China Oil And Gas Midstream Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The China Oil And Gas Midstream Market size is estimated at USD 11.71 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 14.87 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 4.90% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
The market growth is driven by Beijing’s twin goals of energy security and carbon neutrality, which together prioritize infrastructure resilience, diversified supply routes, and measurable reductions in emissions. Surging natural gas demand from industrial and residential users, combined with steady domestic production, intensifies the need for additional transmission, import handling, and storage capacity. Policy-backed pipeline mileage expansion, accelerated LNG terminal commissioning, and mandatory strategic reserve targets create a sustained construction pipeline for contractors and equipment suppliers. Digitalization—especially AI-enabled monitoring—enhances asset utilization, reduces operating costs, and facilitates stricter environmental compliance, thereby further improving project economics.[1]Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, “Industrial Digitalization Policies,” miit.gov.cn
Key Report Takeaways
- By infrastructure, pipelines held 45.8% of the Chinese oil and gas midstream market share in 2024, while terminals are forecast to record the fastest 8.5% CAGR through 2030.
- By product type, natural gas captured 33.5% of the Chinese oil and gas midstream market size in 2024, whereas LNG is set to expand at a leading 9.0% CAGR to 2030.
- By service type, pipeline construction commanded 40.4% of the China oil and gas midstream market share in 2024; storage and handling services are projected to advance at a 7.9% CAGR through 2030.
China Oil And Gas Midstream Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expansion of national gas-pipeline mileage | +1.2% | National, concentrated in western regions | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Accelerated build-out of LNG regasification terminals | +1.0% | Coastal provinces, Yangtze River Delta | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Coal-to-gas switching mandates in industrial & residential sectors | +0.8% | Northern China, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| AI-driven pipeline-health analytics adoption | +0.4% | National, early deployment in major corridors | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Boom in LNG-fueled heavy-duty trucking creating small-scale LNG demand | +0.6% | Eastern seaboard, major logistics hubs | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Strategic gas storage capacity mandates | +0.5% | National, focus on consuming regions | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Expansion of National Gas-Pipeline Mileage
China’s 14th Five-Year Plan raises the transmission grid target to 120,000 km by 2025—a 25% jump over 2020—anchored by the West-to-East system.[2]National Development and Reform Commission, “Pipeline Mileage Expansion Targets,” ndrc.gov.cn Redundant trunk lines mitigate the risk of single-point failure during geopolitical or technical disruptions and enhance cross-regional balancing. PipeChina’s unified ownership accelerates interconnections, allowing flexible, bidirectional flows that lift utilization rates. The commissioning of the China–Russia East Route in 2024 diversified supply and reduced reliance on seaborne trade. Although cross-provincial land coordination is complex, centralized planning compresses build times once permits are clear. These projects present sizable opportunities for specialist contractors, high-specification pipe manufacturers, and digital monitoring solution providers.
Accelerated Build-out of LNG Regasification Terminals
Regas capacity hit 130 million tpa in 2024, with 40 million tpa under construction, positioning the country as the world’s most active LNG-infrastructure builder.[3]China National Energy Administration, “LNG Import Infrastructure Update,” nea.gov.cn Smaller, distributed facilities mitigate supply bottlenecks that were revealed during the 2022 crisis, when large terminals faced congestion. Coastal governments are increasingly favoring FSRUs due to their rapid deployment speed, flexibility in capital expenditure, and reduced demand for onshore land. The 2024-commissioned Zhoushan III terminal reduced methane emissions by 15% through advanced vapor-recovery systems, setting a new domestic benchmark. Average 65% utilization leaves headroom for opportunistic spot cargo buying while serving strategic stockpiles. The segment thereby underpins import diversification and strengthens price-risk management.
Coal-to-Gas Switching Mandates in Industrial & Residential Sectors
More than 40,000 industrial boilers in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei cluster converted to gas in 2024, backed by air-quality imperatives.[4]Ministry of Ecology and Environment, “Boiler Conversion Progress 2024,” mee.gov.cn Residential conversion reached 15 million households, creating stable off-peak pipeline flows that improve economics in previously underserved regions. Switching momentum persists even when gas-coal spreads widen because compliance fines outweigh fuel-cost disadvantages.[5]China Iron and Steel Association, “Steel Price Report 2024,” cisa.org.cn Subsidies for equipment retrofits and preferential pricing shield early adopters, although policy tapering could expose weaker balance sheets. Geographic disparity favors affluent coastal provinces, highlighting the need for adaptive tariff schemes and localized infrastructure planning.
AI-Driven Pipeline-Health Analytics Adoption
By 2024, operators had installed AI monitoring across 25,000 km of trunk lines, cutting unplanned maintenance by 30% and extending asset life by 5–8 years. Systems integrate satellite imagery, IoT sensors, and machine learning models to detect anomalies in real-time. Domestic R&D reduces foreign-tech dependence and fosters the development of export-oriented software companies. Data standardization and cybersecurity remain hurdles, but cost savings of 15–20% justify the capital outlays. Early adopters have shifted from interval-based to condition-based maintenance, freeing crews for higher-value activities.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lengthy environmental & land-use permitting process | -0.8% | National, acute in eastern provinces | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Capex escalation amid commodity-price volatility | -0.6% | National, affecting all project types | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Shipping chokepoints inflating landed LNG costs | -0.4% | Coastal import regions | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Coastal water-stress limits on new LNG terminals | -0.3% | Eastern seaboard, Pearl River Delta | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Lengthy Environmental & Land-Use Permitting Process
Environmental reviews now last 18–36 months, with extra delays where routes cross ecologically sensitive zones. Land acquisition in the densely populated eastern provinces averages USD 50,000 per hectare, often triggering valuation disputes that prolong project timelines. As a result, planning-to-operation spans stretch 5–7 years, raising financing risk and slicing IRRs for developers.[6]China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, "Energy Project Financing Guidelines," cbirc.gov.cn Digital one-stop portals unveiled in 2024 aim to condense review cycles, yet agency adoption is uneven. Investors now incorporate 12–18 month permitting buffers into their schedules, which inflates budgets and delays revenue generation.
Capex Escalation Amid Commodity-Price Volatility
Steel pipe prices increased by 35% in 2024, while specialized equipment costs rose by 25% due to supply chain disruptions. Labor costs climbed 15% annually as safety and skill requirements tightened. Critical equipment lead times extend to 18 months, compelling early orders that increase the risk of spec changes.[7]China Machinery Industry Federation, "Equipment Manufacturing Report 2024," cmif.org.cn RMB fluctuations versus the USD complicate budgets for imported components. Combined, these pressures shave 2–3 percentage points off project returns, prompting operators to adopt higher utilization and premium tariffs.
Segment Analysis
By Infrastructure: Terminals Drive Import Capacity Growth
Terminals accounted for an 8.5% CAGR growth between 2025 and 2030, outpacing pipelines, which retained a dominant 45.8% 2024 share of the China oil and gas midstream market size. FSRU rollouts shorten build cycles and limit shoreline disruption, enabling rapid response to demand shifts. Coastal governments are fast-tracking the development of smaller terminals to diversify landing points, thereby reducing congestion and regional price spikes. Pipelines still underpin system integrity, linking western resources and Russian imports with high-consumption eastern provinces. AI-enhanced monitoring reduced pipeline O&M costs by 15–20% and improved safety compliance, enhancing the platform’s attractiveness for further capacity expansion. Storage facilities, although the smallest, gain policy momentum from the 20% strategic reserve mandate, shifting capital expenditures toward depleted field re-engineering and salt-cavern leaching. Collectively, blended infrastructure investments strike a balance between import flexibility and transmission reliability, thereby securing multi-path gas flow resilience.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Product Type: LNG Transformation Accelerates Market Dynamics
Natural gas held 33.5% of China's oil and gas midstream market share in 2024; however, LNG is forecast to lead the market at a 9.0% CAGR through 2030, reflecting its adoption in trucking, distributed generation, and peaking power applications. LNG's modular supply chain unlocks inland consumption beyond pipeline reach, creating new offtake nodes for producers. Crude oil services experience muted growth as EV adoption and refinery optimization limit demand, despite current utilization remaining high. Integrated refiners capitalize on regional product-export opportunities, reinforcing pipeline backhaul demand while signaling a long-term shift toward gas-based assets. Regulatory preference for emissions-light fuels steers capital toward LNG terminals and associated logistics. Consequently, portfolio reshaping within state-owned giants favors gas, thereby cushioning them against future oil demand deceleration.
By Service Type: Storage Services Capitalize on Strategic Reserve Mandates
Pipeline construction maintained the largest 40.4% slice of China's oil and gas midstream market share in 2024, while storage and handling services are projected to post a 7.9% CAGR due to strategic reserve policies. Underground caverns outperform surface tanks in terms of cost per m³, spurring technology partnerships for salt-rock mapping and solution mining. Transportation firms diversify into LNG trucking and coastal shuttle tankers, bundling logistics with terminal slots for bundled service contracts. Maintenance vendors are pivoting from routine inspections to predictive, AI-guided interventions that lower downtime and extend asset life. Quality management certification (GB/T 19001) now serves as a gatekeeper for service awards, triggering consolidation among small-scale providers. The resulting service landscape blends scale efficiencies with digital capabilities, supporting higher asset-turnover targets.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
Eastern coastal provinces attracted 60% of the 2024 midstream capex, anchored by LNG terminal clustering and dense population centers. The Yangtze River Delta hosts eight of the 25 major regasification sites, forming a regional import and distribution hub. Pearl River Delta expansions emphasize distributed cogeneration and industrial switching to stabilize air-quality metrics. Northern cities are pursuing aggressive coal-to-gas mandates, which require extensive last-mile pipeline grids and urban storage to support winter heating.
Western provinces, such as Xinjiang and Inner Mongolia, house trunk pipeline origins, which move both domestic and Russian gas eastward. The China–Russia East Route’s 38 bcm full-capacity milestone in 2024 rebalanced supply options and eased coastal import dependency. Central transit provinces capitalize on their crossroads status by installing storage that doubles as regional balancing pools, thereby smoothing intra-seasonal demand swings.
Regulatory rigor varies: coastal jurisdictions impose stricter environmental standards, incentivizing the use of higher-efficiency equipment, whereas inland areas emphasize low-cost rollout to sustain price competitiveness. Third-party pipeline access rules aim to foster downstream competition while preserving state control of strategic corridors. Forward capital expenditure plans indicate that the coast will still capture 65% of new capacity through 2030, although fiscal incentives aim to shift more investment inland.
Competitive Landscape
State-owned enterprises (SOEs) account for roughly 85% of capacity, indicating a high level of concentration; however, PipeChina’s 2019 spin-out structurally separated transmission ownership from upstream production. Independent service specialists now bid on maintenance, digitalization, and niche logistics, broadening competitive dynamics without diluting state oversight. Pipeline Engineering subsidiaries of CNPC and Sinopec still dominate the construction sector, but regional storage and small-scale LNG distribution are witnessing rising private participation.
Technology leadership drives differentiation: AI, IoT, and predictive analytics reduce operating costs by 15–20%, providing first-movers with margin latitude. Disruptors include sensor manufacturers and cloud-based asset management firms that partner with incumbents to overcome regulatory barriers. Domestic sourcing mandates channel demand to local equipment suppliers, spawning national champions that can export turnkey pipeline solutions. Consolidation among sub-scale maintenance firms continues as GB/T 19001 certification becomes a prerequisite for SOE tenders. Overall, competition pivots on cost efficiency, digital capability, and environmental compliance rather than pure price undercutting.
China Oil And Gas Midstream Industry Leaders
-
China National Petroleum Corporation
-
PipeChina
-
Sinopec
-
CNOOC Gas & Power
-
ENN Natural Gas
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- October 2024: PipeChina completed the 1,200 km Sichuan-to-East expansion, adding 12 bcm/y capacity at USD 2.8 billion.
- September 2024: CNOOC brought the 5 Mtpa Zhoushan III LNG terminal online with 15% lower methane emissions.
- August 2024: Sinopec earmarked USD 1.5 billion for underground storage across six provinces, targeting 8 bcm by 2027.
- July 2024: China–Russia East Route achieved full 38 bcm design flow, completing its 3,000 km corridor.
China Oil And Gas Midstream Market Report Scope
Midstream operations is one of the three oil and gas industry nodes. Midstream is the second node, and it involves storing and transporting oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids to refineries. Midstream operations also involve treating the products to remove waste and compressing them before transporting them to the downstream markets and end-users.
The Chinese oil and gas midstream market is segmented by type. By type, the market is segmented by transportation, LNG terminals, and storage. For each segment, the market size and forecasts have been done based in volume.
| Pipelines |
| Terminals |
| Storage Facilities (Underground and Above-ground) |
| Crude Oil |
| Natural Gas |
| Refined Products |
| LNG |
| Pipeline Construction |
| Pipeline Maintenance and Repair |
| Storage and Handling Services |
| Transportation and Logistics |
| By Infrastructure | Pipelines |
| Terminals | |
| Storage Facilities (Underground and Above-ground) | |
| By Product Type | Crude Oil |
| Natural Gas | |
| Refined Products | |
| LNG | |
| By Service Type | Pipeline Construction |
| Pipeline Maintenance and Repair | |
| Storage and Handling Services | |
| Transportation and Logistics |
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current value of the China oil and gas midstream market?
The market was valued at USD 11.71 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 14.87 billion by 2030.
Which infrastructure segment is growing the fastest?
Terminals lead with an expected 8.5% CAGR thanks to aggressive LNG-import expansion programs.
How large is LNG’s role compared with pipeline gas?
LNG accounted for a smaller share in 2024 but is projected to grow at 9.0% CAGR, outpacing natural gas supplied by pipeline.
What policies drive storage capacity investment?
Mandates require suppliers to hold inventories equal to 10% of annual sales and aim for national working storage equivalent to 20% of yearly consumption by 2030.
Who controls most of the midstream infrastructure?
State-owned enterprises collectively hold about 85% of capacity, although PipeChina’s independent transmission model is opening space for specialized private players.
How does AI improve pipeline operations?
AI-enabled monitoring reduces unplanned maintenance by 30%, cuts operating costs up to 20%, and extends pipeline life by 5–8 years.
Page last updated on: