Military Wearables Market Size and Share
Military Wearables Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The military wearables market size is estimated at USD 4.71 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 6.10 billion by 2030, growing at a 5.31% CAGR. Real-time sensor fusion, autonomous decision support, and modular power systems turn connected gear into tactical force multipliers that shorten engagement cycles and improve mission endurance. North America retains leadership through programs like the USD 22 billion Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS). At the same time, the Asia-Pacific region registers the fastest expansion as Japan, India, and Australia accelerate their soldier modernization budgets. Power-density breakthroughs, exoskeleton field trials, and AI-ready display optics create new adoption triggers even as supply-chain risks around critical battery materials persist. In parallel, cyber-hardening and interoperability standards are emerging as prerequisites for purchase, reshaping vendor qualification criteria.
Key Report Takeaways
- By wearable type, bodywear led the military wearables market with a 36.76% share in 2024; exoskeletons are forecasted to grow at a 7.51% CAGR through 2030.
- By application, communication and computing accounted for 34.21% of the military wearables market size in 2024, while power and energy management is projected to advance at an 8.66% CAGR between 2025 and 2030.
- By end user, land forces represented 61.52% of demand in 2024; airborne forces were expected to record the highest growth at a 6.78% CAGR to 2030.
- By core technology, smart textiles captured 31.11% of 2024 revenue, and wearable robotics and actuators are poised for an 8.85% CAGR through 2030.
- By geography, North America commanded a 43.89% share in 2024; the Asia-Pacific region is the fastest-growing, with a 7.90% CAGR through 2030.
Global Military Wearables Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Increased global investment in next-generation soldier modernization programs | +1.1% | North America, Europe, selected APAC allies | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Growing operational need for real-time biometric and health monitoring | +0.8% | Early adoption in North America and APAC | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Advancements in battery energy density enhancing mission endurance | +0.6% | Global; supply dependencies in APAC | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Deployment of AI-driven sensor fusion for enhanced situational awareness | +0.9% | North America, Europe, expanding to APAC | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Emergence of low-SWaP photonics enabling wearable directed-energy technologies | +0.7% | North America, Europe | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Integration of augmented reality (AR) systems for battlefield visualization and mission planning | +0.5% | Global, led by North America | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Increased Global Investment in Next-Generation Soldier Modernization Programs
Defense departments redirect capital from large platforms toward individual lethality kits that blend sensors, power modules, and cognitive aids into existing body armor. The US Army formalized this shift through the Optimizing the Human Weapon System initiative, which embeds wearable metrics into readiness scores. A similar intent is evident in Australia’s order for 470 operational exosuits, indicating that programs are transitioning from laboratory trials to field deployment. Multi-year spending horizons create predictable demand for suppliers able to meet stringent durability and integration benchmarks. As modernization doctrines ripple across NATO and select Asia-Pacific allies, the military wearables market gains long-term revenue visibility and greater competition from dual-use electronics vendors.
Growing Operational Need for Real-Time Biometric and Health Monitoring
Combat units now prioritize predictive health insights that avert in-mission casualties. Fiber-computer textiles developed at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology enable continuous electrocardiac, hydration, and fatigue tracking without extra device weight.[1]Massachusetts Institute of Technology, “Fiber Computer Allows Apparel to Run Apps and Understand the Wearer,” mit.edu The US Army runs Arctic trials to validate these garments under extreme conditions, underscoring the urgency for low-profile medical telemetry. Successful rollouts enable new training protocols that tailor workloads to individual physiology, reducing evacuation incidents and lowering life-cycle costs. Vendors that align sensor stacks with secure data-handling rules gain an immediate edge as defense health agencies tighten procurement scrutiny.
Advancements in Battery Energy Density Enhancing Mission Endurance
Mission length remains constrained by the weight soldiers carry. Silicon-anode cells from Amprius have doubled watt-hours per kilogram in conformal packs delivered to ground units, halving the number of spares required per patrol.[2]Amprius Technologies, “Safe-Cell Silicon Anode Batteries Double Energy Density for Army Packs,” nationaldefensemagazine.org Complementary efforts include Honeywell’s hydrogen fuel micro-generators that power tablets for 72 hours without recharging. Human kinetic harvesters mounted on rucksacks add trickle energy and lower logistical resupply rates. Together, these breakthroughs shift the design focus from aggressive power throttling to feature expansion, propelling the adoption of military wearables in data-intensive roles such as real-time video and AR overlays.
Deployment of AI-Driven Sensor Fusion for Enhanced Situational Awareness
Artificial intelligence (AI) converts disparate data sources, such as biometrics, inertial navigation, and acoustic cues, into immediate threat alerts. Elbit Systems has embedded neural-network processors in modular battery packs to run target-recognition algorithms on-device, sidestepping contested networks. The US Army’s Virtual Sixth Sense concept layers similar micro-services onto body-worn computers to recommend maneuver options within seconds. These capabilities redefine competitive differentiation, compelling legacy primes to pair their hardware portfolios with in-house data science teams. Once validated, AI fusion platforms become a mandatory spec item, expanding the addressable military wearables market across squad-level electronics.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lack of allied interoperability standards | –0.4% | Global, heavy NATO exposure | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| High cybersecurity costs versus legacy gear | –0.3% | Predominantly developed markets | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Instability in lithium and rare-earth supply | –0.5% | Global, dependence on China | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Ethical concerns on constant biometrics | –0.2% | North America, Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Lack of Standardized Interoperability Frameworks Across Allied Forces
NATO updates its mandate to include plug-and-play communications, yet member armies still procure unique radio protocols and data buses, forcing soldiers to carry multiple adapters. Divergent encryption suites further hinder cross-border battalion exercises, diluting the gains of network-centric warfare. The European Union’s GOSSRA architecture offers a blueprint, but limited sign-ups stall economies of scale. Vendors must maintain multiple firmware branches, which inflates non-recurring engineering costs and ultimately restrains the military wearables market.
High Cybersecurity Costs Outweighing ROI Compared With Legacy Equipment
Connected helmets and exosuits enlarge the digital attack surface. NIST threat modeling shows more than 35 high-severity vulnerabilities per wearable endpoint, necessitating secure boot, continuous patching, and multifactor authentication. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) estimates that adding security hardening can increase total ownership costs by 40% compared to a traditional analog kit. Budget owners weigh these premiums against incremental battlefield gains, often delaying wide rollout until cost curves improve.
Segment Analysis
By Wearable Type: Bodywear Integration Sets the Baseline
Bodywear generated the largest revenue share, accounting for 36.76% of the military wearables market in 2024. Integrated chest rigs house radios, power hubs, and e-textile vitals patches without altering the soldier's silhouette, making them the procurement default. Exoskeletons drive future momentum with a 7.51% CAGR, as field trials demonstrate a 25% reduction in back injuries and 15% increase in march-time savings.
Exoskeleton adoption drives the development of supportive technologies, including servo-actuators, high-cycle Li-ion packs, and reinforced fabrics, creating new subcontracting opportunities. Head-worn optics benefit from rapid night-vision refresh cycles, while hearables incorporate bone-conduction transceivers that preserve environmental awareness. These developments enlarge the military wearables market by spawning accessory ecosystems around the foundational bodywear chassis.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Application: Power Management Overtakes Communication in Growth Priority
Communication and computing still account for 34.21% of 2024 spending, but energy concerns are now spearheading new budgets. The power-and-energy segment is on an 8.66% trajectory, and its innovations are increasingly dictating the overall military wearables market size forecasts.
Advanced distribution nodes, such as the US Army’s STAMP, reduce generator fuel burn by nearly 50% on forward bases. Galvion’s Nerv Centr hubs deliver smart charging and state-of-health analytics, letting logisticians predict battery replacement cycles.[3]Galvion, “Soldier Power Solutions,” galvion.com As power reliability improves, commanders are increasingly authorizing always-on encrypted video and AI inference at the edge, solidifying power management as a new procurement must-have.
By End User: Ground Dominance Endures Amid Airborne Upside
Land formations consumed 61.52% of 2024 volumes, reflecting sheer troop numbers and mature infantry programs. Although smaller, airborne units exhibit a 6.78% CAGR due to climate-extreme missions that benefit from physiological monitoring and lightweight optics.
