Top 5 Indonesia Oil And Gas Companies

PT Pertamina
Chevron Corporation
Petroliam Nasional Berhad
Exxon Mobil Corporation
PT Medco Energi Internasional Tbk

Source: Mordor Intelligence
Indonesia Oil And Gas Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Indonesia Oil And Gas players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The top revenue list and the MI Matrix can diverge because scale alone does not always translate into Indonesian execution strength across upstream, LNG, pipelines, and refining. Buyers often reward operators that show dependable uptime, fast permitting progress, and credible local delivery capacity, even when their footprint is narrower. Indonesia's recent block awards and partner reshuffles also mean "presence" can shift quickly from producing assets to exploration commitments. CCS regulation has moved from concept toward implementable permits, which changes what "innovation" looks like for mature fields and LNG expansions. Gross split adjustments and tax clarity also influence how quickly contractors sanction work programs and spend capital inside Indonesia. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence supports supplier and competitor evaluation better than revenue tables alone because it balances footprint, delivery capability, and near term change signals.
MI Competitive Matrix for Indonesia Oil And Gas
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Indonesia Oil And Gas Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Indonesia Oil And Gas Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Pertamina
Commissioning readiness at the Balikpapan RDMP is now shaping many near-term choices, as the project moves into commissioning readiness. Pertamina, a leading company in Indonesia's hydrocarbons system, can still lose momentum if governance noise tightens oversight and slows approvals. Its SAF pathway is becoming more tangible because Kilang Pertamina Internasional signaled ISCC certified output from Cilacap starting in early 2025. If CCS licensing keeps maturing, partnership options widen across mature fields and hubs, but any extended outage or delay would raise import exposure.
ExxonMobil
Liftings from Cepu remain a national lever, which makes reliability more important than headline projects. Reuters reported Indonesia's energy minister said Cepu lifting increased and reached about 180,000 bpd in 2025. ExxonMobil, a top operator in Indonesian upstream, is pairing that base with recovery methods like Low Dosage Acid and Gas Shut Off at Banyu Urip. If CCS rules keep tightening into clear permits, the Asri CCS hub work with Pertamina could become a new moat, but chemical and well integrity execution becomes the do-or-die risk.
BP
Train 3 start up at Tangguh is a structural Indonesian gas event rather than a one-time milestone. BP confirmed first cargo from the expanded facility in October 2023 and stated total capacity rose to about 11.4 million tonnes per year. BP, a leading service provider in LNG operations, depends on stable domestic offtake and safe uptime to protect that position. If more domestic gas is redirected to power and industry, contract flexibility becomes an advantage, while any multi-week unplanned shutdown becomes the clearest risk to both revenues and regulator confidence.
Medco Energi
Portfolio expansion is the lever, being pulled through asset rotations by foreign owners. Reuters reported Medco agreed to buy stakes in Sakakemang and South Sakakemang from Repsol and become operator, pending approvals. Medco, a major supplier of Indonesian domestic gas, also agreed to buy Repsol's 24% Corridor Block stake for USD 425.0 million, strengthening its South Sumatra position. If approvals slow, integration timing is the risk, but if gas demand grows as expected, corridor-connected infrastructure becomes a durable advantage.
PGN
Gas infrastructure utilization is becoming the value driver because buyers care more about reliability than expansion headlines. ANTARA reported PGN highlighted 2024 performance and cited optimization of the FSRU Lampung to serve industrial and power users. PGN, a major distributor in Indonesian gas, also set a 2025 target to expand household gas connections, which signals demand anchoring beyond large plants. If LNG imports rise, PGN can strengthen balancing capability, but price volatility and contract rigidity remain the key risks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which capabilities matter most when selecting an upstream operator in Indonesia?
Look for proven safety performance on Indonesian offshore or mature onshore assets, plus fast drilling and well intervention cycles. Also confirm they can navigate SKK Migas work program commitments without frequent rescoping.
What should buyers check before signing a long term LNG supply contract in Indonesia?
Confirm train uptime history, shipping flexibility, and domestic offtake obligations that could redirect cargoes. Also review whether planned debottlenecks or carbon reduction projects could affect operating costs.
How can a pipeline or city gas buyer assess reliability of a gas transporter?
Ask for compressor station redundancy, SCADA coverage, and recent outage response times. Contracting should also address pressure management and balancing during LNG import swings.
What is a practical way to screen refinery upgrade partners or EPC contractors?
Prioritize teams with recent commissioning experience in Indonesia and a clear local content delivery plan. Schedule realism matters, so validate long lead equipment strategy and site interface management.
What are the most common execution risks in Indonesian gas development projects?
Permitting and land access can delay pipelines and onshore facilities, while offshore projects face logistics and weather constraints. Late changes in domestic allocation directives can also shift volumes and pricing assumptions.
How should firms evaluate CCS readiness when partnering with an Indonesian oil and gas operator?
Check whether the operator has identified storage geology, monitoring plans, and a credible permitting path. Also confirm how liabilities, long term monitoring, and third party emissions sources will be handled contractually.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
We prioritized company press rooms, filings, and regulator or government disclosures, then used named journalism for confirmations. Private firms were scored using visible contracts, approvals, and project milestones. Where financial detail was limited, we triangulated using committed capex, sanctioned work programs, and asset level signals. We focused on Indonesia specific evidence from 2023 onward.
Indonesian wells, LNG trains, refineries, pipelines, terminals, and customer touchpoints determine practical coverage.
Recognition with SKK Migas, buyers, and SOEs affects tender access, partnering, and crisis tolerance.
Indonesia production, LNG throughput, refining runs, and transported gas volumes proxy relative position.
Committed Indonesia assets and staffed execution teams drive uptime, safety, and schedule delivery.
Post 2023 CCS readiness, debottleneck tools, digital oilfield methods, and low carbon fuels show solution depth.
Ability to fund Indonesia capex and absorb delays signals resilience for multi year programs.

