Top 5 Southeast Asia Renewable Energy Companies
B.Grimm Power PCL
Gulf Energy Development PCL
ACEN Corp (Ayala Group)
Vena Energy
BCPG PCL

Source: Mordor Intelligence
Southeast Asia Renewable Energy Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Southeast Asia Renewable Energy players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can rank companies differently because it weights what buyers feel in day to day delivery. Local site coverage, permitting speed, and grid connection outcomes can matter more than booked revenue. Innovation signals also change the picture, especially for storage paired solar, floating PV, and geothermal drilling programs that add firm capacity. Corporate buyers often ask whether direct renewable contracts are possible across ASEAN, and the answer varies sharply by country. Grid curtailment and interconnection queues are also common concerns, which is why storage integration and export capable transmission plans show up strongly here. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation because it emphasizes delivery capability and repeatable execution, not just headline scale.
MI Competitive Matrix for Southeast Asia Renewable Energy
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Southeast Asia Renewable Energy Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Southeast Asia Renewable Energy Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
ACEN Corp (Ayala Group)
Attributable capacity reached about 7.0 GW by end 2024, supporting a stronger earnings base. The Philippines listed renewables operator has relied on disciplined project sequencing in Vietnam and Laos while exiting diesel to align with end 2025 targets. Its status as a leading player can hold if cross border wheeling remains workable, yet Vietnam grid congestion could still weaken cash conversion for newer sites. If auctions accelerate in Indonesia, ACEN's local partnerships could convert late stage wind positions into firm awards, but procurement delays would raise carry costs.
Gulf Energy Development PCL
Large scale solar financing has become a core strength for this Thai listed developer. Gulf secured funding tied to 12 solar projects totaling 649 contracted MW with CODs staged across 2024 and 2025. The group, a top operator, can convert bank confidence into faster build schedules, which matters when auction windows are tight. Policy support for storage linked solar can lift value, but battery procurement and warranty terms may add delivery risk. If grid codes tighten in Thailand, Gulf's project design discipline should help, yet overruns would quickly dilute the advantage of low cost capital.
Sembcorp Industries Ltd
Cross border power trade has moved from concept toward structured development. Sembcorp was granted conditional approval to import 1.2 GW of renewable electricity from Vietnam to Singapore and is expanding its Vietnam renewables base through added assets. The Singapore headquartered utility group, a major player in regional decarbonization, also reported renewables capacity reaching 17.0 GW as of end 2024. If transmission buildout keeps pace, Sembcorp can lock in long duration offtake economics for data centers and industrial loads. The critical risk is regulatory timing across multiple jurisdictions, which can stall revenue while costs continue.
Vena Energy
Construction backed offtake is becoming the fastest route to scale in the Philippines. Vena Energy signed an investment agreement with MGreen for the 550 MW Bugallon solar project with commercial operations expected by Q4 2025. The Singapore headquartered renewables platform, a key participant in utility scale delivery, also announced project financing for its Opus Solar project under the Green Energy Auction Program 2. If curtailment risk rises, Vena can defend returns by pairing storage and firming contracts. The operational risk remains land and interconnection timing, which can push COD slippage.
First Gen Corporation
Geothermal reinvestment is becoming the clearest sign of sustained base load strength. EDC, the renewables arm of First Gen, outlined a 2025 drilling program targeting 19 wells and an expected 141 MW of additional capacity. The Philippines based power group also strengthened gas supply optionality through a Tokyo Gas stake in its LNG unit, which can help grid reliability alongside renewables. If geothermal well success rates exceed plan, cash flows can rise quickly. The key risk is drilling underperformance, which can consume capital with limited output gain.
Masdar
Floating solar execution has already moved from pilot to scaled delivery in Indonesia. Masdar and PLN inaugurated the 145 MW Cirata floating solar plant in November 2023 and discussed further expansion potential. The UAE based clean energy investor, a leading company in cross border project finance, also signed a Philippines agreement aiming to deliver up to 1 GW of clean power by 2030. If Southeast Asia accelerates auctions for solar plus storage, Masdar can compete on capital access and delivery partners. The key downside is that permitting and local grid constraints can limit usable output without storage or transmission upgrades.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should a corporate buyer check before signing a renewable offtake in Southeast Asia?
Confirm grid delivery rules, settlement terms, and curtailment compensation in the specific country. Ask for evidence of interconnection studies and a realistic commissioning schedule.
How can buyers reduce curtailment risk for solar heavy sites in Vietnam or the Philippines?
Prioritize projects with storage, flexible dispatch arrangements, and proven grid access. Also check whether the developer has a track record of meeting grid code requirements.
When does floating solar make sense in Indonesia versus ground mounted PV?
Floating solar helps where land access is constrained and reservoirs are available. It still needs careful stakeholder planning, especially where aquaculture and water use are sensitive.
What separates strong geothermal developers from weaker ones in Indonesia and the Philippines?
Look for multi year drilling programs, reservoir management capability, and stable operating data. Balance sheet stamina matters because wells can fail and still consume capital.
How should utilities evaluate solar plus battery proposals across Thailand, Singapore, and Malaysia?
Compare round trip efficiency assumptions, warranty terms, and augmentation plans over ten or more years. Require clear degradation modeling and replacement cost visibility.
What is the most common failure point for cross border renewable supply projects in ASEAN corridors?
The technical build is usually solvable, but permitting and wheeling agreements often slip. The best developers show binding milestones across both exporting and importing systems.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Data Sourcing: Used company IR, filings, and official press rooms first, then reputable journalism and regulators. Private firm signals relied on financial close, COD notices, and contracted capacity. Indicators were triangulated when disclosures were limited. Scoring focused on Southeast Asia observable activity from 2023 onward.
Local sites, teams, and channels drive permitting, interconnection, and corporate offtake delivery in Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore.
Trusted names win utility tenders, secure lenders, and pass stricter ESG screening for regional corporate procurement.
Relative standing using contracted MW, COD pipeline, and repeat wins in ASEAN tenders and auctions.
Owned plants, service hubs, and regional manufacturing reduce lead times and raise uptime under grid constraints.
Storage pairing, floating PV, nearshore wind designs, and geothermal drilling programs increase usable output and reduce curtailment exposure.
Access to project finance and stable cash generation supports faster build cycles and resilience during tariff and auction transitions.