Paratrooper headbands that log hypoxia and shock forces are entering qualification, while aviator jackets with embedded crash sensors link to flight data recorders. Naval forces remain testing partners for salt-spray-resistant smart textiles, but move cautiously given constrained deck space. Cross-domain doctrines push for interoperable loadouts, gradually harmonizing requirements and reinforcing the multi-service pull on the military wearables market.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Core Technology: Smart Textiles Anchor, Robotics Accelerate
Smart textiles held a 31.11% share in 2024 by embedding stretchable circuits directly into uniform fiber. Such ubiquity sets the baseline for soldier health dashboards viewed by squad medics in near real-time. Wearable robotics and actuators, although smaller today, are riding an 8.85% CAGR wave as labs transfer lower-limb assist exosuits from healthcare to infantry roles.
AI-ready optics and transparent displays piggyback on consumer AR investments, trimming cost curves. Energy-harvesting soles and pack frames add watts per step, nudging designers toward net-positive loadouts. With each incremental gain, the military wearables market attracts non-traditional entrants from the athletic apparel and consumer electronics sectors, which can scale advanced fabrics more quickly than legacy armor manufacturers.
Geography Analysis
North America commanded 43.89% of the revenue in 2024, thanks to the Pentagon’s multi-billion-dollar IVAS rollout and a resilient defense innovation base. US contractors benefit from established test ranges, cyber accreditation pipelines, and venture-funded spinouts that shorten prototype cycles. Canada and Mexico contribute modest volumes through joint training requirements and niche component exports, yet remain overshadowed by the scale of US modernization outlays. However, supply-chain exposure to foreign battery materials forces policymakers to fast-track domestic refining subsidies, which in turn shape mid-term sourcing strategies for the military wearables market.
The Asia-Pacific region is the fastest climber, with a 7.90% CAGR through 2030, driven by rapid shifts in threat perception and expanding capital budgets. Australia’s air force exosuit procurement, Japan’s dedicated AI warfare task force, and India’s F-INSAS revamp all signal durable demand. Indigenous electronics giants in South Korea and Taiwan now prototype rugged waveguides and graphene packs, seeding local content mandates that alter competitive dynamics. Chinese breakthroughs in flexible batteries add urgency for allied nations to accelerate the development of alternative chemistries, intensifying technology-transfer partnerships across the region.
Europe maintains steady momentum under NATO interoperability mandates and EU funding frameworks. Thales, Rheinmetall, and BAE Systems channel their continental R&D into next-generation night vision, trusted generative AI, and soldier-cloud gateways.[4]Thales Group, “Thales Reports Its 2025 Half-Year Results,” thalesgroup.com Fragmented national procurement still challenges economies of scale; however, standard requirements around cybersecurity accreditation and data sovereignty are pushing integrators toward modular, open systems. Eastern member states are increasing spending as border security tops political agendas, gradually expanding the addressable military wearables market without diluting Western European primacy.
Competitive Landscape
The military wearables market is a crossroads of defense primes, venture-backed newcomers, and dual-use consumer giants. Lockheed Martin Corporation, BAE Systems plc, and Thales Group leverage long-standing integration contracts and classified program clearances to bundle wearables into larger systems-of-systems packages. Yet, software-centric entrants like Anduril, secured by Meta’s device expertise and a USD 100 million Army bid, demonstrate how agile commercial hardware can meet ruggedization specifications at a lower unit cost.
Elbit Systems Ltd. reported USD 1.9 billion in Q1 2025 revenue, driven by AI-enabled optics and a USD 23.1 billion backlog, underscoring the demand for sensor-fusion solutions. Honeywell secured Defense Department funding to transition quantum PNT sensors into soldier kits, positioning itself as the reference supplier for GPS-denied navigation. Meanwhile, niche players such as Kopin dominate micro-display sub-segments with contract wins for low-power OLED panels used in helmet visors.
Strategic differentiation is shifting from raw device durability to ecosystem proficiency, encompassing battery chemistries, secure OS overlays, and ML model retraining pipelines. Vendors that can bundle power, compute, and AI at competitive price points stand to accelerate deal velocity. Conversely, as illustrated by canceled biometric tenders, procurement integrity lapses elevate compliance overhead. Overall, moderate consolidation is expected as primes acquire smaller specialists to fill gaps in energy harvesting, cybersecurity, and AR optics, raising the combined top-five share yet leaving room for disruptive entrants.
Military Wearables Industry Leaders
-
BAE Systems plc
-
Lockheed Martin Corporation
-
Thales Group
-
Rheinmetall AG
-
Saab AB
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- June 2025: Sarcos Robotics received a contract from the US Special Operations Command to deliver a production version of its Guardian XO, a full-body powered robotic exoskeleton.
- May 2025: Meta Platforms Inc. and Anduril Industries Inc. announced a partnership to develop wearable devices for the US military.
Global Military Wearables Market Report Scope
| Headwear |
| Eyewear |
| Wristwear |
| Bodywear |
| Hearables |
| Exoskeletons |
| Communication and Computing |
| Vision and Surveillance |
| Navigation and Positioning |
| Power and Energy Management |
| Protection and Survivability |
| Health and Stress Monitoring |
| Land Forces |
| Airborne Forces |
| Naval Forces |
| Special Operations Force |
| Training and Simulation Units |
| Smart Textiles |
| AR/VR Optics and Waveguides |
| AI-Driven Sensor Fusion |
| Energy Harvesting |
| Wearable Robotics and Actuators |
| Flexible and Transparent Displays |
| North America | United States | |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Europe | United Kingdom | |
| France | ||
| Germany | ||
| Italy | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| South Korea | ||
| Australia | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Rest of South America | ||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | Saudi Arabia |
| United Arab Emirates | ||
| Rest of Middle East | ||
| Africa | South Africa | |
| Rest of Africa | ||
| By Wearable Type | Headwear | ||
| Eyewear | |||
| Wristwear | |||
| Bodywear | |||
| Hearables | |||
| Exoskeletons | |||
| By Application | Communication and Computing | ||
| Vision and Surveillance | |||
| Navigation and Positioning | |||
| Power and Energy Management | |||
| Protection and Survivability | |||
| Health and Stress Monitoring | |||
| By End-User | Land Forces | ||
| Airborne Forces | |||
| Naval Forces | |||
| Special Operations Force | |||
| Training and Simulation Units | |||
| By Core Technology | Smart Textiles | ||
| AR/VR Optics and Waveguides | |||
| AI-Driven Sensor Fusion | |||
| Energy Harvesting | |||
| Wearable Robotics and Actuators | |||
| Flexible and Transparent Displays | |||
| By Geography | North America | United States | |
| Canada | |||
| Mexico | |||
| Europe | United Kingdom | ||
| France | |||
| Germany | |||
| Italy | |||
| Rest of Europe | |||
| Asia-Pacific | China | ||
| India | |||
| Japan | |||
| South Korea | |||
| Australia | |||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |||
| South America | Brazil | ||
| Rest of South America | |||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | Saudi Arabia | |
| United Arab Emirates | |||
| Rest of Middle East | |||
| Africa | South Africa | ||
| Rest of Africa | |||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How large is the military wearables market in 2025?
The military wearables market size is valued at USD 4.71 billion in 2025 and is forecasted to reach USD 6.10 billion by 2030.
Which segment grows fastest through 2030?
Exoskeletons register the highest CAGR at 7.51%, reflecting defense demand for load bearing and injury-reduction systems.
Why is power management receiving more investment?
Battery-energy density breakthroughs and hybrid micro-generators extend mission endurance and unlock real-time data applications, making power management the fastest-growing application at 8.66% CAGR.
Which region expands quickest?
Asia-Pacific posts a 7.90% CAGR as Japan, India, and Australia intensify soldier-modernization spending.
Who are the leading vendors?
Established primes such as Thales Group, Saab AB, Lockheed Martin Corporation, BAE Systems plc, and Rheinmetall AG lead in integrated solutions.
Page last updated on: