Vascular Closure Devices Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts (2025 - 2030)

The Vascular Closure Device Market Report is Segmented by Product Type (Active Approximators and Passive Approximators), Material Composition (Collagen-Based, PEG/Polymer-based, and More), Procedure Type (Interventional Cardiology, and More), End-User (Hospitals, and More), Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, The Middle East and Africa, and South America). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Vascular Closure Device Market Size and Share

Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Compare market size and growth of Vascular Closure Device Market with other markets in Healthcare Industry

Vascular Closure Device Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The vascular closure devices market is valued at USD 1.77 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 2.47 billion by 2030, registering a 6.98% CAGR over the period. Heightened procedural complexity in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), neuro‐interventions, and complex peripheral cases positions vascular closure as an indispensable step in contemporary endovascular therapy. Purchaser preference is tilting away from manual compression because large‐bore access sites up to 25 Fr demand predictable hemostasis, and same-day discharge mandates rapid ambulation. Growing outpatient volumes, adoption of minimally invasive therapies for high-risk elderly patients, and expanding reimbursement for ambulatory care are reinforcing the business case for device-based closure. Innovation momentum is strongest in bio-absorbable materials and large-bore implant designs that shorten deployment time and remove operator variability. Concurrently, radial-specific compression bands address the procedural migration from femoral to radial routes, ensuring that the vascular closure devices market continues to evolve rather than stagnate.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product type, active approximators led with 54.34% revenue share in 2024; passive approximators are projected to expand at an 8.45% CAGR through 2030.
  • By material composition, collagen-based systems held 51.23% of the vascular closure devices market share in 2024, while suture and filament solutions are advancing at an 8.95% CAGR to 2030.
  • By mode of access, femoral sites ≤8 Fr accounted for 61.45% of the vascular closure devices market size in 2024; large-bore femoral sites ≥12 Fr represent the fastest segment, growing at 8.12% CAGR through 2030.
  • By procedure, interventional cardiology commanded 38.54% share of the vascular closure devices market size in 2024, whereas neurovascular procedures record the highest projected CAGR at 9.43% to 2030.
  • By end user, hospitals captured 55.78% of vascular closure devices market share in 2024; catheterization laboratories and outpatient vascular centers are set to expand at a 9.54% CAGR through 2030.
  • By geography, North America held 42.67% revenue share in 2024; Asia-Pacific is forecast to post the fastest 7.84% CAGR between 2025 and 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Product Type: Active Approximators Remain the Workhorse

Active approximators controlled 54.34% of the vascular closure devices market in 2024. This leadership derives from their suture-mediated or clip-based mechanisms that lock arteriotomies immediately, enabling anticoagulated or large-bore patients to ambulate within hours. Abbott’s Perclose ProGlide illustrates category strength by offering 100% procedural success in multiple high-sheath trials. Hospitals prize the deterministic closure these devices provide, particularly when intra-procedural anticoagulation is mandatory.

Passive approximators occupy a smaller base but are pacing growth at 8.45% CAGR through 2030. Plug, patch, and sealant systems such as Haemonetics’ VASCADE MVP shorten deployment to a single push, reducing fluoroscopy and operator fatigue. The AMBULATE study confirmed a 54% decline in time-to-ambulation, showcasing workflow dividends that resonate with outpatient programs. Simplified technique lowers training barriers, raising adoption in mid-volume centers. As regulatory pressures favor same-day discharge, passive approximators are positioned to expand their contribution to the vascular closure devices market.

Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Material Composition: Bio-Absorbable Polymers Challenge Collagen Dominance

Collagen plugs retained 51.23% share in 2024, reflecting three decades of clinical familiarity. Terumo’s Angio-Seal VIP employs a collagen sponge, a polymer anchor, and a suture that collectively resorb within 90 days, offering predictable vessel healing. Physicians value collagen’s thrombin-rich matrix, which accelerates clot formation especially in anticoagulated patients.

Suture and filament devices built from polyglycolic acid, polyethylene glycol, or proprietary polymers are advancing at 8.95% CAGR. Vivasure’s PerQseal Elite is entirely bio-absorbable and designed for 14-22 Fr TAVR sheaths, eliminating retained foreign material and imaging artifacts. Polymer innovations provide tailored degradation kinetics, enabling large-bore security without permanent implants. Clip-based metal systems remain a niche for cases where radiopaque markers aid follow-up imaging. Material diversification reinforces competitive differentiation inside the vascular closure devices market.

By Mode of Access: Large-Bore Innovation Steals the Spotlight

Femoral access ≤8 Fr continues to dominate with 61.45% of vascular closure devices market size in 2024. Established devices like Abbott’s StarClose and Cordis’ ExoSeal deliver reproducible hemostasis for PCI and diagnostic angiography, sustaining demand despite radial penetration. However, radial adoption has already carved share from low-sheath femoral cases and generated a parallel radial compression market.

Large-bore femoral access ≥12 Fr is expanding at 8.12% CAGR on the back of TAVR, EVAR, and mechanical circulatory support. Teleflex’s MANTA and the InSeal patch close 10-25 Fr arteriotomies in a single step, eradicating surgical cut-downs while meeting stringent bleed-through criteria in anticoagulated elders. Radial access maintains utility for diagnostic studies but yields limited incremental revenue to the vascular closure devices market because inexpensive compression bands suffice.

By Procedure Type: Neurovascular Momentum Overtakes Cardiology

Interventional cardiology held 38.54% share of the vascular closure devices market size in 2024. Chronic total occlusion PCI, left main stenting, and alcohol septal ablation supply sustained volume, though radial access curtails femoral device usage. Growth within cardiology hinges on structural heart therapies such as left atrial appendage occlusion, which continue to require femoral access and favor large-bore solutions.

Neurovascular intervention is the fastest-growing slice at 9.43% CAGR. Mechanical thrombectomy volumes are surging because earlier stroke detection meets guideline support for endovascular clot retrieval. The Tubridge flow diverter delivered 100% deployment success in Chinese multicenter assessment, validating procedure efficacy and elevating closure demand. Vascular access for neuro work typically involves 6-9 Fr femoral sheaths, a sweet spot for both active and passive approximators. Electrophysiology ablation adds another vector, where venous closure devices cut bed rest from six hours to two, enhancing patient satisfaction.

Vascular Closure Device Market: Market Share by Procedure Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By End User: Outpatient Centers Capture Runway for Expansion

Hospitals continued as the principal customer group with 55.78% of vascular closure devices market share in 2024. They benefit from 24/7 imaging, surgical backup, and volume agreements that incentivize bundled procurement. Tertiary centers increasingly push routine elective cases to satellites or ambulatory hubs to preserve ICU resources for complex care.

Catheterization laboratories and outpatient vascular centers will grow 9.54% per year as payers reimburse same-day discharge and patients value rapid turnover. CMS has introduced additional C-codes recognizing complexity adjustments, directly rewarding facilities that achieve prompt hemostasis and early mobilization[3]. Telemetry‐ready recovery bays, fixed-cost service lines, and lean nursing ratios make ASCs ideal arenas for devices that guarantee predictable closure, uplifting the vascular closure devices market.

Geography Analysis

North America, with 42.67% share, remains the largest regional constituent of the vascular closure devices market. High per-capita procedure rates, early technology adoption, and robust reimbursement frameworks underpin leadership. The FDA granted 510(k) clearance for Cordis’ MYNX CONTROL venous VCD in 2024, emphasizing the region’s role as a primary gateway for next-generation systems. Notwithstanding recalls, North America maintains physician confidence through structured training and rapid post-market surveillance.

Asia-Pacific records the fastest 7.84% CAGR through 2030, spurred by health infrastructure build-out, government investment in cardiovascular care, and an aging population predisposed to stenotic and valvular disease. China’s National Medical Products Administration accepted 61 innovative device dossiers in 2023, signaling accelerating regulatory throughput for local and foreign suppliers[3]“NMPA Annual Report on Innovative Devices 2023,” Hankun Law, hankunlaw.com. Terumo’s double-digit cardiovascular revenue growth and MicroPort CardioFlow’s VitaFlow Liberty TAVI approval in early 2025 confirm vibrant regional demand. Although device cost sensitivity persists, expanding private insurance and public funding improve affordability.

Europe maintains steady, albeit slower, expansion amid transition to the Medical Device Regulation framework. CE marks awarded to Terumo’s Angio-Seal VIP and Vivasure’s PerQseal Elite under MDR attest to adaptability of manufacturers. Radial penetration in continental centers is higher than in North America, moderating femoral closure volumes, yet growth in large-bore structural heart programs counterbalances attrition. Economic pressures in Southern Europe constrain premium device uptake, but Northern European networks compensate with procedure innovation, sustaining the vascular closure devices market.

Vascular Closure Device Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

Incumbent leaders Abbott, Terumo, and Medtronic anchor the vascular closure devices market with broad portfolios, multiyear safety datasets, and global sales footprints. Abbott leverages combined vessel closure, coronary, and structural heart platforms to cross-sell into hybrid suites, while Terumo aligns Angio-Seal sales with its interventional guidewire franchise. Medtronic pursues neurovascular synergy, though its March 2025 Pipeline Vantage recall underscores execution risk.

Specialists Haemonetics and Vivasure carve niches through technology differentiation. Haemonetics extends VASCADE MVP capabilities into larger venous sheaths for complex ablation, reflecting tailored innovation. Vivasure’s bio-absorbable PerQseal responds directly to unmet large-bore closure needs in TAVR, creating a unique value proposition for structural heart programs. Cordis competes in radial with the ZEPHYR band and complements femoral solutions with ExoSeal, displaying versatility.

Strategic consolidation reshapes boundaries. Stryker’s USD 4.9 billion takeover of Inari adds venous thrombectomy and sets a platform for future closure synergies, while Teleflex sealed a EUR 760 million deal for Biotronik’s vascular assets to expand its large-bore presence. New entrants focus on polymer science and smart deployment mechanics rather than scale, betting on hospital desire for evidence-backed performance gains. Competition now hinges less on price and more on ease of use, post-procedure mobility, and regulatory compliance, sustaining healthy rivalry across the vascular closure devices market.

Vascular Closure Device Industry Leaders

  1. Abbott Laboratories

  2. Cardiva Medical Inc.

  3. Terumo Corporation

  4. Biotronik SE & Co. KG

  5. Cardinal Health, Inc.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Vascular Closure Device Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • June 2025: Vivasure Medical received CE mark for PerQseal Elite, the first fully bio-absorbable large-bore arterial closure platform.
  • February 2025: Stryker completed its acquisition of Inari Medical for USD 4.9 billion, entering high-growth peripheral markets.
  • February 2025: Teleflex acquired Biotronik’s vascular intervention business for EUR 760 million to broaden its interventional cardiology lineup.
  • January 2025: MicroPort CardioFlow secured NMPA approval for the VitaFlow Liberty Flex TAVI system featuring motorized delivery.
  • April 2024: Haemonetics launched VASCADE MVP XL in the United States, offering greater collagen volume for 10-12 Fr venous sheaths.

Table of Contents for Vascular Closure Device Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Increase In Catheterization-Related Procedures
    • 4.2.2 Growing Preference for Minimally Invasive Interventions
    • 4.2.3 Shift Toward Radial Access in PCI & Electrophysiology
    • 4.2.4 Aging Population Expanding CVD Treatment Volumes
    • 4.2.5 Expansion Of Large-Bore TAVR/EVAR Driving Next-Gen VCD Demand
    • 4.2.6 Out-Patient & Same-Day Discharge Reimbursement Incentives
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High Cost of Advanced Vcds Vs. Manual Compression
    • 4.3.2 Device-Related Complications & Product Recalls
    • 4.3.3 Lengthy Approval Cycles for Bio-Absorbable Polymers
    • 4.3.4 Cannibalisation From Low-Cost Radial Compression Bands
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.5.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Product Type
    • 5.1.1 Active Approximators
    • 5.1.1.1 Clip-based Devices
    • 5.1.1.2 Suture-based Devices
    • 5.1.1.3 Plug-based Devices
    • 5.1.2 Passive Approximators
    • 5.1.2.1 Hemostatic Pads & Patches
    • 5.1.2.2 Compression Devices
  • 5.2 By Material Composition
    • 5.2.1 Collagen-based
    • 5.2.2 PEG / Polymer-based
    • 5.2.3 Suture / Filament-based
    • 5.2.4 Metal Clip-based
  • 5.3 By Mode of Access
    • 5.3.1 Femoral Access
    • 5.3.2 Large-bore Femoral
    • 5.3.3 Radial Access
    • 5.3.4 Other Mode of Access
  • 5.4 By Procedure Type
    • 5.4.1 Interventional Cardiology
    • 5.4.2 Peripheral Vascular
    • 5.4.3 Neurovascular
    • 5.4.4 Structural Heart / TAVR
    • 5.4.5 Electrophysiology
  • 5.5 By End User
    • 5.5.1 Hospitals
    • 5.5.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centres
    • 5.5.3 Cath-labs & Out-patient Vascular Centres
  • 5.6 Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.6.2 Europe
    • 5.6.2.1 Germany
    • 5.6.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.2.3 France
    • 5.6.2.4 Italy
    • 5.6.2.5 Spain
    • 5.6.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.3.1 China
    • 5.6.3.2 Japan
    • 5.6.3.3 India
    • 5.6.3.4 Australia
    • 5.6.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.6.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.6.4.1 GCC
    • 5.6.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.6.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.6.5 South America
    • 5.6.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.6.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Business Segments, Financials, Headcount, Key Information, Market Rank, Market Share, Products and Services, and analysis of Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Abbott Laboratories
    • 6.3.2 Terumo Corporation
    • 6.3.3 Medtronic plc
    • 6.3.4 Haemonetics Corp.
    • 6.3.5 Teleflex Inc.
    • 6.3.6 Cardinal Health / Cordis
    • 6.3.7 Becton, Dickinson & Co.
    • 6.3.8 B. Braun Melsungen AG
    • 6.3.9 Biotronik SE & Co. KG
    • 6.3.10 Merit Medical Systems
    • 6.3.11 Vivasure Medical Ltd
    • 6.3.12 Cardiva Medical Inc.
    • 6.3.13 Advanced Vascular Dynamics
    • 6.3.14 Essential Medical
    • 6.3.15 InSeal Medical
    • 6.3.16 Manta (Abbott-Manta)
    • 6.3.17 Forge Medical
    • 6.3.18 Rex Medical
    • 6.3.19 Morrison Medical
    • 6.3.20 Medeon Biodesign

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global Vascular Closure Device Market Report Scope

As per the scope of this report, vascular closure devices (VCDs) are medical devices used in sealing puncture of the femoral artery in patients who have undergone diagnostic angiography procedures or interventional procedures. The growing popularity of VCDs is primarily due to the fact that they are an alternative to the manual compression method, which is a time-intensive procedure, the exact procedure-time depending on the size of the plastic sheath placed in the artery. VCDs provide immediate sealing of the femoral artery access site, which is not the case with mechanical or manual compression. The market is segmented by product type (active approximators and passive approximators), mode of access (femoral access and radial access), end users (hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, and other end users), and geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and South America). The market report also covers the estimated market sizes and trends for 17 countries across major regions globally. The report offers value in USD million for the above segments.

By Product Type Active Approximators Clip-based Devices
Suture-based Devices
Plug-based Devices
Passive Approximators Hemostatic Pads & Patches
Compression Devices
By Material Composition Collagen-based
PEG / Polymer-based
Suture / Filament-based
Metal Clip-based
By Mode of Access Femoral Access
Large-bore Femoral
Radial Access
Other Mode of Access
By Procedure Type Interventional Cardiology
Peripheral Vascular
Neurovascular
Structural Heart / TAVR
Electrophysiology
By End User Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centres
Cath-labs & Out-patient Vascular Centres
Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East & Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
By Product Type
Active Approximators Clip-based Devices
Suture-based Devices
Plug-based Devices
Passive Approximators Hemostatic Pads & Patches
Compression Devices
By Material Composition
Collagen-based
PEG / Polymer-based
Suture / Filament-based
Metal Clip-based
By Mode of Access
Femoral Access
Large-bore Femoral
Radial Access
Other Mode of Access
By Procedure Type
Interventional Cardiology
Peripheral Vascular
Neurovascular
Structural Heart / TAVR
Electrophysiology
By End User
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centres
Cath-labs & Out-patient Vascular Centres
Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East & Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How fast is the vascular closure devices market expected to grow between 2025 and 2030?

The market is projected to expand at a 6.98% CAGR, moving from USD 1.77 billion in 2025 to USD 2.47 billion by 2030.

Which region shows the highest growth potential?

Asia-Pacific leads in expansion with a 7.84% forecast CAGR, propelled by healthcare modernization, regulatory acceleration, and aging demographics.

What product category currently dominates the sector?

Active approximators hold 54.34% revenue share due to their immediate hemostasis and suitability for complex, large-bore procedures.

Why are large-bore closure systems gaining traction?

The rise of TAVR and EVAR produces punctures up to 25 Fr that traditional plugs cannot seal, driving demand for devices like Teleflex’s MANTA that secure large arteriotomies safely.

How do outpatient reimbursement trends influence device selection?

New CMS codes reward same-day discharge, so centers prioritize closure tools that achieve rapid hemostasis and early ambulation, shifting purchases toward high-efficacy systems.

What safety concerns exist around vascular closure devices?

While complication rates are low, recalls such as the FDA Class I action on Medtronic’s Pipeline Vantage highlight the need for continuous design refinement and operator training.

Page last updated on: June 26, 2025

Vascular Closure Device Market Report Snapshots