Composite Repair Market Size and Share

Composite Repair Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Composite Repair Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The composite repair market stood at USD 15.34 billion in 2025 and is forecast to rise to USD 21.31 billion by 2030, delivering a 6.79% CAGR. Growth continues as asset owners pivot from costly replacements to efficient composite repairs that restore structural performance while curbing downtime. Structural repairs remain the anchor segment, supported by deep certification expertise, yet cosmetic repairs are advancing fastest as preventive maintenance gains favor across wind, marine, and transportation assets. Aerospace keeps the largest end-user share, while offshore wind drives incremental demand for in-situ blade work that cannot be moved onshore. Digital twin integration, automation, and standards such as ASME PCC-2 and ISO 24817 ensure quality, contain risk, and underpin expanding adoption across critical infrastructure.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product type, structural repairs commanded 44.56% of the composite repair market share in 2024, whereas cosmetic repairs are projected to post the highest 7.66% CAGR to 2030.
  • By repair process, the hand lay-up technique led with a 38.55% revenue share in 2024; autoclave-based repairs are forecast to advance at an 8.03% CAGR through 2030.
  • By material type, CFRP accounted for 54.66% of the composite repair market size in 2024, while aramid-fiber systems are set to expand at a 7.77% CAGR between 2025-2030.
  • By end-user industry, aerospace and defense contributed 44.02% of the composite repair market share in 2024; wind energy is expected to record the fastest 7.75% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By region, Asia-Pacific accounted for the largest share of 38.45% in 2024 and is projected to grow at the fastest CAGR of 8.16% from 2025 to 2030. 

Segment Analysis

By Product Type: Structural Dominance Drives Critical Infrastructure Needs

Structural repairs accounted for 44.56% of the composite repair market share in 2024 as owners prioritize restoring load-bearing capacity on aircraft, pipelines, and wind blades. The segment benefits from rigorous certification protocols that favor established providers, especially in aerospace where composite primary structures demand precise scarf geometry and controlled cure profiles. Operators adopt these repairs to extend safe service intervals and defer capital-intensive replacements, reinforcing segment leadership inside the composite repair market. 

Cosmetic repairs are rising at a 7.66% CAGR to 2030, reflecting the shift to early-stage interventions that address surface erosion before it propagates. Wind turbine leading-edge treatments, such as Belzona coatings, exemplify how cosmetic activities cut aerodynamic losses and avoid larger structural campaigns. As predictive maintenance tools flag minor surface defects earlier, the composite repair market size attached to the cosmetic category will expand, encouraging service providers to develop fast-cure, field-friendly systems that align with tight outage windows.

Composite Repair Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment Share of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Repair Process: Hand Lay-Up Prevalence Meets Autoclave Innovation

The hand lay-up method held 38.55% of composite repair market share in 2024 because of its portability and minimal equipment requirement. Field teams often rely on hand lay-up when weather, geometry, or access challenges rule out automated approaches. CompositePatch’s five-minute emergency kits illustrate the advantage in maritime incidents where rapid hull sealing prevents costly downtime. 

Autoclave repairs exhibit an 8.03% forecast CAGR as operators insist on aerospace-grade quality for highly loaded components. Airlines route engine cowls and flight-control surfaces to autoclave shops to regain qualification levels equal to original builds. As fleets grow, the composite repair market size for autoclave services will climb because airlines favor centralized, repeatable quality over field expediency. Vacuum infusion and automated fiber placement continue to advance, spurred by equipment manufacturers such as Ingersoll Machine Tools that supply robotics to MRO centers.

By Material Type: CFRP Leadership Challenged by Aramid Innovation

CFRP dominated 54.66% of the composite repair market in 2024, driven by its high modulus-to-weight ratio vital to aircraft and high-performance vehicles. Hexcel’s aerospace backlog underscores the momentum behind CFRP adoption. The composite repair market size allocated to CFRP repairs remains the largest, requiring trained technicians conversant with complex cure cycles and conductivity considerations. 

Aramid-fiber composites are expected to post a 7.77% CAGR through 2030 as defense and automotive programs value their energy-absorption under impact. Hybrid solutions that blend CFRP, GFRP, and aramid are emerging, nearly doubling flexural strength for wind blade root sections compared with single-fiber variants. This innovation broadens material choice and diversifies revenue streams for repair resin formulators.

By End-User Industry: Aerospace Maturity Versus Wind Energy Momentum

Aerospace and defense supplied 44.02% of composite repair market share in 2024, a legacy of decades-long composites integration and stringent airworthiness rules. Boeing continues to refine digital repair threads that archive each scarf repair on the 787, preserving structural traceability. The sector’s maturity ensures a steady baseline for service providers. 

Wind energy is on track for a 7.75% CAGR, the fastest among end-users, as blade counts and dimensions escalate offshore. Owners adopt robotic sanding, drilling, and film-application platforms that expedite repairs on 100 m-plus blades anchored 80 km from shore. The composite repair industry also benefits from automotive lightweighting programs, marine corrosion challenges, and civil infrastructure strengthening, each growing at mid-single-digit rates.

Composite Repair Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment Share of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific commands the largest composite repair market because of its immense manufacturing base, expanding offshore wind pipelines, and ambitious infrastructure renewal plans. China’s wind OEMs deploy fleets of 15-MW class turbines, fueling demand for in-situ blade servicing technologies[3]Global Wind Energy Council, “Global Offshore Wind Report 2024,” gwec.net. India and Southeast Asia register high single-digit growth as road, rail, and port projects integrate composite strengthening to meet accelerated timelines. 

North America follows, underpinned by an aging energy network and a robust commercial aviation fleet. Pipeline operators apply ASME-qualified carbon overwraps to mitigate corrosion while maintaining throughput, and MRO houses in the United States invest in autoclave capacity for wide-body nacelles. The region also pilots digital twin deployments for predictive blade repairs on Great Plains wind farms. 

Europe remains technology-centric with state incentives that drive R&D. Germany’s aerospace cluster works on thermoplastic scarf-less patching, and Denmark pioneers blade robotics. Lufthansa Technik’s EUR 1.2 billion expansion underscores local commitment to composite MRO leadership. Composite repair market size growth in Europe stabilizes at mid-single digits as the installed base matures but demands more sophisticated upkeep. Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa collectively form a smaller yet rapidly advancing bloc, adopting proven techniques from mature regions while cultivating domestic technician pipelines.

Composite Repair Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The composite repair market exhibits moderate fragmentation. Boeing, Lufthansa Technik, and Hexcel secure entrenched positions through proprietary processes and regulatory approvals that are arduous for newcomers to replicate. They routinely supply engineering manuals, materials, and training packages that lock in customer loyalty. 

Digitalization creates fresh battlegrounds. Firms able to merge deep materials science, robotic execution, and AI-driven maintenance recommendations will harvest premium margins, while traditional labor-intensive shops could face margin compression unless they automate.

Composite Repair Industry Leaders

  1. Lufthansa Technik AG

  2. Boeing Company

  3. ClockSpring

  4. Milliken Infrastructure Solutions

  5. TEAM, Inc.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
composite repair market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • September 2024: Toray Industries, Inc. became the first globally to receive type approval from the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) for its vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding (VaRTM) process. This method uses carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) to repair corroded areas in FPSO and FSO systems with reduced thickness.
  • November 2023: Henkel acquired US-based Critica Infrastructure, a specialized supplier of maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) composite solutions for critical infrastructure like oil and gas transmission and municipal water systems.

Table of Contents for Composite Repair Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Surging investment in ageing-asset life-extension programs
    • 4.2.2 Cost advantages of on-site composite repair versus metallic part replacement
    • 4.2.3 Increasing Use of Composites in the Aerospace and Defense Industry
    • 4.2.4 Offshore wind blade length growth demanding in-situ repair capability
    • 4.2.5 Digital twin–guided predictive maintenance lowers inspection cost
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Emergence of self-healing composite laminates
    • 4.3.2 Scarcity of certified composite repair technicians
    • 4.3.3 Lack of harmonised repair codes for subsea composite pipelines
  • 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Porter’s Five Forces
    • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.5.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.6 Patent Analysis

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Product Type
    • 5.1.1 Structural
    • 5.1.2 Semi-structural
    • 5.1.3 Cosmetic
  • 5.2 By Repair Process
    • 5.2.1 Hand Lay-up
    • 5.2.2 Vacuum Infusion
    • 5.2.3 Autoclave
    • 5.2.4 Other Processes
  • 5.3 By Material Type
    • 5.3.1 Carbon-fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)
    • 5.3.2 Glass-fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)
    • 5.3.3 Aramid-fibre Composites
    • 5.3.4 Hybrid & Other Fibres
  • 5.4 By End-User Industry
    • 5.4.1 Aerospace and Defense
    • 5.4.2 Wind Energy
    • 5.4.3 Automotive
    • 5.4.4 Marine
    • 5.4.5 Construction
    • 5.4.6 Other Industries
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
    • 5.5.4.3 India
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Australia
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products & Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 3M
    • 6.4.2 Belzona International Ltd.
    • 6.4.3 Boeing
    • 6.4.4 ClockSpring
    • 6.4.5 Composite Technology Inc.
    • 6.4.6 Crawford Composites LLC
    • 6.4.7 DIAB Group
    • 6.4.8 Gurit Holding AG
    • 6.4.9 HAECO Group
    • 6.4.10 Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
    • 6.4.11 Hexcel Corporation
    • 6.4.12 Lufthansa Technik AG
    • 6.4.13 Milliken Infrastructure Solutions
    • 6.4.14 ResinTech Inc.
    • 6.4.15 Sika AG
    • 6.4.16 TD Williamson Inc.
    • 6.4.17 TEAM, Inc.
    • 6.4.18 Toray Advanced Composites
    • 6.4.19 WR Composites

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
  • 7.2 Automation of Composite Repair

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the composite repair market as the spending generated when damaged fiber-reinforced polymer parts, whether aircraft panels, wind-turbine blades, pipelines, or marine structures, are brought back to certified load-bearing capability through bonded patches, wraps, or scarf repairs that remain in service for at least one duty cycle. Values cover material, labor, tooling, and temporary access costs for new repair events only; retrofit strengthening, original equipment composites, and self-healing materials are outside scope.

Scope Exclusion: Routine cosmetic refinishing and unrelated civil concrete jacketing are not counted.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Product Type
    • Structural
    • Semi-structural
    • Cosmetic
  • By Repair Process
    • Hand Lay-up
    • Vacuum Infusion
    • Autoclave
    • Other Processes
  • By Material Type
    • Carbon-fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)
    • Glass-fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)
    • Aramid-fibre Composites
    • Hybrid & Other Fibres
  • By End-User Industry
    • Aerospace and Defense
    • Wind Energy
    • Automotive
    • Marine
    • Construction
    • Other Industries
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed MRO managers at airlines, blade-field service supervisors, and composite repair material formulators across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. These conversations validated repair frequency, labor-material cost shares, and the adoption curve of rapid-cure resins that secondary sources only hinted at.

Desk Research

We began with open data sets such as FAA Service Difficulty reports, EASA airworthiness directives, the US Wind Turbine Database, UN Comtrade resin and fiber trade codes, and energy output logs from IRENA. Trade-association handbooks for pipelines and class-society advisories on marine laminate failures anchored baseline incident rates. Company 10-Ks, selected investor decks, and news harvested through Dow Jones Factiva helped us benchmark typical ticket sizes. D&B Hoovers supplied revenue splits for specialist repair contractors. This list is illustrative; many additional public and paid sources were tapped for cross-checks and context.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down incident-pool build draws on in-service fleet counts, average repair events per asset, and sampled spend per event, which are then corroborated with selective bottom-up snapshots from supplier roll-ups and channel checks. Key variables inside the model include fleet flight-cycle or operating-hour accumulation, wind-blade failure density, resin price indices, carbon-fiber import volumes, average repair labor hours, and regional technician day-rates. Forecasts use multivariate regression blended with scenario analysis; resin price elasticity, asset age mix, and policy-driven inspection intervals form the predictor set that our experts stress-test before each run. Gap handling for sparse geographies relies on regional analog substitution, followed by sanity checks against patent trends pulled through Questel.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs face variance checks against parallel metrics such as airline maintenance cost per available seat kilometer and average blade downtime. Senior reviewers sign off only after anomalies are reconciled. Reports refresh annually, while major regulatory or material-price shocks trigger interim updates; a last-mile validation pass occurs just before release.

Why Mordor's Composite Repair Baseline Deserves Buyer Confidence

Published estimates often diverge because each firm chooses its own service depth, asset pool, and inflation handling. We disclose every boundary upfront, letting decision-makers trace numbers back to observable fleets and price lines.

Key gap drivers include whether cosmetic touch-ups are blended with structural fixes, how warranty work is treated, and if aggressive technician-hour escalation is assumed.

Our annual refresh cadence captures rapidly rising wind-fleet counts, whereas some peers rely on biennial updates. Currency conversion at average yearly rates, not spot peaks, further stabilizes our view.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 15.34 bn (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 18.60 bn (2023) Global Consultancy A Includes retrofit strengthening and applies constant 13 % CAGR without fleet-age weighting
USD 24.71 bn (2025) Industry Source B Counts multi-year maintenance contracts at total contract value and uses optimistic resin price freeze

The comparison shows that once scope crevasses and pricing assumptions are aligned, the spread narrows markedly, underscoring how Mordor Intelligence offers a balanced, defensible baseline grounded in transparent variables and repeatable steps.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current Composite Repair Market size?

The composite repair market was valued at USD 15.34 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 21.31 billion by 2030.

Which segment holds the largest share within the composite repair market?

Structural repairs lead with 44.56% of composite repair market share in 2024, driven by safety-critical applications in aerospace and energy assets.

How fast is the wind energy segment growing?

Wind energy repair demand is forecast to register a 7.75% CAGR through 2030, the fastest among all end-user industries.

Which material dominates composite repairs today?

CFRP commands 54.66% of market revenue owing to its widespread use in aircraft and high-performance components.

Page last updated on:

Composite Repair Report Snapshots