Armored Vehicle Upgrade And Retrofit Market Size and Share

Armored Vehicle Upgrade And Retrofit Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market size is expected to reach USD 8.65 billion in 2026 and is projected to grow to USD 13.63 billion by 2031, reflecting a 9.51% CAGR. Modernization budgets favor life-extension programs that deliver 70-80% of new-platform capability at 30-40% of the acquisition cost, as illustrated by the US decision to refresh 504 Abrams tanks instead of accelerating a clean-sheet design. NATO members alone earmarked EUR 12 billion (USD 13.96 billion) for armor upgrades in fiscal 2025, a sign that geopolitical flashpoints are compressing decision cycles. Active-protection systems (APS), hybrid-electric powertrains, and open-systems electronics now dominate specifications, while Tier-2 integrators use modular kits to erode incumbent market share. Supply-chain risks around rare-earth magnets and cyber vulnerabilities in over-the-air software updates remain the principal headwinds for the armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market.
Key Report Takeaways
- By vehicle type, infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs) led with a 37.89% revenue share in 2025; other vehicle types are projected to expand at a 11.56% CAGR through 2031.
- By upgrade type, armor and survivability kits captured 31.69% of 2025 spending, while powertrain electrification and energy systems will climb at a 9.97% CAGR through 2031.
- By end-user, the Army commanded a 72.67% share in 2025; homeland security and paramilitary forces are forecasted to grow at a 10.78% CAGR to 2031.
- By geography, the Asia-Pacific region generated 43.78% of 2025 revenue; North America is set to record the steepest CAGR from 2026 to 2031 at 12.21%.
Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.
Global Armored Vehicle Upgrade And Retrofit Market Trends and Insights
Driver Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modernization of ageing armored fleets | +2.1% | North America, Europe, Middle East | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Rising defense budgets and geopolitical tensions | +1.8% | Eastern Europe, Indo-Pacific, Middle East | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Demand for enhanced survivability vs IEDs and drones | +1.6% | Middle East, Africa, South Asia | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Digitization and network-centric warfare upgrades | +1.4% | North America, Europe, advanced APAC | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Field-deployable additive-manufactured retrofit kits | +0.9% | North America, Europe, pilot programs in Middle East | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Hybrid/electric-propulsion retrofits for silent mobility | +0.8% | North America, Europe, selected APAC | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Modernization of Ageing Armored Fleets
The median age of NATO MBTs reached 28 years in 2025, and service-life extensions to 40-45 years now rely on overhauls of the powertrain, armor, and electronics rather than wholesale replacement.[1]Poland MOD Desk, “Leopard 2PL Modernization,” Defense24, defense24.pl Poland’s 250-unit Leopard 2PL program demonstrates how incremental upgrades support interoperability while preserving budgets for artillery and air defense priorities. The US shifted USD 1.2 billion from a clean-sheet Abrams variant to SEPv4 upgrades that add Israeli Trophy active protection and next-generation infrared sensors. Similar logic informs Japan’s USD 340 million Type 90 tank refresh, which incorporates network radios and counter-drone electronic warfare (EW) modules. These cases demonstrate that retrofit strategies maintain industrial lines open and distribute risk over time.
Rising Defense Budgets and Geopolitical Tensions
Global defense outlays increased by 6.8% in 2025 to USD 2.24 trillion, and the armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market accounted for 3.9% of that expenditure.[2]Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, “World Military Expenditure 2025,” sipri.org Germany’s Zeitenwende initiative injected EUR 3.1 billion (USD 3.61 billion) into overhauls of the Leopard and Puma, signaling a durable shift in budget priorities away from austerity. South Korea devoted USD 890 million to K2 and K21 enhancements that incorporate hard-kill protection and laser warning receivers. The Indo-Pacific share of retrofit spending rose from 38% in 2023 to 43.78% in 2025, fueled by India’s USD 4.2 billion BMP-2 program and Australia’s Land 400 Phase 3 initiative. Sustained budget momentum underwrites multi-year contracts and de-risks supplier investment.
Demand for Enhanced Survivability vs IEDs and Drones
Improvised explosive devices and first-person-view drones caused 62% of armored-vehicle losses in Ukraine through mid-2025. Operators are responding with layered active-plus-electronic defenses that swap passive armor mass for radar, counter-UAS jammers, and laser dazzlers. The US Stryker A1 integrates vehicle-protection suites that create a full 360-degree defeat envelope against quadcopter threats. Rafael recorded a 340% jump in Iron Fist orders between 2024 and 2025, reflecting global recognition of the system’s 15-millisecond intercept cycle. The weight savings from active layers, often ranging from 1,200 to 1,800 kilograms per platform, preserve mobility without compromising safety standards defined in STANAG 4569.
Digitization and Network-Centric Warfare Upgrades
NATO mandates that all combat vehicles carry Link 16 and Coalition Shared Data links by 2028, pushing a USD 2.1 billion retrofit wave across the Bradley, Stryker, and Abrams fleets. Germany’s Puma integrates the Gladius soldier system, which fuses vehicle sensors with infantry tablets to synchronize fires inside a 5-kilometer bubble.[3]Rheinmetall, “Gladius Soldier System,” rheinmetall.com France’s Scorpion program reduced call-for-fire timelines to under 90 seconds on 200 VBCI carriers after equipping them with CONTACT radios and SYNAPS software. Cybersecurity now dominates specifications, and STANAG 4774 requires hardware-based encryption, as well as air-gapped firmware updates, which collectively add up to USD 180,000 per vehicle, thereby mitigating the hacks that plagued commercial telematics in 2024.
Restraint Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| High program and component costs | -1.2% | Budget-constrained markets in South America, Africa, Southeast Asia | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Integration complexity with legacy platforms | -0.9% | 1980s-1990s fleets in Europe and North America | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Budget volatility and procurement cycles | -0.7% | Democracies with multi-year appropriations | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Emerging cybersecurity risks in digital retrofits | -0.5% | North America, Europe, advanced APAC | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
High Program and Component Costs
Active-protection kits add USD 300,000-500,000 per vehicle, and a full C4ISR suite can push incremental costs past USD 1.2 million, eroding the financial logic of retrofits when more than 60% of subsystems need replacement. The Bradley M2A4E1 upgrade now sits at USD 4.3 million per unit, only 28% cheaper than a clean-sheet equivalent. Rare-earth magnet prices remain volatile, forcing some programs to accept torque densities 15-20% lower with ferrite substitutes. South American and African customers respond by buying partial upgrade packages, fragmenting volumes, and squeezing economies of scale.
Integration Complexity with Legacy Platforms
Bridging MIL-STD-1553 data buses to modern Ethernet required an 18-month middleware sprint on the US Marine Corps Amphibious Combat Vehicle refresh. Germany’s Leopard 2A7V spent 14 additional months in engineering when its hydraulic turret drive could not handle the 900-kilogram weight rise from modular armor and sensors. Trophy integration on Israeli Merkava Mark 3 tanks caused electromagnetic interference with legacy radios on 23% of units, prompting a fleet-wide harness retrofit.[4]Israel Defense Forces, “Trophy Integration Lessons,” idf.il Such bottlenecks can stretch schedules by 18 to 36 months and incur unexpected, non-recurring costs.
Segment Analysis
By Vehicle Type: IFVs Lead, Logistics Variants Accelerate
Infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs) retained 37.89% of the 2025 armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market share, underscoring their central role in combined-arms maneuver. The armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market size for support vehicles is poised for faster growth, with logistics carriers, command posts, and engineering variants projected to post an 11.56% CAGR through 2031. IFV programs consume disproportionate budgets because lethality and survivability must match peer MBTs. The US Bradley M2A4 integrates Iron Fist Light Decoupled active protection and third-generation infrared, demonstrating the cost intensity of IFV refresh cycles. Mine-resistant vehicles receive steady orders for counter-insurgency theaters, while APCs gain momentum through interoperability mandates such as Canada’s Light Armoured Vehicle 6.0 line.
Lower-baseline capability lets support variants realize step-function benefits from modest upgrades, and armies now treat rear-echelon protection as an operational imperative. The M88A3 recovery vehicle retrofit, which incorporates Trophy and Link 16, exemplifies the trend of enhancing survivability for maintenance and logistics assets. Amphibious and medium-weight platforms also enter the pipeline as emerging markets seek versatile assets that double as disaster-relief vehicles. Together, these factors keep the armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market on a trajectory where combat and support fleets modernize in parallel rather than sequentially.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Upgrade Type: Electrification Gains Momentum
Armor and survivability kits secured 31.69% of 2025 spend as customers raced to field hard-kill solutions with verified combat performance. Trophy’s 95% intercept rate in 2025 validated the pivot from passive armor to integrated detection-defeat layers. Remote-weapon stations (RWS) continue to proliferate, with Kongsberg expected to deliver its 12,000th CROWS-J by mid-2025. Mobility packages restore baseline performance after vehicles gain 2,000-3,000 kilograms from protection and electronics. Open-architecture electronics shorten integration timelines, and the Common Modular Open Suite of Standards reduces software drop cycles from 24 months to 8 months.
Powertrain electrification and energy systems are expected to post the fastest segment growth at a 9.97% CAGR. Hybrid demonstrators achieve 70% fuel savings during silent watch, tripling loiter time in contested areas. GM Defense’s eLTV illustrates how exportable electric power underpins future sensor and laser payloads.[5]GM Defense, “eLTV Technical Brief,” gmdefense.com Run-flat tires, software patches, and crew-comfort inserts round out the “Other” category, together reducing maintenance downtime by over 20%.
By End-User: Homeland Security Accelerates
The Army commanded 72.67% of the 2025 revenue, a figure that reflects its substantial inventories and priority access to modernization appropriations. Multi-year US Army contracts covering Abrams, Bradley, and Stryker fleets ensure a stable baseline for prime contractors. Naval forces refresh amphibious assault vehicles to maintain littoral relevance, while air force security units procure limited mine-resistant vehicles for base defense.
Homeland security and paramilitary agencies are expected to grow at a 10.78% CAGR through 2031, the highest among end-users. The US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a USD 187 million order in 2025 to add electronic-warfare kits and thermal imagers to 340 M-ATVs, illustrating how non-military buyers now demand near-military protection levels. European gendarmeries purchased 1,200 armored patrol vehicles in 2025 to counter unmanned aerial and ground threats, representing a 65% increase from 2023. The armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market, therefore, extends beyond defense ministries and into civil-security domains where rapid capability insertion offers immediate operational payoff.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
The Asia-Pacific region generated 43.78% of the 2025 revenue for the armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market, a lead built on India's USD 4.20 billion BMP-2 program and South Korea's K2/K21 retrofits. Japan's USD 340 million Type 90 refresh, along with rising interest from Southeast Asian buyers, sustains regional momentum. Open-source imagery also shows China integrating active protection on roughly 400 Type 96/Type 99 tanks by late 2025, although Beijing discloses few details about the program.
North America is expected to record the fastest 2026-2031 CAGR of 12.21% as the US ramps up armored multi-purpose vehicle (AMPV) production and upgrades its legacy combat fleets in parallel. Canada's LAV 6.0 entered full-rate production in 2025, and Mexico invested USD 210 million in mine-resistant vehicles with counter-drone kits to harden domestic security operations. Consistent appropriations and a preference for incremental capability upgrades underpin regional growth.
Europe trails the Asia-Pacific region in revenue but benefits from Germany's Zeitenwende spending, France's Leclerc XLR program, and Poland's Leopard 2PL conversion. The United Kingdom's Challenger 3 line entered production in 2025, closing a rifled-gun gap that had limited ammunition commonality with NATO allies. The Middle East remains a pivotal theater, with Saudi Arabia's USD 1.8 billion Abrams plan and the UAE's efforts to indigenize shaping the local industry footprint. South America and Africa pursue selective refresh work constrained by fiscal headwinds, yet flagship projects in Brazil and South Africa signal longer-term potential.

Competitive Landscape
The armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market exhibits moderate concentration, with the top five suppliers such as General Dynamics Corporation, Rheinmetall AG, BAE Systems plc, Elbit Systems Ltd., and Oshkosh Corporation. Tier-2 integrators, such as FNSS, Otokar, and ST Engineering, undercut primes by 20-30% with modular kits, gradually eroding incumbents' market positions. Rheinmetall's 55% stake in Leonardo DRS provided the German firm with a transatlantic pipeline for active-protection sensors, prompting BAE and Elbit to expand their own electronics portfolios.
Modularity and open architecture drive strategy. BAE's Common Modular Open Suite of Standards enables third-party plug-ins, shortening fielding timelines to under 12 months and turning speed into a commercial differentiator. Elbit's TORCH-X software follows a similar playbook by decoupling the user interface from hardware. Additive manufacturing represents the newest white-space, with US Army depot trials proving that field printers can cut lead times for bespoke parts by 90%.
Hybrid-electric propulsion is emerging as a key battleground. BAE's Bradley demonstrator and GM Defense's eLTV compete on exportable power metrics relevant to directed-energy systems, while Hanwha Defense bundles technology transfer into Poland's and Australia's contracts to gain political traction. Cybersecurity compliance under STANAG 4774 forms a final competitive axis, adding USD 180,000 per vehicle but acting as a non-price barrier for late entrants.
Armored Vehicle Upgrade And Retrofit Industry Leaders
General Dynamics Corporation
Rheinmetall AG
BAE Systems plc
Oshkosh Corporation
Elbit Systems Ltd.
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Recent Industry Developments
- December 2025: BAE Systems Inc. secured a contract modification to procure 240 AMPVs. The Army Contracting Command, Detroit Arsenal, Michigan, awarded the contract. Valued at USD 198.40 million, the project is expected to be completed by May 2028.
- November 2025: The Indian Army signed a contract to procure BvS10 Sindhu vehicles from Larsen & Toubro Limited, in collaboration with BAE Systems. Under this agreement, Larsen & Toubro Limited will manufacture the BvS10 Sindhu domestically at its Armoured Systems Complex in Hazira, with technical and design support from BAE Systems Hägglunds, the original developer of the BvS10 platform. The contract also includes a comprehensive integrated logistics support package covering initial deployment, maintenance, and life-cycle sustainment.
- August 2024: General Dynamics' Land Systems division secured a USD 174.40 million contract from the US Army to retrofit and repair the Stryker family of vehicles.
Global Armored Vehicle Upgrade And Retrofit Market Report Scope
Armored vehicles are land combat vehicles used for transporting troops and equipment for various offensive and defensive operations. They are typically used for the transportation of military personnel and cargo, as well as for operations in active combat.
The armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market is segmented by vehicle type, upgrade type, end-user, and geography. By vehicle type, the market is segmented into armored personnel carriers (APCs), infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs), mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles, main battle tanks (MBTs), and other vehicle types. By upgrade type, the market is classified into armor and survivability kits, weapon and remote weapon stations, mobility, electronics/sensors/C4ISR, powertrain electrification and energy systems, and other upgrades. By end-user, the market is segmented into the Army, Navy, Air Force, and homeland security and paramilitary. The report also covers market sizes and forecasts for the armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market in major countries across different regions. For each segment, the market size is provided in terms of value (USD).
| Armored Personnel Carriers (APCs) |
| Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFVs) |
| Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicles |
| Main Battle Tanks (MBTs) |
| Other Vehicle Types |
| Armor and Survivability Kits |
| Weapon and Remote Weapon Stations |
| Mobility (Engine, Transmission, Suspension) |
| Electronics/Sensors/C4ISR |
| Powertrain Electrification and Energy Systems |
| Other Upgrades (Tires, Software, etc.) |
| Army |
| Navy |
| Air Force |
| Homeland Security and Paramilitary |
| North America | United States | |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Europe | United Kingdom | |
| France | ||
| Germany | ||
| Russia | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| South Korea | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Rest of South America | ||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | United Arab Emirates |
| Saudi Arabia | ||
| Rest of Middle East | ||
| Africa | South Africa | |
| Rest of Africa | ||
| By Vehicle Type | Armored Personnel Carriers (APCs) | ||
| Infantry Fighting Vehicles (IFVs) | |||
| Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicles | |||
| Main Battle Tanks (MBTs) | |||
| Other Vehicle Types | |||
| By Upgrade Type | Armor and Survivability Kits | ||
| Weapon and Remote Weapon Stations | |||
| Mobility (Engine, Transmission, Suspension) | |||
| Electronics/Sensors/C4ISR | |||
| Powertrain Electrification and Energy Systems | |||
| Other Upgrades (Tires, Software, etc.) | |||
| By End-User | Army | ||
| Navy | |||
| Air Force | |||
| Homeland Security and Paramilitary | |||
| By Geography | North America | United States | |
| Canada | |||
| Mexico | |||
| Europe | United Kingdom | ||
| France | |||
| Germany | |||
| Russia | |||
| Rest of Europe | |||
| Asia-Pacific | China | ||
| India | |||
| Japan | |||
| South Korea | |||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |||
| South America | Brazil | ||
| Rest of South America | |||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | United Arab Emirates | |
| Saudi Arabia | |||
| Rest of Middle East | |||
| Africa | South Africa | ||
| Rest of Africa | |||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How large is the armored vehicle upgrade and retrofit market in 2026?
It is valued at USD 8.65 billion, with a forecasted rise to USD 13.63 billion by 2031, reflecting a 9.51% CAGR.
Which vehicle type commands the biggest share of upgrade spending?
Infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs) account for 37.89% of 2025 revenue due to their dual role in troop transport and direct fire.
What region will see the fastest growth through 2031?
North America is projected to post a 12.21% CAGR, driven by US and Canadian programs.
Why are hybrid-electric retrofits gaining traction?
Silent mobility and exportable electrical power for sensors and directed-energy weapons make hybrid drives attractive despite higher component costs.
Which companies lead the competitive landscape?
General Dynamics, Rheinmetall, BAE Systems, Elbit Systems, and Oshkosh together held roughly 60% of 2025 revenue.
What is the main restraint facing retrofit programs?
High component costs and integration complexity can narrow the financial gap versus purchasing new vehicles, especially when more than 60% of systems require replacement.



