United Kingdom General Surgical Devices Market Size and Share

United Kingdom General Surgical Devices Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
View Global Report

United Kingdom General Surgical Devices Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The United Kingdom General Surgical Devices Market size is estimated at USD 0.85 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 1.23 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 7.63% during the forecast period (2025-2030). Growth is anchored in the National Health Service (NHS) pivot toward minimally invasive and day-case surgery, the rapid approval of 11 robotic systems by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE),[1]Source: Digital Health, “NICE approves 11 robotic surgery systems for use in the NHS,” digitalhealth.net and sustained demand for data-rich surgical analytics despite capital budget headwinds. A rising trauma and chronic-disease burden, especially among an aging population, accelerates orthopedic and cardiovascular procedures, while carbon-footprint-linked procurement criteria advantage suppliers of reusable or low-waste instruments. Regulatory transitions to UKCA marking create short-term uncertainty, but phased implementation mitigates immediate supply shocks and favors incumbents with strong compliance infrastructure.  

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product, Handheld Devices led with 33.16% revenue share in 2024, while Wound Closure Devices are projected to grow at an 8.81% CAGR to 2030.  
  • By procedure approach, Minimally Invasive Surgery captured 73.43% of the UK general surgical devices market share in 2024 and is advancing at an 8.52% CAGR through 2030.  
  • By application, Orthopedic procedures accounted for a 26.24% share of the UK general surgical devices market size in 2024; Gynecology and Urology applications are expanding fastest at an 8.73% CAGR to 2030.  
  • By end user, hospitals held 71.66% share in 2024, whereas ambulatory surgical centres are poised for an 8.01% CAGR to 2030.  

Segment Analysis

By Product: Handheld Devices Lead Market Share

Handheld Devices generated 33.16% of 2024 revenue within the UK general surgical devices market. The UK general surgical devices market size for this segment equated to USD 0.28 billion in 2024 and is projected to advance at 6.3% CAGR through 2030. Hospitals favour their portability and cross-specialty utility, which maximises usage rates versus capital-intensive robots. Wound Closure Devices, led by bioabsorbable electro-stimulation sutures, will climb fastest at 8.81% CAGR, backed by evidence of accelerated healing and lower infection risk.  

Continuous innovation sustains demand for electrosurgical pencils, laparoscopic graspers and access trocars. Standardised procedure packs promoted by NHS Supply Chain strengthen procurement of bundled device kits that reduce set-up time and logistics complexity. Domestic producers are responding to import competition with quality-assured European steel and value-added servicing.

Market Share
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Procedure Approach: Minimally Invasive Surgery Dominates

Minimally Invasive Surgery accounted for 73.43% of the UK general surgical devices market share in 2024; it is forecast to rise at an 8.52% CAGR, reflecting the NHS's strategic commitment to procedures that reduce patient trauma, accelerate recovery, and optimize resource utilization. Implementation of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in novice centers demonstrated comparable outcomes to conventional approaches while achieving significant reductions in hospital stays from 7 to 5 days.

Open Surgery maintains relevance for complex cases requiring direct visualization and tactile feedback, representing the remaining market share with steady demand in trauma, emergency, and specialized procedures. The procedural shift toward minimally invasive approaches is creating training requirements for surgical teams, with AI-driven education systems demonstrating improved skill acquisition and retention in laparoscopic techniques.

By Application: Orthopedic Procedures Lead, Gynecology and Urology Surge

Orthopedics generated the single-largest revenue block at 26.24% in 2024 thanks to high joint-replacement volumes and trauma repairs. Cardiology applications maintain steady growth through continued innovation in minimally invasive cardiac procedures and device technologies. Neurology procedures benefit from precision requirements that favor robotic assistance and advanced imaging capabilities. Other Applications encompass diverse surgical specialties with varying growth trajectories based on technological advancement and clinical adoption patterns. 

Gynecology and Urology together achieve the swiftest expansion at 8.73% CAGR, spurred by Olympus 4K endoscopy optics and first-in-region robotic hysterectomies. Narrow-band imaging and blue-light cystoscopy advance tumour detection rates, stimulating device upgrades at cancer hubs. Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust performed the first robotic-assisted hysterectomy in Kent and Medway using the da Vinci system, demonstrating the expanding adoption of robotic technologies in gynecological procedures. 

Market Share
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By End User: Hospitals Dominate, Ambulatory Centres Accelerate

Hospitals controlled 71.66% revenue in 2024 because complex robotics and vascular interventions remain inpatient-centric. Yet ambulatory surgical centres will grow 8.01% annually. The shift toward ambulatory care is supported by evidence showing that complex procedures like thyroidectomy, joint arthroplasty, and spinal surgery can be safely performed in day-case settings with appropriate patient selection and care protocols.

Trusts pursuing bed-capacity relief invest in portable anaesthesia, smart wound closure and remote-monitoring kits that enable safe discharge. Outcome-based contracts tie device payments to reduced readmissions, appealing in tight capital-budget settings. The British Association of Day Surgery's promotion of best practices and educational initiatives is facilitating the safe expansion of complex procedures into ambulatory settings, creating sustained demand for appropriate surgical technologies.

Geography Analysis

England comprises roughly 84% of the UK population and commands the lion’s share of the UK general surgical devices market, anchored by London, Manchester and Birmingham teaching hospitals that pioneer robotics and digital analytics. Guy’s and St Thomas’ adoption of the Versius robot exemplifies early-mover leverage over neighbouring trusts.  

Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland show differentiated procurement rules: Northern Ireland still adheres to EU MDR, requiring CE marking, whereas UKCA applies to Great Britain, creating dual-path compliance for multi-site vendors. Wales leads in digital performance analytics, with two health boards integrating Versius Clinical Insights for continuous quality improvement.  

Regional integrated-care systems increasingly pool demand via collaborative tenders that weight carbon metrics, whole-life cost and clinical outcomes, favouring suppliers equipped with validated environmental data.

Competitive Landscape

The UK general surgical devices market hosts moderate fragmentation: top five firms hold 48% revenue, with Intuitive Surgical, CMR Surgical, Stryker, Smith & Nephew and Medtronic in the lead. Hologic’s USD 310 million acquisition of Endomagnetics adds magnetic-tracing tech to its breast-surgery suite, signalling portfolio deepening. Smith & Nephew earmarked USD 3.92 billion for R&D and M&A to expand orthopedics and wound care, illustrating capital-intensive playbooks.  

Emerging disruptor CMR Surgical combines ergonomic arm design with cloud-based analytics to lower operating height and deliver benchmarking dashboards that resonate with NHS digital roadmaps. Its mooted USD 4 billion sale could reshape bargaining power if a larger conglomerate absorbs its installed base.  

Post-Brexit supply chain resilience has become a differentiator; vendors now dual-source critical components and hold six months’ inventory to mitigate port delays. Outcome-based pricing—where payment hinges on reduced complications or days-of-stay—gains favour as trusts pursue cost-containment without deferring innovation.

United Kingdom General Surgical Devices Industry Leaders

  1. B. Braun SE

  2. Stryker

  3. Boston Scientific Corporation

  4. Medtronic plc

  5. Stryker Corporation

  6. Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon)

  7. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
General Surgical Devices Market Concentration.png
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • June 2025: A UK-based medical device company, CMR Surgical initiated a USD 4 billion sale process, reflecting strong investor interest in the surgical devices sector and potential for market consolidation. The transaction could reshape competitive dynamics and create new partnership opportunities for NHS suppliers
  • November 2024: Halma acquired Lamidey Noury Medical to bolster healthcare sector offerings, reflecting ongoing consolidation activity in the UK medical devices market and strategic portfolio expansion.
  • March 2023: Bactiguard, in partnership with Quintess Medical and its affiliate, launched its line of wound care products in the United Kingdom and Ireland. This collaboration expanded the reach of Bactiguard's Wound Care offerings to a broader audience, including patients and other end users. The Bactiguard product line falls under the category of Class III medical devices, known for their non-toxic and eco-friendly attributes.

Table of Contents for United Kingdom General Surgical Devices Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising demand for minimally-invasive devices
    • 4.2.2 Increasing prevalence of trauma & chronic diseases
    • 4.2.3 NHS long-term plan to cut inpatient stay via day-case surgery
    • 4.2.4 Shift to single-use instruments to mitigate hospital-acquired-infection risk
    • 4.2.5 OR digitalisation enabling device-level data analytics
    • 4.2.6 Carbon-footprint‐linked procurement scoring in NHS supply chain
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Stringent MDR/UKCA regulatory timelines
    • 4.3.2 Capital-budget headwinds in NHS trusts
    • 4.3.3 Supply chain vulnerabilities
    • 4.3.4 Surgeons’ skills gap for advanced robotics
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.6.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Product
    • 5.1.1 Handheld Devices
    • 5.1.2 Laparoscopic Devices
    • 5.1.3 Electrosurgical Devices
    • 5.1.4 Wound Closure Devices
    • 5.1.5 Trocars and Access Devices
    • 5.1.6 Other Products
  • 5.2 By Procedure Approach
    • 5.2.1 Open Surgery
    • 5.2.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • 5.3 By Application
    • 5.3.1 Gynecology and Urology
    • 5.3.2 Cardiology
    • 5.3.3 Orthopedic
    • 5.3.4 Neurology
    • 5.3.5 Other Applications
  • 5.4 By End User
    • 5.4.1 Hospitals
    • 5.4.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centres
    • 5.4.3 Other End Users

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 B. Braun SE
    • 6.3.2 Medtronic plc
    • 6.3.3 Olympus Corporation
    • 6.3.4 Integra LifeSciences
    • 6.3.5 Stryker Corporation
    • 6.3.6 Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon)
    • 6.3.7 Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH
    • 6.3.8 Boston Scientific Corporation
    • 6.3.9 Smith & Nephew plc
    • 6.3.10 Getinge AB
    • 6.3.11 ConvaTec Group plc
    • 6.3.12 Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc.
    • 6.3.13 Becton Dickinson & Co.
    • 6.3.14 Cook Medical
    • 6.3.15 CMR Surgical Ltd.
    • 6.3.16 Purple Surgical
    • 6.3.17 Teleflex Incorporated
    • 6.3.18 Surgical Holdings Ltd.
    • 6.3.19 Swann-Morton Ltd.

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the United Kingdom general surgical devices market as revenue generated from new, factory-built instruments purpose-designed for tissue cutting, grasping, sealing, access, and visualization during open or minimally invasive procedures performed across all surgical specialties.

Scope Exclusions: single-use drapes, sutures, and large capital robotics platforms are outside the value pool considered.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Product
    • Handheld Devices
    • Laparoscopic Devices
    • Electrosurgical Devices
    • Wound Closure Devices
    • Trocars and Access Devices
    • Other Products
  • By Procedure Approach
    • Open Surgery
    • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • By Application
    • Gynecology and Urology
    • Cardiology
    • Orthopedic
    • Neurology
    • Other Applications
  • By End User
    • Hospitals
    • Ambulatory Surgical Centres
    • Other End Users

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed procurement leads at district general hospitals, biomedical engineers within private surgical centers, and senior product managers at domestic distributors across England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. These conversations clarified average selling prices, refurbish cycles, and penetration of handheld versus powered devices, while short online surveys with colorectal and orthopedic surgeons validated utilization shifts toward day-case laparoscopy.

Desk Research

We started with core public datasets, including annual procedure volumes from NHS Digital, device recall and approval files published by the MHRA, import-export codes for HS-9018 and HS-9019 from HM Revenue & Customs, and hospital capital spend series available through the Office for National Statistics. Complementary insight came from peer-reviewed journals in the BMJ group, OECD Health Data, and selective company 10-K filings. Where market granularity was limited, our team accessed subscribed libraries such as Dow Jones Factiva for deal flow, D&B Hoovers for UK manufacturer revenues, and Questel to screen patent momentum around laparoscopic energy devices. The sources listed are illustrative, not exhaustive; many others informed data checks.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down procedure-based model converts yearly NHS surgical counts into device demand using specialty-specific instrument sets, then multiplies by price curves adjusted for sterling inflation and tender discounts. Select bottom-up checks, supplier roll-ups of handheld forceps, channel audits for trocar kits, and sampled ASP × volume from three hospital groups align totals within an accepted variance band. Key drivers include laparoscopic share of abdominal cases, average device life, elective backlog clearance targets, hospital capital budgets, and import reliance ratios. Multivariate regression, supported by ARIMA smoothing for seasonality, projects each variable to 2030; assumptions are stress tested with scenario inputs gathered during primary research.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass a two-step analyst review: first for statistical anomalies versus external benchmarks, then for logical consistency across segments. Variances beyond five percent trigger re-contact of expert sources. We refresh every twelve months and issue mid-cycle revisions if material policy, currency, or reimbursement shifts emerge.

Why Our UK General Surgical Devices Baseline Commands Dependability

Published estimates often diverge because firms anchor on different device lists, price ladders, or update cadences. By adhering to a clearly declared scope and reconciling procedure data with channel checks, Mordor Intelligence delivers a balanced number buyers can trace and replicate.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 0.85 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 1.60 B (2024) Regional Consultancy A counts single-use consumables and broad automation tools, no price deflator applied
USD 1.50 B (2024) Trade Journal B relies on import values only, excludes domestic OEM output and refurb sales

The comparison shows how broader product baskets or partial data feeds inflate competitor values. Our disciplined alignment to surgical procedure demand, validated prices, and annual refresh cadence ensures a dependable baseline for planners and investors.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the UK general surgical devices market?

The UK general surgical devices market size is USD 0.85 billion in 2025 and is projected to hit USD 1.23 billion by 2030.

Which product category leads revenue in 2025?

Handheld Devices hold the top position with 33.16% revenue share, driven by their cross-specialty versatility.

Why are data-enabled robotic systems gaining faster acceptance than earlier robotic generations?

The newest platforms bundle cloud analytics that benchmark surgeon performance and flag workflow bottlenecks, helping trusts justify capital outlays through measurable productivity gains and shorter learning curves.

How is the single-use versus reusable instrument debate evolving in UK theatres?

Infection-control protocols still favour single-use instruments for high-risk ENT and neurosurgery, yet trusts are piloting hybrid sets that combine critical disposable items with reprocessable handles to balance safety and environmental goals.

Page last updated on:

United Kingdom General Surgical Devices Report Snapshots