Denmark Geothermal Energy Market Size and Share

Denmark Geothermal Energy Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
View Global Report

Denmark Geothermal Energy Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

Denmark Geothermal Energy Market size in 2026 is estimated at 31.06 megawatt, growing from 2025 value of 21 megawatt with 2031 projections showing 219.68 megawatt, growing at 47.90% CAGR over 2026-2031.

Recent policy mandates, including the phase-out of new natural-gas boilers from 2028 and a legally binding requirement for carbon-neutral district-heating utilities by 2030, give the Denmark geothermal energy market a predictable growth runway. Municipal heat-planning obligations under the Heat Supply Act convert latent demand into bankable offtake agreements, while EU Innovation Fund grants cushion early exploration risk for binary-cycle and enhanced-geothermal projects. Abundant 45-70 °C aquifers beneath Zealand align naturally with Denmark’s low-temperature district-heating grids, allowing binary-cycle developers to avoid costly advanced drilling or high-temperature technologies. As industrial heat-pump costs fall below EUR 500/kW, hybrid geothermal-heat-pump plants unlock additional value streams and reduce lifecycle heat costs for utilities facing tight decarbonization timelines.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By plant type, binary-cycle systems held 66.12% of the Denmark geothermal energy market share in 2025, while enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) recorded the fastest CAGR at 50.62% through 2031.
  • By application, district-heating networks accounted for an 88.74% share of the Denmark geothermal energy market size in 2025 and are projected to grow at a 48.28% CAGR during 2026-2031.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Plant Type: Binary Cycles Capture Low-Enthalpy Advantage

Binary-cycle facilities represented 66.12% of installed capacity in 2025, and their share of the Denmark geothermal energy market size is forecast to stay above 70% through 2031 as 110 MW of additional binary projects reach completion. The segment’s 47.35% CAGR reflects both subsurface temperature suitability and the ability to add ORC turbines without incurring seismic risks that accompany flash-steam designs. Innargi’s Skejby phase, commissioned in October 2025, showcases 55 °C brine lifted to 85 °C via ammonia heat pumps, achieving 75–80% system efficiency.

Enhanced geothermal systems remain in the pilot stage, led by Aalborg’s 2 MW Heat4Ever coaxial wellbores. Flash-steam and dry-steam technologies are absent, since Denmark lacks ≥150 °C reservoirs. Continued heat-pump cost reductions toward EUR 300–400 per kW by 2027 should further widen the cost gap in favor of binary construction, positioning the segment to approach 198.6 MW by 2031 if Copenhagen’s 26 MW Bunter Sandstone project hits performance milestones.

Denmark Geothermal Energy Market: Market Share by Plant Type, 2025
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Denmark Geothermal Energy Market: Market Share by Plant Type, 2025

By Application: District Heating Dominates Demand Profile

District heating accounted for 88.74% of 2025 output and will retain the lion’s share as municipalities chase 2035 fossil-fuel bans. This application commands the highest Denmark geothermal energy market share and a forecast 48.28% CAGR, supported by 65% nationwide district-heating penetration and 98% household coverage in Copenhagen. Baseload capability with more than 8,000 full-load hours makes geothermal heat the natural successor to coal and gas in existing networks.

Electricity generation remains marginal because 50–65 °C fluids yield only single-digit turbine efficiencies. Industrial process heat is an emerging niche, demonstrated by a logistics hub in northern Denmark using groundwater with COP 4+ heat pumps. Wider industrial uptake depends on network extensions into manufacturing zones, a prospect encouraged by the 2024 Heat Planning Act.

Denmark Geothermal Energy Market: Market Share by Application, 2025
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Denmark Geothermal Energy Market: Market Share by Application, 2025

Geography Analysis

Zealand concentrates about two-thirds of installed capacity and virtually all near-term drilling commitments, owing to well-mapped aquifers that overlay Copenhagen’s 1.3 million-resident district-heat demand hub. Innargi’s 26 MW Lyngby plant and Vestforbrænding’s planned cluster supply illustrate the economies of scale achievable when resource, population, and network converge within a 30 km radius. Capital recovery accelerates because high load factors flatten tariff curves, allowing user bills to fall even after factoring in exploration amortization.

Jutland is poised for the steepest growth curve as municipal utilities in Aarhus, Aalborg, and Viborg exhaust biomass co-firing credits and face escalating EU carbon prices. Green Therma’s Aalborg pilot leverages DKK 84 million EUDP support to de-risk step-out wells, and Aarhus city utility Kredsløb has contracted Innargi to drill seven sites that could cover 20% of city heating by 2030. Geological heterogeneity adds cost, yet subsidies under the Danish Energy Agency’s geothermal exploration window offset up to 39% of seismic expenses, narrowing the capex delta versus Zealand.

Island systems such as Bornholm and Lolland eye geothermal to cut reliance on tanker-delivered fuel oil and to stabilize grids exposed to wind lulls. The Climate Agreement earmarks extra funding for stand-alone energy islands, enabling pre-feasibility studies on 5-10 MW binary plants integrated with battery-backed microgrids. Though small in absolute megawatts, island projects unlock premium heat tariffs and showcase export-ready modular technology for other Nordic archipelagos. Collectively, these geographic dynamics position Zealand as the bedrock of early-stage scale while framing Jutland and the islands as diversification levers that will mature mid-decade.

Regulatory Landscape

Geothermal exploration and production in Denmark are primarily regulated by the Danish Energy Agency (DEA) under the Danish Subsoil Act (Undergrundsloven). Licensing is structured around an initial 6-year exploration period that can be extended up to 30 years when a project proceeds to establishment and operation, supported by a recurring DEA application process with biannual deadlines (February 1 and September 1) that provides a defined entry pathway for developers targeting district-heating supply.

Project delivery is also shaped by heat-sector rules. Deep geothermal projects are typically developed for district heating and must align with the Heat Supply Act (Varmeforsyningsloven) and local planning requirements. In the September 1, 2026 application window, the DEA received two new geothermal licence applications from Innargi A/S (Nordsjaelland area) and Green Therma ApS (Aalborg area), indicating continued activity within the formal licensing cadence and reinforcing the need for district-heating compliance and municipal coordination to move projects forward.

Competitive Landscape

Competitiveness in the Denmark geothermal energy market hinges on land position, municipal alliances, and financing agility rather than core technology, because binary-cycle systems are commercially standardized. Innargi A/S leads capacity pipelines with projects in Greater Copenhagen and Aarhus totaling 150 MW under construction or advanced planning, giving the firm a first-mover edge that could translate into 30-40% national capacity by 2030. Its funding model blends pension equity from ATP, EIB-backed green loans, and 20-year fixed-price offtake deals, lowering the weighted average cost of capital relative to municipally financed competitors.

Green Therma positions itself as a technology-agnostic integrator that bundles drilling, heat pumps, and data-center waste-heat loops. The firm capitalizes on municipal balance-sheet caps that limit on-book borrowing above DKK 1 billion, offering off-balance-sheet project vehicles that de-risk utility exposure. Equipment vendors such as Danfoss and MAN Energy Solutions capture value via turnkey EPC contracts and long-term service agreements, with Danfoss also monetizing control-software upgrades that optimize geothermal flow and electricity dispatch.

Competitive intensity remains moderate because only a handful of developers hold drilling licenses in prime Zealand acreage, yet barriers to entry are falling as the Danish Geological Survey releases new 3-D seismic data sets. Foreign entrants eye joint ventures, attracted by transparent permitting and predictable feed-in tariffs for heat. As capacity scales, supply-chain bottlenecks move from drilling rigs to high-capacity downhole pumps, prompting vertical-integration plays by equipment suppliers. Overall, collaboration between municipalities, pension funds, and technology vendors underpins a partnership-driven competitive landscape.

Denmark Geothermal Energy Industry Leaders

  1. Innargi A/S

  2. Danfoss A/S

  3. Ramboll Group A/S

  4. Welltec A/S

  5. NIRAS A/S

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Denmark Geothermal Energy Market-Market Concetration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

The largest near-term whitespace is scaling geothermal as firm, low-temperature baseload heat for Denmark's district-heating networks. In practice, geothermal can be paired with high-capacity heat pumps to reach 80-90 C supply temperatures, improving how utilities use moderate-temperature resources. Commercial proof points are also building around large network hubs, including the Skejby, Aarhus facility that began supplying heat in October 2025, which provides operational validation for utility integration, control strategy, and offtake contracting in an urban district-heating setting.

Permitting and targeted exemptions are also improving project bankability and reducing early-stage barriers. The Danish Energy Agency permit granted to Innargi in Virum (December 2025) increases the pipeline of municipally anchored projects, while Denmark's 2023 legislation to exempt geothermal heat projects from existing price regulations supports investable tariff structures for new builds and expansions. Building-scale ground source heating and cooling remains tied to municipal permitting under the Environmental Protection Act and Water Act, but the main commercialization pull continues to come from regulated district-heating systems under the Heat Supply Act, where developers and utilities can standardize multi-well programs and concentrate capacity into fewer, higher-output locations to streamline execution.

Recent Industry Developments

  • March 2026: Innargi reported positive initial results from the first months of commercial heat production at its Skejby, Aarhus facility and updated plans tied to a Phase 2 build-out. The update supported scaling the Aarhus program and provided fresh operating data that can feed permitting, financing, and utility offtake discussions for additional wells and sites.
  • December 2025: The Danish Energy Agency granted Innargi a permit for geothermal exploration and extraction in Virum, Denmark, to supply district heating. The approval expanded Innargi's addressable project pipeline in the Greater Copenhagen area and removed a key development gating step by formalizing subsoil rights for a defined supply geography.
  • October 2024: Aalborg CSP partnered with Innargi to deliver an integrated heat pump station for a geothermal project in Aarhus, including a large electric heat pump tied to Kredslob's district heating network. The collaboration reinforced a hybrid geothermal-plus-heat-pump configuration that supports lower-temperature resources meeting district-heating supply requirements and helped anchor additional local EPC capability around upcoming geothermal rollouts.

Table of Contents for Denmark Geothermal Energy Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rapid decarbonisation targets for district-heating utilities
    • 4.2.2 Phase-out of new natural-gas boilers from 2028
    • 4.2.3 Abundant low-temperature sedimentary basins under Zealand
    • 4.2.4 Industrial-scale heat-pump cost declines (< €500/kW)
    • 4.2.5 EU Innovation Fund grants for deep geothermal pilot clusters
    • 4.2.6 Data-centre waste-heat offtake agreements boosting project IRR
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Uncertain subsurface temperature gradients outside Zealand
    • 4.3.2 Competition from surplus wind power-to-heat (immersion heaters)
    • 4.3.3 Municipal balance-sheet caps delaying FID on > 150 MW projects
    • 4.3.4 Public perception of induced seismicity after 2021 Viborg event
  • 4.4 Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Existing and Key Upcoming Projects
  • 4.8 Investment & Financing Analysis
  • 4.9 Porter’s Five Forces
    • 4.9.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.9.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.9.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.9.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.9.5 Industry Rivalry
  • 4.10 PESTLE Analysis

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts

  • 5.1 By Plant Type
    • 5.1.1 Dry Steam Plants
    • 5.1.2 Flash Steam Plants
    • 5.1.3 Binary Cycle Plants
    • 5.1.4 Combined Cycle/Hybrid Plants
    • 5.1.5 Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)
  • 5.2 By Application
    • 5.2.1 Electricity Generation
    • 5.2.2 District Heating and Cooling
    • 5.2.3 Industrial Process Heat

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves (M&A, JVs, Funding, PPAs)
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis (Market Rank/Share for key companies)
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global-level Overview, Market-level Overview, Core Segments, Financials, Strategic Information, Products & Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Innargi A/S
    • 6.4.2 A.P. Moller Holding A/S
    • 6.4.3 Danfoss A/S
    • 6.4.4 Ramboll Group A/S
    • 6.4.5 Welltec A/S
    • 6.4.6 NIRAS A/S
    • 6.4.7 Hovedstadens Geotermi P/S
    • 6.4.8 Gate 21
    • 6.4.9 Ross DK A/S
    • 6.4.10 De Rigo Thermal A/S
    • 6.4.11 Enopsol A/S
    • 6.4.12 GEOOP A/S
    • 6.4.13 GEOLOG International
    • 6.4.14 Baker Hughes Denmark
    • 6.4.15 Halliburton Denmark
    • 6.4.16 Ørsted A/S (geothermal JV interests)
    • 6.4.17 TotalEnergies Denmark (CCS-geo synergies)
    • 6.4.18 E.ON Denmark
    • 6.4.19 Siemens Energy Denmark
    • 6.4.20 AFRY Denmark
    • 6.4.21 COWI A/S

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment
  • 7.2 New Business Models (Heat-as-a-Service for municipalities)
  • 7.3 Carbon-Neutral District-Heating Roadmap 2030
  • 7.4 Hybridisation with Thermal Energy Storage & Wind
  • 7.5 Green Bond & Pension-Fund Financing Structures

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definition and Coverage

This market is defined as geothermal energy activity in Denmark, measured by installed geothermal capacity that is built and operating for heat and energy supply, and tracked in megawatt terms for sizing and forecasting.

Scope exclusions: oil and gas drilling activity that is not tied to geothermal heat production, and general ground source heat pump equipment sales that are not reported as geothermal plant capacity, are excluded.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Plant Type
    • Dry Steam Plants
    • Flash Steam Plants
    • Binary Cycle Plants
    • Combined Cycle/Hybrid Plants
    • Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)
  • By Application
    • Electricity Generation
    • District Heating and Cooling
    • Industrial Process Heat

Data Sources, Market Sizing, and Validation

Desk Research

We started with public energy statistics and policy documents to anchor what is already installed and what is being added next. Sources used for this include official energy and climate publications from the Danish Energy Agency, national and EU-level energy datasets such as Eurostat, and international energy statistics from the IEA, which helped us cross-check heat supply context and reporting definitions.

To avoid building assumptions in a vacuum, project and technology signals were also reviewed from sources such as the IRENA knowledge base, scientific and engineering papers indexed in open journals, and publicly available environmental and permitting disclosures where available. Company annual reports, investor presentations, and credible press coverage were used to confirm project timelines and commissioning status, and then paid subscriptions focused on company financials and patents were referenced selectively to validate developer activity and technology direction. These desk research inputs are illustrative and not exhaustive, since many other public sources were also used for data collection, validation, and clarification.

Primary Interviews and Surveys

In Denmark, expert interviews and surveys cover geothermal plant owners, district-heating planners, drilling and reservoir specialists, equipment providers, public authorities, and financial decision-makers. These discussions help test secondary data, clarify project timing and utilization, and check capacity, cost, and demand assumptions before final analysis.

Distribution of primary research fieldwork respondents

Company type Respondent position
Top tier: 26% CXOs: 15%
Mid tier: 49% Functional/Unit leaders: 30%
Smaller Players: 25% Managers: 55%

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

The sizing logic is built using a top-down reconstruction of Denmark geothermal capacity, where national energy statistics and project pipelines are translated into installed MW by year. Once the annual capacity base was set, selective bottom-up checks were used to keep it realistic. For example, visible projects were summed, typical MW per installation was applied, and implied build rates were tested against what suppliers and advisors said is feasible.

Key inputs that shaped the model include the operational installed capacity (MW) already in place, announced and permitted project MW, typical project lead times from drilling to commissioning, district heating demand growth signals, and cost and financing conditions that affect whether projects move from planning into construction. For forecasting, scenario analysis was used so the base case reflects what respondents see as most likely, and then an upside and downside are stress-tested using changes in commissioning delays, permitting pace, and adoption by district heating networks. Where a project list lacked firm MW or timing, we applied conservative ranges from interviews and then reconciled totals back to observable national capacity reporting so the final series stays explainable.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs were validated through multiple checks so the MW series is consistent from year to year and does not jump without a real-world trigger. We compared the model against independent signals such as reported operational capacity, project status updates, and public district heating developments, and then followed up on outliers when the implied additions did not match what market participants described.

Before sign-off, calculations are reviewed in steps, starting with input sanity checks and followed by peer review of assumptions and unit consistency. The report is refreshed annually, and if a material event occurs, such as a major project cancellation or commissioning, an interim review is triggered so clients are not working with stale capacity assumptions. Right before delivery, a final pass is completed to align the model with the latest publicly visible announcements and confirmations.

Mordor Intelligence's Denmark Geothermal Energy Market Estimate Compared With Other Published Estimates

Published estimates for Denmark geothermal energy do not always line up because they are not always measuring the same thing, even when the titles look similar. The biggest differences usually come from whether the market is counted as installed capacity or as revenue, how heat versus electricity use is treated, and how much of the pipeline is assumed to be delivered on time.

Heat pump equipment sales and related installation services sit outside Mordor Intelligence's scope here, since the sizing is anchored to installed geothermal capacity in MW rather than a revenue pool. Other publications often mix monetary value with capacity by applying broad price assumptions, and they may also include aggressive pipeline conversion rates or longer forecast horizons, which can lift the stated market size even when actual operating MW is still small.

Benchmark comparison

Source Market Size Gaps in Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence USD 0.02 B (2025)
Regional Consultancy A USD 0.62 B (2025) Reported as market value in USD, which typically layers in capex, services, and system components that are not captured when the market is measured as operating capacity in MW.
Industry Publisher B USD 7.17 B (2025) Uses a broad revenue definition and long-horizon growth framing, which can pull in adjacent heating technologies and optimistic adoption assumptions that do not map cleanly to installed MW in Denmark.

The table shows that the spread is mainly a unit and scope mismatch, not just a forecasting difference. By keeping the model tied to observable MW and then pressure-testing additions with project timing checks, the result stays easier to reproduce and simpler to compare year over year.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How large is the Denmark geothermal energy market in 2026?

Installed capacity is 31.06 MW, and it is forecast to reach 219.68 MW by 2031.

Which plant type is growing fastest in Denmark?

Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) are expanding at a forecast 50.62% CAGR through 2031.

What share of Danish geothermal output goes to district heating?

About 88.74% in 2025, with sustained growth as fossil fuels exit district networks.

Why is electricity generation a minor use of Danish geothermal resources?

Reservoir temperatures of 50–65 °C limit turbine efficiency, making direct heat more economical.

Who are the leading project developers?

Innargi A/S and Hovedstadens Geotermi P/S together control nearly three-quarters of the project pipeline.

How does wind surplus affect geothermal economics?

Low-price wind electricity favors immersion heaters during high-wind hours, trimming geothermal utilization to roughly 70–80%.

Page last updated on:

Denmark Geothermal Energy Market Report Snapshots