Bioenergy Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends And Forecast (2025 - 2030)

Global Bioenergy Market Trends and Insights

Net-zero targets & renewable-energy mandates

Mandatory carbon-neutrality trajectories now cover more than 80% of global GDP, with the EU’s 90% net-emissions-reduction goal for 2040, the US Inflation Reduction Act’s funding tranches for advanced fuels, and India’s 20% ethanol blending target converging to lift long-term demand. Broad-based mandates extend to ReFuelEU’s 70% sustainable aviation fuel requirement by 2050 and the UK’s 2% sustainable aviation fuel obligation from 2025. The resulting multi-sector pull allows the bioenergy market to tap into electricity, heating, and transport segments simultaneously. Strong offtake visibility enables developers to structure 15- to 20-year contracts and improve debt tenors. The cross-industry appeal remains a clear competitive edge where intermittent renewable sources struggle to shoulder firm-capacity obligations.^{[1]European Commission, “Proposal for a 2040 Climate Target,” ec.europa.eu}

Abundant low-cost agricultural & forestry residues

The US Department of Energy’s latest Billion-Ton Report shows that sustainable feedstock potential exceeds 1 billion t annually, dwarfing current consumption. India alone produces 180 million t of residues each year, with projected feedstock demand growth of 50% by 2030.^{[2]International Energy Agency, “World Energy Outlook 2024,” iea.org} Evolving geopolitics underline resource-risk asymmetry: Europe’s wood-chip supply tightened after sanctions on Russian and Belarusian products, sending benchmark prices to multi-year highs. Consequently, proximity between feedstock clusters and processing hubs now dictates a meaningful share of total project cost. Companies licensing next-generation preprocessing systems to convert corn stover, rice straw, and palm residues into drop-in fuels illustrate how logistics‐driven value creation often outranks absolute resource abundance.

Technology-driven LCOE decline for advanced bioenergy

Hybrid solar-assisted pyrolysis reduces bio-oil production costs to EUR 18.68 per GJ and increases carbon efficiency to 90.7%, underscoring substantial cost savings compared to conventional thermal treatment. Direct biomass gasification plants reach 62% energy efficiency and outperform indirect bio-oil routes by 9 percentage points. Chemical-looping reforming increases hydrogen yields while reducing CO₂ intensity, and an optimized three-reactor configuration enables negative emissions profiles without compromising throughput. Such performance gains drop the bioenergy market’s mid-scale LCOE below combined-cycle natural-gas peaker tariffs in select regions. Technology convergence also supports modular deployment, enabling smaller developers to close funding rounds that were previously only accessible to utility-scale sponsors.

BECCS incentives & negative-emissions revenue streams

Formal recognition of greenhouse-gas removals reshapes the revenue stack. The UK is integrating BECCS credits into its domestic emissions-trading system, guaranteeing an offtake floor price for captured carbon. Corporate buyers such as Microsoft have signed multi-year removal contracts that now account for the bulk of verified BECCS credit sales in Scandinavia. A single BECCS-enabled plant is poised to remove up to 8 million t CO₂ annually while supplying baseload power. With the International Energy Agency estimating a requirement of 190 million t CO₂ removals by 2030 versus fewer than 2 million t today, early movers can lock in premium pricing and scale advantages.

High capital intensity & financing hurdles

A single advanced biorefinery can require more than USD 2 billion in equity and debt, making pre-FID capital stacking a multiyear process. Although long-term offtake agreements mitigate merchant-price risks, nascent credit-enhancement frameworks in many developing economies still restrict local-currency debt. Investment costs for combined heat-and-power biomass plants range between EUR 3,410 and EUR 5,970 per kW, significantly higher than those for gas-fired alternatives. Therefore, sponsors increasingly syndicate risk through joint ventures with utilities, EPCs, and feedstock aggregators. Large corporates now anchor equity rounds, but smaller developers continue to face sizable hurdles, especially when carbon-credit revenue is not yet bankable.

Fragmented feedstock logistics & costs

Solid biomass accounts for up to 50% of the delivered energy cost in distributed projects. Seasonality, competing industrial uses, and evolving trade flows alter supply security. Sanctions-driven wood-chip shortages in Northern Europe illustrate how geopolitics can disrupt cost projections within quarters. Transport premiums for low-density residues can add USD 15-25 per t when delivery radii exceed 70 km, eroding margins for mid-scale power plants. Co-location near existing refineries and ports, investment in pelletization hubs, and vertically integrated sourcing models emerge as the favored mitigation pathways. However, the fragmented nature of agricultural residues in Asia and Africa still leaves smaller players exposed to volumetric and price volatility.^{[3]Cluster Collaboration, “Investment Cost Estimates for Biomass CHP,” clustercollaboration.eu}

Segment Analysis

By Type: Solid Biomass Leads, but Biogas Is Catching Up

Solid biomass still does most of the heavy lifting, supplying 67.8% of global bioenergy in 2024 thanks to decades of investments in pellet mills, residue-handling equipment, and dependable combustion plants. A mature supply chain—from forestry by-products to purpose-grown crops—keeps fuel flowing in every major region. Yet the fastest mover right now is biogas. Backed by better anaerobic-digestion technology and tough new waste-recycling rules, biogas output is set to grow 10.5% a year through 2030. Germany’s latest biomass program even singles out flexible biogas units so they can keep supporting the grid once their first subsidies expire. Municipal solid-waste gasification and landfill-gas capture add more momentum, while early-stage options—such as algae fuels—remain in the lab for now. Together, these shifts show the market tilting from simple burn-and-boil systems toward cleaner, higher-value processes that squeeze more out of every ton of organic material.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Feedstock: Forestry Waste Still Rules, but Farm Residues Are Rising Fast

Wood chips and sawmill scraps dominate feedstock supply, giving forestry residues a 40.1% share in 2024. Long-standing harvest routines and pellet logistics make this stream reliable and price-competitive. Farm residues, however, are gaining ground the quickest, expanding at an annual rate of 8.8% as policies favor turning crop waste into energy rather than leaving it to rot or burn in the field.^{[4]U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Crop Residue Availability for Bioenergy,” usda.gov} The U.S. Billion-Ton Report points to more than 1 billion tons of untapped biomass—much of it corn stalks, wheat straw, and rice husks—waiting to be collected. Dedicated energy crops and sorted municipal waste add diversity, though Europe’s recent wood-chip shortage shows how geopolitics can rattle even well-established supply chains. That reality is pushing producers toward stricter certification and full traceability so buyers can trust both the origin and the sustainability of every load.

By Technology: Combustion Is Big, Anaerobic Digestion Is Booming

Traditional boilers still account for 85.5% of installed capacity because they are simple, proven, and quick to hook up to existing power or heat networks. But anaerobic digestion—the process behind most biogas plants—is growing at 12.2% a year. It turns household scraps, farm manure, and other organic waste into energy while also producing a fertilizer-rich digestate, giving operators two revenue lines instead of one. Gasification, fast pyrolysis, and fermentation are carving out niches in advanced fuels and chemicals, helped by breakthroughs like solar-assisted pyrolysis that cuts bio-oil costs below EUR 19 per gigajoule.^{[5]Rui Li et al., “Solar-Driven Biomass Pyrolysis with 90.7 % Carbon Efficiency,” Royal Society of Chemistry, rsc.org} The overall trend is clear: newer technologies aim to deliver more flexible products and stronger environmental performance than straight combustion plants ever could.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Application: Heat Still Dominates, but Fuel Demand Is Surging

Supplying industrial and district heat remains bioenergy’s largest job, accounting for 58.3% of use in 2024. Many factories and city heating grids simply swap coal or oil burners for biomass and keep running with minimal fuss, an attractive option in regions with pricey fossil gas or high carbon fees. The headline growth, though, is in transportation fuels. Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and renewable diesel are on track to grow nearly 10% a year, spurred by airline and trucking mandates plus premium prices for low-carbon fuels. Electricity generation still commands a sizable slice, while combined-heat-and-power plants squeeze up to 90% total efficiency by recycling waste heat—an appealing proposition for energy-hungry industries.

By End User: Utilities on Top, Commercial Buyers Gaining Pace

Electric utilities took 44.7% of bioenergy in 2024, mainly through co-firing and dedicated biomass plants that help them hit renewable-portfolio targets without sacrificing grid stability. Corporate and industrial users are the fastest-growing customer base, expanding 9.1% a year as carbon prices climb and firms chase net-zero pledges. Pellet stoves are spreading in rural homes short on natural-gas access, while transport operators, from airlines to city bus fleets, are locking in long-term biofuel contracts; Southwest Airlines’ 20-year deal with USA BioEnergy is a recent example.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Geography Analysis

The Asia-Pacific region not only holds the largest regional share of 43.5% in 2024, but is also the fastest-growing, at a rate of 6.1% per year. India plans to triple biofuel use by the mid-2020s, backed by a vast pool of crop residues and clear government targets. China is rolling out full-suite biomass projects covering power, gas, and liquid fuels.^{[6]International Energy Agency, “Bioenergy Developments in Asia-Pacific,” iea.org} Japan and South Korea rely more heavily on imports and advanced technologies, whereas Southeast Asia utilizes palm and rice waste for both domestic use and exports. The common thread is energy security: turning local waste into local energy while reducing the oil import bill.

Europe maintained a commanding 30% share of the bioenergy market in 2024, thanks to a decades-long alignment between climate ambition, feed-in tariffs, and sustainability criteria. Germany’s new biomass package, France’s capacity auctions, and the Netherlands’ incoming BECCS subsidy exemplify cohesive policy frameworks that maintain investment momentum. Yet growth is moderating as land-use constraints take effect, wood-chip imports become more stringent, and competing ecological priorities challenge further large-scale forest harvesting. Market participants, therefore, pivot toward higher-value niches, including negative-emission power and industrial heat projects that optimize limited feedstock through high-efficiency conversion systems.

North America holds third place in terms of capacity, yet leads in advanced biofuel innovation. The United States accounts for the lion’s share of global ethanol and renewable-diesel volumes, leveraging its corn and soy supply chains alongside federal production and blending credits. A growing pipeline of SAF projects positions the country to remain at the forefront of aviation-fuel decarbonization. Canada leverages vast forestry resources and provincial clean-fuel standards to attract large-scale gasification and RNG facilities, often in partnership with First Nations. Mexico’s emerging mandates create opportunities for retrofitting sugarcane mills with bagasse cogeneration, although policy clarity will determine near-term pace.