External Pacemakers Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth, Trends, And Forecasts (2025 - 2030)

The External Pacemakers Market Report is Segmented by Pacing Type (Transcutaneous, Transvenous (Temporary) and More), by Modality (single Chamber and Dual Chamber), End-User (Hospitals & Cardiac Center, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, and Other More), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa, and South America). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD)

External Pacemakers Market Size and Share

Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Compare market size and growth of External Pacemakers Market with other markets in Healthcare Industry

External Pacemakers Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The external cardiac pacemaker market generated USD 1.88 billion in 2025 and is projected to expand at a 3.84% CAGR, lifting revenues to USD 2.27 billion by 2030. Consistent procedure growth, breakthrough leadless technologies that shorten hospital stays, and broader adoption in emergency medical services keep the demand curve stable while moderating price volatility. Technological differentiation in dual-chamber systems and AI-driven remote re-programming allows leading vendors to protect margins even as smaller firms push lower-priced alternatives[1]Source: Richard Stevenson, “Forward-Deployable Cardiac Pacing in Military Settings,” tccc.org.ua. Military field-medicine protocols, along with aging populations that face rising rates of atrioventricular block, further widen the external cardiac pacemaker market’s clinical footprint[2]Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, “Accolade Pacemaker Devices: FDA Safety Communication,” fda.gov . Reimbursement complexity and uneven infrastructure outside Tier-1 hospitals remain headwinds, yet continuing investments in cath-lab capacity across Asia-Pacific underpin the market’s long-term trajectory.

Report Key Takeaways

  • By pacing type, transvenous systems led with 37.73% of the external cardiac pacemaker market share in 2024.
  • By modality, single-chamber devices accounted for 44.30% of revenue in 2024, while dual-chamber units are poised for a 5.16% CAGR through 2030.
  • By end user, hospitals and cardiac centers captured 72.57% of the external cardiac pacemaker market size in 2024; emergency medical services are growing fastest at 6.01% CAGR to 2030.
  • By geography, North America commanded 38.50% of the external cardiac pacemaker market share in 2024, whereas Asia-Pacific is projected to expand at a 4.67% CAGR.

Segment Analysis

By Pacing Type: Transvenous Systems Drive Market Leadership

Transvenous platforms secured 37.73% of the external cardiac pacemaker market share in 2024 thanks to >95% capture reliability and well-established clinical familiarity. Corresponding revenue equaled roughly USD 710 million of the 2025 external cardiac pacemaker market size. Transcutaneous devices dominate early emergency usage but discomfort restricts dwell time to hours. Epicardial wires remain a surgical niche yet offer definitive capture post-sternotomy. Newly branded “temporary-permanent” leads show 2.5% infection and 1.7% dislodgement rates, improving confidence for multiday support.

Demand is shifting toward systems with integrated hemodynamic sensors that report real-time capture thresholds, helping intensivists fine-tune output without fluoroscopy. Major suppliers leverage these incremental upgrades to safeguard share against cost-focused entrants, underscoring the external cardiac pacemaker market’s reliance on feature innovation.

Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Modality: Single-Chamber Dominance Faces Dual-Chamber Innovation

Single-chamber devices represented 44.30% of 2024 revenue, translating to about USD 830 million of the external cardiac pacemaker market size. Rapid deployment and adequate ventricular support keep the modality attractive during acute bradyarrhythmias. Dual-chamber solutions, however, are on a 5.16% CAGR path as data show AV synchrony lifts cardiac output by up to 20% sciencedirect.com. Abbott’s wireless AVEIR system sustains >90% synchrony during varied activities.

Ultra-high-frequency ECG mapping tools allow bedside optimization in under two minutes, encouraging broader uptake, especially where patients may need support for weeks. As pricing narrows, dual-chamber offerings are expected to erode the single-chamber lead, reshaping competitive hierarchies within the external cardiac pacemaker market.

By End User: Hospital Concentration Amid EMS Expansion

Hospitals and cardiac centers held 72.57% of 2024 revenues, equivalent to USD 1.36 billion of the external cardiac pacemaker market size, reflecting availability of fluoroscopy, telemetry and 24-hour staffing needed for safe temporary pacing. Emergency medical services show the fastest trajectory at 6.01% CAGR, riding investments in mobile critical-care units that integrate compact generators weighing under 300 g. Ambulatory surgical centers and specialty outpatient clinics contribute incremental gains as same-day electrophysiology interventions rise, supported by cloud-based rhythm dashboards that push monitoring out of the ICU.

Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Geography Analysis

North America captured 38.50% of 2024 revenue, driven by favorable reimbursement policies, large cardiac surgery volumes and rapid adoption of leadless platforms. AI-driven predictive analytics help U.S. centers shorten ICU dwell times, reinforcing the external cardiac pacemaker market’s health-economic case. Canada advances through provincial funding adjustments that now bundle external pacing into DRG payments, while Mexico’s IMSS system funds mobile coronary units equipped with transcutaneous kits.

Europe accounts for the second-largest share. France and Germany pursue sustainability by piloting device re-processing schemes that lower environmental impact without compromising sterility. The United Kingdom’s NHS trials cloud dashboards for step-down unit transfer within 24 hours of lead insertion, aiming to free ICU beds. Italian and Spanish hospitals recorded a 48.2% fall in permanent implants during COVID-19 lockdowns, yet emergency pacing volumes stayed comparatively resilient..

Asia-Pacific boasts the fastest growth at 4.67% CAGR. Japan pioneered reimbursements for leadless temporary generators, and China’s cath-lab count keeps multiplying in tier-2 cities. India’s national ambulance upgrade program equips every vehicle with external pacing pads, broadening rural access. South Korea, Australia and Singapore contribute with ageing demographics and medical-tourism flows that rely on quick-turnaround cardiac procedures to fuel the external cardiac pacemaker market.

Latin America and the Middle East & Africa remain nascent yet promising. Brazil’s SUS is piloting unit-price caps to stimulate local assembly, while Saudi Arabia funds advanced cardiac centers under Vision 2030. These programs could accelerate adoption once staff training and supply-chain barriers ease.

Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The external cardiac pacemaker market is moderately Consolidated. Medtronic, Abbott and Boston Scientific collectively control about majority of global turnover and rely on proprietary algorithms, longer battery lifetimes and broad service networks. Medtronic’s Micra AV2 and VR2 promise 40% longer battery life—up to 17 years—which, while designed for permanent placement, resets clinician expectations for temporary replacements. Abbott pursues conduction-system pacing that may migrate into retrievable formats, while Boston Scientific fuses leadless pacemakers with subcutaneous ICD links to simplify escalation paths.

Tier-2 firms—BIOTRONIK, Osypka, MicroPort—compete on cost-effectiveness and regional customization, particularly across Europe and China. Teleflex’s planned EUR 760 million acquisition of BIOTRONIK’s vascular unit underscores portfolio bundling aimed at cath-lab procurement teams. University-backed start-ups target biodegradable materials and wireless energy harvesting to leapfrog legacy designs, reflecting how innovation pipelines keep the external cardiac pacemaker market dynamic.

Regulatory landscapes evolve in tandem. The FDA’s harmonization with ISO 13485, effective 2026, compels manufacturers to tighten cyber-security controls and traceability. Early movers may gain a negotiating edge with hospital groups that prioritize audit-ready supply chains.

External Pacemakers Industry Leaders

  1. Medtronic

  2. BIOTRONIK

  3. MicroPort Scientific Corporation

  4. Boston Scientific Corporation

  5. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
External Pacemakers Market  Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • February 2025: Teleflex agreed to acquire BIOTRONIK’s Vascular Intervention business for EUR 760 million.
  • June 2024: Abbott earned CE Mark for AVEIR DR, the first dual-chamber leadless pacemaker.

Table of Contents for External Pacemakers Market Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising prevalence of transient bradyarrhythmias & CVD
    • 4.2.2 Growing volume of cardiac & structural‐heart surgeries requiring temporary pacing
    • 4.2.3 Technological upgrades in dual-chamber & connected external pacemakers
    • 4.2.4 Expansion of emergency-medical & ambulance fleets equipped with pacing capability (EMS, aeromedical)
    • 4.2.5 AI-enabled remote monitoring platforms accelerating early discharge programs
    • 4.2.6 Military field-medicine adoption for far-forward care in conflict zones
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High device cost & patchy reimbursement outside Tier-1 hospitals
    • 4.3.2 Infection & lead-related complication risk vs. drug therapy alternatives
    • 4.3.3 Supply-chain fragility for lithium-iodine batteries & critical ICs
    • 4.3.4 Shrinking dwell-time as leadless implantables gain traction
  • 4.4 Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, 2024-2030)

  • 5.1 By Pacing Type
    • 5.1.1 Transcutaneous
    • 5.1.2 Transvenous (Temporary)
    • 5.1.3 Epicardial
    • 5.1.4 Esophageal
  • 5.2 By Modality
    • 5.2.1 Single-Chamber
    • 5.2.2 Dual-Chamber
  • 5.3 By End User
    • 5.3.1 Hospitals & Cardiac Centers
    • 5.3.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • 5.3.3 Emergency Medical Services
    • 5.3.4 Military Field Hospitals
  • 5.4 By Geography
    • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.4.2 Europe
    • 5.4.2.1 Germany
    • 5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.2.3 France
    • 5.4.2.4 Italy
    • 5.4.2.5 Spain
    • 5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.3.1 China
    • 5.4.3.2 Japan
    • 5.4.3.3 India
    • 5.4.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.4.3.5 Australia
    • 5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.4 South America
    • 5.4.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.4.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.4.5.1 GCC
    • 5.4.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Medtronic
    • 6.3.2 Abbott Laboratories
    • 6.3.3 Boston Scientific
    • 6.3.4 BIOTRONIK
    • 6.3.5 Osypka Medical
    • 6.3.6 Zoll Medical
    • 6.3.7 Stryker (Physio-Control)
    • 6.3.8 Pacetronix
    • 6.3.9 Cook Medical
    • 6.3.10 Lepu Medical
    • 6.3.11 MicroPort CRM
    • 6.3.12 LivaNova
    • 6.3.13 Shree Pacetronix
    • 6.3.14 Oscor
    • 6.3.15 Inomed Medizintechnik
    • 6.3.16 Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical
    • 6.3.17 Nihon Kohden
    • 6.3.18 Fukuda Denshi
    • 6.3.19 Vector Medical
    • 6.3.20 Biotronik SE & Co. KG

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global External Pacemakers Market Report Scope

As per the scope of the report, an external pacemaker or temporary pacemaker is an electrode-based device that is used to regulate heart rhythm and a normal heart rate. The external pacemakers market is segmented by product (single chamber and dual chamber), application (bradycardia, acute myocardial infarction, and other applications), end-user (hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, and other end-users), and geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East and Africa, and South America). The market report also covers the estimated market sizes and trends for 17 different countries across major regions globally.

The report offers the value (in USD) for the above segments.

By Pacing Type Transcutaneous
Transvenous (Temporary)
Epicardial
Esophageal
By Modality Single-Chamber
Dual-Chamber
By End User Hospitals & Cardiac Centers
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Emergency Medical Services
Military Field Hospitals
By Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
South Korea
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Middle East and Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East and Africa
By Pacing Type
Transcutaneous
Transvenous (Temporary)
Epicardial
Esophageal
By Modality
Single-Chamber
Dual-Chamber
By End User
Hospitals & Cardiac Centers
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Emergency Medical Services
Military Field Hospitals
By Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
South Korea
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Middle East and Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East and Africa
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the external cardiac pacemaker market?

The external cardiac pacemaker market generated USD 1.88 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 2.27 billion by 2030.

Which segment holds the largest external cardiac pacemaker market share?

Transvenous systems led with 37.73% share in 2024, reflecting widespread clinical familiarity and reliable capture rates.

What is propelling growth in the Asia-Pacific external cardiac pacemaker market?

Rapid cath-lab expansion, ageing populations and national ambulance upgrades that carry pacing capability underpin a 4.67% CAGR outlook.

Why are dual-chamber external pacemakers gaining popularity?

Data show AV synchrony can boost cardiac output by up to 20%, and new leadless systems achieve high synchrony without traditional leads, driving a 5.16% CAGR for this modality.

How are reimbursement challenges affecting external cardiac pacemaker adoption?

High unit costs and complex Coverage-with-Evidence requirements limit uptake in smaller or resource-constrained facilities, creating geographical adoption gaps.

Page last updated on: June 18, 2025

External Pacemakers Market Report Snapshots