Container Monitoring Market Size and Share

Container Monitoring Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Container Monitoring Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The container monitoring market size stands at USD 1.31 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 4.92 billion by 2030, translating into a 30.2% CAGR over the period 2025-2030. Surging enterprise transition to cloud-native architectures, the dominance of Kubernetes, and the rapid infusion of eBPF-enabled observability underpin this acceleration. Enterprises prioritize lightweight, kernel-level visibility that minimizes overhead while expanding telemetry depth, prompting a clear pivot away from agent-heavy tooling. Demand intensifies further as DevOps shift-left practices embed observability earlier in software lifecycles, ensuring performance guardrails before production release. Heightened regulatory expectations for security and audit trails encourage unified platforms that combine performance, compliance, and cost analytics, giving rise to sustained vendor consolidation.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By offerings, software captured 70.3% revenue share of the container monitoring market in 2024, while services are projected to post the fastest 31.5% CAGR through 2030.
  • By deployment, cloud-based models led with a 57.6% share of the container monitoring market in 2024; hybrid configurations are set to log the highest 32.1% CAGR to 2030.
  • By organization size, large enterprises held a 72.5% share of the container monitoring market in 2024, whereas small and medium-sized enterprises are forecast to expand at a 31.9% CAGR over the same period.
  • By container platform, Kubernetes dominated with a 62.8% share of the container monitoring market in 2024; no alternate platform reported a higher growth rate in the available data set.
  • By monitoring mode, host-agent deployments accounted for a 64.7% share of the container monitoring market in 2024, while agentless eBPF monitoring is expected to advance at a 32.0% CAGR through 2030.
  • By cloud type, public cloud workloads represented a 58.7% share of the container monitoring market in 2024; hybrid and multi-cloud environments are on track for the fastest 32.1% CAGR to 2030.
  • By end-user industry, IT and telecom commanded a 32.5% share of the container monitoring market in 2024, but banking, financial services, and insurance are projected to grow the quickest at a 32.6% CAGR through 2030.
  • By geography, North America generated 39.16% revenue share of the container monitoring market in 2024, while Asia-Pacific is poised to record the highest 32.4% CAGR between 2025 and 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Offerings: Services Acceleration Amid Software Dominance

Software platforms accounted for 70.3% of the container monitoring market share in 2024 as enterprises preferred customizable on-premise or SaaS stacks that align with internal workflows. The container monitoring market size for services, however, is projected to expand at a 31.5% CAGR to 2030, reflecting the skills deficit around multi-cloud observability rollouts. Specialized consultancies package eBPF integration, service-mesh tracing, and policy-as-code frameworks into turnkey engagements that shorten time-to-value.

Managed monitoring offerings resonate with SMEs that lack 24×7 SRE coverage, bundling AI-powered alert triage and cost optimization into subscription models. Hyperscale cloud providers expand professional services to secure long-term account stickiness, bundling observability blueprints with broader migration deals. As compliance rules tighten, audit-ready reporting services add incremental demand, ensuring that the container monitoring market continues to balance product revenue with expertise-driven engagements.

Container Monitoring Market: Market Share by Offerings
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

By Deployment: Hybrid Multi-Cloud Momentum

Cloud-first implementations comprised 57.6% of the container monitoring market size in 2024, benefiting from near-zero infrastructure overhead and tight coupling with cloud logs. Hybrid models are pacing a 32.1% CAGR because real-world architectures straddle data centers, public clouds, and edge nodes that must share a single pane of glass. Enterprises require deployment-agnostic agents capable of auto-discovering new nodes and backhauling telemetry through firewalls without manual tuning.

Vendor roadmaps prioritize policy-driven placement that respects data-sovereignty zones while preserving global query capabilities. Edge footprints necessitate streaming-first architectures that buffer metrics locally, then trickle aggregates to central stores during connectivity windows. Such hybrid-aware design cements long-term growth as organizations modernize at uneven velocities across business units.

By Organization Size: SME Democratization Through Managed Services

Large enterprises represented 72.5% of the container monitoring market revenue in 2024, owing to complex estate sizes and stringent governance. Yet SMEs display the steepest 31.9% CAGR as consumption-based pricing and low-touch SaaS onboarding remove cost and complexity barriers. Low-code dashboards, auto-instrumentation, and guided remediation shrink the learning curve for lean DevOps teams.

Vendors embed AI copilots that surface optimization opportunities without requiring deep performance expertise, further lowering entry thresholds. As digital-first startups scale, they adopt enterprise-grade features such as audit logging and anomaly analytics early, expanding average revenue per account. This democratization broadens the container monitoring market beyond Fortune 500 budgets.

Container Monitoring Market: Market Share by Organization Size
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

By Container Platform: Kubernetes Ecosystem Consolidation

Kubernetes held 62.8% of the container monitoring market share in 2024, confirming its status as the orchestration default. The container monitoring market size for alternative platforms lags, yet vendors keep connectors for Docker Swarm, Apache Mesos, and HashiCorp Nomad to accommodate legacy clusters. OpenTelemetry-native collectors stream uniform traces irrespective of runtime, simplifying heterogeneous estates.

Standardization drives down integration friction, funneling R&D toward deeper Kubernetes context, such as node autoscaling events and CRI-O runtime metrics. Operators now manage the full lifecycle of monitoring stacks, automating upgrades and policy propagation. This convergence reinforces Kubernetes as the gravitational center for future observability innovation.

By Monitoring Mode: eBPF Revolution in Observability

Host-agent patterns still generated 64.7% of container monitoring market revenue in 2024 due to entrenched tooling familiarity. However, agentless eBPF telemetry is surging at 32.0% CAGR because it intercepts system calls directly from the Linux kernel without sidecars, minimizing resource drag.

Early adopters report double-digit CPU savings while gaining packet-level visibility previously impossible without kernel modules. Vendors leverage eBPF to merge performance and security analytics, capturing lateral movement attempts alongside latency spikes. Regulatory auditors value immutable kernel probes that cannot be tampered with from user space, enhancing evidentiary integrity.

Container Monitoring Market: Market Share by Monitoring Mode
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Cloud Type: Multi-Cloud Complexity Drives Innovation

Public cloud encompassed 58.7% of workloads under observation in 2024, yet hybrid/multi-cloud combinations are growing fastest given risk diversification and sovereignty concerns. Organizations require cross-provider dashboards that normalize metrics from AWS CloudWatch, Azure Monitor, and Google Cloud operations suite into a single schema.

Open-source adapters translate proprietary event formats, mitigating vendor lock-in. Policy engines then enforce geography-specific retention, ensuring that telemetry generated in France, for instance, never exits EU regions. Edge deployments extend this fabric to industrial gateways, demanding low-footprint collectors capable of intermittent store-and-forward.

By End-User Industry: Financial Services Digital Transformation

IT and telecom retained 32.5% revenue contribution in 2024, reflecting their deep cloud-native lineage. BFSI workloads, however, are forecast to post a 32.6% CAGR through 2030 as banks containerize core payment rails and adopt real-time fraud analytics that require sub-second observability.

Retail uses container monitoring to stabilize holiday traffic surges, while manufacturing infuses predictive maintenance models at the edge. Healthcare prioritizes HIPAA-compliant logging with strict encryption in flight and at rest. Cross-industry commonality emerges around unified dashboards that fuse security, performance, and spend metrics to satisfy board-level governance.

Geography Analysis

North America contributed 39.16% of global revenue in 2024, buoyed by mature DevOps cultures, stringent regulatory mandates, and the headquarters presence of leading vendors. Financial institutions across the United States implement eBPF-powered drift detection to satisfy SOC 2 queries in minutes instead of days. Hyperscale cloud availability zones clustered across the region accelerate the release of preview observability features, creating a virtuous cycle between vendor R&D and sophisticated early-adopter feedback loops.

Asia-Pacific is poised for the fastest 32.4% CAGR, propelled by rapid digitization across India, China, and Southeast Asia. Indian e-pharmacy Tata 1mg achieved 40% cost savings after adopting high-cardinality storage backends that compress time-series metrics without losing granularity. [3]Kloudfuse, “Tata 1mg Achieves 40% Cost Savings with Kloudfuse,” kloudfuse.com Chinese e-commerce giants deploy thousands of microservices per application, forcing next-generation trace analytics that resolve call graphs exceeding a million nodes. Japanese manufacturers integrate container monitoring with MES systems to track factory-floor latency that can impact robotics precision.

Europe records steady uptake underpinned by GDPR-driven observability to prove data-processing minimization. German automotive firms blend Prometheus metrics with CAN bus telemetry to create unified views spanning IT and OT layers. Governments across the region refine AI accountability laws, prompting vendors to expose explainable anomaly detection models that auditors can review. These demands consolidate preference for platforms offering auditable pipelines and long-term immutable storage resident within EU datacenters.

Latin America, and Middle East and Africa form nascent yet accelerating pockets. Cloud region expansions by hyperscale providers shorten telemetry round-trip latency, encouraging regional banks and telcos to adopt managed observability suites. In South Africa, container monitoring underpins nationwide 5G rollouts that require node health analytics across sprawling cell-edge clusters. Collective momentum in emerging markets guarantees that global demand for container monitoring market solutions remains diversified and resilient.

Container Monitoring Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The container monitoring market is moderately consolidated. Datadog’s acquisition of Metaplane injects AI-driven data observability into its platform, SUSE folded StackState into Rancher to unify full-stack monitoring, and DoiT added PerfectScale for autonomous Kubernetes cost optimization. [4]Datadog, “Datadog Acquires Metaplane,” datadoghq.com Incumbents race to integrate eBPF capabilities natively rather than through kernel-module add-ons, seeking performance advantages and security market adjacency.

Startups leverage specialized telemetry compression, graph-based dependency mapping, and AI-copilot incident responders to carve niches before consolidation waves absorb them. OpenTelemetry and Prometheus serve as lingua franca, lowering switching costs and pressuring vendors to compete on analytics depth rather than data collection. Compliance modules that auto-generate SOC 2 or GDPR evidence grow as key differentiators, particularly in heavily regulated verticals. Overall, the market displays healthy competition where innovation cycles outrun lock-in, yet scaling vendors amass funding to drive inorganic expansion.

Container Monitoring Industry Leaders

  1. Datadog, Inc.

  2. Dynatrace, LLC

  3. Splunk Inc.

  4. New Relic, Inc.

  5. Sysdig, Inc.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Broadcom Inc, Splunk Inc, Microsoft Corp, SolarWinds Worldwide LLC, New Relic Inc.
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • July 2025: Fujitsu deployed a store-wide monitoring solution across 500 METRO Inc. Canadian outlets, extending observability from IT infrastructure to point-of-sale transactions.
  • June 2025: Ciroos secured USD 21 million to commercialize an AI SRE teammate that trims incident response time by 90%.
  • June 2025: Cloudflare unveiled Containers in public beta, blending global edge deployment with built-in metrics and logs.
  • May 2025: Microsoft released the OpenTelemetry agent GA and the Aspire dashboard for Azure Container Apps, backed by an AI-powered SRE agent.
  • May 2025: Nutanix introduced Cloud Native AOS to extend its data platform’s disaster-recovery capabilities into Kubernetes clusters.
  • March 2025: OpenTelemetry partners Alibaba, Datadog, and Quesma advanced Go compile-time instrumentation, simplifying developer adoption.
  • February 2025: Hitachi Vantara and Cisco co-engineered an OpenShift-optimized converged stack with AI-powered energy orchestration.
  • February 2025: DoiT acquired PerfectScale to add autonomous Kubernetes optimization into its Cloud Intelligence suite.
  • February 2025: Dynatrace introduced developer-centric observability tooling that embeds code-level insights into IDE workflows.
  • February 2025: Palo Alto Networks launched Cortex Cloud, integrating CNAPP and cloud detection response in a single AI-driven console.

Table of Contents for Container Monitoring Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing adoption of cloud-based services
    • 4.2.2 Proliferation of micro-services architecture
    • 4.2.3 DevOps shift-left culture driving continuous monitoring
    • 4.2.4 Rising compliance and container-security mandates
    • 4.2.5 eBPF-enabled deep, low-overhead observability
    • 4.2.6 FinOps cost-optimization pressures at container level
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Tool-chain complexity and skills gap
    • 4.3.2 Escalating telemetry storage and licensing costs
    • 4.3.3 Shortage of container-observability talent
    • 4.3.4 Data-sovereignty limits on cross-border telemetry flows
  • 4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.8 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUES)

  • 5.1 By Offerings
    • 5.1.1 Software
    • 5.1.2 Services
  • 5.2 By Deployment
    • 5.2.1 Cloud-based
    • 5.2.2 On-premise
    • 5.2.3 Hybrid
  • 5.3 By Organization Size
    • 5.3.1 Large Enterprises
    • 5.3.2 Small and Medium-sized Enterprises
  • 5.4 By Container Platform
    • 5.4.1 Kubernetes
    • 5.4.2 Docker Swarm
    • 5.4.3 Apache Mesos
    • 5.4.4 HashiCorp Nomad
    • 5.4.5 Other Runtimes
  • 5.5 By Monitoring Mode
    • 5.5.1 Host-agent-based
    • 5.5.2 Sidecar/Service-mesh
    • 5.5.3 Agentless/eBPF
  • 5.6 By Cloud Type
    • 5.6.1 Public Cloud
    • 5.6.2 Private Cloud
    • 5.6.3 Hybrid Multi-cloud
  • 5.7 By End-user Industry
    • 5.7.1 IT and Telecom
    • 5.7.2 BFSI
    • 5.7.3 Retail and E-commerce
    • 5.7.4 Manufacturing and Industrial
    • 5.7.5 Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • 5.7.6 Other End-user Industries
  • 5.8 By Geography
    • 5.8.1 North America
    • 5.8.1.1 United States
    • 5.8.1.2 Canada
    • 5.8.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.8.2 South America
    • 5.8.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.8.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.8.2.3 Chile
    • 5.8.2.4 Rest of South America
    • 5.8.3 Europe
    • 5.8.3.1 Germany
    • 5.8.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.8.3.3 France
    • 5.8.3.4 Italy
    • 5.8.3.5 Spain
    • 5.8.3.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.8.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.8.4.1 China
    • 5.8.4.2 India
    • 5.8.4.3 Japan
    • 5.8.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.8.4.5 Malaysia
    • 5.8.4.6 Singapore
    • 5.8.4.7 Australia
    • 5.8.4.8 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.8.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.8.5.1 Middle East
    • 5.8.5.1.1 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.8.5.1.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.8.5.1.3 Turkey
    • 5.8.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.8.5.2 Africa
    • 5.8.5.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.8.5.2.2 Nigeria
    • 5.8.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Datadog, Inc.
    • 6.4.2 Dynatrace, LLC
    • 6.4.3 Splunk Inc.
    • 6.4.4 New Relic, Inc.
    • 6.4.5 Sysdig, Inc.
    • 6.4.6 SolarWinds Worldwide, LLC
    • 6.4.7 Broadcom Inc. (CA APM)
    • 6.4.8 AppDynamics LLC
    • 6.4.9 ScienceLogic, Inc.
    • 6.4.10 LogicMonitor, Inc.
    • 6.4.11 Grafana Labs, Inc.
    • 6.4.12 Red Hat, Inc.
    • 6.4.13 Instana Inc.
    • 6.4.14 ManageEngine (Zoho Corp. Pvt Ltd.)
    • 6.4.15 Zabbix LLC
    • 6.4.16 Checkmk GmbH
    • 6.4.17 OpsRamp, Inc.
    • 6.4.18 Netdata Inc.
    • 6.4.19 StackState B.V.
    • 6.4.20 Fairwinds Ops, Inc.
    • 6.4.21 Elastic N.V.
    • 6.4.22 Zenoss, Inc.

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and unmet-need assessment
*List of vendors is dynamic and will be updated based on the customized study scope

Global Container Monitoring Market Report Scope

Container monitoring is the activity of monitoring the performance of microservice containers in different environments for optimizing and improving its performance. Container monitoring is an important capability required for applications that are built on modern microservices architectures to ensure optimal performance. It gives IT teams a quick overview to rapidly develop and deploy applications using DevOps principles. Containers are transient and are critical to monitor as compared to traditional applications running on virtual servers or bare metal servers. 

By Offerings
Software
Services
By Deployment
Cloud-based
On-premise
Hybrid
By Organization Size
Large Enterprises
Small and Medium-sized Enterprises
By Container Platform
Kubernetes
Docker Swarm
Apache Mesos
HashiCorp Nomad
Other Runtimes
By Monitoring Mode
Host-agent-based
Sidecar/Service-mesh
Agentless/eBPF
By Cloud Type
Public Cloud
Private Cloud
Hybrid Multi-cloud
By End-user Industry
IT and Telecom
BFSI
Retail and E-commerce
Manufacturing and Industrial
Healthcare and Life Sciences
Other End-user Industries
By Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
South America Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Rest of South America
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
India
Japan
South Korea
Malaysia
Singapore
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa Middle East United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
Rest of Middle East
Africa South Africa
Nigeria
Rest of Africa
By Offerings Software
Services
By Deployment Cloud-based
On-premise
Hybrid
By Organization Size Large Enterprises
Small and Medium-sized Enterprises
By Container Platform Kubernetes
Docker Swarm
Apache Mesos
HashiCorp Nomad
Other Runtimes
By Monitoring Mode Host-agent-based
Sidecar/Service-mesh
Agentless/eBPF
By Cloud Type Public Cloud
Private Cloud
Hybrid Multi-cloud
By End-user Industry IT and Telecom
BFSI
Retail and E-commerce
Manufacturing and Industrial
Healthcare and Life Sciences
Other End-user Industries
By Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
South America Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Rest of South America
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
India
Japan
South Korea
Malaysia
Singapore
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa Middle East United Arab Emirates
Saudi Arabia
Turkey
Rest of Middle East
Africa South Africa
Nigeria
Rest of Africa

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How large is the container monitoring market in 2025?

The container monitoring market size is USD 1.31 billion in 2025.

What CAGR is expected for container monitoring solutions through 2030?

The market is projected to post a robust 30.2% CAGR from 2025 to 2030.

Which region will grow the fastest in container observability spending?

Asia-Pacific is forecast to expand at a 32.4% CAGR, the highest globally.

Why are services growing faster than software in container monitoring?

Enterprises need specialized expertise for multi-cloud observability, driving services to a 31.5% CAGR.

What technology trend is disrupting traditional agent-based monitoring?

EBPF-based agentless monitoring is rising at a 32.0% CAGR because it offers deep kernel visibility with minimal overhead.

Which industry vertical will register the quickest adoption?

Banking, financial services, and insurance workloads will grow at a 32.6% CAGR as regulatory and digital demands converge.

Page last updated on:

Container Monitoring Report Snapshots