Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Market Size and Share

Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The vertebral compression fracture devices market generated USD 1.33 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 1.97 billion by 2030, translating into an 8.08% CAGR. Population aging, rapid uptake of minimally invasive spinal interventions and a decisive industry shift toward outpatient venues are the primary engines behind this growth trajectory. Demand is further amplified by robust clinical data validating balloon kyphoplasty, AI-assisted navigation that lowers cement-leak risk, and wider reimbursement for ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) under evolving value-based care mandates.[1]Food and Drug Administration, “Medical Devices; Quality System Regulation Amendments,” federalregister.govCompetitive activity remains intense: market leaders are consolidating portfolios, as evidenced by Globus Medical’s move into pain management through its Nevro acquisition, while regulators streamline approvals via harmonized Quality System Regulation amendments at the FDA.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product type, balloon kyphoplasty devices held 44.57% of vertebral compression fracture devices market share in 2024; expandable intravertebral implants are poised for the fastest 11.37% CAGR to 2030. 
  • By material, PMMA bone cement accounted for 56.72% share of the vertebral compression fracture devices market size in 2024, whereas bio-active and bioresorbable cements are tracking a 12.69% CAGR. 
  • By surgery, minimally invasive percutaneous procedures captured 65.41% revenue share in 2024 and are projected to advance at a 12.78% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By end user, hospitals led with 53.12% of vertebral compression fracture devices market size in 2024, but ambulatory surgical centers are the fastest riser at 11.22% CAGR. 
  • By geography, North America commanded 39.23% vertebral compression fracture devices market share in 2024; Asia-Pacific is expanding quickest at a 10.45% CAGR.

Segment Analysis

By Product Type: Expandable Implants Drive Innovation

Balloon kyphoplasty secured 44.57% of vertebral compression fracture devices market share in 2024 due to payer familiarity, straightforward workflows, and ample clinical proof. Expandable intravertebral implants, however, are growing at an 11.37% CAGR and challenge the incumbent modality by restoring vertebral height more effectively, as demonstrated in randomized trials of the SpineJack system. Conventional vertebroplasty retains market presence because of its lower cost and quick learning curve in resource-limited settings. Niche segments such as radio-frequency augmentation and vesselplasty solve complex anatomic challenges, expanding surgeon toolkits within the vertebral compression fracture devices market.

Engineering advances in expandable implants distribute endplate loads evenly, improving long-term biomechanics. The SPICO study confirmed shorter hospital stays and faster work resumption despite higher upfront device costs. Ancillary bone-cement delivery systems are also proliferating as surgeons prioritize precision; the Tripod-Fix device’s retractable arms nearly eliminated leakage in early clinical use. New entrants must now pair hardware with integrated navigation software to gain traction in the vertebral compression fracture devices market.

Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Market: Market Share by Product Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Material: Bio-Active Cements Challenge PMMA Dominance

PMMA continues to dominate with 56.72% share of vertebral compression fracture devices market size due to cost advantages and decades-long surgical familiarity. Yet bio-active and bioresorbable cements are accelerating at 12.69% CAGR because clinicians aim for osteointegration and reduced long-term foreign-body presence. Calcium-phosphate fillers and ceramic hybrids provide intermediate mechanical performance and resorb naturally, while enhanced PMMA variants integrate nano-tantalum carbide for higher radiopacity and osteogenic potential.

Three-year follow-up on calcium-phosphate cement shows volume reduction without loss of stability. Hydroxyapatite/collagen composites deliver fusion rates comparable to iliac crest grafts but with less surgical trauma, hinting at broader spinal application. Material R&D will be a decisive lever for differentiation across the vertebral compression fracture devices industry, especially as payers scrutinize long-term outcomes.

By Surgery: Minimally Invasive Dominance Accelerates

Minimally invasive percutaneous procedures captured 65.41% of the vertebral compression fracture devices market size in 2024 and are forecast to compound at 12.78% CAGR. Open spine surgery remains essential for multi-level deformities but is ceding routine fracture care to percutaneous techniques. Single-session multilevel kyphoplasty cut pain scores from 8.38 to 2.15 with minimal complications, confirming efficacy in broader indications.

Navigation-guided methods reduce radiation exposure while sharpening screw accuracy. Balloon-assisted endplate reduction now treats severe thoracolumbar fractures that once required open fixation. Such procedural expansion cements minimally invasive care as the default within the vertebral compression fracture devices market.

Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Market: Market Share by Surgery
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By End User: ASCs Reshape Care Delivery

Hospitals retained a 53.12% revenue share in 2024, yet ASCs are scaling at 11.22% CAGR as payers capitalize on lower procedural costs. Trauma centers remain vital for acute fracture stabilization, whereas specialty spine clinics attract elective vertebral augmentation cases, building high-volume expertise that reinforces outcomes.

Medicare’s 2024 policy expanded ASC-eligible primary codes and simplified prior authorization. Comparative studies confirm equivalent safety between ASCs and hospital outpatient departments, strengthening payer confidence. The COVID-19 experience underscored ASC adaptability, further accelerating the vertebral compression fracture devices market shift toward decentralized care.

Geography Analysis

North America led with 39.23% share in 2024, leveraging mature reimbursement systems and sophisticated spine-care infrastructure. Medicare compares vertebral augmentation at USD 4,737 against USD 7,250 for conservative therapy, validating cost-effectiveness. ASC reimbursement reform shortened approval timelines, encouraging providers to transfer cases out of hospital outpatient departments. Canada’s universal model and Mexico’s episodic payment pilots also expand demand, each supported by regional training and NIH-sponsored clinical trials that power innovation in the vertebral compression fracture devices market.

Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing theater at 10.45% CAGR through 2030, propelled by demographic shifts and healthcare modernization. Japan’s osteoporosis screening deficit—only 25.7% of elderly fusion patients receive pre-operative scans—underscores latent demand. China speeds device approvals through its National Medical Products Administration fast-track, while India’s elder cohorts benefit from proven post-surgical functional gains. Australia and South Korea pioneer early adoption of AI navigation, and Southeast Asian nations introduce bundled payments for minimally invasive spine surgery, collectively widening the vertebral compression fracture devices market footprint.

Europe advances steadily on the back of evidence-based medicine and pan-EU regulatory harmonization. Economic modeling projects EUR 2.8 billion in potential savings by 2040 if osteoporosis diagnosis rates improve. Germany, the United Kingdom, and France spearhead multicenter trials, while Southern Europe accelerates adoption through public-private partnership initiatives. Russia modernizes rural spine centers, tapping into EU research networks to upgrade procedural standards. South America and the Middle East & Africa lag but display growing interest in cost-optimized percutaneous approaches, indicating long-term contribution to the vertebral compression fracture devices market.

Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The vertebral compression fracture devices market is moderately concentrated. Medtronic posted a 7.1% neuroscience revenue upturn anchored by the AiBLE ecosystem and expandable implant launches. Stryker divested U.S. spinal implants to VB Spine LLC so it can channel resources into interventional spine and robotics. Johnson & Johnson, via DePuy Synthes, leverages double-digit R&D investment, while Globus Medical’s USD 250 million Nevro acquisition integrates spinal cord stimulation with fracture repair.

Market rivalry pivots on evidence generation and digital workflow integration. Companies couple implants, bio-active cement and AI navigation systems into turnkey packages that match value-based reimbursement criteria. Regulatory heft is a differentiator: larger firms absorb the cost of FDA’s ISO-aligned Quality System Regulation, whereas smaller entrants may prioritize CE-first strategies to maintain burn rates. White-space fosters innovation in biodegradable cements and low-radiation imaging, creating opportunities for nimble players aiming at the vertebral compression fracture devices industry.

Strategic collaborations also proliferate. Medtronic joined forces with Merit Medical in 2024 to co-develop next-generation augmentation technology that combines the former’s spine heritage with the latter’s interventional toolkit. Elsewhere, regional OEMs in Asia-Pacific partner with academic centers to localize implant designs, addressing unique anthropometric requirements and improving penetration of the vertebral compression fracture devices market.

Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Industry Leaders

  1. IZI Medical Products

  2. Stryker Corporation

  3. Merit Medical Systems Inc.

  4. Globus Medical, Inc.

  5. Johnson & Johnson (DePuy Synthes)

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • February 2025: Globus Medical agreed to acquire Nevro Corp for USD 250 million to integrate spinal-cord stimulation with fracture-repair offerings.
  • January 2025: Stryker finalized the sale of its U.S. spinal implants portfolio to Viscogliosi Brothers, forming VB Spine LLC
  • June 2024: Medtronic partnered with Merit Medical to co-develop a next-generation vertebral compression fracture treatment device.

Table of Contents for Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising Prevalence Of Osteoporosis-Linked Vcfs
    • 4.2.2 Growing Adoption Of Minimally-Invasive Spinal Procedures
    • 4.2.3 Increasing Healthcare Expenditure In Emerging Markets
    • 4.2.4 Robust Clinical Evidence Validating Balloon Kyphoplasty
    • 4.2.5 Reimbursement Shift Toward ASC-Performed Augmentation
    • 4.2.6 AI-Enabled Navigation Lowering Cement-Leakage Risk
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Post-Surgical Complications (Cement Leakage, Embolism)
    • 4.3.2 Stringent Regulatory & Reimbursement Hurdles
    • 4.3.3 Price Erosion Of Commoditized PMMA Bone Cement
    • 4.3.4 Limited Long-Term Evidence For Bio-Active Cements
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technology Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value-USD)

  • 5.1 By Product Type
    • 5.1.1 Balloon Kyphoplasty Devices
    • 5.1.2 Vertebroplasty Devices
    • 5.1.3 Expandable Intravertebral Implants
    • 5.1.4 Radio-frequency Augmentation Systems
    • 5.1.5 Vesselplasty & Mesh-containment Systems
    • 5.1.6 Bone-cement Delivery Systems & Accessories
  • 5.2 By Material
    • 5.2.1 PMMA Bone Cement
    • 5.2.2 Bio-active / Bioresorbable Cement
    • 5.2.3 Calcium-phosphate & Ceramic Fillers
    • 5.2.4 Others
  • 5.3 By Surgery
    • 5.3.1 Open Spine Surgery
    • 5.3.2 Minimally-Invasive (Percutaneous) Surgery
  • 5.4 By End User
    • 5.4.1 Hospitals
    • 5.4.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • 5.4.3 Trauma Centers
    • 5.4.4 Specialty Spine Clinics
    • 5.4.5 Others
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 Australia
    • 5.5.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Medtronic
    • 6.3.2 Stryker Corporation
    • 6.3.3 Johnson & Johnson (DePuy Synthes)
    • 6.3.4 Globus Medical
    • 6.3.5 Merit Medical Systems
    • 6.3.6 Orthofix Interventional
    • 6.3.7 ZimVie
    • 6.3.8 Spirit Spine Holdings
    • 6.3.9 Spine Wave
    • 6.3.10 Zavation
    • 6.3.11 joimax GmbH
    • 6.3.12 IZI Medical Products
    • 6.3.13 CareFusion / BD
    • 6.3.14 Osseon LLC
    • 6.3.15 VEXIM SA
    • 6.3.16 Alphatec Holdings
    • 6.3.17 SpineArt SA
    • 6.3.18 Seawon Meditech
    • 6.3.19 Icotec AG

7. Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Market Report Scope

As per the scope of this report, vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are caused by the collapse of the bone block or vertebral body in the spine, resulting in severe pain, deformity, and loss of height. These fractures are more prevalent in the thoracic spine (the middle section of the spine), particularly in the lower section. The vertebroplasty procedure involves placing medical cement in the damaged vertebral body to provide immediate pain relief and stability. Kyphoplasty, on the other hand, involves the equipment for creating a cavity underneath the broken vertebral body and injecting medical-grade bone cement into the cavity. The Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Market is segmented by Product Type (Balloon Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty), Surgery (Open Spine Surgery and Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery), End-User (Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Trauma Centers, Others), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa, and South America). The market report also covers the estimated market sizes and trends for 17 different countries across major regions globally. The report offers the value (in USD million) for the above segments.

By Product Type
Balloon Kyphoplasty Devices
Vertebroplasty Devices
Expandable Intravertebral Implants
Radio-frequency Augmentation Systems
Vesselplasty & Mesh-containment Systems
Bone-cement Delivery Systems & Accessories
By Material
PMMA Bone Cement
Bio-active / Bioresorbable Cement
Calcium-phosphate & Ceramic Fillers
Others
By Surgery
Open Spine Surgery
Minimally-Invasive (Percutaneous) Surgery
By End User
Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Trauma Centers
Specialty Spine Clinics
Others
By Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East and Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
By Product Type Balloon Kyphoplasty Devices
Vertebroplasty Devices
Expandable Intravertebral Implants
Radio-frequency Augmentation Systems
Vesselplasty & Mesh-containment Systems
Bone-cement Delivery Systems & Accessories
By Material PMMA Bone Cement
Bio-active / Bioresorbable Cement
Calcium-phosphate & Ceramic Fillers
Others
By Surgery Open Spine Surgery
Minimally-Invasive (Percutaneous) Surgery
By End User Hospitals
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Trauma Centers
Specialty Spine Clinics
Others
By Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East and Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

1. What is the current size of the vertebral compression fracture devices market?

The market generated USD 1.33 billion in 2025 and is projected to hit USD 1.97 billion by 2030 at an 8.08% CAGR.

2. Which product segment leads the vertebral compression fracture devices market?

Balloon kyphoplasty devices held 44.57% market share in 2024, supported by strong reimbursement and mature clinical evidence.

3. Why are ambulatory surgical centers important for market growth?

ASC procedures cost less than hospital outpatient equivalents and now qualify for broader Medicare coverage, driving faster 11.22% CAGR growth for this venue.

4. Which region is expanding fastest?

Asia-Pacific is expected to grow at a 10.45% CAGR to 2030, propelled by rapidly aging populations and expanding healthcare coverage.

5. What technologies are companies investing in to stay competitive?

Firms focus on AI-enabled navigation, expandable intravertebral implants, and bio-active cements that improve safety and long-term outcomes.

Page last updated on:

Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices Report Snapshots