Biopharmaceutical CMO And CRO Market Size and Share
Biopharmaceutical CMO And CRO Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market stood at USD 83.41 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 115.35 billion by 2030, advancing at a 6.7% CAGR. Outsourcing scale is expanding as originator companies prioritize cash conservation and faster launch cycles over new brick-and-mortar plants. Demand is amplified by bottlenecks in high-potency fill-finish suites and the growing intricacy of late-phase clinical trials, both of which require specialized expertise unavailable in most in-house networks. A steady increase in biologic and advanced-therapy pipelines continues to stretch existing capacity, prompting record capital expenditure among CDMOs. The regulatory climate is also reshaping business models: US and EU on-shoring incentives reward providers that can meet heightened supply-chain security rules, while the BIOSECURE Act accelerates the search for alternatives to Chinese capacity. Meanwhile, digital-first operators deploying AI-enabled analytics are lowering batch-failure rates and nudging sponsors toward tech-savvy vendors.
Key Report Takeaways
By service type, clinical services led with 75.65% revenue share in 2024; pre-clinical services are growing at a 7.23% CAGR through 2030.
By molecule type, biologics held 83.43% of biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market share in 2024, whereas cell and gene therapies are set to expand at a 7.57% CAGR to 2030.
By expression system, mammalian cell culture controlled 69.14% of the biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market size in 2024; perfusion processes are advancing at a 7.94% CAGR.
By scale, Phase III work accounted for 31.87% of the biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market size in 2024; Phase II is the fastest-rising tier with an 8.31% CAGR.
By geography, North America commanded 39.45% of the biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market share in 2024, while Asia-Pacific records the strongest CAGR at 9.56%.
Global Biopharmaceutical CMO And CRO Market Trends and Insights
Driver Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surging biologics & biosimilars pipeline | +1.8% | North America & Europe (primary); global spill-over | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Rapid growth of cell & gene therapy outsourcing | +1.5% | North America & Europe; emerging Asia-Pacific hubs | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Rising cost & complexity of late-phase trials | +1.2% | North America & Europe; global CRO networks | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Capacity crunch in high-potency fill-finish suites | +1.0% | North America & Europe; new builds in Asia-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| US/EU on-shoring incentives & security mandates | +0.8% | United States & European Union | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| AI-enabled process optimization | +0.4% | Technology-intensive clusters worldwide | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Surging Biologics & Biosimilars Pipeline
Biologic assets now represent half of the global development pipeline, creating a sustained capacity gap that tilts sponsors toward outsourcing. Biosimilar launches in Europe amplify demand as payers push for cost-effective alternatives, spurring CDMOs to add modular suites that can switch quickly between reference and follow-on products. The preference for asset-light strategies among both large pharma and venture-backed biotechs concentrates manufacturing spend with vendors that have end-to-end capabilities, thereby minimising technology-transfer risks. Flexible facilities equipped with single-use systems are especially attractive because they can scale in parallel with uncertain commercial volumes. Service providers that can integrate analytical development, cell-line engineering, and commercial supply within a single campus remain best positioned to win multi-year master service agreements.
Rapid Growth of Cell & Gene Therapy Outsourcing
Manufacturing cell and gene therapies (CGT) demands bespoke cleanrooms, stringent chain-of-identity controls, and specialised analytical assays—investments few sponsors can justify early in a product’s life cycle. Outsourcing rates have climbed as autologous programmes scale and as allogeneic platforms approach commercial reality. Per-patient production costs that can top USD 500,000 place an even higher premium on yield optimisation, steering contracts toward CDMOs with process-automation expertise. North America and Europe currently host most CGT suites due to regulatory proximity, but Singapore and South Korea are emerging as cost-effective nodes for allogeneic therapies. Providers with automated, closed systems that support multiple vector types gain a decisive edge, because they compress lead times and simplify regulatory validation across programmes.
Rising Cost & Complexity of Late-Phase Clinical Trials
Phase III trials average USD 19 million per study and are rising 7% annually, partly because regulators require larger safety data sets. The complexity burden increases when precision-medicine protocols call for smaller batch sizes and multiple strengths. Integrated CRO–CDMO platforms help reduce these costs by linking supply planning directly to enrolment forecasting, thereby shrinking buffer inventory. Decentralised trial models add further intricacy, as drug product must reach a geographically dispersed patient base under strict time and temperature controls. CDMOs that operate global GMP-certified depots and can manage cold-chain distribution end-to-end are seeing robust bid volumes from sponsors ready to move beyond traditional hub-and-spoke logistics.
Capacity Crunch in High-Potency Fill-Finish Suites (HPAPI, ADC)
Industry-wide utilisation in high-potency fill-finish suites exceeds 90%, reflecting the rapid adoption of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and other cytotoxic payloads. New facilities require isolator technology, closed-loop material handling, and advanced HVAC containment, extending build timelines beyond three years. Early movers therefore enjoy premium pricing and near-full capacity commitments on day one. Geographic clustering is emerging: Singapore’s Economic Development Board offers incentives for ADC plants, while Germany and the United States continue to add new suites within existing bioclusters. Sponsors increasingly negotiate long-term volume guarantees or equity partnerships to secure scarce cytotoxic slots, sometimes accelerating M&A activity purely to lock in internal capacity.
Restraint Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stringent multi-jurisdiction cGMP / GCP compliance burden | -0.9% | Global, particularly complex in US-EU-APAC operations | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Chronic shortage of skilled bioprocess engineers & CRA talent | -0.6% | Global, acute in North America & Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Volatile supply of single-use plastics and resins | -0.4% | Global, with acute impact in Asia-Pacific supply chains | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| ESG pressure on energy-intensive biologics facilities | -0.3% | Europe & North America, expanding to APAC | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Stringent Multi-Jurisdiction cGMP / GCP Compliance Burden
Regulatory divergence forces CDMOs to adopt the most stringent standard across all plants, pushing compliance costs to as much as 20% of total opex. The FDA’s 2024 guidance on advanced technologies layers fresh validation tasks onto an already demanding audit calendar, while EMA’s emphasis on supply-chain transparency mandates granular provenance data for every component. Brexit compounds complexity by creating dual clearance pathways for UK-EU shipments. Smaller providers lacking robust regulatory affairs teams struggle to absorb the overhead, indirectly driving consolidation as sponsors lean toward vendors with clean multi-agency audit records.
Chronic Shortage of Skilled Bioprocess Engineers & CRA Talent
A projected 35% talent deficit by 2030 is widening, with experienced upstream-process engineers and clinical research associates in shortest supply. Salary inflation for senior bioprocess roles exceeds 8% annually, eroding margin for mid-tier CDMOs that compete on price. The talent crunch is sharper in emerging hubs, where university output lags industrial demand. Providers respond by launching in-house academies, forming joint curricula with public institutions, and offering relocation packages to lure expatriate scientists. AI-driven process-control systems partially offset labour scarcity, but most facilities still require hands-on expertise for deviation management and tech-transfer troubleshooting.
Segment Analysis
By Service Type: Clinical Breadth Anchors Growth, Pre-Clinical Upshift Continues
Clinical services generated 75.65% of 2024 revenue, underlining their pivotal role as molecules progress toward pivotal studies . The biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market size for clinical supply is thus anchored by large-volume biologic batches, sometimes surpassing USD 50 million per Phase II/III programme. Contract development remains smaller in absolute dollars but commands premium margins because sponsors pay for process optimisation, formulation, and tech-transfer expertise not readily found internally. Growth is also accelerating in manufacturing services as continuous platforms shorten campaign cycles and raise plant utilisation.
Pre-clinical outsourcing is expanding at a 7.23% CAGR as venture-funded start-ups de-risk assets before fundraising or licensing. The segment benefits from AI-driven cell-line engineering that can halve early-development timelines, increasing the volume of molecules ready for IND filing. Service providers that package toxicology, analytical method development, and small-scale GMP production within one campus lower transaction costs for clients, reinforcing stickiness as candidates advance. Consequently, diversification into pre-clinical work helps CDMOs balance capital-intensive late-stage contracts with higher-margin early projects, bolstering overall profitability within the biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Molecule Type: Biologics Hold Sway as Cell & Gene Therapies Surge
Biologics retained 83.43% of 2024 revenue, guided mainly by monoclonal antibodies and recombinant proteins. Within this universe, ADC manufacturing stands out as the fastest sub-segment because cytotoxic payloads require scarce high-containment suites. The biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market size attributed to biologics is forecast to remain dominant even as growth moderates, reflecting entrenched commercial portfolios and a steady inflow of biosimilar versions in Europe and Japan.
Cell and gene therapies, though only a fraction of current revenue, will capture the highest incremental dollars at a 7.57% CAGR to 2030. Autologous oncology treatments continue to drive capital expansion in North America, while allogeneic platforms incentivise larger-scale facilities in cost-competitive Asia-Pacific zones. Viral-vector capacity is tightening across both hemispheres, prompting multi-year take-or-pay contracts that stabilise provider cash flows. CDMOs that master both viral and non-viral delivery modalities position themselves as one-stop partners as the biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market pivots toward curative medicines.
By Source/Expression System: Mammalian Perfusion Extends Reach
Mammalian systems contributed 69.14% of 2024 revenue because they produce complex glycosylated proteins compatible with human biology. Fed-batch remains prevalent, but perfusion is climbing rapidly, posting a 7.94% CAGR through 2030 as sponsors embrace high-cell-density operations that deliver more grams of product per litre. The biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market share of microbial fermentation remains meaningful for insulin, growth factors, and certain biosimilars, benefiting price-sensitive payers.
Process intensification via perfusion trims facility footprints, allowing CDMOs to repurpose existing suites rather than build greenfield plants. Continuous culture also facilitates real-time release testing, which dovetails with regulators’ push for advanced analytics. Insect, plant, and cell-free platforms play niche roles—such as rapid vaccine response—but they advance the industry’s long-run diversification. Providers investing in adaptable bioreactor farms that can switch between host systems in less than four weeks gain flexibility prized by small biotech innovators with heterogeneous pipelines.
By Scale of Operation: Phase II Activity Becomes the Growth Core
Phase III projects held 31.87% of 2024 revenue, reflecting the high-volume requirements of pivotal trials. Yet Phase II budgets are expanding fastest at an 8.31% CAGR because sponsors seek clear proof-of-concept before committing to larger studies. This trend lifts demand for mid-scale single-use reactors that sit between discovery kilolitre volumes and commercial 20,000 L tanks. The biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market size allocated to these flexible assets is therefore rising disproportionately.
Commercial supply remains stable as legacy biologics mature, but margin pressure tightens with broader biosimilar competition. Pre-clinical and Phase I volumes still account for modest spend, though their importance as pipeline feeders cannot be overstated. CDMOs deploying modular ballroom facilities can modulate scale seamlessly across lifecycle stages, a trait especially valued by venture-backed sponsors who prefer one contract from IND through BLA. Samsung Biologics’ expansion in Incheon, for instance, exemplifies how multi-scale campuses reinforce strategic customer lock-in.
By Therapeutic Area: Oncology Leads while Cell Therapy Redraws Boundaries
Oncology generated 30.72% of 2024 revenue, buoyed by sustained interest in checkpoint inhibitors and targeted radioligands. Precision oncology compounds typically carry higher potency, feeding demand for isolated suites and cold-chain logistics, both core competencies of leading CDMOs. The biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market size tied to oncology will persist as the largest therapeutic bucket through 2030 even as growth rates taper.
Cell and gene therapies deliver the steepest upside at an 8.71% CAGR, mainly in haematologic malignancies and rare genetic conditions. Cardiovascular and metabolic disorders also lift demand for peptide and oligonucleotide manufacturing, especially given GLP-1 agonist popularity. Infectious-disease manufacturing has normalised post-pandemic but continues to receive governmental preparedness funding. Across all areas, smaller patient subsets foster batch fragmentation, inherently favouring CDMOs with fast turn-round micro-lots.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By End User: Biotech Momentum Rewrites Capacity Planning
Big Pharma consumed 42.23% of 2024 outsourced capacity, leveraging multi-year volume guarantees to negotiate favourable unit economics. Their pivot to asset-light models deepens reliance on external partners for both clinical and commercial supply. Consequently, tier-one vendors use dedicated lines to ring-fence strategic accounts within the broader biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market.
Small and mid-size biotechs show the quickest expansion at 9.13% CAGR, driving demand for vertically integrated packages that cut coordination costs. Specialty pharma and academic spin-outs add to volume diversity but typically prefer flexible, pay-as-you-go agreements. The dual-track customer mix pushes CDMOs to balance fixed-asset utilisation with agile scheduling software, ensuring high-volume anchor clients do not crowd out high-margin emerging sponsors.
Geography Analysis
North America retained 39.45% of total 2024 revenue, underpinned by the United States’ robust R&D ecosystem and new federal incentives for domestic biomanufacturing. Fujifilm’s USD 1.2 billion North Carolina expansion and Lonza’s Vacaville acquisition together inject nearly 450,000 L of fresh capacity. Skilled-labour scarcity remains the principal growth brake despite supportive financing.
Asia-Pacific is sprinting at a 9.56% CAGR, propelled by lower wage structures, state subsidies, and the BIOSECURE Act’s re-routing of supply chains toward India and Singapore. AstraZeneca’s USD 1.5 billion ADC plant in Singapore illustrates the region’s emerging role in high-value niche manufacturing.
Europe remains steady, backed by cohesive EMA guidelines and a dense vendor network. Germany leads with Daiichi Sankyo’s EUR 1 billion ADC build and Rentschler Biopharma’s headquarters upgrade. Brexit complicates multi-site clearance, raising administrative cost but not yet reversing investment flows. Switzerland leverages high-margin bioconjugation demand, while Eastern Europe absorbs secondary fill-finish work.
Competitive Landscape
The 10 largest providers controlled USD 30.2 billion in 2024 revenue—roughly 36% of the biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market—underscoring a moderately fragmented landscape. Consolidation continues apace: Novo Holdings’ USD 16.5 billion acquisition of Catalent and Lonza’s USD 1.2 billion Vacaville deal signal a race to secure capacity and broaden modality coverage.
Technology is the new battleground. Providers employing digital twins and AI-enabled process controls report up to 30% fewer deviations and faster batch release. Early adoption aligns closely with the FDA’s advanced manufacturing guidance, giving tech-forward vendors a regulatory tailwind that can shorten pre-approval inspection timelines. Continuous-manufacturing retrofits, though capital-intensive, attract sponsors who value shorter cycle times and smaller carbon footprints.
Capacity scarcity in ADCs, viral vectors, and peptide therapeutics allows niche specialists to command premium contracts. Asian contenders leverage cost advantages, but Western firms maintain an edge in quality culture, regulatory familiarity, and proximity to headquarters of Big Pharma. The BIOSECURE Act restricts federal funding for drugs manufactured in certain Chinese facilities, prompting sponsors to seek alternative hubs, a shift that benefits India, Singapore, and selected US states with ready infrastructure.
Biopharmaceutical CMO And CRO Industry Leaders
-
Lonza Group AG
-
ICON Plc
-
Parexel International Corporation
-
Samsung Biologics
-
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- January 2025: FDA issued new cGMP guidance stressing in-process controls and advanced analytics.
- October 2024: Lonza acquired Genentech’s Vacaville biologics site for USD 1.2 billion, adding 330,000 L capacity.
- September 2024: SK pharmteco invested USD 260 million in global peptide production expansion.
Global Biopharmaceutical CMO And CRO Market Report Scope
As per the scope of the report, biopharmaceutical CMO (contract manufacturing organization) refers to companies that provide manufacturing services to biopharmaceutical companies. They handle the production of drugs, biologics, or other pharmaceutical products on a contractual basis.
The biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market is segmented by source, service type, contract research, products, and geography. By source, the market is segmented as mammalian and non-mammalian. The market is segmented by service type as contract manufacturing (process development, fill and finish operations, analytical & qc studies, and packaging). The market is segmented by contract research as oncology, inflammation & immunology, cardiology, neuroscience, and others. The market is segmented by product as biologics and biosimilars; by geography, the market is segmented as North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa, and South America. The report also covers the estimated market sizes and trends for 17 countries across major global regions. The report offers the value (in USD) for the above segments.
| Contract Manufacturing Services |
| Contract Research Services |
| Biologics | Monoclonal Antibodies |
| Cell & Gene Therapies | |
| Vaccines | |
| Antibody–Drug Conjugates | |
| Small Molecules | Branded APIs |
| Generics |
| Mammalian Cell Culture |
| Microbial Fermentation |
| Insect / Baculovirus |
| Plant-based |
| Cell-Free / Synthetic Biology |
| Pre-clinical |
| Clinical – Phase I |
| Clinical – Phase II |
| Clinical – Phase III |
| Commercial Production |
| Oncology |
| Cardiovascular |
| Neurology |
| Infectious Diseases & Vaccines |
| Immunology & Rare Diseases |
| Others |
| Big Pharma |
| Small & Mid-size Biotech |
| Specialty Pharma |
| Academic & Research Institutes |
| North America | United States |
| Canada | |
| Mexico | |
| Europe | Germany |
| United Kingdom | |
| France | |
| Italy | |
| Spain | |
| Rest of Europe | |
| Asia-Pacific | China |
| India | |
| Japan | |
| South Korea | |
| Australia | |
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |
| South America | Brazil |
| Argentina | |
| Rest of South America | |
| Middle East and Africa | GCC |
| South Africa | |
| Rest of Middle East and Africa |
| By Service Type | Contract Manufacturing Services | |
| Contract Research Services | ||
| By Molecule Type | Biologics | Monoclonal Antibodies |
| Cell & Gene Therapies | ||
| Vaccines | ||
| Antibody–Drug Conjugates | ||
| Small Molecules | Branded APIs | |
| Generics | ||
| By Source/Expression System | Mammalian Cell Culture | |
| Microbial Fermentation | ||
| Insect / Baculovirus | ||
| Plant-based | ||
| Cell-Free / Synthetic Biology | ||
| By Scale of Operation | Pre-clinical | |
| Clinical – Phase I | ||
| Clinical – Phase II | ||
| Clinical – Phase III | ||
| Commercial Production | ||
| By Therapeutic Area | Oncology | |
| Cardiovascular | ||
| Neurology | ||
| Infectious Diseases & Vaccines | ||
| Immunology & Rare Diseases | ||
| Others | ||
| By End User | Big Pharma | |
| Small & Mid-size Biotech | ||
| Specialty Pharma | ||
| Academic & Research Institutes | ||
| By Geography | North America | United States |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Europe | Germany | |
| United Kingdom | ||
| France | ||
| Italy | ||
| Spain | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| South Korea | ||
| Australia | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Argentina | ||
| Rest of South America | ||
| Middle East and Africa | GCC | |
| South Africa | ||
| Rest of Middle East and Africa | ||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How big is the Biopharmaceutical CMO And CRO Market?
The Biopharmaceutical CMO And CRO Market size is expected to reach USD 83.41 billion in 2025 and grow at a CAGR of 6.70% to reach USD 115.35 billion by 2030.
What is the current size of the biopharmaceutical CMO and CRO market?
The market is valued at USD 83.41 billion in 2025 and is projected to climb to USD 115.35 billion by 2030.
Which service segment is growing fastest within the market?
These therapies require specialised cleanrooms, bespoke analytics, and complex logistics, prompting high outsourcing rates and premium contract values.
How is the BIOSECURE Act influencing geographic strategies?
The Act drives US-based sponsors to diversify away from Chinese capacity, creating new opportunities for India, Singapore, and select US states.
What technological advances are differentiating leading CDMOs?
Adoption of digital twins, AI-driven process controls, and continuous manufacturing reduces batch deviations by up to 30% and shortens release timelines.
Page last updated on: