United States Oil And Gas Upstream Market Size and Share

United States Oil And Gas Upstream Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

United States Oil And Gas Upstream Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The United States Oil And Gas Upstream Market size is expected to grow from USD 103.94 billion in 2025 to USD 108.97 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 138.08 billion by 2031 at 4.84% CAGR over 2026-2031.

Technology-enabled cost optimization, disciplined capital deployment, and digital drilling analytics that cut non-productive time by 15–20% are the primary growth engines behind the US oil and gas upstream market. Operators are increasingly concentrating their spending on proven shale basins, utilizing artificial intelligence and automation to enhance recovery rates from existing wells while reducing overall breakeven costs. Selective capital allocation toward high-return projects in the Permian Basin and the Gulf of Mexico underpins the sector’s resilience, even as commodity prices fluctuate. Near-term momentum also stems from LNG-export build-outs that add new natural-gas takeaway capacity and from Inflation Reduction Act incentives that monetize carbon capture and storage projects.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By location of deployment, onshore drilling held a 74.18% share of the US oil and gas upstream market in 2025, while offshore production is projected to expand at a 5.66% CAGR through 2031 
  • By resource type, natural gas commanded 54.12% of the US oil and gas upstream market share in 2025 and carries the fastest growth outlook at a 5.17% CAGR to 2031 
  • By well type, unconventional wells accounted for 64.62% of the US oil and gas upstream market size in 2025 and are projected to grow at a 4.98% CAGR through 2031 
  • By service, development and production services controlled 69.25% of spending in 2025, whereas decommissioning is forecast to register the highest 6.74% CAGR over the next five years

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Location of Deployment: Offshore Growth Outpaces Onshore Dominance

Onshore operations accounted for 74.18% of the US oil and gas upstream market in 2025, reflecting established infrastructure, rapid cycle times, and favorable cost profiles. Yet, the offshore segment is forecast to log a stronger 5.66% CAGR through 2031, as de-risked deepwater fields in the Gulf of Mexico move into development. Offshore projects involve higher upfront capital but generate flatter decline curves and longer plateau production, traits that attract patient capital. Chevron’s Anchor and BP’s Tiber are emblematic, each designed for 75,000 bbl/d peak output with managed-pressure drilling that trims subsalt risk.

Offshore growth bolsters supply diversity and tempers overall decline rates in the US oil and gas upstream market. Service providers are rolling out high-pressure riser systems, real-time formation evaluation, and automated well-completion strings that compress development schedules by 10-12%. As Gulf of Mexico lease sales raised USD 382 million in 2024, operators secured acreage at favorable terms amid muted competition. These commitments underpin a production up-cycle likely to endure beyond the current decade.

By Resource Type: Natural Gas Leads Both Scale and Growth

Natural gas held 54.12% of 2025 output and is projected to grow at a 5.17% CAGR, the fastest among resources in the US oil and gas upstream market. Abundant Appalachian dry gas and associated gas from Permian oil wells feed expanding LNG and domestic power demand, presenting multiple monetization avenues. Pipeline debottlenecks and processing plant additions in West Texas and Louisiana reduce flaring and capture more rich-gas liquids, improving well economics.

Crude oil volumes, while still substantial, face growth headwinds from OPEC+ coordination and refinery capacity constraints. Nonetheless, associated gas elevates the composite return of oil-weighted wells. The US oil and gas upstream industry is increasingly selling “energy packages” consisting of oil, condensate, gas, and NGLs, thereby optimizing revenue streams against market fluctuations.

United States Oil And Gas Upstream Market: Market Share by Resource Type, 2025
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
United States Oil And Gas Upstream Market: Market Share by Resource Type, 2025

By Well Type: Unconventional Dominance Reinforces Technology Leadership

Unconventional wells captured 64.62% of the US oil and gas upstream market size in 2025 and are expected to grow at a 4.98% CAGR through 2031, driven by continuous improvements in lateral length, proppant loading, and real-time geosteering. Engineered completions deliver 20-30% higher estimated ultimate recovery, justifying tighter stage spacing and more intense fracture treatments. Data-rich pad drilling also reduces lease operating expense by sharing infrastructure across multi-well pads.

Conventional wells retain a niche in aging fields where secondary and tertiary recovery extend plateau output. However, the steep learning curve and network effects in shale favor incumbents that amassed core acreage early. Regulatory spacing rules, water-management constraints, and surface-use agreements are increasingly shaping drilling geometry, compelling operators to invest in sophisticated reservoir models and public engagement programs.

By Service: Decommissioning Emerges as Fastest-Growing Segment

Development and production activities accounted for 69.25% of 2025 spending, reflecting the constant need to drill, complete, and optimize wells. However, decommissioning services are expected to grow at a rate of 6.74% annually as 2,700 Gulf of Mexico platforms approach their end-of-life status. Stricter federal standards now require full jacket removal and seabed clearance, raising the technical bar.

Specialist contractors utilize heavy-lift vessels, modular cutting tools, and remotely operated vehicles to mitigate project risk and reduce costs. Technology spillovers from offshore wind installation and subsea robotics improve safety and environmental compliance. As decommissioning liabilities crystallize on balance sheets, operators are increasingly reserving capital for plug-and-abandon activities, opening a multi-billion-dollar service niche within the broader US oil and gas upstream market.

United States Oil And Gas Upstream Market: Market Share by Service, 2025
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
United States Oil And Gas Upstream Market: Market Share by Service, 2025

Geography Analysis

Texas remained the nerve center of the US oil and gas upstream market in 2025, contributing approximately 40% of the nation's oil output and 25% of its gas volumes through the Permian and Eagle Ford plays. Infrastructure density, mineral-owner familiarity, and year-round drilling weather encourage sustained investment, even during price dips. North Dakota's Bakken supplied 12% of US crude despite winter weather, thanks to heated gathering lines and high-efficiency drilling rigs purpose-built for the Williston Basin.

Federal Gulf of Mexico waters are the fastest-growing geography, expected to post 6-8% production gains as deepwater hubs, such as Mad Dog 2 and Whale, come online. Long-life assets stabilize national decline curves and provide baseload volumes for Gulf Coast refiners. High-spec drillships, riserless mud recovery, and subsea boosting extend the reach into ultra-deep zones that were formerly deemed marginal.

Appalachia dominates dry-gas supply, with Pennsylvania and West Virginia delivering more than 35 Bcf/d as of late 2024. The regional focus now shifts from pure volume growth to emissions management and well-site electrification, aligning with ESG mandates. Smaller but important contributions arise from Colorado's J Basin, Wyoming's Powder River, and Alaska's North Slope, each subject to distinct regulatory and logistical hurdles that temper growth but preserve supply diversity within the US oil and gas upstream market.

Regulatory Landscape

Federal oversight for US upstream operations continues to be shaped by leasing policy on public lands and methane and air-emissions requirements, with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), US EPA, and US Forest Service among the primary agencies influencing project economics and operating practices. In 2024, BLM finalized rulemaking to implement Inflation Reduction Act leasing provisions, including changes to royalties, rentals, and minimum bids, which directly affect the cost of accessing federal acreage.

From mid-2025 through 2026, several actions shifted compliance timelines and permitting procedures in ways that change operational sequencing and documentation burdens. US EPA issued an interim final rule in July 2025 extending compliance deadlines for the 2024 oil and gas NSPS and emissions guidelines (OOOOb/c), and in April 2026 finalized technical changes that adjusted certain flaring-related provisions and continuous monitoring requirements. Separately, the US Forest Service published a final rule in January 2026 updating procedures for surface-disturbing activities on national forests and grasslands under federal oil and gas leases, reinforcing the importance of land-use planning, bonding, and field-level approvals for operators active on federal estates.

Competitive Landscape

The top five operators—ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, EOG Resources, and Occidental—collectively control approximately 60% of the US oil and gas upstream market value, resulting in a moderately concentrated competitive field. Scale enables these companies to negotiate lower service rates, secure premium acreage, and fund multi-year capital programs, all while dedicating 3–5% of their capital expenditures to digital transformation.

Consolidation accelerated in 2024, with Chevron’s USD 6.3 billion acquisition of PDC Energy and Diamondback’s USD 26 billion merger with Endeavor expanding horizontal shale footprints. Larger portfolios cushion against basin-specific risks and facilitate balanced oil-gas mixes aligned with price and demand trends. Mid-cap independents respond by doubling down on their core competencies—such as high-resolution subsurface imaging, rapid-cycle pad development, or CO₂-EOR expertise—to carve out defensible niches.

Technology alliances are proliferating as service firms embed AI modules into drilling, completion, and production workflows. SLB, Halliburton, and Baker Hughes provide turnkey platforms that smaller operators access via subscription, flattening technology adoption disparities. Competitive intensity shifts from acreage capture to operational execution, rewarding continuous learning and efficiency gains across the US oil and gas upstream market.

United States Oil And Gas Upstream Industry Leaders

  1. Exxon Mobil Corporation

  2. Chevron Corporation

  3. Occidental Petroleum Corporation

  4. Pioneer Natural Resources

  5. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Market Concentration- United States Oil and Gas Upstream Market.png
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

Near-term whitespace in the US oil and gas upstream market centers on pairing resource development with market access and lowering unit costs through programs and deployments that are already underway. LNG-linked gas drilling remains supported by ongoing export build-outs referenced in the market context (2.1 Bcf/d of LNG export capacity added in 2024), while offshore investment is being refreshed by new project approvals and discoveries in the Gulf of Mexico, aligning with the report’s emphasis on de-risked deepwater plays and longer-life barrels.

Two 2026 proof points expand the opportunity set across both offshore oil and gas technology. The US Department of Energy (Hydrocarbons and Geothermal Energy Office) launched a USD 150 million funding opportunity in July 2026 focused on unconventional recovery, fracture characterization, and produced-water management, providing a clearer path for service companies and operators to commercialize incremental-recovery and water solutions at scale. In June 2026, Delfin Midstream reached FID for its first floating LNG vessel (Delfin FLNG 1) as a deepwater port project, reinforcing upstream interest in integrating supply with Gulf Coast and offshore export pathways. At the same time, the market context around 45Q (USD 85/ton for permanently sequestered CO2) keeps CCS-linked EOR as an actionable route for extending field life where CO2 sourcing and infrastructure partnerships are available.

Recent Industry Developments

  • April 2026: Occidental Petroleum announced an oil discovery at the Bandit prospect in the Gulf of America (Green Canyon Block 680), with Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Woodside Energy as co-owners. The find reinforces ongoing exploration appetite in the deepwater Gulf and supports the report theme of de-risked offshore development as operators pursue longer-life production hubs.
  • July 2025: Chevron completed its acquisition of Hess Corporation, adding a 30% position in Guyana’s Stabroek Block and U.S. Bakken acreage. While Guyana is outside the report geography, the deal materially reshapes Chevron’s capital allocation and portfolio resilience, influencing competitive behavior and investment capacity for US onshore and offshore upstream activity.
  • September 2024: Diamondback completed its all-stock merger with Endeavor, creating a larger Permian-focused producer. The consolidation increased scale in the basin, strengthening purchasing power for rigs and completion services and accelerating the competitive shift toward operational execution and cost-per-barrel performance.

Table of Contents for United States Oil And Gas Upstream Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Cost optimisation through digital drilling analytics
    • 4.2.2 Proliferation of horizontal shale drilling in Permian Basin
    • 4.2.3 Rising LNG-export infrastructure boosting gas drilling
    • 4.2.4 Inflation Reduction Act CCS incentives accelerating EOR projects
    • 4.2.5 Re-fracking of mature shale wells extending field life
    • 4.2.6 De-risked deep-water plays in Gulf of Mexico post-2024 lease sales
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Crude-price volatility & capital-discipline pressures
    • 4.3.2 Federal leasing restrictions on public lands
    • 4.3.3 ESG-driven divestment & financing constraints
    • 4.3.4 Skilled-labour shortages in advanced drilling ops
  • 4.4 Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Crude-Oil Production & Consumption Outlook
  • 4.8 Natural-Gas Production & Consumption Outlook
  • 4.9 Unconventional Resources CAPEX Outlook (tight oil, oil sands, deep-water)
  • 4.10 Porter’s Five Forces
    • 4.10.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.10.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.10.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.10.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.10.5 Industry Rivalry
  • 4.11 PESTLE Analysis

5. Market Size & Growth Forecast

  • 5.1 By Location of Deployment
    • 5.1.1 Onshore
    • 5.1.2 Offshore
  • 5.2 By Resource Type
    • 5.2.1 Crude Oil
    • 5.2.2 Natural Gas
  • 5.3 By Well Type
    • 5.3.1 Conventional
    • 5.3.2 Unconventional
  • 5.4 By Service
    • 5.4.1 Exploration
    • 5.4.2 Development and Production
    • 5.4.3 Decomissioning

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves (M&A, Partnerships, PPAs)
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis (Market Rank/Share for key companies)
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Exxon Mobil Corporation
    • 6.4.2 Chevron Corporation
    • 6.4.3 ConocoPhillips
    • 6.4.4 Occidental Petroleum Corporation
    • 6.4.5 Pioneer Natural Resources Company
    • 6.4.6 Devon Energy Corporation
    • 6.4.7 EOG Resources Inc.
    • 6.4.8 BP plc
    • 6.4.9 Shell plc
    • 6.4.10 Hess Corporation
    • 6.4.11 Marathon Oil Corporation
    • 6.4.12 Continental Resources Inc.
    • 6.4.13 Chesapeake Energy Corporation
    • 6.4.14 EQT Corporation
    • 6.4.15 Diamondback Energy Inc.
    • 6.4.16 Coterra Energy Inc.
    • 6.4.17 APA Corporation
    • 6.4.18 Murphy Oil Corporation
    • 6.4.19 Talos Energy Inc.
    • 6.4.20 Matador Resources Company

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definition and Coverage

For this methodology, the United States oil and gas upstream market is defined as the value of activities linked to exploration, development, and production of crude oil and natural gas within the United States, across onshore and offshore operations.

Scope exclusions: Midstream transport, storage, LNG liquefaction, refining, petrochemicals, and retail fuel distribution are not counted in this market value.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Location of Deployment
    • Onshore
    • Offshore
  • By Resource Type
    • Crude Oil
    • Natural Gas
  • By Well Type
    • Conventional
    • Unconventional
  • By Service
    • Exploration
    • Development and Production
    • Decomissioning

Data Sources, Market Sizing, and Validation

Desk Research

Desk research starts by pinning down the operating footprint and activity levels that drive upstream spending in the United States. We referenced public datasets and publications such as the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Bureau of Economic Analysis, and the U.S. Geological Survey, along with releases from relevant industry associations and regulators.

Those sources help build the model structure, including trends for rig counts, wells drilled and completed, crude oil and natural gas production, and benchmark price series that influence budgets. To fill gaps, we also used company filings, investor presentations, earnings call transcripts, and reputable press coverage to understand capex direction, basin priorities, and service intensity. Where needed, subscription databases for company financials, news and financials, and patent databases were used to speed up cross-checking and keep assumptions consistent across operators and time periods. The desk research sources listed here are indicative only, and many additional sources were used for data collection, validation, and clarification.

Primary Interviews and Surveys

Primary work focused on validating what the spending mix looks like across exploration, development, production, and end-of-life work, because the same production level can be achieved with different cost and activity profiles. We spoke with a spread of upstream operators, oilfield service participants, equipment suppliers, and domain experts across key producing states, and then used those inputs to stress-test pricing, activity intensity, and timing assumptions used in the model.

Distribution of primary research fieldwork respondents

Company typeRespondent positionRegion
Top tier: 38% CXOs: 15%
Mid tier: 41% Functional/Unit leaders: 31%
Smaller Players: 21% Managers: 54%

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

Sizing starts with a top-down build that reconstructs upstream spend from demand and activity signals. Production volumes, well counts, and drilling and completion intensity are translated into annual market value using observed cost and pricing benchmarks. The model is then checked with selective bottom-up approximations, such as sampled operator capex and development budgets, supplier revenue exposure to upstream, and typical unit costs multiplied by activity volumes. This helps us adjust totals when one input series appears overstated.

Key inputs used in the model include crude oil and natural gas production trends, rig counts and drilling footage, wells drilled and completed, benchmark oil and gas prices, and announced upstream capex guidance and productivity changes. In practice, when a single data series is missing or inconsistent for a sub-area, the gap is handled through proxy indicators like regional activity mix, productivity per rig, and normalized cost per well, and then reviewed again during primary validation.

Forecasting is run using scenario analysis anchored to commodity price expectations and activity response. It is supported with simpler time-series smoothing for variables like rig and completion cadence, where near-term inertia matters. Assumptions are kept explicit so the forecast can be replicated and challenged, especially around price realizations, service cost inflation, and the pace of offshore project timing.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs are validated through multiple checks so the final number is not dependent on one dataset or one assumption. Analysts compare totals against independent signals such as production trajectories, public capex guidance trends, and broad cost movements, and then investigate outliers at the basin and activity level before sign-off.

If variances remain large after internal review, follow-up calls are triggered to retest the key drivers, which usually come down to price timing, activity definitions, or one-time project effects. The report is refreshed annually, and interim updates are made when material events occur that can shift drilling, completion, or production plans. Before delivery, a final pass ensures the numbers reflect the most recent public releases and validated market signals.

Mordor Intelligence's United States Oil and Gas Upstream Market Size Compared Against Other Published Estimates

Published market sizes for US upstream can look far apart, even when the topic name is similar, because the boundary between upstream activity value and broader extraction revenue is not handled the same way. Differences also come from what gets counted as upstream services versus total operator revenue, which year pricing is used, and how onshore and offshore cost cycles are normalized.

By tracking activity indicators (rigs, wells drilled and completed, and production) and refreshing pricing and service-cost assumptions each update, Mordor Intelligence keeps the estimate tied to upstream exploration and production spend in the United States rather than broader extraction industry revenue.

Benchmark comparison

SourceMarket SizeGaps in Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence USD 103.94 B (2025)
Industry Data Publisher A USD 598.70 B (2026)This figure is presented as a US oil and gas extraction industry revenue view, which can include operator revenue components and a wider set of extraction-related activities, so it will read higher than an upstream spend-based model.
Research Marketplace Summary B USD 285.00 B (2025)The scope appears to apply a broader upstream value framing that can blend operator value and adjacent cost elements, and the longer-dated forecast window can also shift the price and cost assumptions used for the base year.

The comparison shows that the spread is mainly about boundary choices and what is being valued, spend versus industry revenue, and how price and cost timing are treated in the base year. Keeping the model anchored to observable activity and explicit upstream spend logic makes the estimate easier to audit and reuse when planning budgets or testing scenarios.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How large will upstream spending in the US be by 2031?

The United States Oil And Gas Upstream Market size is projected to reach USD 138.08 billion by 2031, up from USD 108.97 billion in 2026.

Which segment is expanding the fastest?

Offshore projects in the Gulf of Mexico are set to grow at a 5.66% CAGR as deepwater hubs move into development.

What resource leads in growth terms?

Natural gas output is expected to rise at a 5.17% CAGR, supported by LNG-export capacity additions and power-generation demand.

Why is decommissioning a growth niche?

More than 2,700 offshore structures will require plug-and-abandon work this decade, driving a 6.74% CAGR in decommissioning services.

How are digital technologies influencing costs?

Real-time drilling analytics and autonomous systems already cut well costs by up to 15% and reduce drilling time by 20%.

What role do 45Q tax credits play?

Enhanced credits of USD 85 per ton encourage CO₂-EOR projects, adding a new revenue stream while boosting ultimate recovery 10-15%.

Page last updated on:

United States Oil And Gas Upstream Report Snapshots