Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Market Size and Share

Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Market (2026 - 2031)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Market size is estimated at USD 8.01 billion in 2026, and is expected to reach USD 11.96 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 8.34% during the forecast period (2026-2031). Rapid industrial growth in the Asia–Pacific, semiconductor water-reuse targets in East Asia, and upstream produced-water directives in the Middle East are amplifying demand, while hybrid membrane-thermal configurations are emerging as the preferred architecture where electricity costs are high. Competitive dynamics remain fluid: the top five vendors hold about 45 % share, yet no single supplier exceeds 15 %, creating scope for regional specialists that offer modular, rapid-deployment packages. At the same time, digital twins and remote monitoring are lowering the operations-and-maintenance expertise threshold, reducing downtime and improving levelized water costs. Although high capital outlay and energy use still restrain adoption—pushing levelized water costs above USD 5 per cubic meter in thermal-heavy plants—declining renewable-electricity prices are narrowing the gap with conventional treatment-plus-discharge. 

Key Report Takeaways

  • By technology, thermal-based systems led with 63.24 % revenue share in 2025; membrane-based configurations are forecast to expand at a 9.12 % CAGR through 2031
  • By process phase, evaporation and crystallization accounted for a 49.48 % share of the Zero Liquid Discharge systems market size in 2025, while pretreatment is advancing at a 9.35 % CAGR to 2031
  • By end-user industry, power generation held 37.89 % of the Zero Liquid Discharge systems market share in 2025, and it also records the highest projected CAGR at 9.42 % through 2031
  • By geography, Asia–Pacific commanded 32.67 % revenue share in 2025 and is set to grow at a 9.69 % CAGR to 2031

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Technology: Hybrid Designs Erode Thermal Dominance

Thermal-based units retained 63.24 % of the Zero Liquid Discharge systems market share in 2025 because multi-effect evaporators handle brines above 100 000 mg L-1 without membrane fouling. Waste-heat integration in power and petrochemical complexes further improves economics, anchoring continued demand. Nonetheless, membrane-centric packages are advancing at a 9.12 % CAGR through 2031 as electricity costs rise and renewable power becomes abundant. Reverse osmosis coupled with forward osmosis or electrodialysis concentrates brine to 150 000 mg L-1 at just 30–40 kWh/m3, half that of conventional thermal routes. DuPont’s 2025 high-rejection RO element extends lifespan to seven years in Chinese dye-house pilots, lowering replacement cost and reinforcing the shift toward membranes. Hybrid RO-plus-crystallizer plants now dominate greenfield bids, offering lower levelized water costs and design flexibility, a trend that underpins growth in the Zero Liquid Discharge systems market across high-electricity regions. 

Second-order impacts are equally material. Membrane adoption reduces steam-cycle complexity, enabling containerized and skid-mounted footprints that accelerate deployment in upstream oilfields. Vendors that integrate digital monitoring—predicting fouling and optimizing cleaning—are differentiating offerings without cutting prices, a strategy that shields margins even as membrane costs fall. Collectively, these factors point to a gradual but meaningful rebalancing of the Zero Liquid Discharge systems market size in favor of membrane-dominant configurations over the forecast horizon. 

Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Market: Market Share by Technology
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Process Phase: Pretreatment Surges Amid Fouling Concerns

Evaporation and crystallization consumed 49.48 % of the Zero Liquid Discharge systems market size in 2025 because they embody the capital-heavy end stage that converts concentrated brine into solids. Yet pretreatment spending is growing 9.35 % annually, reflecting recognition that upstream fouling control governs downstream uptime and energy demand. Plants are deploying antiscalants, multimedia filtration, and ion-exchange polishing to shield RO membranes and heat-exchanger surfaces from calcium sulfate, silica, and organics. Brine-concentration steps—RO and electrodialysis—are expanding in tandem, minimizing the flow that reaches thermal units and thus trimming energy costs. Innovation is moving into solids handling: Saltworks Technologies launched eutectic freeze crystallization in 2025, enabling saleable sodium chloride and sulfate streams while slashing landfill fees. As operators chase value recovery and circular-economy goals, comprehensive lifecycle calculations increasingly favor investments beyond the traditional evaporator-focused core, a dynamic that broadens the addressable Zero Liquid Discharge systems market. 

Upfront pretreatment also accelerates plant commissioning by standardizing feedwater quality, making modular plants feasible for small and medium users. Vendors that bundle chemical dosing, rapid media exchange, and cloud diagnostics are shortening payback periods, tilting procurement specifications toward integrated platforms. These shifts underscore why pretreatment now stands out as the fastest-growing internal segment of the Zero Liquid Discharge systems market. 

By End-User Industry: Power Generation Leads but Pharmaceuticals Accelerate

Power generation captured 37.89 % of the Zero Liquid Discharge systems market share in 2025 and continues to top growth tables with a 9.42 % CAGR as India, China, and Indonesia build coal and combined-cycle stations under water-scarcity constraints. Integrated ZLD sidesteps retrofit headaches and secures water permits, making it standard in new projects. In oil and gas, modular systems shrink trucking mileage for produced water, aligning with carbon-reduction goals and lowering disposal fees. Chemicals and petrochemicals face converging EU REACH rules and Chinese park consolidation that embed ZLD within environmental risk management. Mining firms deploy ZLD to mitigate acid-mine drainage; BHP’s Escondida retrofit in 2025 eliminated 1.2 million m³/year of pond discharge, supporting community relations. 

Pharmaceutical producers, a minor slice today, are scaling fastest after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration tightened effluent limits for endocrine disruptors in 2025, compelling active-drug separation before discharge. ZLD satisfies both compliance and corporate ESG targets, especially where plants rely on scarce municipal supplies. Food and beverage, along with pulp-and-paper operators, are piloting containerized units as water tariffs climb. This diversification reduces concentration risk and expands the Zero Liquid Discharge systems market size across a broader client base than a decade ago. 

Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Market: Market Share by End-user Industry
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific commanded 32.67 % of global revenue in 2025 and is forecast to grow at a 9.69 % CAGR through 2031, underpinned by stringent basin-wide discharge bans in China’s Yellow River corridor and India’s multi-river clean-up mission. China shut 23 non-compliant chemical plants in 2025, triggering retrofit orders across Shanxi and Inner Mongolia. India’s extension of ZLD mandates to facilities within 10 km of major rivers affects more than 4,200 plants, propelling domestic EPC order books. Japan and South Korea subsidize fab-level water reuse; Japan set aside USD 120 million in 2025 to reach 95 % reuse by 2030, accelerating procurement of high-purity ZLD modules. ASEAN incentives, such as Vietnam’s 2 percentage-point corporate-tax discount for zero-discharge sites, extend growth to export-oriented clusters. 

North America retains a large installed base owing to shale-gas water reuse and California’s 80 % industrial-recycle mandate. Chevron recycled 78 % of Permian produced water in 2025 and targets 90 % by 2028 via ZLD pilots. California broadened recycled-water requirements to refineries and chemical plants in 2025, driving EPC backlog. Canada trials ZLD in oil-sands tailings ponds to shorten reclamation timelines. Mexico raised industrial water tariffs 35 % in 2024, tipping brewery and auto-plant economics toward closed-loop recovery. Robust capital markets and mature EPC capacity accelerate deployment across the continent. 

Europe’s uptake hinges on the Industrial Emissions Directive and local abstraction caps. Germany’s Rhine-Main chemical complex leads retrofits, while France’s variable salinity levy nudges inland firms toward ZLD. The UK tightened permits for coastal desalination concentrator brines in 2025, demanding either dilution or ZLD to protect marine ecosystems. Italy designated 12 zero-discharge industrial zones in the Po basin in mid-2025, giving incentives for textiles and ceramics P. South America concentrates activity in Brazil’s São Francisco basin, where 18 mines added ZLD in 2025 to secure licenses. In the Middle East and Africa, Saudi Arabia and the UAE drive demand through produced-water mandates, while South African mines deploy ZLD to manage acid-mine drainage despite high electricity tariffs. 

Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The Zero Liquid Discharge systems market is moderately fragmented. Competition revolves around three axes. First, energy efficiency: vendors that leverage mechanical vapor recompression or integrate waste-heat recovery offer 25–40 % lower operating costs, capturing premium margins. Second, modularization: skid-mounted units sized 250–750 m³/day allow rapid field deployment in oilfields and small chemical parks, an arena where Praj Industries and Saltworks Technologies excel through containerized designs financed on a water-as-a-service model. Third, digital integration: Siemens’ May 2025 AI-driven brine optimizer trims antiscalant use by 18 % and extends membrane life, differentiating bids even when capex is higher. Longer term, digital twins and outcome-based contracts (volume-of-water-recovered pricing) may shift risk from owners to suppliers, boosting recurring revenue. Vendors expanding service portfolios position themselves to capture annuity streams while intensifying customer lock-in. Consequently, although consolidation has inched upward, competitive intensity remains high and innovation pipelines robust. 

Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Industry Leaders

  1. Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies

  2. GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft

  3. Aquatech

  4. ALFA LAVAL

  5. Xylem

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Market - Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • January 2026: Veolia Water Technologies won a USD 95 million EPC-O contract for a 3,500 m³/day ZLD plant at a petrochemical complex in Jubail, Saudi Arabia, integrating RO, mechanical vapor recompression, and crystallization with 98 % water-recovery targets.
  • November 2025: Thermax Limited formed a joint venture with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries to co-develop modular ZLD units for ASEAN textile and food-processing plants; the first 500 m³/day pilot launched in Ho Chi Minh City in Dec 2025.
  • September 2025: Aquatech International completed a USD 72 million ZLD retrofit at a coal-fired station in Gujarat, India, reducing freshwater withdrawal by 1.5 million m³ /year through 95 % water recovery and salt crystallization.

Table of Contents for Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing demand for freshwater in water-stressed regions
    • 4.2.2 Semiconductor-grade brine-treat recycling targets
    • 4.2.3 Upstream produced-water reuse mandates in the Middle East
    • 4.2.4 Tightening zero-effluent regulations in OECD and BRICS
    • 4.2.5 Expansion of water-intensive process industries (textile, chemicals, power)
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High CAPEX and energy intensity of ZLD configurations
    • 4.3.2 Scarcity of skilled operations and maintenance personnel
    • 4.3.3 Limited fiscal incentives for water-circularity projects
  • 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Porter’s Five Forces
    • 4.5.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.5.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.5.5 Degree of Competition

5. Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Technology
    • 5.1.1 Thermal-based
    • 5.1.2 Membrane-based
  • 5.2 By Process Phase
    • 5.2.1 Pretreatment
    • 5.2.2 Brine Concentration
    • 5.2.3 Evaporation and Crystallization
    • 5.2.4 Solids Handling and Disposal
  • 5.3 By End-user Industry
    • 5.3.1 Power Generation
    • 5.3.2 Oil and Gas
    • 5.3.3 Chemicals and Petrochemicals
    • 5.3.4 Metallurgy and Mining
    • 5.3.5 Pharmaceuticals
    • 5.3.6 Other End-user Industries
  • 5.4 By Geography
    • 5.4.1 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.1.1 China
    • 5.4.1.2 India
    • 5.4.1.3 Japan
    • 5.4.1.4 South Korea
    • 5.4.1.5 ASEAN
    • 5.4.1.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.2 North America
    • 5.4.2.1 United States
    • 5.4.2.2 Canada
    • 5.4.2.3 Mexico
    • 5.4.3 Europe
    • 5.4.3.1 Germany
    • 5.4.3.2 France
    • 5.4.3.3 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.3.4 Italy
    • 5.4.3.5 Rest of Europe
    • 5.4.4 South America
    • 5.4.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.4.5 Middle-East and Africa
    • 5.4.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.4.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share/Ranking Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 ALFA LAVAL
    • 6.4.2 Aquarion AG
    • 6.4.3 Aquatech
    • 6.4.4 Doosan Corporation
    • 6.4.5 Dow
    • 6.4.6 GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft
    • 6.4.7 H2O GmbH
    • 6.4.8 Hydranautics (A Nitto Group Company)
    • 6.4.9 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
    • 6.4.10 Praj Industries
    • 6.4.11 SafBon Water Technology
    • 6.4.12 Saltworks Technologies Inc.
    • 6.4.13 Siemens
    • 6.4.14 Thermax Limited
    • 6.4.15 Toshiba Water Solutions Private Limited
    • 6.4.16 Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies
    • 6.4.17 Xylem

7. Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-need Assessment
  • 7.2 Increased Investments in the Deployment of ZLD Systems
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the zero-liquid-discharge (ZLD) systems market as the revenue generated from complete, factory-built or field-assembled installations whose integrated pretreatment, concentration, and crystallization steps yield a solid residue and recyclable water stream that meets prevailing discharge norms. Associated engineering, commissioning, and aftermarket services tied directly to a specific ZLD unit fall inside the scope.

Scope exclusion: modular skid packages sold only for reverse-osmosis brine concentration without a crystallizer are left out.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Technology
    • Thermal-based
    • Membrane-based
  • By Process Phase
    • Pretreatment
    • Brine Concentration
    • Evaporation and Crystallization
    • Solids Handling and Disposal
  • By End-user Industry
    • Power Generation
    • Oil and Gas
    • Chemicals and Petrochemicals
    • Metallurgy and Mining
    • Pharmaceuticals
    • Other End-user Industries
  • By Geography
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • ASEAN
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • France
      • United Kingdom
      • Italy
      • Rest of Europe
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle-East and Africa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle-East and Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Analysts spoke with plant engineers in power, chemicals, and textiles; EPC contractors that integrate ZLD trains; and regional regulators across North America, India, China, and the GCC. These dialogues verified typical capacity brackets, energy consumption benchmarks, and upcoming policy triggers, while also stress-testing pricing curves derived from desk work.

Desk Research

We first gathered foundational figures on industrial water withdrawal, power capacity additions, and effluent norms from tier-1 public sources such as the US EPA, India's Central Pollution Control Board, Eurostat Water Statistics, and UN Water. Trade association white papers from the International Desalination Association, American Chemistry Council, and World Steel Association supplied technology penetration and plant-level water intensity ratios. Company filings, investor decks, and reputable business media captured order backlogs and average selling prices. Subscription platforms, notably Dow Jones Factiva for deal flows and D&B Hoovers for vendor financials, enriched firm-side data. The sources cited above are illustrative; many additional references were consulted during validation.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down construct starts with industrial wastewater volumes by sector and region, applies mandated or voluntary ZLD penetration rates, and multiplies by weighted capital cost per cubic meter per day capacity. Select bottom-up checks, supplier order books, channel interviews, and sampled ASP × volume for large projects refine totals. Key variables modeled include new coal and gas power capacity (GW), high-TDS chemical output (million tons), regional water-scarcity indices, average capital cost per m³/day, and grid electricity price trends influencing thermal versus membrane mix. Multivariate regression links these drivers to historical install revenue and projects through 2030; scenario analysis tests policy acceleration and energy price shocks. Gaps in bottom-up data, especially for privately financed plants, are bridged using regional analogs endorsed by interviewed experts.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass variance checks against independent water reuse ratios and vendor shipment logs. Senior analysts review anomalies, re-engage sources if deviations exceed preset bands, and approve only convergent ranges. Reports refresh each year, with interim updates triggered by large regulatory moves or megaproject awards.

Why Our Zero Liquid Discharge Systems Baseline Earns Stakeholder Trust

Published estimates often diverge because firms slice the wastewater universe differently, choose unique price decks, or refresh at uneven intervals.

Key gap drivers in this field include whether pharmaceutical and mining users are counted, how hybrid-system learning curves temper capital costs, and the cadence at which currency conversions and inflation resets are applied. Mordor's disciplined scope, variable selection, and annual refresh cadence minimize these skews, giving decision-makers a stable anchor.

Benchmark comparison

Market SizeAnonymized sourcePrimary gap driver
USD 7.98 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence
USD 7.80 B (2024) Global Consultancy AExcludes pharma and mining segments; regional split limited to three super-regions; update cycle every three years
USD 7.06 B (2025) Industry Journal BUses install count × average cost only for thermal systems; keeps currency at 2020 rates
USD 9.03 B (2025) Regional Consultancy CAdds ancillary O&M services; assumes fast hybrid uptake without policy cross-check; single-scenario CAGR

The comparison shows that when scope is either narrower or inflated with peripheral revenue, totals swing markedly. By anchoring calculations to clearly documented wastewater volumes, verified penetration ratios, and live price points, Mordor Intelligence delivers a balanced, transparent baseline clients can reproduce and defend.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the projected value of the Zero Liquid Discharge systems market in 2031?

The market is projected to reach USD 11.96 billion by 2031, expanding at an 8.34% CAGR.

Which segment currently holds the largest Zero Liquid Discharge systems market share?

Thermal-based technology led with a 63.24 % share in 2025.

Why is Asia–Pacific the fastest-growing region for Zero Liquid Discharge deployment?

Regulatory discharge bans and rapid industrialization drive a 9.69% regional CAGR.

How are semiconductor companies influencing Zero Liquid Discharge adoption?

Fab operators in Taiwan, South Korea, and the United States are targeting 98 % water reuse, embedding ZLD into permitting.

What is the main restraint limiting Zero Liquid Discharge uptake?

High capital and energy costs push levelized water prices above USD 5/ m3 in thermal-heavy plants.

Which technology trend is lowering operational barriers for Zero Liquid Discharge owners?

Digital twins and AI-driven control systems reduce skilled-labor requirements and cut downtime.

Page last updated on:

Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) Systems Market Report Snapshots