Waste-to-Energy Wastewater Treatment Systems Market Size and Share

Waste-to-Energy Wastewater Treatment Systems Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Waste-to-Energy Wastewater Treatment Systems Market was valued at USD 0.79 billion in 2025 and is estimated to grow from USD 0.84 billion in 2026 to reach USD 1.14 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 6.34% during the forecast period (2026–2031). Tighter discharge rules are moving wastewater treatment from a supporting utility function to a required part of plant design, particularly where flue gas desulfurization wastewater and combustion-residual leachate are present. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s 2024 rule requires zero discharge for specified streams and sets a compliance deadline no later than December 31, 2034, for direct dischargers, creating a long replacement cycle for affected facilities. Operators are also giving more attention to water reuse, heat integration, anaerobic digestion, and biogas upgrading because these configurations can reduce operating exposure and affect , energy use, staffing, and long-term brine management. Asia-Pacific combines the largest installed base with the fastest expansion, while North America and Europe are more focused on upgrades required by compliance and asset renewal. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market, therefore, favors suppliers that can combine process design, equipment delivery, long-term operations support, and reliable management of complex wastewater streams.
Key Report Takeaways
- By wastewater stream, Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) wastewater held 32.15% of the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market in 2025, while ash handling and leachate water is forecast to grow at a 7.15% CAGR through 2031.
- By treatment technology, physical and chemical treatment systems held 38.23% of the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market in 2025, while biological treatment systems are forecast to grow at a 7.51% CAGR through 2031.
- By waste-to-energy plant type, municipal solid waste (MSW) waste-to-energy plants held 48.06% of the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market in 2025, while biomass waste-to-energy plants are forecast to grow at an 8.07% CAGR through 2031.
- By project type, new installations held 35.68% of the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market in 2025, while retrofit installations are forecast to grow at a 7.39% CAGR through 2031.
- By geography, Asia-Pacific held 43.55% of the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market in 2025 and is forecast to grow at a 7.26% CAGR through 2031.
Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.
Global Waste-to-Energy Wastewater Treatment Systems Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis*
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tightening Effluent and Combustion-Residue Compliance Requirements | +1.8% | Global, led by North America and EU; spill-over to APAC core | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Expansion of Water Reuse and Zero Liquid Discharge in Water-Stressed Plants | +1.4% | Asia-Pacific core (China, India), Middle-East and Africa; spill-over to North America | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Growth of Energy-Positive Wastewater and Sludge Operations | +1.0% | Global, led by Asia-Pacific and Northern Europe | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Retrofit Demand Across Aging Waste-to-Energy Assets | +1.2% | Europe (Germany, UK, Nordic), Japan, North America | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| FGD and Ash-Leachate Treatment Requirements in High-Salinity Streams | +0.9% | North America, EU, Asia-Pacific core | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Digital Optimization of Digestion, Aeration and Thermal ZLD Operations | +0.7% | Global, led by North America and EU; early adoption in China | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Tightening Effluent and Combustion-Residue Compliance Requirements
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s final Steam Electric Effluent Limitations Guidelines, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 423, took effect on July 8, 2024. The rule requires zero discharge for flue gas desulfurization wastewater and combustion-residual leachate at covered facilities, with a direct-discharger compliance date no later than December 31, 2034[1]U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Supplemental Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category,” Federal Register, govinfo.gov. It specifies chemical precipitation and membrane filtration with 100% permeate recycle for flue gas desulfurization wastewater, which limits the role of simple discharge systems. The European Union’s recast Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive, Directive (EU) 2024/3019, entered into force on January 1, 2025, and adds energy-management audits and energy-neutrality requirements for larger treatment plants. These requirements favor vendors with validated, integrated treatment trains that can document performance, recycling rates, and operating outcomes. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market is consequently seeing compliance requirements influence technology selection, not only final effluent limits.
Expansion of Water Reuse and Zero Liquid Discharge in Water-Stressed Plants
Water scarcity can support zero liquid discharge investment even before a formal compliance deadline applies. A 2026 scientific assessment found that renewable-energy integration could reduce emissions from circular zero liquid discharge systems by up to 72%, although higher capital requirements extended payback beyond the planning horizon for many industrial facilities. This trade-off makes hybrid process configurations important because biological and membrane stages can reduce the volume reaching thermal evaporation. WaterNext’s 2026 case study at Vardhman Textiles reported 97.5% water recovery through a membrane bioreactor, multistage reverse osmosis, and concentrated reverse osmosis train. The remaining 2.5% of influent required thermal evaporation, showing why front-end separation can reduce energy demand and the operating duty of downstream evaporation equipment. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market benefits where plants seek water reuse and lower freshwater dependence alongside discharge control.
Growth of Energy-Positive Wastewater and Sludge Operations
Energy self-sufficiency is changing how many operators assess wastewater and sludge assets. Singapore’s Tuas Nexus combines an Integrated Waste Management Facility with a Water Reclamation Plant and uses co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste to target full energy self-sufficiency. The project is expected to save more than 200,000 metric tons of carbon emissions each year, according to Singapore’s National Environment Agency. Research published in 2026 found that an integrated alkaline electrolyzer and pressure-retarded osmosis could remove ammonia, recover freshwater, and produce 99.9% pure hydrogen. Such systems remain at an early stage, but they link wastewater treatment decisions with wider facility energy planning. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market can gain where plant operators value energy, water, and material outputs alongside wastewater compliance.
Retrofit Demand Across Aging Waste-to-Energy Assets
Legacy plants are reaching renewal cycles while facing discharge standards that were not part of their original design basis. This overlap is especially relevant in Europe, Japan, and North America, where many facilities require equipment replacement and new compliance capability at the same time. ANDRITZ received four German sludge and waste-to-energy wastewater upgrade contracts within around 12 months, including the Wuppertal-Buchenhofen project and the Hildesheim project. The Wuppertal contract covers 47,500 metric tons of dry matter each year, while the Hildesheim project covers 33,500 metric tons of dry matter each year. Modular and skid-mounted equipment is valuable in these projects because installation must fit within planned maintenance periods, making engineering flexibility and reliable commissioning central to supplier selection. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market is therefore likely to see retrofit activity outpace new-build activity in mature plant fleets through much of the forecast period.
Restraints Impact Analysis*
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| High CAPEX and Energy Consumption of Thermal ZLD Systems | -1.5% | Global; most acute in South America, South/Southeast Asia, smaller North American operators | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Variable Wastewater Chemistry and Inconsistent Feedstock Quality | -0.9% | Global; most severe at MSW plants with mixed, unclassified waste inputs | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Corrosion, Scaling and Difficult Salt-By-Product Management | -0.7% | Global; most intense at high-salinity FGD and ash-leachate streams | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Permitting Risk and Community Opposition to Integrated Facilities | -0.5% | North America, Western Europe, Australia | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
High CAPEX and Energy Consumption of Thermal ZLD Systems
Thermal zero liquid discharge systems remain the proven option for fully eliminating liquid discharge from high-salinity waste-to-energy streams. Their energy requirement of 15-25 kilowatt-hours per cubic meter of treated water can produce operating costs that challenge project economics for smaller operators. A 2026 techno-economic assessment found that solar photovoltaic integration reduced emissions by up to 72%, but it also raised capital costs and pushed payback beyond the planning horizon for most industrial facilities. This can lead operators to defer projects until a compliance obligation becomes unavoidable. Financing constraints are particularly important in South America and Southeast Asia, where concessional finance and technology leasing remain limited, particularly at sites with lower wastewater volumes or limited energy-recovery options. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market may therefore produce larger contract values per project while the number of thermal zero liquid discharge projects remain constrained.
Variable Wastewater Chemistry and Inconsistent Feedstock Quality
Municipal solid waste and refuse-derived fuel plants process mixed inputs that can cause substantial wastewater variation. Ammonia nitrogen concentrations in incinerator leachate can change by a factor of 3-5 across seasons as the organic fraction of incoming material changes. The variability can weaken conventional biological nitrification during high-salinity and high-load periods, increasing the need for chemical dosing and design redundancy. These conditions complicate fixed-fee operations and maintenance contracts because operators must allow for uncertain reagent use and treatment performance. Digital monitoring and adaptive control can reduce this exposure, but treatment designs still need flexibility for changing loads and water chemistry. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market faces a persistent operating challenge where feedstock quality is inconsistent.
*Our forecasts treat driver/restraint impacts as directional, not additive. The impact forecasts reflect baseline growth, mix effects, and variable interactions.
Segment Analysis
By Wastewater Stream: Flue Gas Desulfurization Wastewater Sets Complexity Baseline for Treatment Design
Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) wastewater held 32.15% of the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market share in 2025. Its sulfate, chloride, selenium, mercury, and arsenic content requires multi-barrier treatment that can include chemical precipitation, biological selenium reduction, and membrane polishing. The U.S. rule requires membrane filtration and 100% permeate recycle for covered flue gas desulfurization streams, reinforcing the need for advanced treatment design. Boiler blowdown water is increasingly being considered for internal recirculation rather than simple discharge. This change requires conditioning equipment in plant areas that previously received limited treatment attention.
The ash handling and leachate water is forecast to expand at a 7.15% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. More intensive fly ash separation for heavy-metal recovery raises associated leachate volumes and increases demand for treatment equipment. Dalian’s Phase 2 incineration plant used pretreatment, anaerobic treatment, an external membrane bioreactor, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis to meet China’s GB/T 19923-2024 reuse standard for cooling and boiler makeup water. Cooling tower blowdown, process water, and landfill leachate at co-located facilities are also being drawn into integrated networks. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market gains incremental equipment demand as zero liquid discharge requirements become more common.

By Treatment Technology: Biological Treatment Systems Challenge Physical and Chemical Treatment Systems
Physical and chemical treatment systems held 38.23% of revenue in 2025. Precipitation and neutralization remain the validated first-stage options for flue gas desulfurization and ash-leachate streams with extreme pH and heavy-metal concentrations. These systems form the core of many treatment trains because they remove contaminants before polishing stages. Membrane treatment systems, including ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis, are increasingly used where compact polishing equipment is needed. In the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market, Thermal Treatment Systems remain the endpoint for zero liquid discharge designs.
Biological treatment systems are forecast to grow at a 7.51% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. Moving bed biofilm reactors and sequencing batch reactors can be adapted for high-ammonia conditions and can reduce reagent use and secondary sludge compared with precipitation-heavy treatment. Veolia selected its AnoxKaldnes moving bed biofilm reactor technology for the USD 500 million Saudi Aramco Total Refining and Petrochemical Company (SATORP) industrial water project in Saudi Arabia. The project confirms the use of biological treatment in demanding applications. In the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market, new procurements in China, India, and the European Union increasingly specify zero liquid discharge as a design objective.
By Waste-to-Energy Plant Type: Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Waste-to-Energy Plants Scale Support Revenue While Biomass Waste-to-Energy Plants Expand
Municipal solid waste waste-to-energy plants accounted for 48.06% of revenue in 2025. China operated more than 400 municipal solid waste incineration plants, creating large demand for treatment of bunker leachate, flue gas desulfurization effluent, ash-handling runoff, and boiler blowdown. Mixed waste inputs make wastewater at these sites variable and technically difficult to manage. As a result, these facilities are highly dependent on integrated, full-plant treatment solutions. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market supports higher capital requirements at these complex facilities.
Biomass waste-to-energy plants are forecast to grow at an 8.07% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. Biomass wastewater generally contains less heavy-metal contamination than municipal solid waste wastewater but has more dissolved organic content. Biological and anaerobic pretreatment can therefore be more suitable than precipitation-first designs. Refuse-derived fuel plants, industrial waste incinerators, and combined heat and power waste-to-energy locations create more varied process wastewater. These facilities form a growing niche with higher treatment contract values per plant. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market serves these plant types with configurations that depend on each feedstock and process stream.
By Project Type: Retrofit Installations Gain Momentum Against New Installations Lead
New Installations held 35.68% revenue share in 2025. This position reflects active greenfield waste-to-energy development in Asia-Pacific, the Middle-East, and parts of Europe. New plants can incorporate water reuse, membrane polishing, and resource recovery systems from the beginning of project design. They also allow developers to plan treatment footprints with the broader facility layout. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market benefits when these projects require integrated treatment for several wastewater streams.
Retrofit Installations are forecast to grow at a 7.39% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. Aging assets and tighter discharge rules are driving this demand, as reflected in ANDRITZ’s four German retrofit contracts within around 12 months. Footprint constraints are a key differentiator because installation must often take place during limited maintenance windows. Modular, skid-mounted systems can command a premium in these conditions. Xylem’s June 2026 design-build-operate agreement with Dow for the Path2Zero project shows how the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market can produce ongoing service revenue.

Geography Analysis
Asia-Pacific held 43.55% of the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market share in 2025 and is forecast to grow at a 7.26% CAGR from 2026 to 2031. China’s municipal solid waste incineration rate exceeded 72% of treated urban waste, and the national target was above 90% by the end of the decade. More than 400 operating Chinese plants sustain procurement demand for wastewater treatment equipment. Chinese operators are using integrated membrane bioreactor and multistage reverse osmosis trains to meet GB/T 19923-2024 reuse requirements for cooling and boiler makeup water. These configurations position the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market for ongoing demand in India and Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries.
North America and Europe are primarily driven by compliance programs and asset renewal rather than new capacity. In North America, the U.S. rule established a December 2034 zero-discharge deadline for covered flue gas desulfurization wastewater and combustion-residual leachate streams. Veolia’s USD 34 million San Francisco Public Utilities Commission contract covers MemGas biogas upgrading at the Southeast Treatment Plant and is intended to produce 68 gigawatt-hours of renewable gas each year by January 2027. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market in Europe is supported by Germany’s AbfKlärV phosphorus recovery mandate and ANDRITZ’s related retrofit projects.
South America and, Middle-East and Africa remain attracting strategic investment. Veolia’s USD 500 million SATORP project in Jubail, Saudi Arabia, has an annual capacity of 8.8 million cubic meters and integrates biological treatment, ultrafiltration, and ActifloCarb technology[2]Veolia, “Veolia Supplies Cutting-Edge Water Recycling Technologies for Major Industrial Project in Saudi Arabia,” Veolia, veolia.com. The project has a 30-year operations and maintenance agreement beginning in 2028. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market in these regions needs financing structures that can address the high initial cost of advanced treatment systems. Flexible project models can help match technology choice with the scale and financing capacity of each facility.

Competitive Landscape
The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market is moderately concentrated, with the top five players including Veolia, Kanadevia Inova AG, Xylem, Aquatech, and ANDRITZ. Veolia, ANDRITZ, Xylem, Alfa Laval, GEA Group, and Aquatech have differentiated positions in integrated design, construction, operations, membranes, thermal zero liquid discharge, and biological treatment. Their ability to manage a full treatment train separates them from regional suppliers focused on individual equipment packages. Suppliers are increasingly competing on long-term service delivery rather than only equipment supply.
Xylem’s June 2026 design-build-operate agreement with Dow for the Path2Zero industrial complex in Alberta covers end-to-end water treatment and reuse, with operation expected by August 2028. Veolia renewed its 15-year management contract for Greater Porto’s waste-to-energy facility, extending a service model that links waste treatment with local energy production. ANDRITZ’s EcoFluid fluidized bed technology was selected for multiple German projects and is supported by registered process patents. These examples show the importance of proprietary technology and service capability in large projects.
Chinese equipment manufacturers offer membrane and mechanical vapor compression evaporation systems at 30%-40% lower capital cost than European peers. This pricing can strengthen their position where Indonesia’s waste-to-energy mandate and India’s urban pipeline create export reference opportunities. DuPont’s water filtration membranes and HUBER SE’s sludge dewatering equipment retain mid-market positions through standardized specifications and established reference lists. Thermax Limited and Ovivo Water Inc. are capable tier-2 competitors in India and North America, where local project experience supports their position. White-space opportunities remain in modular zero liquid discharge for facilities below 300 metric tons per day, adaptive digital control for feedstock variability, and recovery systems for salts, phosphorus, and biomethane. The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market remains competitive because integrated-project capability, specialized component expertise, site-specific design, and service capacity are all required.
Waste-to-Energy Wastewater Treatment Systems Industry Leaders
Veolia
Kanadevia Inova AG
Xylem
Aquatech
ANDRITZ
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Recent Industry Developments
- August 2026: Morocco signed a concession agreement for a USD 1.5 billion waste-to-energy plant in Casablanca, led by a consortium including Kanadevia Inova AG, Nareva, and ITOCHU Corporation. The project is expected to increase demand for wastewater treatment systems to manage boiler blowdown, flue gas desulfurization wastewater, ash handling effluents, and other process water streams generated during waste-to-energy operations.
- July 2026: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) awarded USD 6.9 million to support nine waste-to-energy projects for transportation energy applications. The funding is expected to encourage new waste-to-energy facilities, indirectly supporting future demand for wastewater treatment systems required to manage process water and effluents.
Global Waste-to-Energy Wastewater Treatment Systems Market Report Scope
Waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems are designed to treat and manage wastewater generated during waste-to-energy plant operations before discharge, reuse, or recycling. These systems remove contaminants, reduce environmental impact, support regulatory compliance, and improve water recovery and operational efficiency across waste-to-energy facilities.
The Waste-to-Energy Wastewater Treatment Systems Market is segmented by wastewater stream, treatment technology, waste-to-energy plant type, project type, and geography. By wastewater stream, the market is segmented into flue gas desulfurization (FGD) wastewater, boiler blowdown water, ash handling and leachate water, and other wastewater streams (including cooling tower blowdown, process water, landfill leachate, and mixed effluents). By treatment technology, the market is segmented into physical and chemical treatment systems, membrane treatment systems, biological treatment systems, thermal treatment systems, and other treatment technologies (including zero liquid discharge systems). By waste-to-energy plant type, the market is segmented into municipal solid waste (MSW) waste-to-energy plants, biomass waste-to-energy plants, refuse-derived fuel (RDF) plants, and other waste-to-energy plant types (including industrial waste incineration plants and combined heat and power (CHP) waste-to-energy plants). By project type, the market is segmented into new installations, retrofit installations, operations and maintenance (O&M) services, and other project types (including replacement and upgrade projects). The report also covers the market size and forecasts for waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems in 16 countries across major regions. For each segment, the market sizing and forecasts have been done on the basis of value (USD).
| Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Wastewater |
| Boiler Blowdown Water |
| Ash Handling and Leachate Water |
| Other Wastewater Streams (Cooling Tower Blowdown, Process Water, Landfill Leachate, Mixed Effluents) |
| Physical and Chemical Treatment Systems |
| Membrane Treatment Systems |
| Biological Treatment Systems |
| Thermal Treatment Systems |
| Other Treatment Technologies (Zero Liquid Discharge Systems) |
| Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Waste-to-Energy Plants |
| Biomass Waste-to-Energy Plants |
| Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) Plants |
| Other Waste-to-Energy Plant Types (Industrial Waste Incineration Plants, CHP Waste-to-Energy Plants) |
| New Installations |
| Retrofit Installations |
| Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Services |
| Other Project Types (Replacement and Upgrade Projects) |
| Asia-Pacific | China |
| India | |
| Japan | |
| South Korea | |
| ASEAN Countries | |
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |
| North America | United States |
| Canada | |
| Mexico | |
| Europe | Germany |
| United Kingdom | |
| France | |
| Italy | |
| NORDIC Countries | |
| Russia | |
| Rest of Europe | |
| South America | Brazil |
| Argentina | |
| Rest of South America | |
| Middle-East and Africa | Saudi Arabia |
| South Africa | |
| Rest of Middle-East and Africa |
| By Wastewater Stream | Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) Wastewater | |
| Boiler Blowdown Water | ||
| Ash Handling and Leachate Water | ||
| Other Wastewater Streams (Cooling Tower Blowdown, Process Water, Landfill Leachate, Mixed Effluents) | ||
| By Treatment Technology | Physical and Chemical Treatment Systems | |
| Membrane Treatment Systems | ||
| Biological Treatment Systems | ||
| Thermal Treatment Systems | ||
| Other Treatment Technologies (Zero Liquid Discharge Systems) | ||
| By Waste-to-Energy Plant Type | Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Waste-to-Energy Plants | |
| Biomass Waste-to-Energy Plants | ||
| Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) Plants | ||
| Other Waste-to-Energy Plant Types (Industrial Waste Incineration Plants, CHP Waste-to-Energy Plants) | ||
| By Project Type | New Installations | |
| Retrofit Installations | ||
| Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Services | ||
| Other Project Types (Replacement and Upgrade Projects) | ||
| By Geography | Asia-Pacific | China |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| South Korea | ||
| ASEAN Countries | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| North America | United States | |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Europe | Germany | |
| United Kingdom | ||
| France | ||
| Italy | ||
| NORDIC Countries | ||
| Russia | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Argentina | ||
| Rest of South America | ||
| Middle-East and Africa | Saudi Arabia | |
| South Africa | ||
| Rest of Middle-East and Africa | ||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the size of the waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market?
The waste-to-energy wastewater treatment systems market stands at USD 0.84 billion in 2026 and is projected to reach USD 1.14 billion by 2031.
Which wastewater stream led the market share in 2025?
Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) wastewater held 32.15% revenue share in 2025 because its contaminant mix requires complex, multi-stage treatment.
Which treatment technology is expected to grow fastest through 2031?
Biological treatment systems are projected to grow at a 7.51% CAGR through 2031, supported by high-ammonia treatment applications.
Why are retrofit installations becoming important?
Retrofit installations are forecast to grow at a 7.39% CAGR through 2031 as older plants need compliance upgrades and equipment renewal.
Page last updated on:




