Polyisobutylene (PIB) Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

PIB suppliers compete by enhancing technology, expanding specialty grades, and securing distribution channels. Braskem, BASF, and The Lubrizol Corporation focus on manufacturing scale and advanced formulations to serve adhesive and lubricant sectors. Mordor Intelligence analysts note positioning driven by application breadth and supplier relationships. For full analysis, see our Polyisobutylene (PIB) Report.

KEY PLAYERS
Braskem The Lubrizol Corporation BASF Daelim Co., Ltd TPC Group
Get analysis tailored to your specific needs and decision criteria.

Top 5 Polyisobutylene (PIB) Companies

trophy
  • arrow

    Braskem

  • arrow

    The Lubrizol Corporation

  • arrow

    BASF

  • arrow

    Daelim Co., Ltd

  • arrow

    TPC Group

Top Polyisobutylene (PIB) Major Players

Source: Mordor Intelligence

Polyisobutylene (PIB) Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Polyisobutylene (PIB) players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures

The MI Matrix can diverge from revenue focused rankings because it weights observable capability signals that affect buyer outcomes. In PIB, those signals include committed production assets, regional delivery reach, product grade breadth, and the pace of post 2023 upgrades. Many buyers also want quick clarity on which HR PIB versus conventional PIB fits lubricant additive chemistry and which suppliers have resilient C4 integration. They also often ask how VOC and REACH style constraints change sealant formulation choices and supplier documentation expectations. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it reflects execution evidence, not only scale.

MI Competitive Matrix for Polyisobutylene (PIB)

The MI Matrix benchmarks top Polyisobutylene (PIB) Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.

Share
Loading chart...

Analysis of Polyisobutylene (PIB) Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Comprehensive positioning breakdown

BASF

Investment at Ludwigshafen keeps BASF positioned for dependable PIB supply across multiple end uses. In a 2023 announcement, the company committed to lift Ludwigshafen medium molecular polyisobutene output by 25%, with full completion expected in the first half of 2025. This action supports a leading producer role without relying on price moves. The OPPANOL portfolio also emphasizes certified sustainability options through its biomass balanced line, which can matter where procurement rules tighten. If European energy or feedstock shocks return, cost pressure could narrow flexibility. A realistic upside scenario is faster adoption of PIB battery binder concepts in Europe.

Leaders

Daelim Co., Ltd

Scale and process breadth are the core advantages for Daelim's PIB platform, even as branding varies by region. DL Chemical's published business page states 220 KTA polybutene production capacity in 2025 and positions both conventional and highly reactive grades within one operating base. Its technology posture and scale signal strong influence on HR PIB availability, fitting a major OEM style qualifier. A 2025 business feature also links the Yeosu site to long running investment and HR PB capability, reinforcing the durability of the asset base. If tire and additive demand weakens, utilization can fall quickly.

Leaders

TPC Group

Innovation framing is unusually explicit, which can help buyers justify switching costs. TPC's product page presents PIBplus as an epoxidized PIB technology and links it to improved oxidation stability in a novel dispersant pathway, signaling active product development beyond commodity grades. The company also reported DIB capacity upgrade steps in 2023, which matters because C4 integration supports supply resilience for PIB related chains. Given the company's North America positioning and broad grade range, a leading producer qualifier fits. If Gulf Coast disruptions hit logistics, delivery reliability becomes the key risk. The upside is higher HR PIB conversion volume as additive specs tighten.

Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I choose between conventional PIB and highly reactive PIB for lubricant additives?

HR PIB is typically preferred when you need higher reactivity for making PIBSA and dispersant intermediates. Conventional PIB can fit viscosity building and tack needs where reactivity is not required.

Which three technical checks reduce qualification risk when switching PIB suppliers?

Confirm viscosity at the reference temperature, molecular weight distribution, and vinylidene level for reactive grades. Ask for batch to batch variability evidence and a clear certificate of analysis format.

What documentation matters most for PIB used in food contact or pharma adjacent applications?

Look for clear statements on relevant approvals and contaminant controls, plus traceable lot documentation. Also confirm packaging, storage limits, and cleaning practices for tanks and drums.

How do VOC limits change supplier selection for adhesives and sealants using PIB?

Lower VOC targets often push formulators toward lower solvent systems and cleaner raw material profiles. That increases the value of consistent impurity control and dependable supply scheduling.

What supply risks should procurement teams plan for in 2025 to 2030?

Isobutylene and C4 feedstock volatility can tighten allocation quickly, especially for reactive grades. Regional disruptions can also matter because viscous polymers are costly to reroute on short notice.

Is PIB becoming relevant for next generation batteries?

PIB based binder concepts are being explored for silicon rich anodes because elastic binders can help manage expansion. Adoption depends on performance validation and whether cell makers accept new binder qualification cycles.


Methodology

Research approach and analytical framework

Data Sourcing & Research Approach

We used public company press rooms, product pages, site descriptions, and credible news coverage where needed. The approach works for both public and private firms. When detailed financial splits were unavailable, we triangulated using assets, certifications, and disclosed expansions. We prioritized scoped indicators tied to PIB production, distribution, or PIB dependent additive chains.

Impact Parameters
1
Presence

Buyers value multi region delivery for tires, sealants, and lubricants with stable lead times.

2
Brand

Approvals for automotive, food contact, and additive chains reduce switching and qualification time.

3
Share

Larger scoped volumes usually translate into better allocation priority during C4 tightness.

Execution Scale Parameters
1
Operations

Dedicated reactors, storage, and terminals determine reliability for viscous grades and HR PIB.

2
Innovation

New grades like HR PIB and functionalized PIB unlock higher value lubricant and sealant formulations.

3
Financials

Sustained upkeep and feedstock hedging reduce outage and allocation risk during volatility.