Market Overview
| Study Period | 2017 - 2030 |
|---|---|
| Market Size (2025) | USD 6.72 Billion |
| Market Size (2030) | USD 11.38 Billion |
| Growth Rate (2025 - 2030) | 11.14% CAGR |
| Fastest Growing Market | North America |
| Largest Market | North America |
| Market Concentration | Low |
Major Players
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0. |
|
Biopesticides Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The biopesticides market size is USD 6.72 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 11.38 billion by 2030, advancing at an 11.14% CAGR, evidence of strong and sustained demand for biological crop-protection tools. Heightened regulatory scrutiny of synthetic chemistries, rapid expansion of organic farmland, and the emergence of fermentation-as-a-service platforms are converging to accelerate the commercialization of microbial-based solutions. Brazil’s unified bioinputs law, effective December 2024, has already shortened approval timelines for biological products, providing momentum that other emerging markets are beginning to emulate.[1]Source: Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, “Law 15.070/2024,” agricultura.gov.br At the same time, North American growers lead global adoption because of a mature controlled-environment agriculture infrastructure and streamlined reviews under the reformed United States Coordinated Framework.[2]Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Coordinated Framework for Biotechnology,” epa.gov Intensifying insecticide resistance, especially in lepidopteran pests, is steering both row-crop and horticultural producers toward biological modes of action that complement existing chemistries.
Key Report Takeaways
- By form, biofungicides led with 47.5% of the biopesticides market share in 2024, while bioinsecticides are forecast to expand at a 12.40% CAGR through 2030.
- By crop type, row crops held 84.1% of the biopesticides market size in 2024 and are advancing at an 11.20% CAGR through 2030.
- By geography, North America commanded 39.5% of revenue in 2024 and is projected to grow at a 12.60% CAGR to 2030.
Global Biopesticides Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stricter global curbs on synthetic pesticides | +2.1% | Global with strongest effect in the European Union and North America | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Expansion of organic farming acreage | +1.8% | Global led by North America and Europe | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Rising resistance to conventional chemistries | +1.5% | Global, most acute in Asia-Pacific and South America | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Government biopesticide incentives and fast-track approvals | +1.2% | South America and Asia-Pacific with spillover to North America | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Growth of controlled-environment agriculture (CEA) | +0.9% | North America and Europe, expanding to Asia-Pacific | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Fermentation-as-a-service lowering scale-up barriers | +0.8% | Global, concentrated in biotechnology hubs | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Stricter Global Curbs on Synthetic Pesticides
The European Union’s Farm to Fork Strategy targets a 50% cut in chemical pesticide use by 2030, prompting a measurable substitution effect in favor of biologicals. Complementing this, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cancelled several organophosphate registrations in 2024, which has increased biological awareness among 87% of surveyed row-crop growers.[3]Source: United States Department of Agriculture, “Biological Pesticide Adoption Survey,” usda.gov Brazil’s streamlined approval process now takes significantly less time for biologicals compared to synthetics, creating a cost-of-delay advantage for biopesticide manufacturers. Thailand and other Southeast Asian nations are drafting comparable policies, illustrating the global reach of regulatory momentum. Across major export crops, residue-limit compliance has become a tangible business risk, so buyers are pressuring suppliers to reduce dependence on synthetic chemistries.
Expansion of Organic Farming Acreage
Certified organic farmland has been steadily increasing, supported by consistent annual growth across major producing regions. Since organic certification prohibits synthetic inputs, biologicals serve as the primary pest-management option in these systems, creating a reliable revenue base for biopesticide vendors. The premium retail pricing associated with organic products allows growers to manage higher per-hectare treatment costs while maintaining profitability. The expansion of controlled-environment agriculture (CEA) within organic supply chains further drives demand, as indoor farms adopt biological controls from the outset to meet residue-free branding requirements. Additionally, investment in regional organic research centers is enhancing extension support for biological products, boosting adoption confidence.
Rising Resistance to Conventional Chemistries
The Insecticide Resistance Action Committee documented resistance across 783 pest species in 2024, with severe cases in lepidopteran populations that threaten yield stability in corn, soybean, and cotton. Biologicals present multiple, often complex, modes of action that delay resistance development, making them a cornerstone of integrated pest management. Yield losses linked to resistant pests cost growers USD 10–15 billion annually in the largest crop systems, and this financial burden is reshaping input purchasing decisions. Multinational seed companies now bundle biological insecticides with traited seed packages, institutionalizing biological use. Insurance providers in South America have also begun to incorporate biological products into premium-discount programs tied to resistance mitigation.
Government Biopesticide Incentives and Fast-Track Approvals
Brazil’s Law 15.070/2024 formalized technical guidelines for bioinputs and reduced dossier duplication, pushing the nation’s market value to USD 780 million in 2024. Argentina’s SENASA Resolution 694/2024 now recognizes technical-grade biological actives registered in peer markets, lowering data-package costs for multinational entrants. The EPA’s Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division shortened typical review cycles to 18 months, accelerating time to market. India, Vietnam, and Kenya are piloting grant and tax-credit programs that reimburse up to 40% of biological registration expenses, thereby attracting local formulation start-ups. Collectively, these incentives favor smaller innovators and enhance geographic diversity of supply.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher cost versus synthetic pesticides | −1.4% | Global, most acute in price-sensitive developing markets | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Shorter shelf life and cold-chain dependence | −0.8% | Global, especially challenging in tropical regions | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Feed-stock price volatility for microbial production | −0.6% | Global, concentrated where agricultural waste supply is limited | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Absence of uniform field-performance KPIs | −0.5% | Global, particularly in emerging markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Higher Cost Versus Synthetic Pesticides
Per-hectare treatment costs for biologicals remain two to three times higher than conventional products, primarily because of lower active-ingredient density and more frequent application cycles. Commodity crop growers in Africa and parts of Asia hesitate to invest in premium inputs, even though premium export channels may cover those costs. Economic modeling that factors in resistance management and residue-testing savings can partially offset price gaps, but such analyses are not yet widely distributed through extension networks. Several governments now offer direct input subsidies to bridge the pricing differential, but program scope is still limited.
Shorter Shelf Life and Cold-Chain Dependence
Many microbial products have relatively short shelf lives and require cold storage at low temperatures. This increases logistics costs, limiting distribution to remote regions. Online ordering and regional depots partially mitigate inventory risk, yet small distributors often lack necessary refrigeration equipment. Formulators are advancing encapsulation and lyophilization techniques that extend stability for longer periods at ambient temperatures, yet widespread commercialization is still a few years away.
Segment Analysis
By Form: Biofungicides Maintain the Lead
Biofungicides generated 47.5% of 2024 revenue and continue to anchor the biopesticides market size, reflecting proven field performance of Bacillus and Trichoderma strains across cereals, fruits, and protected vegetables. Innovation in wettable-powder and oil-dispersion formulations has improved shelf stability, which supports penetration in warmer climates. The segment’s broad utility has built distributor confidence, encouraging wider shelf allocation in retail channels. Bioinsecticides trail in current share but are forecast to advance at a 12.40% CAGR, outpacing other categories. Adoption is rising as growers seek new modes of action to counter lepidopteran resistance. Recent regulatory submissions show a 35% rise in bioinsecticide dossiers in 2024, supplying a pipeline that will expand choices over the forecast window.
Second-generation bioherbicides remain niche but show commercial momentum as companies pair novel microbial isolates with adjuvants that improve host specificity. While limited acreage uptake keeps volume small, the category attracts venture capital because it offers a differentiated solution to herbicide-resistant weeds. Other biopesticides, including nematicides and molluscicides, target high-value specialty crops where yield preservation justifies higher inputs. Together, these diverse forms demonstrate the expanding technical scope of the biopesticides market.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF
By Crop Type: Row Crops Dominate Value and Growth
Row crops captured 84.1% share of the biopesticides market size in 2024, and are advancing at an 11.20% CAGR through 2030, driven by widespread use in corn and soybean systems where integrated pest management programs now incorporate multiple biological products per season. Cooperative extension trials across the Midwestern United States confirm consistent yield gains when biologicals are layered with reduced-rate synthetics. Volume advantages in extensive acreage drive manufacturing economies that progressively narrow cost differentials versus chemical treatments. Organic certification growth in field crops, especially in Canada and Argentina, further enlarges the installed base.
Horticultural crops, though smaller in scale, yield higher per-hectare revenues for suppliers. Greenhouse vegetables, berries, and specialty orchards adopt biologicals early because residue limits and consumer brand commitments demand minimal synthetic exposure. CEA operators account for a rising portion of this segment and adopt biologicals from day one, reinforcing brand narratives around sustainability. Cash crops such as cotton and sugarcane occupy an intermediate position. Growers in Brazil and India intensify biological use to manage resistance, but remain highly cost sensitive. Overall, the crop-type spectrum illustrates why balanced product portfolios are essential for sustaining growth in the biopesticides market.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF
Geography Analysis
North America retained 39.5% revenue in 2024 and posted the fastest regional CAGR at 12.60%, underscoring its dual status as both the largest and fastest-growing territory for the biopesticides market. Streamlined EPA reviews, state-level incentive programs, and strong retailer commitments to residue-free sourcing combine to accelerate uptake. United States CEA operations integrate biological pest control in leafy greens, tomatoes, and strawberries, providing a steady baseline of demand. Canada’s organic acreage expansion and Mexico’s export-oriented horticulture further expand regional use.
Europe follows closely, propelled by the European Union’s Farm to Fork Strategy. The European biocontrol market has grown significantly, representing a notable portion of total crop-protection sales. Stringent approval processes extend over several years, slowing product turnover but ensuring high-quality data packages that bolster grower trust. Northern member states emphasize residue reduction in cereals, while Mediterranean regions employ biologicals heavily in horticulture and viticulture.
South America delivers the most dynamic growth, led by Brazil’s expanding market and favorable regulatory reforms that unify bioinput approvals. A significant portion of Brazilian growers now report routine biological use, and annual market expansion vastly outstrips the global average. Argentina’s equivalency recognition and Chile’s public research funding enhance regional momentum. Asia-Pacific registers strong potential tied to rising organic acreage and government sustainability mandates, yet progress is fragmented by variable regulatory timelines and limited technical extension. Africa and the Middle East represent early-stage markets where donor-funded programs and multinational demonstrations seed future demand.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF
Competitive Landscape
The top five players controlled a small percentage of global revenue in 2024, confirming an extremely fragmented competitive field. Specialized biotechnology start-ups often outpace multinationals in strain discovery and formulation stability, while legacy crop-protection companies bring unrivaled distribution networks. Consolidation strategies now revolve around intellectual-property aggregation rather than traditional volume acquisition. Ginkgo Bioworks’ purchase of AgBiome’s extensive strain library is emblematic, offering deep microbial diversity that can fuel multiple product pipelines.
Collaboration models dominate. Syngenta partnered with Lavie Bio to apply artificial-intelligence algorithms to strain-selection workflows, reducing discovery cycles significantly. Bayer licensed an AlphaBio Control bioinsecticide to complement its cereal fungicide franchise, reinforcing a multi-modal portfolio strategy. FMC Corporation’s alliance with Brazil’s Ballagro focuses on fungi-based biosolutions for broad-acre soybeans and corn. These partnerships highlight a pragmatic division of labor: innovative small firms provide novel actives, while large firms deliver regulatory, manufacturing, and market-access muscle.
Financial investors remain optimistic. Funding rounds for biological start-ups have climbed steadily, led by venture funds specializing in ag-tech. Contract manufacturing organizations are scaling to capture fee-for-service revenue, creating additional competitive dynamics. Suppliers that secure reliable fermentation capacity and demonstrate long shelf life stand best positioned to consolidate share as demand accelerates.
Biopesticides Industry Leaders
-
Corteva Agriscience
-
Marrone Bio Innovations Inc. (Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp.)
-
Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd.
-
Valent BioSciences LLC (Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd.)
-
T.Stanes and Company Limited
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF
Recent Industry Developments
- September 2025: BioWorks announced its entry into the European market, introducing a portfolio of biopesticides and biostimulants designed for sustainable crop protection. This expansion aims to provide EU growers with biological solutions for managing diseases and pests.
- August 2025: Kan Biosys launched ROFA specialty fertilizers and neem-based crop protection products, combining microbial nutrition and botanical biopesticides to promote sustainable and profitable farming across India and potentially global markets.
- July 2025: UPL Corp Australia introduced Thiopron, a biofungicide for grapevines, at WineTech 2025. The product is designed to address fungal diseases such as powdery mildew and serves as a sustainable alternative to traditional fungicides, aligning with global and European trends in biological crop protection.
- May 2025: Super Growers introduced Omnicide IPM, a biopesticide developed using nano-emulsion technology. Specifically designed for integrated pest management (IPM), it provides broad-spectrum pest control with improved effectiveness and environmental safety.
Free With This Report
Along with the report, We also offer a comprehensive and exhaustive data pack on Areas under organic cultivation, one of the key trends that affect the market size of agricultural biologicals. This data pack also includes areas under cultivation by crop types, such as Row Crops (Cereals, Pulses, and Oilseeds), Horticultural Crops (Fruits and Vegetables), and Cash Crops in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America and Africa.
List of Tables & Figures
- Figure 1:
- AREA UNDER ORGANIC CULTIVATION IN HECTARES, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 2:
- PER CAPITA SPENDING ON ORGANIC PRODUCTS IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 3:
- GLOBAL BIOPESTICIDES MARKET, VOLUME, METRIC TON, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 4:
- GLOBAL BIOPESTICIDES MARKET, VALUE, USD, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 5:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 6:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 7:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY FORM IN %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 8:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 9:
- BIOFUNGICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 10:
- BIOFUNGICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 11:
- BIOFUNGICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 12:
- BIOHERBICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 13:
- BIOHERBICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 14:
- BIOHERBICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 15:
- BIOINSECTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 16:
- BIOINSECTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 17:
- BIOINSECTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 18:
- OTHER BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 19:
- OTHER BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 20:
- OTHER BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 21:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 22:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 23:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY CROP TYPE IN %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 24:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 25:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION BY CASH CROPS IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 26:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION BY CASH CROPS IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 27:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 28:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 29:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 30:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 31:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION BY ROW CROPS IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 32:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION BY ROW CROPS IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 33:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, GLOBAL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 34:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 35:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, GLOBAL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 36:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY REGION IN %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 37:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY REGION IN %, GLOBAL, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 38:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 39:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 40:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, AFRICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 41:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, AFRICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 42:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EGYPT, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 43:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, EGYPT, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 44:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, EGYPT, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 45:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NIGERIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 46:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, NIGERIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 47:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, NIGERIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 48:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, SOUTH AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 49:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, SOUTH AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 50:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, SOUTH AFRICA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 51:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 52:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF AFRICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 53:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, REST OF AFRICA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 54:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 55:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 56:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 57:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 58:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, AUSTRALIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 59:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, AUSTRALIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 60:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, AUSTRALIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 61:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, CHINA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 62:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, CHINA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 63:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, CHINA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 64:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 65:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 66:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 67:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDONESIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 68:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDONESIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 69:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, INDONESIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 70:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, JAPAN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 71:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, JAPAN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 72:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, JAPAN, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 73:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, PHILIPPINES, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 74:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, PHILIPPINES, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 75:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, PHILIPPINES, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 76:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, THAILAND, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 77:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, THAILAND, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 78:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, THAILAND, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 79:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, VIETNAM, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 80:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, VIETNAM, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 81:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, VIETNAM, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 82:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 83:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 84:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, REST OF ASIA-PACIFIC, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 85:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 86:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 87:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 88:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 89:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, FRANCE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 90:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, FRANCE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 91:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, FRANCE, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 92:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GERMANY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 93:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, GERMANY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 94:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, GERMANY, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 95:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, ITALY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 96:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, ITALY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 97:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, ITALY, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 98:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NETHERLANDS, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 99:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, NETHERLANDS, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 100:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, NETHERLANDS, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 101:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, RUSSIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 102:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, RUSSIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 103:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, RUSSIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 104:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, SPAIN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 105:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, SPAIN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 106:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, SPAIN, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 107:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, TURKEY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 108:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, TURKEY, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 109:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, TURKEY, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 110:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED KINGDOM, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 111:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED KINGDOM, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 112:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, UNITED KINGDOM, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 113:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 114:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 115:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, REST OF EUROPE, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 116:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, MIDDLE EAST, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 117:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, MIDDLE EAST, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 118:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, MIDDLE EAST, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 119:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, MIDDLE EAST, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 120:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, IRAN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 121:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, IRAN, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 122:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, IRAN, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 123:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, SAUDI ARABIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 124:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, SAUDI ARABIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 125:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, SAUDI ARABIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 126:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF MIDDLE EAST, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 127:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF MIDDLE EAST, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 128:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, REST OF MIDDLE EAST, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 129:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 130:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 131:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 132:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 133:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, CANADA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 134:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, CANADA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 135:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, CANADA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 136:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, MEXICO, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 137:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, MEXICO, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 138:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, MEXICO, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 139:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 140:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 141:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, UNITED STATES, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 142:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 143:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 144:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, REST OF NORTH AMERICA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 145:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 146:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 147:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 148:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 149:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, ARGENTINA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 150:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, ARGENTINA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 151:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, ARGENTINA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 152:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, BRAZIL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 153:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, BRAZIL, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 154:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, BRAZIL, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 155:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 156:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF SOUTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 157:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, REST OF SOUTH AMERICA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 158:
- GLOBAL BIOPESTICIDES MARKET, MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES, BY NUMBER OF STRATEGIC MOVES, 2017-2022
- Figure 159:
- GLOBAL BIOPESTICIDES MARKET, MOST ADOPTED STRATEGIES, 2017-2022
- Figure 160:
- GLOBAL BIOPESTICIDES MARKET SHARE(%), BY MAJOR PLAYERS
Global Biopesticides Market Report Scope
Biofungicides, Bioherbicides, Bioinsecticides are covered as segments by Form. Cash Crops, Horticultural Crops, Row Crops are covered as segments by Crop Type. Africa, Asia-Pacific, Europe, Middle East, North America, South America are covered as segments by Region.
Form
| Biofungicides |
| Bioherbicides |
| Bioinsecticides |
| Other Biopesticides |
Crop Type
| Cash Crops |
| Horticultural Crops |
| Row Crops |
Geography
| Africa | By Country | Egypt |
| Nigeria | ||
| South Africa | ||
| Rest of Africa | ||
| Asia-Pacific | By Country | Australia |
| China | ||
| India | ||
| Indonesia | ||
| Japan | ||
| Philippines | ||
| Thailand | ||
| Vietnam | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| Europe | By Country | France |
| Germany | ||
| Italy | ||
| Netherlands | ||
| Russia | ||
| Spain | ||
| Turkey | ||
| United Kingdom | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Middle East | By Country | Iran |
| Saudi Arabia | ||
| Rest of Middle East | ||
| North America | By Country | Canada |
| Mexico | ||
| United States | ||
| Rest of North America | ||
| South America | By Country | Argentina |
| Brazil | ||
| Rest of South America |
| Form | Biofungicides | ||
| Bioherbicides | |||
| Bioinsecticides | |||
| Other Biopesticides | |||
| Crop Type | Cash Crops | ||
| Horticultural Crops | |||
| Row Crops | |||
| Geography | Africa | By Country | Egypt |
| Nigeria | |||
| South Africa | |||
| Rest of Africa | |||
| Asia-Pacific | By Country | Australia | |
| China | |||
| India | |||
| Indonesia | |||
| Japan | |||
| Philippines | |||
| Thailand | |||
| Vietnam | |||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |||
| Europe | By Country | France | |
| Germany | |||
| Italy | |||
| Netherlands | |||
| Russia | |||
| Spain | |||
| Turkey | |||
| United Kingdom | |||
| Rest of Europe | |||
| Middle East | By Country | Iran | |
| Saudi Arabia | |||
| Rest of Middle East | |||
| North America | By Country | Canada | |
| Mexico | |||
| United States | |||
| Rest of North America | |||
| South America | By Country | Argentina | |
| Brazil | |||
| Rest of South America | |||
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now
Market Definition
- AVERAGE DOSAGE RATE - The average application rate is the average volume of biopesticides applied per hectare of farmland in the respective region/country.
- CROP TYPE - Crop type includes Row crops (Cereals, Pulses, Oilseeds), Horticultural Crops (Fruits and vegetables) and Cash Crops (Plantation Crops, Fibre Crops and Other Industrial Crops)
- FUNCTION - The Crop Protection function of agirucultural biological include products that prevent or control various biotic and abiotic stress.
- TYPE - Biopesticides prevent or control various pests, including insects, diseases, and weeds, from causing crop damage and yield loss.
| Keyword | Definition |
|---|---|
| Cash Crops | Cash crops are non-consumable crops sold as a whole or part of the crop to manufacture end-products to make a profit. |
| Integrated Pest Management (IPM) | IPM is an environment-friendly and sustainable approach to control pests in various crops. It involves a combination of methods, including biological controls, cultural practices, and selective use of pesticides. |
| Bacterial biocontrol agents | Bacteria used to control pests and diseases in crops. They work by producing toxins harmful to the target pests or competing with them for nutrients and space in the growing environment. Some examples of commonly used bacterial biocontrol agents include Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Streptomyces spp. |
| Plant Protection Product (PPP) | A plant protection product is a formulation applied to crops to protect from pests, such as weeds, diseases, or insects. They contain one or more active substances with other co-formulants such as solvents, carriers, inert material, wetting agents or adjuvants formulated to give optimum product efficacy. |
| Pathogen | A pathogen is an organism causing disease to its host, with the severity of the disease symptoms. |
| Parasitoids | Parasitoids are insects that lay their eggs on or within the host insect, with their larvae feeding on the host insect. In agriculture, parasitoids can be used as a form of biological pest control, as they help to control pest damage to crops and decrease the need for chemical pesticides. |
| Entomopathogenic Nematodes (EPN) | Entomopathogenic nematodes are parasitic roundworms that infect and kill pests by releasing bacteria from their gut. Entomopathogenic nematodes are a form of biocontrol agents used in agriculture. |
| Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM) | VAM fungi are mycorrhizal species of fungus. They live in the roots of different higher-order plants. They develop a symbiotic relationship with the plants in the roots of these plants. |
| Fungal biocontrol agents | Fungal biocontrol agents are the beneficial fungi that control plant pests and diseases. They are an alternative to chemical pesticides. They infect and kill the pests or compete with pathogenic fungi for nutrients and space. |
| Biofertilizers | Biofertilizers contain beneficial microorganisms that enhance soil fertility and promote plant growth. |
| Biopesticides | Biopesticides are natural/bio-based compounds used to manage agricultural pests using specific biological effects. |
| Predators | Predators in agriculture are the organisms that feed on pests and help control pest damage to the crops. Some common predator species used in agriculture include ladybugs, lacewings, and predatory mites. |
| Biocontrol agents | Biocontrol agents are living organisms used to control pests and diseases in agriculture. They are alternatives to chemical pesticides and are known for their lesser impact on the environment and human health. |
| Organic Fertilizers | Organic fertilizer is composed of animal or vegetable matter used alone or in combination with one or more non-synthetically derived elements or compounds used for soil fertility and plant growth. |
| Protein hydrolysates (PHs) | Protein hydrolysate-based biostimulants contain free amino acids, oligopeptides, and polypeptides produced by enzymatic or chemical hydrolysis of proteins, primarily from vegetal or animal sources. |
| Biostimulants/Plant Growth Regulators (PGR) | Biostimulants/Plant Growth Regulators (PGR) are substances derived from natural resources to enhance plant growth and health by stimulating plant processes (metabolism). |
| Soil Amendments | Soil Amendments are substances applied to soil that improve soil health, such as soil fertility and soil structure. |
| Seaweed Extract | Seaweed extracts are rich in micro and macronutrients, proteins, polysaccharides, polyphenols, phytohormones, and osmolytes. These substances boost seed germination and crop establishment, total plant growth and productivity. |
| Compounds related to biocontrol and/or promoting growth (CRBPG) | Compounds related to biocontrol or promoting growth (CRBPG) are the ability of a bacteria to produce compounds for phytopathogen biocontrol and plant growth promotion. |
| Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria | Symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria such as Rhizobium obtain food and shelter from the host, and in return, they help by providing fixed nitrogen to the plants. |
| Nitrogen Fixation | Nitrogen fixation is a chemical process in soil which converts molecular nitrogen into ammonia or related nitrogenous compounds. |
| ARS (Agricultural Research Service) | ARS is the U.S. Department of Agriculture's chief scientific in-house research agency. It aims to find solutions to agricultural problems faced by the farmers in the country. |
| Phytosanitary Regulations | Phytosanitary regulations imposed by the respective government bodies check or prohibit the importation and marketing of certain insects, plant species, or products of these plants to prevent the introduction or spread of new plant pests or pathogens. |
| Ectomycorrhizae (ECM) | Ectomycorrhiza (ECM) is a symbiotic interaction of fungi with the feeder roots of higher plants in which both the plant and the fungi benefit through the association for survival. |
Need More Details on Market Definition?
Ask a Question
Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence follows a four-step methodology in all our reports.
- Step-1: Identify Key Variables: In order to build a robust forecasting methodology, the variables and factors identified in Step-1 are tested against available historical market numbers. Through an iterative process, the variables required for market forecast are set and the model is built on the basis of these variables.
- Step-2: Build a Market Model: Market-size estimations for the forecast years are in nominal terms. Inflation is not a part of the pricing, and the average selling price (ASP) is kept constant throughout the forecast period.
- Step-3: Validate and Finalize: In this important step, all market numbers, variables and analyst calls are validated through an extensive network of primary research experts from the market studied. The respondents are selected across levels and functions to generate a holistic picture of the market studied.
- Step-4: Research Outputs: Syndicated Reports, Custom Consulting Assignments, Databases & Subscription Platforms.
Get More Details On Research Methodology
Download PDF
