Floating Offshore Wind Power Market Size and Share

Floating Offshore Wind Power Market (2026 - 2031)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Floating Offshore Wind Power Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Floating Offshore Wind Power Market size in terms of installed base is expected to grow from 0.54 gigawatt in 2026 to 4.13 gigawatt by 2031, at a CAGR of 50.08% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

This growth comes from the transition into deep-water zones that hold roughly 80% of global offshore wind potential and from continuous turbine upsizing that lowers the levelized cost of energy. Transitional depths of 30-60 m still dominate installations, yet ultra-deep sites beyond 60 m are accelerating as regulators unlock leases off California, Japan, and South Korea. Semi-submersible platforms maintain the lead because they suit modular fabrication, while Spar-buoy concepts advance quickly as Asian yards perfect steel-intensive hulls for typhoon conditions. Reforms to contracts for difference (CfDs) in the United Kingdom and France increase bankability, and national hydrogen roadmaps enhance revenue certainty by pairing electricity sales with green-hydrogen offtake. At the same time, shortages of installation vessels and dynamic-cable reliability issues pressure near-term schedules and margins.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By water depth, Transitional depths captured 54.1% revenue share in 2025; Deep-water zones above 60 m are forecasted to have a 58.2% CAGR through 2031.
  • By platform type, semi-submersibles held 55.8% of the Floating Offshore Wind Power market share in 2025, while Spar-buoy designs are pacing at a 55.3% CAGR to 2031.
  • By turbine class, 5-10 MW machines accounted for 52.9% of the Floating Offshore Wind Power market size in 2025; units above 15 MW are advancing at a 56.1% CAGR through 2031.
  • By the application stage, pre-commercial pilots dominated 65.3% of capacity in 2025, whereas commercial utility-scale arrays are poised for a 61.5% CAGR to 2031.
  • By geography, Europe retained 53.6% capacity in 2025; Asia-Pacific is the fastest region, tracking a 53.3% CAGR toward 2031.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Water Depth: Deep Zones Redefine Lease Economics

Transitional depths of 30-60 m represented 54.1% of global installations in 2025, largely around the North Sea, where hybrid gravity anchors lower mooring costs. Deep-water sites beyond 60 m are on pace for a 58.2% CAGR, unlocking the vast technical potential off California, Japan, and Norway. The Floating Offshore Wind Power market size for the Deep segment is projected to reach 2,900 MW by 2031. California’s Morro Bay area highlights the economics: suction anchors rated for 1,000-m depths lift capital expense to USD 4.1 million per MW, yet access to 25 GW of wind resource offsets that premium. Japan’s Goto leases and South Korea’s Ulsan sites confirm similar depth-driven economics.

Shallow settings under 30 m captured only demonstration activity. Several European pilots used benign waters to test platform behavior before scaling to harsher seas. Meanwhile, Deep-water adoption relies on mooring innovation such as Vryhof’s STEVMANTA suction anchor, which reduces anchor count from four to three and slashes installation time by 25%.

Floating Offshore Wind Power Market: Market Share by Water Depth
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Floating Platform Type: Semi-Submersibles Dominate, Spar-Buoys Rise

Semi-submersibles contributed 55.8% of 2025 capacity, thanks to modular fabrication and compatibility with 15-20 MW turbines. Principle Power’s WindFloat platform can be towed out from quays with only a 4 m draft and then ballasted in place.[3]Principle Power, “WindFloat Atlantic Performance Update 2025,” principlepower.com Spar-buoys show the fastest ascent with a 55.3% CAGR as Asian yards employ high-volume steel roll-forming and demonstrate remarkable pitch stability in typhoon seas. The Floating Offshore Wind Power market share of Spar-buoys is therefore set to expand sharply through 2031.

Tension-leg platforms hold a niche 12% share, appearing where firm seabed clay enables vertical tethers that minimize heave. Hybrid barge ideas like BW Ideol’s Damping Pool or Hexicon’s TwinWind duet aim to trim anchor costs by sharing moorings but remain at pilot scale.

By Turbine Capacity: Gigawatt-Class Machines Reshape Economics

Turbines rated 5-10 MW still formed 52.9% of 2025 deployments, yet serial production of 15-16 MW units is tilting the economics decisively. The Floating Offshore Wind Power market size for machines above 15 MW is expected to expand at a 56.1% CAGR, aided by Siemens Gamesa’s SG 14-236 DD and Vestas’ V236-15.0 MW products. A 1 GW farm now needs 63 turbines instead of 125, cutting cable runs by 40%. Goldwind’s direct-drive 16 MW rotor reduces gearbox maintenance and extends service intervals to 18 months.

Smaller turbines remain configured for older pilots and typhoon-constrained regions. Doosan’s 8 MW platform continues to serve South Korean demos, yet its announced 12 MW variant shows the convergence toward global sizing norms.

Floating Offshore Wind Power Market: Market Share by Turbine Capacity
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Application Stage: Pilots Yield to Utility-Scale Arrays

Pilots occupied 65.3% of installed capacity in 2025, virtually all funded by demonstration grants or transitional tariffs. Utility-scale arrays now line up financing as CfD reforms lower the weighted average cost of capital to 6.2% and insurers offer premiums of 1.8% of the installed cost. The Floating Offshore Wind Power market size for utility-scale projects is projected to overtake pilot capacity in 2028.

Hybrid wind-to-hydrogen projects already account for 8% of deployments. Germany’s AquaVentus and Japan’s Fukushima Forward pilots confirm that pairing wind with electrolyzers boosts equity returns by 150 bps, although electrolyzer capex of USD 800/kW still weighs on scalability.

Geography Analysis

Europe maintained 53.6% of installations in 2025, supported by the United Kingdom’s ScotWind leases, France’s Golfe du Lion tender, and Norway’s oil-platform decarbonization schemes. The Floating Offshore Wind Power market size in Europe is expected to pass 2,000 MW by 2031. United Kingdom policy mandates 25% local content, prompting port upgrades at Aberdeen and Inverness and sustaining semi-submersible fabrication.[4]Crown Estate Scotland, “ScotWind Leasing Round Outcomes,” crownestatescotland.com France’s 15-year CfDs at EUR 120/MWh and Mediterranean barge deployments provide predictable revenue and regional yard work. Spain, Italy, and Nordic nations follow with smaller yet fast-moving allocations that embed aquaculture or desalination co-use.

Asia-Pacific shows the strongest growth trajectory with a 53.3% CAGR. China’s Guangdong and Fujian provinces target 5 GW under the 14th Five-Year Plan, deploying MingYang and Goldwind 16 MW turbines. Japan’s 1.8 GW Round 2 leases include mandatory green-ammonia synthesis, while South Korea’s Ulsan Hydrogen City connects 500 MW of wind to 200 MW of PEM electrolyzers. Taiwan’s 2026 round reserves 3 GW for floating projects with 60% local content to develop domestic cable and mooring suppliers.

North America secured 4.6 GW of leases off California and Oregon, but ESA consultations for the North Pacific right whale extend permitting by 18 months. Developers now fund passive-acoustic monitoring and seasonal work restrictions, pushing the first power to 2030. Meanwhile, Gulf of Mexico platform conversions tap idle rigs and established subsea infrastructure to curb capex by 35%. South America and the Middle East & Africa remain nascent. Petrobras studies a 150 MW conversion off Rio de Janeiro, and the United Arab Emirates assesses 200 MW near Abu Dhabi for green-hydrogen export.

Floating Offshore Wind Power Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The sector shows moderate concentration. The five largest turbine makers, Siemens Gamesa, Vestas, GE Vernova, MingYang, and Goldwind, deliver 68% of nacelle supply, while platform intellectual-property holders Principle Power, BW Ideol, Aker Solutions, and Hexicon license designs that regional yards fabricate. Developers with oil-and-gas pedigrees such as Equinor, TotalEnergies, Shell, and Ørsted exploit subsea-engineering know-how to defend margins. Emerging Chinese players compress costs through vertical integration, exerting pricing pressure on European OEMs.

Technology competition centers on moorings and dynamic cables. Vryhof’s STEVMANTA suction anchor reduces anchor count, trimming a 1 GW farm’s balance-of-plant cost by USD 40 million. Prysmian’s 66 kV helically armored cable mitigates fatigue but raises capex. Strategic deals in 2025 include Equinor and RWE’s USD 9.2 billion commitment for 3 GW at Morro Bay and Ocean Winds’ USD 4.5 billion partnership with Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners for 2.5 GW in Scotland, each leveraging indexed tariffs and EIB debt to close financing.

Patent filings under WIPO IPC F03D13/25 rose 42% in 2024, led by Equinor’s shared-mooring patterns and Hexicon’s dual-turbine barge, suggesting intensifying intellectual-property rivalry. Supply-chain scarcities persist, particularly WTIV availability and heavy-lift cranes, but 14 units now under construction in Korean and Chinese yards should come online between 2026-2027 to alleviate bottlenecks.

Floating Offshore Wind Power Industry Leaders

  1. General Electric Company

  2. Vestas Wind Systems A/S

  3. Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, S.A

  4. BW Ideol AS

  5. Equinor ASA

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Floating Offshore Wind Power Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • June 2025: DNV, a global leader in wind energy technology certification, has signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Japan's Floating Offshore Wind Technology Research Association (FLOWRA) to explore collaborative opportunities in the development of floating wind technology.
  • April 2025: The UK government announced a GBP 300 million package for domestic offshore wind supply chains, spanning turbine components, floating platforms, and subsea cables.
  • April 2025: China Power, Tokyu Land Corporation, and Renewable Japan commenced commercial operation of the 3 MW Hibiki-nada barge-type floating wind plant, Japan’s first of its kind.
  • March 2025: The UK government has allocated more than GBP 55 million for Port of Cromarty Firth upgrades, enabling the serial production of floating turbines and creating up to 1,000 skilled jobs.

Table of Contents for Floating Offshore Wind Power Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing Lease Awards in U.S. & APAC Deep-Water Zones
    • 4.2.2 Rapid Turbine Upsizing to 15-20 MW Class Reducing LCOE
    • 4.2.3 Oil & Gas Platform Conversions Unlocking Gulf of Mexico Supply Chain
    • 4.2.4 EU & UK CfD Reform Boosting Bankability
    • 4.2.5 National Hydrogen Roadmaps Creating Co-location Demand
    • 4.2.6 Asian Cable-Vessel Build-out Shortening Installation Schedules
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 WTIV & FIV Vessel Shortage Driving Day-rates > US$450k
    • 4.3.2 High-Voltage Dynamic Cable Failures in 50-100 m Depth Pilots
    • 4.3.3 California ESA Right-Whale Constraints Slowing BOEM Permits
    • 4.3.4 Spot Steel Price Volatility (> US$950/t) Disrupting Floater Yards
  • 4.4 Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Outlook
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Key Projects Information
    • 4.7.1 Major Existing Projects
    • 4.7.2 Upcoming Projects
  • 4.8 Porter’s Five Forces
    • 4.8.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.8.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.8.5 Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.9 Investment Analysis

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts

  • 5.1 By Water Depth
    • 5.1.1 Shallow (Up to 30 m)
    • 5.1.2 Transitional (30 to 60 m)
    • 5.1.3 Deep (Above 60 m)
  • 5.2 By Floating Platform Type
    • 5.2.1 Semi-Submersible
    • 5.2.2 Spar-Buoy
    • 5.2.3 Tension-Leg Platform (TLP)
    • 5.2.4 Barge & Hybrid Concepts
  • 5.3 By Turbine Capacity
    • 5.3.1 Up to 5 MW
    • 5.3.2 5 to 10 MW
    • 5.3.3 11 to 15 MW
    • 5.3.4 Above 15 MW
  • 5.4 By Application Stage
    • 5.4.1 Pre-Commercial Pilot
    • 5.4.2 Commercial Utility-Scale
    • 5.4.3 Hybrid Wind-to-X (Hydrogen, Desalination)
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Rest of North America
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 France
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 Spain
    • 5.5.2.4 Nordic Countries
    • 5.5.2.5 Italy
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.4 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 South America
    • 5.5.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.5.5.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.3 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.4 Rest of Middle East and Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves (M&A, Partnerships, PPAs)
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis (Market Rank/Share for key companies)
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy SA
    • 6.4.2 Vestas Wind Systems A/S
    • 6.4.3 GE Vernova (GE Renewable Energy)
    • 6.4.4 BW Ideol AS
    • 6.4.5 Equinor ASA
    • 6.4.6 Ørsted A/S
    • 6.4.7 Principle Power Inc.
    • 6.4.8 Aker Solutions ASA
    • 6.4.9 Hexicon AB
    • 6.4.10 TotalEnergies SE
    • 6.4.11 Shell plc
    • 6.4.12 Ocean Winds (EDPR/ENGIE)
    • 6.4.13 Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners
    • 6.4.14 RWE AG
    • 6.4.15 Marubeni Corporation
    • 6.4.16 Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd
    • 6.4.17 MingYang Smart Energy
    • 6.4.18 Goldwind Science & Technology
    • 6.4.19 Cobra IS (Grupo ACS)
    • 6.4.20 Gazelle Wind Power Ltd.

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the floating offshore wind power market as all grid-connected wind turbines installed on buoyant, moored platforms that operate in waters deeper than thirty meters, with market size measured in commissioned capacity (MW) as well as their associated revenue pools.

Scope Exclusion: Near-shore fixed-foundation projects in depths below thirty meters are excluded.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Water Depth
    • Shallow (Up to 30 m)
    • Transitional (30 to 60 m)
    • Deep (Above 60 m)
  • By Floating Platform Type
    • Semi-Submersible
    • Spar-Buoy
    • Tension-Leg Platform (TLP)
    • Barge & Hybrid Concepts
  • By Turbine Capacity
    • Up to 5 MW
    • 5 to 10 MW
    • 11 to 15 MW
    • Above 15 MW
  • By Application Stage
    • Pre-Commercial Pilot
    • Commercial Utility-Scale
    • Hybrid Wind-to-X (Hydrogen, Desalination)
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Rest of North America
    • Europe
      • France
      • United Kingdom
      • Spain
      • Nordic Countries
      • Italy
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle East and Africa
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Saudi Arabia
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

During 2025, we interviewed turbine OEM engineers, mooring contractors, port managers, and power-offtake planners across Europe, Asia-Pacific, and North America. Their insights helped us confirm average turbine ratings, commissioning lags, and achievable load factors, which we then used to temper aspirational project schedules published online.

Desk Research

Mordor analysts first gather foundational numbers from open datasets such as IRENA, GWEC annual capacity tallies, Eurostat renewable statistics, and U.S. DOE offshore wind market reports, which outline national pipelines, auction results, and commissioning dates. Policy documents by the European Commission, the UK Crown Estate, and BOEM supply target trajectories and lease specifics that anchor the capacity build-out curves. Industry journals and port authority cargo logs help us approximate nacelle movements and blade exports that signal actual installations. We layer this with paywalled intelligence pulled from D&B Hoovers for company financials and Dow Jones Factiva for investment announcements to cross-check project valuations. The sources listed are illustrative; many additional publications and datasets inform the desk phase.

A second pass mines patent filings via Questel and shipment traces from Volza to validate technology diffusion and hardware flow, letting us isolate genuine turbine deployments from mere press releases. Where gaps persist, we consult Aviation Week and IMTMA libraries for steel and composite cost indices used to sanity-check capex assumptions.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down installed-capacity reconstruction is built from government targets and announced project pipelines, which are then stress-tested with selective bottom-up supplier roll-ups for the five largest arrays. Drivers such as average turbine rating, water-depth mix, floating platform choice, capacity factor progression, steel price trends, and lease-to-COD cycle length feed a multivariate regression that projects capacity through 2030. Missing sub-municipal data, when encountered, is bridged using regional penetration ratios benchmarked against analogous fixed-bottom builds.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs run through variance checks against IRENA and GWEC time-series, after which a senior reviewer challenges anomalies. Models refresh annually, with off-cycle updates triggered by final investment decisions, turbine order backlogs, or policy shifts. Just before publication, an analyst reruns the latest numbers so clients receive a current snapshot.

Why Mordor's Floating Offshore Wind Power Baseline Earns Trust

Published figures for this young sector often diverge because providers mix revenue and capacity metrics, bundle fixed-bottom assets, or apply aggressive learning-curve multipliers. Our team anchors estimates to physically installed megawatts and moderates long-range growth using country-specific supply-chain constraints, which makes Mordor's view naturally more conservative yet dependable for planning.

Key gap drivers include: a) differing unit of account (capacity versus dollar value), b) inclusion of speculative license areas that lack grid agreements, and c) currency and inflation adjustments applied inconsistently across multiyear models.

Benchmark comparison

Market SizeAnonymized sourcePrimary gap driver
0.39 GW (2025) Mordor Intelligence-
USD 1.7 B (2025) Global Consultancy AMixes revenue of component vendors with capacity, lacks deployment cut-off date
USD 0.37 B (2024) Trade Journal BCounts prototypes and optioned leases, excludes Asia-Pacific cost inflation

In short, Mordor's stepwise capacity tracking, tempered assumptions, and annual refresh cadence supply decision-makers with a transparent baseline that links directly to verifiable turbines in the water.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the projected capacity for floating offshore wind by 2031?

Installed capacity is expected to reach 4,130.80 MW by 2031, driven by a 50.08% CAGR.

How do deep-water sites impact project economics?

Depths beyond 60 m unlock larger wind resources but add mooring costs, lifting capex toward USD 4.1 million/MW yet enabling higher capacity factors.

Which turbine rating now sets the benchmark for commercial arrays?

Serial-production 15-16 MW machines now dominate new contracts because they cut foundation counts and balance-of-plant costs.

Why are semi-submersible platforms still favored?

They allow modular yard fabrication, shallow-draft tow-out, and compatibility with turbines up to 20 MW, keeping installed costs competitive.

What policy reforms have improved bankability?

Inflation-indexed CfDs in the United Kingdom and 15-year fixed tariffs in France lower weighted average cost of capital to roughly 6.2%.

How does hydrogen co-location influence returns?

Pairing floating wind with offshore electrolyzers adds a second revenue stream that can lift equity returns by about 150 bps.

Page last updated on:

Floating Offshore Wind Power Market Report Snapshots