Australia Wind Energy Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Australia Wind Energy Market size in terms of installed base is expected to grow from 18.80 gigawatt in 2025 to 45 gigawatt by 2030, at a CAGR of 19.07% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
This steep growth projection stems from a structural pivot away from compliance-only procurement toward utility decarbonization mandates, 24/7 corporate power-purchase agreements, and the federal Capacity Investment Scheme’s revenue‐floor underwriting. A parallel build-out of grid-connected hydrogen electrolysers is emerging as a long-term offtake stabilizer, while repowering of 1990s-vintage onshore fleets with turbines above 6 MW is lifting average capacity factors. Tender 1 of the Capacity Investment Scheme alone awarded 3.6 GW of wind in 2024, signalling firm federal support even as state transmission build-outs lag demand. Yet bottlenecks inside Renewable Energy Zones and protracted offshore licensing cycles threaten near-term deployment timelines, creating a two-speed path split between grid-connected utility projects and isolated industrial microgrids.
Key Report Takeaways
- By location, onshore wind led with 100% of the Australian wind energy market share in 2024; offshore is still pre-commercial, but onshore additions are forecast to expand at a 19.1% CAGR through 2030.
- By turbine capacity, the 3-to-6 MW class held 64.7% share of the Australian wind energy market size in 2024, while units above 6 MW are projected to grow at 32.7% CAGR through 2030.
- By application, utility-scale projects commanded 95.1% capacity in 2024, whereas commercial and industrial installations posted the fastest expansion at a 19.3% CAGR to 2030.
- By geography, New South Wales led capacity additions with 8.1 GW targeted across Central-West Orana and New England Renewable Energy Zones, while Victoria shows the quickest future expansion pace on the back of Gippsland offshore potential.
- By company concentration, Vestas, Goldwind, and GE Vernova collectively controlled 80% of 2024 turbine orders, underscoring tightening OEM supply and heightened price pressure on developers.
Australia Wind Energy Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utility decarbonisation mandates | +4.2% | National, with concentration in NSW, Victoria, Queensland | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Corporate 24/7 renewable-PPAs surge | +3.8% | National, strongest in mining regions (Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia) | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Grid-connected hydrogen project pipeline | +2.9% | Hunter Valley (NSW), Pilbara (WA), Bell Bay (Tasmania) | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Repowering of 1990s onshore fleet | +2.1% | South Australia, Victoria, early NSW installations | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Large-scale Renewable Energy Target (LRET) | +3.5% | National | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Utility Decarbonization Mandates
State net-zero legislation is accelerating coal retirements and obliging integrated utilities to secure wind capacity volumes that eclipse legacy Large-scale Renewable Energy Target compliance. The Australian Energy Market Operator’s 2024 Integrated System Plan calls for 127 GW of combined wind and solar by 2050, a target that requires yearly wind additions to triple from 2024’s commissioning rate.[1]Australian Energy Market Operator, “2024 Integrated System Plan,” aemo.com.au Victoria’s legislated 95% renewable electricity goal by 2035 and Queensland’s 80% target by the same year lock in demand, yet transmission upgrades trail by three to five years. The Capacity Investment Scheme partially offsets merchant risk by issuing 15-year revenue-floor contracts; the inaugural 3.6 GW tender allowed projects to close finance at sub-5% weighted average cost of capital.[2]Clean Energy Regulator, “Large-scale Generation Certificates,” cleanenergyregulator.gov.au With Large Generation Certificate prices swinging between AUD 26 and AUD 41.50 in late-2024, the underwriting mechanism narrows bankability risk and speeds build timelines. However, it shifts a slice of market risk onto taxpayers, raising questions about the long-run fiscal envelope for future tenders.
Corporate 24/7 Renewable-PPA Surge
Industrial and technology firms are bypassing utilities to ink long-term physical delivery contracts, led by Rio Tinto’s 25-year offtake for the 1.4 GW Bungaban Wind Farm.[3]Rio Tinto, “Bungaban Wind Farm Power Purchase Agreement,” riotinto.com Corporate PPA volumes climbed 40% year-on-year to 7.9 TWh in 2024 as Scope 2 reporting under the Climate-Related Financial Disclosures framework crystallized. Mining majors are deploying behind-the-meter wind to decarbonize ore processing, but localized load profiles require hybrid storage, lifting capital expenditure 15%. Voluntary demand absorbed 10.4 million Large Generation Certificates in 2024 and could reach up to 15 million in 2025, lifting premium prices for wind projects offering firm delivery. This trend fragments the Australian wind energy market into grid-oriented utility projects and industrial microgrids, each with distinct financing stacks and technology mixes.
Grid-Connected Hydrogen Project Pipeline
Electrolyser co-location is converting variable wind output into storable molecules, underpinning offtake where grid congestion persists. The Hunter Hydrogen Hub alone targets 10 GW of renewable supply to feed domestic ammonia and export cargoes. In 2024, ARENA awarded AUD 70 million under Hydrogen Headstart to eight wind-to-hydrogen studies, de-risking projects at Port of Newcastle, Gibson Island, and Bell Bay. Fortescue Future Industries plans 300 MW of electrolysers in the Pilbara, vertically integrating green iron and bypassing grid fees. Yet electrolyser capex sits 30% above grid-parity benchmarks, and export infrastructure will not mature before 2028, limiting near-term capacity uptake. ISO 19880 adoption in 2024 clarified purity standards, but full commercial momentum requires drop-in cost curves and port liquefaction readiness.
Repowering of 1990s Onshore Fleet
Australia’s earliest wind assets, many delivering sub-30% capacity factors after two decades, now offer a capacity-doubling play through 6 MW replacements. Candidates such as Waubra and Hallett can reuse grid connections, sidestepping three-to-five-year permitting for greenfield sites. Upgraded turbines raise capacity factors to the 40–45% range and improve internal rates of return by two to three percentage points. Nevertheless, council planners are imposing stricter acoustic and height curbs, with some caps at 150 m tower height versus OEM norms above 180 m. Substation upgrades at aged sites dilute some capital-efficiency upside, but repowering remains the fastest route to incremental gigawatts wherever transmission corridors are saturated.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission bottlenecks in REZs | -3.7% | Central-West Orana (NSW), New England (NSW), North Queensland | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Local supply-chain inflation (steel, cranes) | -2.4% | National, acute at port cities (Newcastle, Melbourne, Fremantle) | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| First Nations land-access litigation risk | -1.6% | Northern Territory, Queensland, Western Australia | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Slow offshore planning approvals (NOPSEMA) | -2.8% | Gippsland (Victoria), Hunter (NSW), Illawarra (NSW) | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Transmission Bottlenecks in Renewable Energy Zones
Project commitments inside Renewable Energy Zones now exceed planned line ratings by two to three times. Central-West Orana’s AUD 5.45 billion build supports 4.5 GW, while 12 GW of projects queue for access, leaving a 7.5 GW overhang. New England’s Stage-1 2.4 GW line is set for 2029, but Stage 2 funding remains undecided, stranding 5 GW of wind with signed offtakes. Curtailment in South Australia already erodes revenues by AUD 30–50/MWh during high-wind hours, forcing PPA renegotiations. Rising steel and labor costs push network budgets 20% over plan, adding 12- to 18-month energization delays. Developers are oversizing wind farms to offset curtailment, yet the strategy inflates land use and sparks local opposition, reinforcing the constraint loop.
Local Supply-Chain Inflation
Tower fabrication and foundations represent roughly 35% of wind project capex, and 2024 saw domestic steel costs spike 15–20%. Australia imports 90% of turbine components, and freight rates from Europe and Asia climbed 25% on port congestion at Newcastle, Melbourne, and Fremantle. Only a dozen cranes exceed 1,000-tonne capacity nationwide, stretching erection schedules by up to nine months. Vestas’ nacelle assembly expansion in Victoria adds local capacity but does not resolve blade manufacturing, leaving projects exposed to 12-18 month lead times. Remote Queensland and Western Australia sites incur AUD 10 million per 100 MW in extra transport, eroding the cost edge of their superior wind resource.
Segment Analysis
By Location: Offshore Licensing Delays Extend Onshore Dominance
Onshore assets delivered the entire 15.29 GW of national capacity in 2024, and their stock is expected to clock a 19.1% CAGR through 2030 on the back of Renewable Energy Zone line upgrades and corporate PPA momentum, cementing the onshore segment’s command over the Australian wind energy market. Offshore remains in the feasibility stage even though the Gippsland, Hunter, Illawarra, and Southern Ocean declared zones cover 18,906 km² and hold theoretical headroom above 40 GW.[4]National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority, “Offshore Wind Licensing,” nopsema.gov.au
The National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority issued 12 Gippsland feasibility licenses in 2024, yet environmental reviews stretch up to 24 months, deferring first power until 2028. Star of the South’s 2.2 GW flagship awaits construction approval and final investment decision despite AUD 10 billion earmarked capex. Chartering European installation vessels at AUD 500,000 per day and the absence of domestic heavy-lift ports inflate offshore capex 20% above North Sea benchmarks. Consequently, the Australian wind energy market will rely on onshore turbines for near-term volume, while offshore projects form a strategic hedge against future land-use pushback.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Turbine Capacity: Gigawatt-Scale Units Reshape Economics
The 3-to-6 MW class held 64.7% of 2024 installations, mirroring builds commissioned between 2018 and 2023, yet turbines above 6 MW are forecast to expand at a 32.7% CAGR, rapidly scaling their share of the Australian wind energy market size. Vestas’ V162-6.2 MW platform at Golden Plains and Robbins Island logs capacity factors near 45% owing to 162 m rotors.
Goldwind’s GW191-6.7 MW unit cuts turbine count per megawatt by 30%, trimming balance-of-system costs by AUD 150,000 per MW. GE Vernova’s two-piece blades ease inland logistics, opening interior sites previously capped at 5.5 MW modules. While sub-3 MW turbines linger in community projects, new grid-connected farms increasingly standardize on 6 MW-plus platforms. Heavy-lift crane scarcity, however, raises scheduling risk; Australia hosts fewer than eight 1,200-tonne cranes, pushing some developers to pre-book years in advance. OEM market share is concentrating: Vestas, Goldwind, and GE Vernova collectively hold roughly 75% of above-6 MW orders, sharpening supply-chain leverage.
By Application: Industrial Offtake Fragments Utility Dominance
Utility-scale projects accounted for 95.1% of operational wind capacity in 2024, anchored by Capacity Investment Scheme support and Renewable Energy Zone lines, thus dominating the Australian wind energy market. Yet mining and processing majors are spurring a 19.3% CAGR in commercial and industrial builds through 2030 as they hedge Large Generation Certificate volatility.
Rio Tinto’s Bungaban PPA and BHP’s Pilbara wind arrays typify behind-the-meter strategies that bypass grid queues. Such projects skirt AUD 100-200 million per GW in connection fees but demand battery hybrids to align with shift-based load profiles. Community ownership remains niche, Hepburn Wind’s 4.1 MW cooperative model covers under 1% of national capacity but enjoys cheaper finance from the Clean Energy Finance Corporation. Differing risk appetites are bifurcating capital pools: institutional investors favor revenue-floored utility plants, whereas corporates self-fund microgrids that internalize power costs and decarbonization credits.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
New South Wales leads the pipeline with 8.1 GW targeted across Central-West Orana and New England Renewable Energy Zones backed by AUD 5.45 billion in network investment and up to AUD 20 billion in private funds.[5]NSW Government, “Central-West Orana Renewable Energy Zone,” nsw.gov.au Eraring’s 2025 coal exit removes 2.88 GW of dispatchable supply, fast-tracking wind deals despite transmission delays. Bungaban (1.4 GW) and Rye Park (396 MW) are under construction, but both hinge on HumeLink’s 2028 energization, deferring revenues by up to three years.
Victoria holds the crown for long-term offshore potential. Gippsland alone offers 25 GW, but coastal community opposition is slowing onshore permits to roughly 1–1.5 GW per year. Golden Plains (756 MW) reached financial close in 2024 after a five-year planning saga. Queensland’s Darling Downs and North Queensland zones lure mining offtakers; MacIntyre (923 MW) broke ground in March 2024 with a 25-year industrial. However, Powerlink’s next-gen lines will only finalize from 2026, leaving 4 GW of consented projects in limbo.
South Australia hit 70% instantaneous wind penetration in 2024, yet curtailment has risen as interconnectors saturate, trimming revenues by AUD 30-50/MWh. New projects must bundle batteries or grid-forming inverters, adding roughly 15% to capex. Tasmania’s 1.5 GW Marinus Link to Victoria could unlock 3 GW of island wind, but cost overruns from AUD 3.5 billion to AUD 5.6 billion cloud merchant economics. Western Australia’s Pilbara region pursues vertically integrated wind-to-hydrogen complexes; isolated grids cap utility penetration to 30% until synchronous condensers and storage arrive post-2027. Geography thus splits the Australian wind energy market into east-coast grid expansion and west-coast industrial green-fuel clusters.
Competitive Landscape
Developer control is dispersed: Neoen, Acciona, CWP Renewables, and Tilt Renewables each hold 5–8% of the pipeline, while the turbine segment is concentrated, with Vestas at 35%, Goldwind at 25%, and GE Vernova at 20% of 2024 orders. The OEM trio’s 80% hold confers pricing power, squeezing developer margins during turbine tenders. Vertical integration is rising: CWP Renewables embeds transmission and hydrogen offtake inside Robbins Island’s 1 GW plan, capturing additional value chain spread. Offshore wind brings heavyweight entrants such as Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners and Corio Generation, each with balance sheets north of AUD 10 billion, crowding out smaller firms unable to fund two-year feasibility cycles.
Floating foundation patents rose 40% in 2024, reflecting growing interest in the 100–200 meter depths of the Southern Ocean. Battery co-location is an emerging arbitrage: 200 MW wind paired with 100 MW/200 MWh storage garners 20% higher revenues via frequency control ancillary markets. Community ownership offers a cost-of-capital edge but faces stricter council conditions. Technology edge now centers on capacity factor differentials. Vestas’ V162 delivers 45% compared with 40% on legacy 3 MW machines, and grid-forming inverter conformance to AEMO system-strength rules. Compliance costs sit at AUD 2-3 million per project, but unlock dispatch eligibility, a prerequisite as thermal exit accelerates.
Australia Wind Energy Industry Leaders
-
Tilt Renewables
-
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
-
Neoen SA
-
Goldwind Australia
-
Iberdrola Australia (Infigen)
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- December 2024: Siemens Gamesa brought a 50 MW South Australian project online with SG 6.6-170 turbines, posting a 46% initial capacity factor.
- November 2024: Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners committed AUD 2.5 billion to the 2 GW Macarthur Offshore Wind project in Gippsland.
- October 2024: CWP Renewables secured AUD 1.2 billion for the 1 GW Robbins Island Wind Farm, including 200 MW battery storage.
- September 2024: Vestas expanded its Victorian nacelle assembly line to 350 units per year, focusing on ≥6 MW platforms.
- August 2024: The federal government awarded 3.6 GW of wind under Capacity Investment Scheme Tender 1, underwriting AUD 8 billion in new builds.
- July 2024: Tilt Renewables gained approval for a 396 MW expansion at Rye Park, pending HumeLink completion.
Australia Wind Energy Market Report Scope
The Australian wind energy market report includes:
| Onshore |
| Offshore |
| Up to 3 MW |
| 3 to 6 MW |
| Above 6 MW |
| Utility-scale |
| Commercial and Industrial |
| Community Projects |
| Nacelle/Turbine |
| Blade |
| Tower |
| Generator and Gearbox |
| Balance-of-System |
| By Location | Onshore |
| Offshore | |
| By Turbine Capacity | Up to 3 MW |
| 3 to 6 MW | |
| Above 6 MW | |
| By Application | Utility-scale |
| Commercial and Industrial | |
| Community Projects | |
| By Component (Qualitative Analysis) | Nacelle/Turbine |
| Blade | |
| Tower | |
| Generator and Gearbox | |
| Balance-of-System |
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the projected installed wind capacity in Australia by 2030?
It is forecast to reach 45 GW, up from 18.80 GW in 2025.
How fast is onshore wind expected to grow?
Onshore capacity is projected to expand at a 19.1% CAGR through 2030.
Which turbine size segment is gaining the most momentum?
Turbines above 6 MW are forecast to grow at a 32.7% CAGR as developers chase higher capacity factors.
Why are corporate PPAs important to future build-out?
They supplied 7.9 TWh in 2024 and reduce reliance on utility intermediaries, accelerating behind-the-meter projects.
What are the main bottlenecks limiting near-term growth?
Transmission congestion in Renewable Energy Zones and local supply-chain inflation in steel and crane services.
When will offshore wind likely deliver first power?
Environmental licensing timelines push first commercial offshore generation beyond 2028.
Page last updated on: