Composite Repair Market Size and Share

Composite Repair Market (2026 - 2031)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Composite Repair Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Composite Repair Market size is estimated at USD 16.39 billion in 2026, and is expected to reach USD 22.82 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 6.85% during the forecast period (2026-2031). Widening adoption of carbon-fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) structures in aircraft, wind turbines, and industrial assets has shifted repair from a reactive cost center to a strategic capital-preservation tool. The 2024 update of FAA Advisory Circular 20-107B shortened structural-repair approvals by one-third, releasing deferred maintenance budgets and giving operators a faster route to keep high-value assets in service. Asia-Pacific is setting the pace, propelled by COMAC C919 fleet expansion and an offshore-wind build-out across the Taiwan Strait and the Yellow Sea, while parallel investment in certified maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) hubs lifts demand for mobile autoclave services. Composite material suppliers are integrating downstream to capture service revenue, and operators increasingly weigh on-site repair economics against replacement lead times, reinforcing the composite repair market as a balance-sheet lever rather than a maintenance expense.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By material type, Carbon-fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) commanded 54.69% of the composite repair market share in 2025, while aramid-fiber composites are forecast to post a 7.85% CAGR through 2031. 
  • By product type, structural accounted for 44.71% of 2025 revenue, and cosmetic is expected to grow at a 7.71% CAGR to 2031. 
  • By repair process, hand lay-up led with 38.78% revenue share in 2025; autoclave is projected to advance at an 8.15% CAGR to 2031. 
  • By end-user industry, aerospace and defense held 44.22% revenue share in 2025; wind energy is poised to register a 7.81% CAGR through 2031. 
  • By geography, Asia-Pacific generated 38.54% of 2025 revenue and is forecast to expand at an 8.29% CAGR to 2031. 

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Material Type: CFRP Dominance Masks Aramid Acceleration

The Carbon-fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) accounts for 54.69% of global revenue. Boeing 787 fuselage delamination alone generated USD 420 million in CFRP repair orders that year, underscoring the segment’s scale. Glass-fiber retains the cost-sensitive mid-market, and the U.S. Navy’s USD 28 million GFRP superstructure repair program on Arleigh Burke-class destroyers highlights its defense relevance[2]U.S. Navy, “GFRP Superstructure Life-Extension Contract,” navy.mil . Hybrid and natural-fiber systems remain niche but gain traction in infrastructure rehabilitation as environmental rules tighten.

Aramid composites occupy a swiftly growing niche. Hydrogen pipeline operators favor aramid-fibre composites that resist cryogenic embrittlement, driving a 7.85% CAGR through 2031. Ballistic-protection retrofits for military vehicles add further pull. Regulatory specificity also shapes share: FAA AC 43-214A restricts cosmetic CFRP repairs to OEM-approved materials, effectively locking lower-cost substitutes out and anchoring CFRP’s position. Taken together, CFRP keeps numerical leadership, yet aramid’s high-value opportunities and regulatory loopholes present outsized upside relative to scale.

Composite Repair Market: Market Share by Material Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Product Type: Structural Repairs Command Premium Pricing

Structural generated 44.71% of 2025 value because downtime risk and certification requirements allow premiums. A composite wing-to-body fairing repair on a Boeing 777 can fetch USD 180,000, contrasting with USD 12,000 for an equivalent cosmetic fix. Semi-structural repairs, such as wind-blade trailing-edge treatments, grew as offshore turbine operators favored repair over replacement.

Cosmetic work is the fastest segment at 7.71% CAGR but faces long-run headwinds from self-healing materials. Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s licensed thermoplastic system could trim cosmetic volumes by up to 20% inside five years. Still, near-term growth is fueled by electric-vehicle adoption: collision centers now handle CFRP battery enclosures that require certified technicians and rapid-cure epoxies. Crawford Composites developed a vacuum-infusion kit that field teams use without autoclaves, capturing semi-structural contracts across U.S. wind farms.

Composite Repair Market: Market Share by Product Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Repair Process: Autoclave Growth Signals Quality Escalation

Hand lay-up produced 38.78% of 2025 revenue owing to its suitability for field work where autoclave access is limited, yet autoclave posted the highest growth at 8.15%. Lufthansa Technik’s mobile autoclave trailer demonstrates the shift toward bringing controlled cures to airport aprons, meeting EASA non-destructive testing mandates without ferry flights or component shipping. Vacuum-infusion methodologies, helped by the Technical University of Denmark’s PrintRepair 3D-mold platform, are rising in offshore wind applications where large repair areas demand precise resin-fiber ratios.

The composite repair market size for autoclave-based processes is growing as aerospace OEMs stipulate vacuum-bag consolidation for any repair covering more than 10% of a primary control surface. HAECO reports 40% margin premiums on autoclave work, prompting the firm to prioritize capital toward high-spec curing even though hand lay-up volumes rise in absolute terms. The bifurcation will likely widen: asset owners of high-liability platforms will continue to push for capital-intensive, quality-assured processes, while cost-sensitive sectors maintain reliance on field-friendly lay-up techniques.

Composite Repair Market: Market Share by Repair Process
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By End-user Industry: Wind Energy Outpaces Aerospace Growth

The composite repair market size for aerospace and defense accounts for 44.22% of global revenue. Boeing’s 787 fuselage fixes alone drove USD 420 million, yet production delays capped incremental upside. Wind energy, by contrast, expanded at 7.81% as blades exceeded 100 meters and offshore maintenance costs for depot work skyrocketed. North Sea operators spent EUR 650 million on blade repair in 2025, doubling 2023 outlays.

Automotive also accelerates as EV uptake lifts the installed base of CFRP battery enclosures. Tesla’s collision guidelines compel OEM-certified repairs, creating a captive aftermarket. Marine and construction applications round out demand: the U.S. Navy contract for GFRP superstructures and Sika’s flax-fiber bridge-repair system illustrate how defense and infrastructure budgets underpin steady, if smaller, revenue streams.

Composite Repair Market: Market Share by End-user Industry
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific generated 38.54% of 2025 revenue for the composite repair market and is forecast to grow at 8.29% through 2031. COMAC C919 composite checks, Toray’s 20% carbon-fiber capacity expansion, and India’s 5 GW 2025 wind-power additions underpin multi-segment demand. HAECO’s USD 85 million Singapore repair center exemplifies regional capacity build-out, while South Korea’s frigate program embeds composite superstructures requiring long-term service infrastructure.

North America’s demand is driven by U.S. aerospace MRO concentration and wind-farm expansion across the Great Plains and Atlantic Coast. The Department of Energy’s 2024 roadmap funded mobile blade-repair training, and TD Williamson’s CAD 120 million Canadian pipeline contracts show industrial adoption beyond aerospace. Technician shortages, however, push overflow work to Mexican hubs where labor supply is more elastic though regulatory limits confine scope to non-primary structures.

Europe’s share is anchored by Lufthansa Technik’s mobile autoclave trailer and the United Kingdom’s 15 GW offshore wind capacity that produced GBP 480 million in blade repairs during 2025. Germany’s EV battery-enclosure adoption brings new collision-repair volume, and Sika’s flax-fiber system supports bridge-strengthening contracts across Germany and France. South America plus the Middle-East and Africa contribute the lower share, led by Brazil’s wind build-out and Saudi pipeline retrofits that employ composite wraps for Vision 2030 infrastructure objectives.

Composite Repair Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The top 5 firms accounted for an estimated 52% of 2025 revenue, illustrating moderate fragmentation. Hexcel’s 2024 partnership with Spain’s FIDAMC to automate wind-blade trailing-edge repairs shows materials suppliers shifting downstream to lock in recurring service income. Boeing’s USD 150 million investment in MRO partnerships across Singapore, Dubai, and Frankfurt underlines OEM intent to retain aftermarket share and mitigate production volatility. Toray mirrors the model through repair-focused joint ventures in Japan and the United States.

Specialists such as Crawford Composites and WR Composites exploit gaps in subsea-pipeline wrapping, where ISO and API standards lag and project-specific certifications provide defensible niches. Technology bifurcation deepens: aerospace and defense repairs require automated lay-up and integrated non-destructive testing systems that favor capital-rich incumbents, while wind and automotive work remains open to smaller operators leveraging hand lay-up and vacuum-infusion kits.

White-space growth avenues include mobile autoclave units for remote wind farms, integration consulting for self-healing materials, and technician-training ventures aligned with FAA and EASA curricula. Start-up activity focuses on self-healing resins; CompPair HealTech’s 2024 funding round aims to commercialize trailing-edge systems capable of reducing blade repair frequency by 30% by 2028.

Composite Repair Industry Leaders

  1. Lufthansa Technik

  2. 3M

  3. Henkel AG & Co. KGaA

  4. Sika AG

  5. Belzona International Ltd.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
composite repair market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • January 2026: Researchers at North Carolina State University announced the development of a self-healing composite capable of repairing itself over 1,000 times. This innovation had the potential to extend the lifespan of fiber-reinforced polymers from several decades to centuries through the use of 3D-printed thermoplastic healing agents.
  • January 2026: Babcock Australasia successfully trialled an advanced composite repair technology designed to reduce maintenance times and enhance fleet availability for the Royal Australian Navy and the Royal New Zealand Navy. The trials, conducted on three naval vessels, showcased the use of fibre-reinforced polymer composites as a permanent replacement for steel in in-water repairs.

Table of Contents for Composite Repair Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Surging Investment in Ageing-Asset Life-Extension Programs
    • 4.2.2 Cost Advantages of On-Site Composite Repair Versus Metallic Part Replacement
    • 4.2.3 Increasing Use of Composites in the Aerospace and Defense Industry
    • 4.2.4 Offshore Wind-Blade Length Growth Demanding In-Situ Repair Capability
    • 4.2.5 Hydrogen Pipeline Retrofits Needing Non-Metallic Reinforcement
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Emergence of Self-Healing Composite Laminates
    • 4.3.2 Scarcity of Certified Composite Repair Technicians
    • 4.3.3 Lack of Harmonised Repair Codes for Subsea Composite Pipelines
  • 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.5.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Material Type
    • 5.1.1 Carbon-fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)
    • 5.1.2 Glass-fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)
    • 5.1.3 Aramid-fibre Composites
    • 5.1.4 Hybrid and Other Fibres
  • 5.2 By Product Type
    • 5.2.1 Structural
    • 5.2.2 Semi-structural
    • 5.2.3 Cosmetic
  • 5.3 By Repair Process
    • 5.3.1 Hand Lay-up
    • 5.3.2 Vacuum Infusion
    • 5.3.3 Autoclave
    • 5.3.4 Other Processes
  • 5.4 By End-user Industry
    • 5.4.1 Aerospace and Defense
    • 5.4.2 Wind Energy
    • 5.4.3 Automotive
    • 5.4.4 Marine
    • 5.4.5 Construction
    • 5.4.6 Other End-user Industries
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.1.1 China
    • 5.5.1.2 Japan
    • 5.5.1.3 India
    • 5.5.1.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.1.5 ASEAN Countries
    • 5.5.1.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.2 North America
    • 5.5.2.1 United States
    • 5.5.2.2 Canada
    • 5.5.2.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 NORDIC Countries
    • 5.5.3.7 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.4 South America
    • 5.5.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.5 Middle-East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share(%)/Ranking Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 3M
    • 6.4.2 Advanced FRP Systems
    • 6.4.3 Belzona International Ltd.
    • 6.4.4 Boeing
    • 6.4.5 Composite Technology Inc.
    • 6.4.6 Crawford Composites LLC
    • 6.4.7 DIAB Group
    • 6.4.8 Gurit Holding AG
    • 6.4.9 HAECO Group
    • 6.4.10 Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
    • 6.4.11 Hexcel Corporation
    • 6.4.12 Lufthansa Technik
    • 6.4.13 ResinTech Inc.
    • 6.4.14 Sika AG
    • 6.4.15 TD Williamson Inc.
    • 6.4.16 TEAM, Inc.
    • 6.4.17 Toray Advanced Composites
    • 6.4.18 WR Composites

7. Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-need Assessment
  • 7.2 Automation of Composite Repair

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the composite repair market as the spending generated when damaged fiber-reinforced polymer parts, whether aircraft panels, wind-turbine blades, pipelines, or marine structures, are brought back to certified load-bearing capability through bonded patches, wraps, or scarf repairs that remain in service for at least one duty cycle. Values cover material, labor, tooling, and temporary access costs for new repair events only; retrofit strengthening, original equipment composites, and self-healing materials are outside scope.

Scope Exclusion: Routine cosmetic refinishing and unrelated civil concrete jacketing are not counted.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Material Type
    • Carbon-fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP)
    • Glass-fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP)
    • Aramid-fibre Composites
    • Hybrid and Other Fibres
  • By Product Type
    • Structural
    • Semi-structural
    • Cosmetic
  • By Repair Process
    • Hand Lay-up
    • Vacuum Infusion
    • Autoclave
    • Other Processes
  • By End-user Industry
    • Aerospace and Defense
    • Wind Energy
    • Automotive
    • Marine
    • Construction
    • Other End-user Industries
  • By Geography
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • ASEAN Countries
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • NORDIC Countries
      • Rest of Europe
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle-East and Africa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle-East and Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed MRO managers at airlines, blade-field service supervisors, and composite repair material formulators across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. These conversations validated repair frequency, labor-material cost shares, and the adoption curve of rapid-cure resins that secondary sources only hinted at.

Desk Research

We began with open data sets such as FAA Service Difficulty reports, EASA airworthiness directives, the US Wind Turbine Database, UN Comtrade resin and fiber trade codes, and energy output logs from IRENA. Trade-association handbooks for pipelines and class-society advisories on marine laminate failures anchored baseline incident rates. Company 10-Ks, selected investor decks, and news harvested through Dow Jones Factiva helped us benchmark typical ticket sizes. D&B Hoovers supplied revenue splits for specialist repair contractors. This list is illustrative; many additional public and paid sources were tapped for cross-checks and context.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down incident-pool build draws on in-service fleet counts, average repair events per asset, and sampled spend per event, which are then corroborated with selective bottom-up snapshots from supplier roll-ups and channel checks. Key variables inside the model include fleet flight-cycle or operating-hour accumulation, wind-blade failure density, resin price indices, carbon-fiber import volumes, average repair labor hours, and regional technician day-rates. Forecasts use multivariate regression blended with scenario analysis; resin price elasticity, asset age mix, and policy-driven inspection intervals form the predictor set that our experts stress-test before each run. Gap handling for sparse geographies relies on regional analog substitution, followed by sanity checks against patent trends pulled through Questel.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs face variance checks against parallel metrics such as airline maintenance cost per available seat kilometer and average blade downtime. Senior reviewers sign off only after anomalies are reconciled. Reports refresh annually, while major regulatory or material-price shocks trigger interim updates; a last-mile validation pass occurs just before release.

Why Mordor's Composite Repair Baseline Deserves Buyer Confidence

Published estimates often diverge because each firm chooses its own service depth, asset pool, and inflation handling. We disclose every boundary upfront, letting decision-makers trace numbers back to observable fleets and price lines.

Key gap drivers include whether cosmetic touch-ups are blended with structural fixes, how warranty work is treated, and if aggressive technician-hour escalation is assumed.

Our annual refresh cadence captures rapidly rising wind-fleet counts, whereas some peers rely on biennial updates. Currency conversion at average yearly rates, not spot peaks, further stabilizes our view.

Benchmark comparison

Market SizeAnonymized sourcePrimary gap driver
USD 15.34 bn (2025) Mordor Intelligence-
USD 18.60 bn (2023) Global Consultancy AIncludes retrofit strengthening and applies constant 13 % CAGR without fleet-age weighting
USD 24.71 bn (2025) Industry Source BCounts multi-year maintenance contracts at total contract value and uses optimistic resin price freeze

The comparison shows that once scope crevasses and pricing assumptions are aligned, the spread narrows markedly, underscoring how Mordor Intelligence offers a balanced, defensible baseline grounded in transparent variables and repeatable steps.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What CAGR is forecast for the composite repair market between 2026 and 2031?

The market is expected to register a 6.85% CAGR, rising from USD 16.39 billion in 2026 to USD 22.82 billion by 2031.

Which region is projected to grow fastest in composite repair services?

Asia-Pacific leads with an 8.29% forecast CAGR, driven by expanding aviation fleets and offshore wind capacity.

Why are autoclave-based repairs gaining share?

Regulatory requirements and higher quality assurance in aerospace are pushing operators toward autoclave curing despite greater capital cost, resulting in an 8.15% growth rate for the process.

How will self-healing composites affect repair demand?

Commercialization of self-healing laminates could cut cosmetic repair volume by up to 20% within five years, especially in automotive and wind-energy segments.

Page last updated on:

Composite Repair Market Report Snapshots