospitals.
Page last updated on: