Medical Device Testing And Certification Market Size and Share

Medical Device Testing And Certification Market Summary
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Medical Device Testing And Certification Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The medical device testing and certification market size was valued at USD 10.55 billion in 2025 and estimated to grow from USD 10.95 billion in 2026 to reach USD 13.15 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 3.75% during the forecast period (2026-2031). Demand is shaped by the simultaneous enforcement of the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cybersecurity mandate, both of which expand validation scope and documentation depth. Mid-risk Class II devices dominate compliance volumes, while proliferating AI/ML algorithms and connected home diagnostics introduce novel test protocols that spur premium service demand. North America remains the revenue leader, although Asia-Pacific is registering the fastest laboratory expansion because China and India tightened national device laws in 2024, prompting foreign and domestic producers to outsource complex assays. Market participants with multi-jurisdictional accreditations benefit from persistent capacity constraints at EU notified bodies, which have doubled lead times since 2023. Sustainability audits, driven by European public procurement rules, and end-to-end cybersecurity assessments are emerging as differentiators that allow laboratories to charge higher margins for integrated engagements.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By service type – Testing services captured 55.98% of medical device testing & certification market share in 2025; software and cybersecurity testing is projected to expand at a 5.03% CAGR through 2031.
  • By device class – Class II devices accounted for 42.78% of the medical device testing & certification market size in 2025; the subsegment led revenue and is expected to register a 5.49% CAGR between 2026-2031.
  • By testing type – Sterility & microbiology commanded 36.92% share of the medical device testing & certification market size in 2025; cybersecurity testing is the fastest-growing subsegment at 5.83% CAGR.
  • By geography – North America held 38.42% revenue share in 2025, while Asia-Pacific is forecast to post the highest 6.42% CAGR through 2031.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Service Type: Testing services remain foundational while cybersecurity accelerates

Testing services held 55.98% of medical device testing & certification market share in 2025, reflecting their status as the unavoidable regulatory entry ticket for all device classes. Certification services track behind because only EU and UK routes legally require third-party auditing, whereas the U.S. relies more on manufacturer self-attestation. However, as regulators intensify post-market surveillance, inspection & auditing revenues are gaining momentum. 

Cybersecurity and software validation—still statistically nested within testing services—represent the fastest revenue stream, posting 5.03% CAGR on account of the FDA and Health Canada mandates. Laboratories that integrate biological, mechanical, and digital-security benches in one location cut total turn-around time by up to 30%, enabling premium billing and reinforcing competitive moat. Consequently, the medical device testing & certification market is shifting toward bundled, subscription-like quality-assurance contracts that lock in multi-year revenue visibility.

Continued investments in automated sample preparation and high-throughput analytics have trimmed direct labor per report by nearly 10% since 2022, raising operating margins. Certification services, hampered by notified-body scarcity, are forecast to grow at a slower 2.44% but remain indispensable for EU market access, sustaining a defensive revenue floor.

Medical Device Testing And Certification Market: Market Share by Service Type, 2025
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Medical Device Testing And Certification Market: Market Share by Service Type, 2025

By Device Class: Complexity sweet-spot keeps Class II dominant

Class II devices accounted for 42.78% of the medical device testing & certification market size in 2025 because they balance high unit volumes with stringent evidence requirements. Examples include infusion pumps, powered wheelchairs, and many AI-enabled imaging devices. Under the FDA Predetermined Change Control Plan, developers can revise algorithms without submitting a new 510(k) provided they validate performance boundaries, effectively locking in recurring test spend every time a model updates. Class III devices, though smaller in number, deliver premium fees due to mandatory clinical evidence and sterility assurance levels of 10^−6. Class I volumes continue to migrate toward in-house self-testing, yet the cybersecurity clause is pulling some connected devices into third-party labs. In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs) remain a distinct growth pocket after the EU IVDR extended transitional deadlines to 2028, sustaining elevated certification backlogs.

Overall, rising software content in mid-risk products keeps the medical device testing & certification services market firmly anchored in the Class II space.

By Testing Type: Sterility maintains scale; cybersecurity drives momentum

Sterility & microbiology testing maintained 36.92% revenue share in 2025, supported by universal applicability across implants, disposables, and combination products. ISO 11737 updates on rapid microbial methods encourage labs to invest in PCR-based platforms that cut time-to-certificate by 2-3 days. Parallelly, cybersecurity testing recorded the most robust growth at 5.83% CAGR, reflecting the legislated pivot toward digitally connected devices. Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) preserve relevance because 100% of new devices integrate wireless components. Packaging & shelf-life assays enjoy tailwinds from eco-friendly materials that require fresh stability datasets.

Conversely, sterility testing rises at a slower 2.98% but still adds nearly USD 0.6 billion in absolute terms over the forecast span. As laboratories cross-sell digital and microbiological services, average project value increases, improving order book resilience.

Global Medical Device Testing And Certification Market: Market Share by Testing Type, 2025
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Global Medical Device Testing And Certification Market: Market Share by Testing Type, 2025

Geography Analysis

North America captured 38.42% of the medical device testing & certification services market in 2025, anchored by the FDA’s streamlined 510(k) and Breakthrough Device pathways that catalyze continuous product launches. Domestic laboratories benefit from deep payer systems that fund innovation and from a regulatory environment that explicitly recognizes several voluntary consensus standards, shortening validation cycles. From 2026-2031, the region is set to expand at 3.05% CAGR, slower than the global mean due to maturity.

Asia-Pacific is the clear volume engine, forecast to grow 6.42% annually. China’s updated Medical Device Regulation, effective July 2024, compels local producers to secure third-party biocompatibility and packaging data, driving steady sample inflows to regional labs. India’s Medical Device Rules amendment of 2024 extended third-party audit requirements to additional product categories, adding incremental demand. Foreign players are rapidly opening satellite laboratories in Suzhou, Bangalore, and Kuala Lumpur to capture the rising tide.

Europe suffered near-term drag from notified-body scarcity; however, once capacity normalizes, deferred applications will convert to billable tests, helping the region regain momentum beyond 2027. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa remain nascent but benefit from harmonization initiatives, which require proof of compliance with reference-market standards—typically executed by global lab networks.

Global Medical Device Testing And Certification Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Regulatory Landscape

The regulatory environment is being shaped by tighter pre-market and post-market expectations across major jurisdictions, expanding the depth of validation packages device makers outsource to accredited laboratories. In the United States, the FDA continues to formalize requirements that increase evidence generation for usability and software assurance, including final guidance issued in May 2026 on the content of human factors information in medical device marketing submissions, alongside continued enforcement of cybersecurity documentation expectations for connected products.

In Europe, implementation of the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR) continues to stress conformity assessment capacity, keeping timelines and documentation burdens elevated for manufacturers and notified bodies. The European Commission introduced Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/977 in May 2026 to set uniform quality management and procedural requirements for notified body conformity assessment activities, while MDR-related EUDAMED functionality is progressing toward mandatory manufacturer actions such as uploading Summary of Safety and Clinical Performance (SS(C)P) documentation on required timelines.

Value Chain Analysis

The value chain starts with device developers and component suppliers generating design inputs, risk management files, and supplier qualification records, then moves into pre-compliance testing such as mechanical, electrical/EMC, software, and biological safety screening before regulatory submission. External partners then perform accredited verification and validation, including biocompatibility, sterility and microbiology, packaging and shelf-life, and software and cybersecurity testing, feeding results into technical documentation for CE/UKCA routes and FDA submissions. Certification bodies and EU notified bodies sit downstream for conformity assessment and quality system audits, after which manufacturers maintain post-market surveillance and periodic re-testing as designs, materials, or software change.

Regulatory convergence is increasing the importance of standardized quality systems and traceable data flows across this chain. The FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR), effective February 2, 2026, incorporates ISO 13485:2016 by reference, raising expectations for supplier controls, documentation transparency, and lifecycle quality activities that connect internal development teams with external test laboratories. In parallel, MDR/IVDR conformity assessment and MDCG guidance keep demand high for multi-disciplinary providers that can coordinate laboratory outputs, audit readiness, and cross-jurisdiction technical documentation while navigating notified-body scheduling constraints.

Competitive Landscape

The competitive landscape exhibits moderate concentration, with the key providers—SGS SA, Intertek Group plc, Eurofins Scientific SE, TÜV SÜD, and UL Solutions. These firms leverage broad accreditation portfolios spanning ISO/IEC 17025, ISO 13485, and multiple regulatory authority recognitions to win multi-territory contracts. SGS expanded U.S. bioanalytical testing in January 2025 by partnering with Agilex Biolabs, strengthening its end-to-end pre-clinical through post-market proposition[1]Source: SGS, "Outstanding US FDA Inspection Solidifies Position as a Leader in Pharmaceutical Testing in China," SGS, sgs.com.

Intertek, TÜV SÜD, and UL Solutions are deploying automated laboratory management systems that cut data-entry errors and accelerate report generation, securing repeat business with multinational device makers seeking digital traceability. Eurofins deepened its medical portfolio via the December 2024 acquisition of Infinity Laboratories, adding eight U.S. facilities specialized in microbiology and package testing[2]Source: Eurofins Scientific, “Infinity Laboratories Acquisition,” eurofins.com . A wave of mid-tier consolidations—Applus+ buying Keystone Compliance and Apave acquiring Baltic Control—signal continued drive for scale to balance rising compliance overheads and to widen geographic coverage.

Niche specialists such as Nelson Labs, BSI Group, and Element Materials Technology maintain stronghold positions in biocompatibility, certification, and EMC respectively. They defend share through deep technical expertise, faster time-to-schedule, and proximity to innovation hubs. However, lab automation and AI-enhanced analytics are narrowing capability gaps, permitting larger rivals to encroach on specialty territories. Price competition remains muted because regulatory complexity and capacity bottlenecks support premium billing, yet customers increasingly favor multi-year framework agreements that bundle tests across product lifecycles to lock in discounts.

Medical Device Testing And Certification Industry Leaders

  1. Eurofins Scientific

  2. SGS SA

  3. TÜV SÜD

  4. British Standards Institution

  5. Intertek Group

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Medical Device Testing And Certification Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

Near-term whitespace is concentrated in laboratories that can combine safety/EMC and wireless validation with software and cybersecurity assurance for connected Class II devices, because manufacturers increasingly prefer bundled engagements that reduce scheduling friction across multiple test types. Capacity investments also provide concrete signals of where demand is pulling: Eurofins MET Laboratories opened a 60,000-square-foot facility in Littleton, Massachusetts in February 2026 with a 10-meter semi-anechoic chamber for safety, EMC, and wireless testing, and Lucideon opened a biocompatibility laboratory in Greenville, South Carolina in May 2026 to consolidate biological safety testing. Such expansions track with higher test volumes from home-use and wearable diagnostics that require electrical safety, wireless performance, and usability evidence alongside classical biological and microbiology work.

Opportunities also link to evolving standards and conformity assessment governance that increase retesting and documentation workloads. The EU introduced Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/977 in May 2026 to standardize notified-body procedures under MDR/IVDR, and the EU updated harmonized standards lists in June 2026 to incorporate newer technical references, including EN ISO 10993-1:2025. On the standards side, ISO updates in 2026 (including ISO 10993-6:2026 and ISO 10993-7:2026, and ISO 14155:2026) reinforce a more lifecycle-oriented approach to biological evaluation and clinical investigation expectations, which supports demand for consultative test planning, gap assessments against revised endpoints, and faster-turnaround methods to preserve submission timelines amid MDR/IVDR backlogs and the FDA QMSR regime.

Recent Industry Developments

  • May 2026: SGS expanded its Controlled Human Infection Model (CHIM) capabilities in Antwerp, Belgium by developing an RSV-NICA challenge model. While rooted in clinical research infrastructure, this investment strengthens SGS offerings that support evidence generation programs adjacent to regulated product development and can broaden cross-selling into regulated testing and compliance services.
  • April 2025: SGS Belgium NV (Notified Body 1639) received official designation under the EU In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation (IVDR). The designation increases notified-body capacity for IVD conformity assessments, a key constraint under IVDR that drives manufacturers to engage larger, multi-jurisdiction providers for coordinated testing and certification planning.
  • December 2024: Eurofins Scientific acquired Infinity Laboratories, adding eight US laboratories focused on microbiology, chemistry, and packaging tests for medical devices. The deal expanded Eurofins capacity in high-throughput test categories that sit on critical submission paths for sterile and packaged devices, supporting faster scheduling and broader national coverage.

Table of Contents for Medical Device Testing And Certification Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Regulatory tightening under EU MDR & FDA Safer Devices Act
    • 4.2.2 Rise in AI/ML-enabled devices driving specialized validation needs
    • 4.2.3 Growth of home & wearable diagnostics expanding test volumes
    • 4.2.4 Mandatory cybersecurity pre-market submissions (FDA 2024)
    • 4.2.5 ESG-driven sustainability audits becoming procurement criteria
    • 4.2.6 Skill-gap certifications for biomedical tech workforce
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Limited capacity & long lead times at Notified Bodies
    • 4.3.2 High testing costs for SMEs & start-ups
    • 4.3.3 Scarcity of standardized datasets for AI algorithm validation
    • 4.3.4 Fragmented sustainability compliance requirements
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Service Type
    • 5.1.1 Testing Services
    • 5.1.2 Certification Services
    • 5.1.3 Inspection & Auditing Services
    • 5.1.4 Others
  • 5.2 By Device Class
    • 5.2.1 Class I
    • 5.2.2 Class II
    • 5.2.3 Class III
    • 5.2.4 In Vitro Diagnostic Devices
  • 5.3 By Testing Type
    • 5.3.1 Biocompatibility Testing
    • 5.3.2 Sterility & Microbiology Testing
    • 5.3.3 Electrical Safety & EMC
    • 5.3.4 Software & Cybersecurity Testing
    • 5.3.5 Mechanical & Physical Testing
    • 5.3.6 Packaging & Shelf-life Testing
  • 5.4 By Geography
    • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.4.2 Europe
    • 5.4.2.1 Germany
    • 5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.2.3 France
    • 5.4.2.4 Italy
    • 5.4.2.5 Spain
    • 5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.3.1 China
    • 5.4.3.2 India
    • 5.4.3.3 Japan
    • 5.4.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.4.3.5 Australia
    • 5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.4 South America
    • 5.4.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.4.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.4.5.1 GCC
    • 5.4.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 SGS SA
    • 6.3.2 Intertek Group plc
    • 6.3.3 TÜV SÜD
    • 6.3.4 UL Solutions
    • 6.3.5 Eurofins Scientific
    • 6.3.6 BSI Group
    • 6.3.7 TÜV Rheinland
    • 6.3.8 TÜV Nord
    • 6.3.9 Dekra SE
    • 6.3.10 Bureau Veritas
    • 6.3.11 DNV GL
    • 6.3.12 Nemko
    • 6.3.13 NSF International
    • 6.3.14 Nelson Labs
    • 6.3.15 Element Materials Technology
    • 6.3.16 Charles River Laboratories
    • 6.3.17 Smithers
    • 6.3.18 Pace Analytical
    • 6.3.19 Mérieux NutriSciences
    • 6.3.20 Medistri SA

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definition and Coverage

This market covers the revenues earned from providing medical device testing, inspection, and certification services that support regulatory clearance and ongoing compliance across the product life cycle, including lab-based and on-site activities tied to defined device requirements.

Scope exclusions: We exclude internal manufacturing costs that are not billed as third-party testing, inspection, or certification services, and we also exclude general consulting that is not linked to a defined test, audit, or certification deliverable.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Service Type
    • Testing Services
    • Certification Services
    • Inspection & Auditing Services
    • Others
  • By Device Class
    • Class I
    • Class II
    • Class III
    • In Vitro Diagnostic Devices
  • By Testing Type
    • Biocompatibility Testing
    • Sterility & Microbiology Testing
    • Electrical Safety & EMC
    • Software & Cybersecurity Testing
    • Mechanical & Physical Testing
    • Packaging & Shelf-life Testing
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle East and Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Data Sources, Market Sizing, and Validation

Desk Research

Desk research is used to set the ground rules for what gets counted and to anchor the model to visible industry signals. We review regulatory and compliance requirements that create repeatable demand for testing and certification, and then map those requirements to service categories that show up in provider revenue reporting.

Public sources are used wherever possible, such as FDA databases and guidance, the European Commission MDR resources, WHO and OECD health statistics, and standards bodies materials such as ISO and IEC summaries. We also review peer-reviewed journals that discuss device safety, biocompatibility, sterilization validation, and software validation, plus trade and association updates on conformity assessment practices. Company filings, annual reports, investor presentations, and reputable press coverage help us understand service mix, lab footprint expansion, and pricing direction. In addition, paid subscriptions for company financials and intelligence, news and financials, patent databases, and import/export shipment-level trade data are used selectively to cross-check scale and activity signals. These sources are illustrative, and many other public references were also used for collection, clarification, and validation.

Primary Interviews and Surveys

Primary work is used to test assumptions that cannot be read directly from public data, especially the share of outsourced versus in-house activity, typical service bundles, and how pricing moves by test type and device class. We speak with testing labs, certification bodies, quality and regulatory leaders at device manufacturers, and procurement stakeholders, and inputs are compared across APAC, EMEA, and the Americas so regional compliance intensity and capacity constraints are reflected consistently.

Distribution of primary research fieldwork respondents

Company type Respondent position Region
Top tier: 29% CXOs: 13% APAC: 44%
Mid tier: 56% Functional/Unit leaders: 38% EMEA: 31%
Smaller Players: 15% Managers: 49% Americas: 25%

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

Our sizing starts with a top-down build that reconstructs the demand pool from medical device compliance activity and serviceable volumes, and then ties it back to billable testing, inspection, and certification work in each region. The totals are then corroborated through selective bottom-up checks, such as sampled provider revenue mix, channel checks on outsourced shares, and simple volume times average selling price ranges for high-frequency test categories.

Key model inputs include the pace of device approvals and registrations, the shift to EU MDR compliance timelines, the frequency of surveillance audits and recertification cycles, the mix of higher-risk devices that require deeper validation, and the growth of software and cybersecurity testing needs for connected devices. We also track lab capacity additions, typical turnaround times, and pricing direction by test type (for example, biocompatibility and sterilization validation are often priced and scheduled differently than basic material characterization). Where a bottom-up roll-up is incomplete for smaller labs or local certification bodies, we fill gaps using region-level service intensity benchmarks validated in interviews, and we keep those assumptions visible in the model.

For forecasting, we rely on scenario analysis supported by a light multivariate regression layer, where demand is linked to leading indicators such as approval volumes, regulatory enforcement intensity, and device innovation cadence. Final growth rates are adjusted after re-checking the outlook with primary respondents so short-term constraints, like lab bottlenecks or standard revisions, do not get missed.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Validation is done through triangulation across model outputs, publicly visible compliance signals, and the ranges confirmed in interviews, followed by checks for abnormal jumps by region, service type, or year. When a variance is flagged, we revisit the underlying driver, re-check the source trail, and if needed we re-contact participants to confirm whether the change reflects pricing, mix, or volume.

Before sign-off, the model and assumptions go through multi-step analyst review so calculation logic, currency handling, and unit consistency are verified. Reports are refreshed annually, and interim updates are made when material events occur, such as major regulatory changes or unusually large lab capacity expansions. Right before delivery, a final pass is done so the client receives the most current view available.

Mordor Intelligence's Medical Device Testing and Certification Market Size Compared Against Other Published Estimates

Published market sizes for this topic often do not line up because firms count different service boundaries and they also choose different base years. Some studies focus only on testing, others narrow it further to outsourced work, and a few mix in adjacent activities that are not always billed as formal testing, inspection, or certification.

Key gap drivers usually come from what is included in the service basket and how the demand pool is anchored. For example, a testing-only view will sit below a broader testing plus inspection plus certification total, and an outsourcing-only view will be smaller again even if it uses the same regions. Differences can also come from how software validation and cybersecurity testing are treated, how average pricing is progressed over time, and whether FX conversion is done on a single-year rate or a blended approach across regions.

Benchmark comparison

Source Market Size Gaps in Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence USD 10.55 B (2025)
Industry Research Publisher A USD 9.76 B (2024) This estimate is framed as testing services, which typically excludes inspection and certification revenues, and it also uses a different base year that can shift FX and pricing effects.
Industry Research Publisher B USD 3.18 B (2024) This figure is for outsourcing only, so in-house testing, internal inspection programs, and certification activity managed directly by manufacturers are not counted, which materially reduces the total.

Regulatory activity signals and service-mix checks from interviews are the guardrails that keep Mordor Intelligence tied to a billable testing plus inspection plus certification scope rather than a narrower testing-only or outsourcing-only lens. When the scope boundary is kept consistent and the base year is aligned, most of the spread seen in published values becomes explainable through service inclusion choices and a few practical modeling assumptions.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the medical device testing & certification services market?

The medical device testing & certification market size reached USD 10.95 billion in 2026 and is projected to grow to USD 13.15 billion by 2031.

Which service segment holds the largest share?

Testing services, including biocompatibility, sterility, and cybersecurity assays, captured 55.98% of medical device testing & certification services market share in 2025.

Why are Class II devices the primary revenue driver?

Class II devices combine high production volumes with moderate-to-high regulatory evidence requirements, making them the core demand source for outsourced testing throughout the forecast period.

How will cybersecurity regulations influence market growth?

The FDA mandate for pre-market cybersecurity submissions and the widespread adoption of UL 2900 standards are fuelling a 5.83% CAGR for cybersecurity testing services through 2031, faster than any other test category.

Which region is expected to grow the fastest?

Asia-Pacific is set to record a 6.42% CAGR thanks to tighter regulatory frameworks in China and India that compel manufacturers to increase third-party test volumes.

Page last updated on:

Medical Device Testing And Certification Market Report Snapshots