What should I prioritize when selecting a Jakarta colocation provider?

Start with power availability, redundancy design, and documented uptime practices. Then validate interconnection options and how fast the provider can deliver additional megawatts.

How important are Tier III or Tier IV claims in Indonesia?

They help as a screening tool, but buyers should confirm what is certified and what is designed only. Ask for commissioning scope, maintenance approach, and evidence of operational discipline.

What makes a site "AI ready" in practical terms?

Look for high density rack support, liquid cooling options, and clear heat rejection design limits. Also confirm grid and backup power headroom for sustained peak loads.

How should I think about Batam versus Jakarta for deployments?

Jakarta is often chosen for network density and local user latency. Batam can work well for cross border resilience patterns, but power and permitting timelines must be confirmed early.

What sustainability checks are realistic for Indonesia deployments today?

Ask about renewable sourcing options, metering, and how the provider reports PUE over time. Also confirm how water use and backup fuel are managed during long outages.

What contract terms matter most for megawatt scale commitments?

Focus on delivery dates, phased expansion rights, and remedies for delayed power. Ensure cross connect pricing, remote hands SLAs, and exit clauses are written clearly.

Top Indonesia Data Center Companies

PT. Telkom Data Ekosistem (NeutraDC)

Grid constraints shape many buildouts. NeutraDC, a major player in Indonesia, has leaned into lower carbon design choices and renewable energy studies that can reduce compliance friction as rules tighten. It has also positioned Batam as a strategic overflow node with plans for a hyperscale facility that targets 51 MW ultimate IT load. If Batam permitting slows, a realistic fallback is staging smaller phases while prioritizing connectivity and customer onboarding. The main risk is power availability timing, because delays can strand contracted demand and weaken pricing discipline.

Leaders

PT DCI Indonesia

Scale is DCI's advantage. DCI, a leading company in Indonesia, has continued to add large, high power buildings, including the JK6 launch that it described as a 36 MW facility. In April 2024, DCI publicly signaled an expansion path from 83 MW at end 2023 toward 119 MW through JK6 delivery. If PLN allocation or equipment import lead times tighten, DCI can still protect service quality by prioritizing higher margin halls and deferring lower density builds. Concentration of new capacity is a key risk, which increases exposure to local grid and flooding events.

Leaders

Indosat Tbk PT (Big Data Exchange (BDx))

AI racks are pushing power density. BDx, a top operator in Indonesia, has framed CGK4 as an AI campus in Jatiluhur designed to scale up to 500 MW and support very high rack densities. It later described a sovereign AI data center deployment built with NVIDIA accelerated computing, which supports GPU dense customer needs. In January 2024, Indosat and BDx were also covered in connection with a transaction involving Indosat data center assets, which can broaden edge reach. If AI demand cools temporarily, BDx can pivot capacity toward cloud and fintech tenants that still value low latency and security. The key risk is power and cooling complexity at scale.

Leaders

NTT Ltd.

Annex builds signal confidence in Jakarta. NTT DATA, a leading service provider in Indonesia colocation, announced in May 2024 that it is constructing the Jakarta 2 Annex Data Center with 12 MW planned capacity and early 2026 completion. The design is framed around hyperscaler needs and higher density racks, which improves relevance for AI era demand patterns. If grid carbon rules become stricter, NTT can win by packaging renewable options with verifiable sourcing. The critical risk is construction and commissioning precision, because high density deployments punish even small cooling design mistakes.

Leaders

Amazon Web Services, Inc.

Connectivity choices often decide cloud. AWS, a top brand in Indonesia enterprise IT, expanded 100 Gbps dedicated connectivity at a Jakarta Direct Connect site in June 2025, which strengthens hybrid deployment options. That local on ramp matters when regulated workloads require predictable network paths and clear residency controls. If cross border latency becomes more sensitive for AI inference, AWS can win by bundling connectivity partners with stricter operational runbooks. The main operational risk is that infrastructure posture in Indonesia can look opaque to colo buyers who want site level transparency.

Established

Alibaba Cloud

Jakarta workloads still demand low latency. Alibaba Cloud, a top brand, is present through its Jakarta region listing, which shows three availability zones for Indonesia. That footprint supports buyers who need local processing and simple recovery patterns without leaving the country. If Indonesian policy pushes stricter audit readiness, Alibaba Cloud can differentiate by expanding compliance reporting that maps controls to local requirements. The main risk is slower ecosystem pull through in enterprise procurement, where vendor governance and local support depth often decide renewals more than feature breadth.

Established

Google LLC

Enterprise AI demand is climbing sharply. Google Cloud, a top brand with Indonesian developers, stated in May 2025 that it is expanding compute capacity for the Jakarta Cloud Region to support enterprise AI needs. This creates a stronger local option for buyers balancing latency, residency, and modern AI services. If public sector procurement increases, Google can benefit by aligning control documentation to local regulatory expectations. A realistic downside is that limited transparency on physical expansion timelines can slow buyers who plan migrations around fixed move windows. Reliability perception remains the most important moat.

Established

Space DC Pte Ltd

PUE targets now influence site selection. SpaceDC, a Jakarta-centered platform, promotes an ID01 campus with 25.45 MW scale and green positioning that includes a stated PUE of 1.3. That framing resonates as sustainability disclosures expand and energy costs remain volatile. If carbon accounting becomes mandatory for more customers, SpaceDC can benefit by packaging renewable options with transparent measurement. A realistic downside is that demand could skew to larger blocks than its current campus mix supports. Operationally, the risk is power upgrade timing if tenant density rises faster than planned.

Performers

Princeton Digital Group

Green finance is changing build economics. Princeton Digital Group, an Indonesia-focused operator, secured an IDR 1.7 trillion green loan in March 2025 to support a 22 MW AI ready campus in Cibitung, which tightens its delivery funding. PDG has also linked this site to renewable powered design choices, which can lower buyer resistance as sustainability reviews get stricter. If biomass sourcing becomes controversial or constrained, PDG can protect uptime by diversifying power inputs and keeping reserve margins conservative. The key risk is fuel supply stability, because renewable narratives fail quickly when reliability slips.

Performers

Digital Edge (Singapore) Holdings Pte. Ltd. (Indonet)

Utilization risk rises after rapid openings. Indonet, a key participant in Jakarta, reported launching EDGE2 with 23 MW capacity in early March 2024 while also reporting 2023 net profit growth in its public disclosures. Digital Edge also positioned EDGE2 as an AI ready facility and described EDGE1 reaching full capacity, which supports a clear expansion narrative. If financing conditions worsen, the platform can still protect delivery by sequencing fit outs to committed demand and preserving energy efficiency targets. The critical risk is execution strain, because fast growth can expose gaps in vendor management and commissioning quality.

Performers

K2 Data Centers-Sinar Mas Land

New campuses hinge on permits. K2 Data Centers-Sinar Mas Land, a Jakarta-focused joint venture, has described an Indonesia program that includes a Cikarang site with 20 MW IT capacity and a 2024 ready for service date. It has also been linked to plans for two sites in Bekasi with more than 100 MW of development intent, which signals ambition beyond a single building. If land acquisition stretches, K2 can still win by pre selling phased halls to a small set of anchor tenants. The critical risk is schedule slip, because hyperscale buyers tend to penalize repeated delivery resets.

Aspirants

Biznet Data Center

Tier certifications remain a buyer filter. Biznet, a major provider for Indonesian enterprises, promotes Tier 3 positioning and highlights certifications such as ISO 27001 and PCI DSS at its Technovillage site. That foundation helps with BFSI and ecommerce workloads that treat audit scope as a gating item. If equipment import barriers raise build costs, Biznet can still compete by emphasizing standardized deployments and fast turn ups for smaller footprints. The main risk is that larger tenants may prefer providers with clearer multi site expansion pipelines in Jakarta and Batam.

Aspirants

Bersama Digital Data Centres (BDDC)

Downtown interconnection is scarce capacity. BDDC, a Jakarta-based platform, became part of the Digital Realty Bersama joint venture announced in March 2025, which gives it access to deeper capital and operating playbooks. The same announcement described CGK11 as launching with 5 MW and expanding toward 32 MW, plus an additional Jakarta site under the platform. If tenant demand concentrates around network dense CBD zones, BDDC can win by accelerating cross connect readiness and internet exchange adjacency. The main risk is integration complexity, because process changes can disrupt customer experience during rapid scaling.

Aspirants

Tencent Cloud

Migration speed matters when apps cannot pause. Tencent Cloud has shown Jakarta execution through a high profile GoTo workload move to a local data center in June 2025, which indicates real operational capability in country. Documentation also lists Jakarta as an available region, reinforcing that Indonesia is a supported deployment location. If data residency enforcement tightens, Tencent can gain by offering clearer control mapping and incident response commitments in Bahasa. The main risk is limited visibility into facility scale, which can slow adoption for large regulated buyers.

Aspirants

MettaDC

Growth plans look credible only with execution. MettaDC said in February 2023 that its West Java facility has 30 MW capacity and that it planned additional builds including activity tied to IKN preparations. That roadmap fits Indonesia's broader push for sovereign digital infrastructure, but it still needs repeatable delivery across sites. If permitting in Jakarta proves difficult, a practical alternative is expanding partner connectivity and selling smaller footprints to enterprise tenants first. The key risk is capital intensity, because a single delayed phase can weaken customer confidence and raise unit costs.

Aspirants

Indonesia Data Center Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

Top 5 Indonesia Data Center Companies

Indonesia Data Center Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

MI Competitive Matrix for Indonesia Data Center

Analysis of Indonesia Data Center Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

PT. Telkom Data Ekosistem (NeutraDC)

PT DCI Indonesia

Indosat Tbk PT (Big Data Exchange (BDx))

NTT Ltd.

Amazon Web Services, Inc.

Alibaba Cloud

Google LLC

Space DC Pte Ltd

Princeton Digital Group

Digital Edge (Singapore) Holdings Pte. Ltd. (Indonet)

K2 Data Centers-Sinar Mas Land

Biznet Data Center

Bersama Digital Data Centres (BDDC)

Tencent Cloud

MettaDC

Frequently Asked Questions

Methodology

Analysis of Leading Indonesia Data Center Companies