Anti-Ship Missile Systems Market Size and Share
Anti-Ship Missile Systems Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The anti-ship missile systems market size reached USD 13.24 billion in 2025 and is forecasted to climb to USD 16.92 billion by 2030, advancing at a 5.03% CAGR. This growth reflects three converging realities: maritime boundary disputes have accelerated naval re-armament programs, hypersonic and AI-enabled guidance technologies are redefining engagement timelines, and defense ministries now prioritize standoff weapons to defeat layered air defenses. As fleet inventories modernize, navies are shifting procurement toward multi-platform missile families that reduce life-cycle costs while strengthening deterrent credibility. Consolidation among prime contractors, however, has tightened supply chains and heightened single-source risks, prompting several allied countries to co-produce or license-manufacture key subsystems. Finally, network-centric targeting has expanded the addressable market beyond blue-water navies; smaller coastal states now see precision shore batteries as an affordable path to sea denial.
Key Report Takeaways
- By launch platform, ship-launched systems commanded 43.56% of the anti-ship missile systems market share in 2024, while coastal defense batteries are advancing at a 6.12% CAGR through 2030.
- By range, long-range weapons accounted for 46.21% of the anti-ship missile systems market size in 2024 and are projected to expand at a 6.54% CAGR during the forecast period.
- By speed, subsonic designs led with 58.95% revenue share in 2024; hypersonic missiles posted the highest CAGR at 8.21% to 2030.
- By guidance type, active-radar homing retained a 53.55% share in 2024, whereas AI-enabled “others” seekers recorded a 6.44% CAGR through 2030.
- By warhead, high-explosive variants held a 54.67% share in 2024; penetrator designs will grow at a 5.78% CAGR to 2030.
- By geography, Asia-Pacific led with 29.76% of global revenue in 2024 and is forecasted to grow at a 6.88% CAGR, underpinned by South China Sea tensions.
Global Anti-Ship Missile Systems Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expansion of global naval fleet modernization programs | +1.2% | Asia-Pacific and Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Escalation of maritime territorial disputes driving higher defense spending | +1.5% | Asia-Pacific, Middle East, Europe | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Increasing demand for long-range stand-off precision strike capabilities | +1.1% | North America and advanced Asia-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Rising adoption of coastal defense missile batteries among emerging powers | +0.8% | Asia-Pacific, Middle East, South America | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Advancement of network-centric targeting and AI-enabled seeker technologies | +0.9% | Global | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Development of modular, multi-platform missile families to reduce life-cycle costs | +0.7% | NATO and allied nations | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Expansion of Global Naval Fleet Modernization Programs
Multi-domain combat requirements drive a wave of destroyer, frigate, and coastal battery upgrades. Australia programmed AUD 123-159 billion (USD 82.12-106.18 billion) for shipbuilding, integrating Tomahawk missiles across Hobart-class destroyers to secure long-range strike capacity. Japan fast-tracked Type 12 production with JPY 16.8 billion (USD 0.12 billion) in FY 2025 to counter regional threats. Similar recapitalization is visible in Greece and Indonesia, underscoring how contested sea lanes compel even midsize navies to embrace precision offensive weapons. These programs increasingly bundle missile acquisition with combat-management software, radar upgrades, and electronic-warfare suites, sustaining demand for interoperable, software-defined launch cells. Because multi-year naval build cycles extend well past 2030, the anti-ship missile systems market benefits from a stable funding horizon supporting incremental upgrades and clean-sheet missile designs.
Escalation of Maritime Territorial Disputes Driving Higher Defense Spending
Flashpoints from the South China Sea to the Red Sea continue to heighten procurement urgency. The Philippines expanded its BrahMos order to nine batteries after renewed reef incursions. Vietnam and Indonesia likewise deepen coastal defenses to deter gray-zone coercion. Beyond Asia, missile expenditures for Red Sea patrols exceeded USD 500 million in six months as US destroyers launched more than 200 interceptors. These episodes expose defense-industrial surge limits, pushing allies to stockpile munitions and sign multi-year production contracts. The immediate threat environment thus compresses acquisition timelines, allowing governments to sole-source proven missiles rather than run competitive tenders, a dynamic that reinforces incumbent vendor dominance.
Increasing Demand for Long-Range Standoff Precision Strike Capabilities
Operational planners now place a premium on outranging adversary air-defense umbrellas. Australia declared the LRASM fully operational in February 2025 after successful live-fire trials from F/A-18F aircraft. Japan secured Foreign Military Sales for Block IV/V Tomahawks through FY 2027 to extend shipborne striking distance to 1,600 km. Because defensive radar coverage already exceeds 400 km on modern destroyers, navies see 500-1,000 km missiles as a survivability prerequisite. Long-range munitions also allow shared stockpiles across air, surface, and submarine fleets, lowering inventory costs. Consequently, engine manufacturers with efficient turbojet or dual-pulse solid motors are experiencing backlog growth as primes integrate propulsion upgrades into modernization roadmaps.
Advancement of Network-Centric Targeting and AI-Enabled Seeker Technologies
Neural-network autopilots and multi-actor cooperative guidance now underpin weapon lethality at sea. Laboratory work published by IEEE demonstrated AI pilots outperforming proportional navigation laws in evasive maneuvers.[1]IEEE Editorial Board, “Neural Network Autopilots Improve Missile Guidance,” ieee.org Field programs mirror these findings: Kongsberg’s future Joint Strike Missile upgrade adds RF pattern-matching to complement active radar cues, supported by Australian R&D funding. Such architectures permit missiles to exchange target vectors, synchronize terminal dives, and overwhelm hard-kill defenses. War-gaming by NATO shows coordinated salvos can raise the probability of mission kill by 30-40% versus unguided broadsides. Uptake, however, remains bounded by certification hurdles for safety-critical AI and by the secure-data-link bandwidth that naval task forces can allocate.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strict international export regulations and MTCR limitations | -0.8% | Global | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| High R&D and unit procurement costs limiting adoption rates | -1.1% | Global (greater impact on emerging economies) | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Rapid emergence of advanced countermeasure technologies | -0.6% | Tech-advanced nations | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Dual-use technology restrictions and cybersecurity vulnerabilities in missile guidance | -0.4% | Nations with advanced cyber capabilities | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Strict International Export Regulations and MTCR Limitations
Although Washington eased Category II export rules in 2025, missiles exceeding 300 km range still face MTCR Category I controls that restrict co-production and slow licensing approvals. The FTC’s 2022 block of Lockheed’s Aerojet acquisition underscored regulatory wariness over vertical integration that could further limit propulsion access.[2] Federal Trade Commission, “FTC Sues to Block Lockheed Martin–Aerojet Deal,” ftc.gov Smaller allies wait up to 24 months for technical-assistance agreements, often missing critical budget cycles. Compliance burdens deter joint ventures, as intellectual-property firewalls raise program overhead and limit hands-on local workforce training. Combined, these factors shave nearly one percentage point off forecast revenue growth.
High R&D and Unit Procurement Costs Limiting Adoption Rates
Government Accountability Office audits peg hypersonic missile unit prices above USD 40 million versus USD 1.4 million for a Block IV Tomahawk.[3]U.S. Government Accountability Office, “Hypersonic Weapons: Cost and Schedule Risks,” gao.gov Similarly, the US Next-Generation Interceptor will consume USD 17.70 billion before full-rate production. These outlays crowd smaller navies out of the hypersonic niche, forcing them to field legacy subsonic stocks or rely on foreign basing of allied forces. Modular approaches promise later savings but still require expensive open-architecture baselines today. As a result, several South American and African states defer anti-ship procurements past 2030, delaying flight control upgrade work for regional missile depots.
Segment Analysis
By Launch Platform: Ship Flexibility Versus Shore Denial
Ship-launched systems contributed USD 5.77 billion in 2024, equal to 43.56% of the anti-ship missile systems market, supported by universal vertical-launch adoption among destroyers and frigates. Their floating magazines permit persistent presence in contested waters, enabling navies to project power without territorial basing rights. However, the anti-ship missile systems market is witnessing coastal defense launchers grow 6.12% CAGR as emerging powers favor area-denial architectures to exploit home-field geography. The Philippines’ expanded BrahMos program exemplifies how a modest defense budget can field sub-USD 400 million batteries that threaten multibillion-dollar carrier task groups.
Ship-based cells remain indispensable for blue-water fleets because they integrate with Aegis, CMS-330, or LCF fire-control suites. Yet shore platforms gain survivability by dispersing across civilian truck convoys and hardened tunnels. Both communities increasingly share a common missile body; Kongsberg’s NSM flies from LCS decks and Polish coastal vehicles, lowering the market size of anti-ship missile systems allocated to unique variants. Over the forecast period, expect navies to rotate magazines between hulls and shore to exploit the same stockpile, driving demand for universal containerized launch canisters.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Range: Standoff Reach Becomes Baseline
Long-range missiles accounted for 46.21% of 2024 revenue, translating to roughly USD 6.12 billion of the anti-ship missile systems market size, and are climbing at a 6.54% CAGR. The impetus is simple: survivability improves sharply once launch platforms remain 500-1,000 km outside enemy SAM rings. Australia’s Tomahawk Block V buy, Japan’s Type 12 extension, and India’s BrahMos-II co-development emphasize this thesis.
Short-range rounds survive in littoral defense where radar horizons and cluttered sea lanes constrain 70-120 km engagements. Medium-range weapons, once the mainstay, now risk obsolescence unless paired with loiter or top-attack profiles. Developers are inserting tandem boosters and autonomous waypointing to push legacy designs beyond 350 km. This trend sustains aftermarket propulsion retrofits and keeps mature production lines profitable within the anti-ship missile systems market.
By Speed: Hypersonic Disruption Meets Cost Reality
Subsonic missiles retained a 58.95% share in 2024 through proven reliability and lower operating costs, equaling nearly USD 7.6 billion of the anti-ship missile systems market value. Hypersonic entrants, though only 3.2% of delivered rounds, post an 8.21% CAGR as marquee programs such as Russia’s 3M22 Zircon and China’s YJ-21 mature. These weapons travel above Mach 5, cutting defender reaction time to 30-40 seconds.
Yet affordability remains a gating factor. A navy can purchase 25 subsonic rounds for each hypersonic round, preserving volume fires essential for saturation tactics. Supersonic designs, typified by BrahMos or NSM-ER, thus occupy the economic middle ground and continue to outsell hypersonics five-to-one. Primes are experimenting with variable-cycle engines and cooled inlets to lower hypersonic unit cost, an R&D thrust that could expand their share of the anti-ship missile systems industry after 2030.
By Guidance: Multi-Mode Seeker Convergence
Active-radar homing generated 53.55% of segment sales in 2024 due to resilient performance in all weather and elevated sea states. However, dense electronic warfare (EW) environments are nudging buyers toward dual-mode packages that blend RF, imaging infrared, and AI-assisted scene matching. "Other" guidance approaches—from passive RF to collaborative swarm logic—are rising 6.44% CAGR, positioning them as the anti-ship missile systems market's innovation frontier.
Because each seeker option carries different power, cooling, and datalink loads, Prime's new architects can now design common back-planes that allow plug-and-play sensor stacks. This modularity helps navies upgrade mid-life missiles with new algorithms without replacing casings or warheads, prolonging fleet relevance. Over the outlook, expect multi-band seekers to dominate new contracts, relegating single-mode radar heads to low-budget retrofit programs.
By Warhead Type: Balancing Blast and Penetration
High-explosive warheads preserved a 54.67% share in 2024, reflecting their versatility against unarmored superstructures and electronics. Penetrator variants, while only 18% of deliveries, rise 5.78% CAGR as modern combatants adopt composite armor and vital-zone bulkheads. Scandinavian and Israeli research labs are prototyping explosively formed penetrators that split hull plating before secondary detonation.
Because warhead choice dictates fuze design, many navies maintain mixed inventories. A task group may preload half its cells with blast warheads for patrol craft targets and the remainder with penetrators for capital ships. Vendors thus bundle modular payload sections with standard guidance kits, an approach that trims certification cycles and supports rapid field customization—crucial advantages within the anti-ship missile systems market.
Geography Analysis
Asia-Pacific’s 29.76% revenue share translated to USD 3.94 billion in 2024 and will climb 6.88% CAGR through 2030. China’s shipbuilding tempo drives neighbors to accelerate missile purchases; Japan’s accelerated Type 12 line triples annual output by 2027, while Australia finalizes Tomahawk Block V deliveries in 2026. India combines indigenous BrahMos production with Russian Klub-S buys to hedge supply risk, and Indonesia’s Natuna Island fortifications integrate truck-mounted launchers with coastal radar belts. The region’s strategic competition feeds the most significant and fastest-growing portion of the market demand for anti-ship missile systems.
North America remains a technology pace-setter owing to the US Navy’s broad R&D budget and steady Foreign Military Sales (FMS) pipeline. Red Sea contingency operations in 2025 consumed more than 200 SM-2/SM-6 rounds, spotlighting resupply challenges and prompting multiyear production contracts that stabilize supplier cash flows. Canada’s surface-combatant project and Mexico’s modest littoral patrol upgrades moderately expand regional sales, though US programs still dominate.
Europe posts mid-single-digit CAGR as NATO members refresh Cold-War-era Harpoon inventories with NSM, Exocet Block 3C, or future FC/ASW missiles. Denmark’s EUR 179 million (USD 211.91 million) NSM order in March 2025 positioned it as the weapon’s 14th operator. The Middle East and Africa register modest but rising budgets linked to maritime security around critical trade routes. South America remains the smallest slice, constrained by fiscal austerity. Regional transparency pacts signed in 2024 may streamline cross-border components trade, incrementally lifting the investment outlook.
Competitive Landscape
Industry consolidation has produced an oligopoly where three prime contractors account for most global deliveries. RTX Corporation and Kongsberg Gruppen ASA co-produce the Naval Strike Missile, leveraging Norwegian subsystems and US assembly lines to satisfy domestic and allied orders. Lockheed Martin Corporation fields the Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM). It invests in low-observable airframes, while MBDA anchors European demand through the Exocet and the joint Future Cruise/Anti-Ship Weapon program. Such concentration accelerates technology diffusion among allies but heightens procurement risk when single factories face supply-chain shocks.
Strategic partnerships define competitive posture. Raytheon’s co-op line in Huntsville exports Tomahawk Block V kits to Japan and Australia, smoothing FMS lead times. Naval Group’s modular launcher initiative invites third-party missile integrators, positioning the French shipbuilder as a platform-agnostic gateway rather than a closed ecosystem. Meanwhile, South Korea’s Hanwha Aerospace eyes export lanes by pairing indigenous propulsion with licensed seekers, offering mid-tier customers an alternative to premium Western rounds.
Disruptors target cost and cybersecurity. EDGE in the UAE uses commercial automotive supply chains to trim launcher costs, while Rafael’s Reshef program embeds quantum-resistant encryption in missile datalinks. The FTC’s willingness to block mergers signals regulators will police vertical-integration plays that could foreclose subsystem competition. Nevertheless, secondary suppliers exploit Small Business Innovation Research grants to develop penetrator warheads, expanding niche rivalry even as the prime tier remains concentrated.
Anti-Ship Missile Systems Industry Leaders
-
RTX Corporation
-
Lockheed Martin Corporation
-
BAE Systems plc
-
Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
-
MBDA
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- July 2025: RTX Corporation secured a USD 74 million contract to manufacture RAM-guided missile launch systems for the US Navy. The contract includes new systems, refurbishments, and hardware upgrades to protect naval assets against anti-ship threats.
- December 2024: BAE Systems plc secured a contract from Lockheed Martin to supply additional radiofrequency (RF) sensors for the LRASM, enhancing its guidance capabilities.
Global Anti-Ship Missile Systems Market Report Scope
| Ship-Launched |
| Air-Launched |
| Submarine-Launched |
| Coastal Defense System-Launched |
| Short |
| Medium |
| Long |
| Subsonic |
| Supersonic |
| Hypersonic |
| Active Radar Homing |
| Infrared Homing |
| Others |
| High Explosive |
| Semi-Armor Piercing |
| Penetrator |
| North America | United States | |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Europe | United Kingdom | |
| France | ||
| Germany | ||
| Italy | ||
| Spain | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| South Korea | ||
| Australia | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | Saudi Arabia |
| Israel | ||
| Egypt | ||
| Rest of Middle East | ||
| Africa | South Africa | |
| Rest of Africa | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Rest of South America | ||
| By Launch Platform | Ship-Launched | ||
| Air-Launched | |||
| Submarine-Launched | |||
| Coastal Defense System-Launched | |||
| By Range | Short | ||
| Medium | |||
| Long | |||
| By Speed | Subsonic | ||
| Supersonic | |||
| Hypersonic | |||
| By Guidance | Active Radar Homing | ||
| Infrared Homing | |||
| Others | |||
| By Warhead Type | High Explosive | ||
| Semi-Armor Piercing | |||
| Penetrator | |||
| By Geography | North America | United States | |
| Canada | |||
| Mexico | |||
| Europe | United Kingdom | ||
| France | |||
| Germany | |||
| Italy | |||
| Spain | |||
| Rest of Europe | |||
| Asia-Pacific | China | ||
| India | |||
| Japan | |||
| South Korea | |||
| Australia | |||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | Saudi Arabia | |
| Israel | |||
| Egypt | |||
| Rest of Middle East | |||
| Africa | South Africa | ||
| Rest of Africa | |||
| South America | Brazil | ||
| Rest of South America | |||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the expected value of global anti-ship missile sales by 2030?
The market is projected to reach USD 16.92 billion by 2030, rising at a 5.03% CAGR.
Which region is growing fastest in anti-ship missile demand?
Asia-Pacific leads growth at a 6.88% CAGR through 2030 due to heightened maritime tensions.
How do hypersonic missiles impact naval defense planning?
Hypersonic weapons cut defender reaction time to under a minute, forcing navies to invest heavily in layered air and electronic defenses.
What drives the shift toward modular missile architectures?
Common airframes and plug-and-play seekers lower life-cycle costs and allow navies to refresh capabilities without new hull or launcher designs.
Why are coastal defense batteries gaining popularity?
Shore launchers provide affordable area-denial capabilities and can be dispersed or hidden, giving smaller states credible deterrence.
Page last updated on: