Data Center Power Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

The data center power sector sees key names such as Schneider Electric, Vertiv, and ABB compete by offering advanced technologies, robust product lines, and technical support. Companies differentiate by focusing on reliability, energy management, and tailored solutions for hyperscale projects. Our analysis underscores the importance of service depth and portfolio breadth for buyers. For comprehensive insights, see our Data Center Power Report.

KEY PLAYERS
Schneider Electric SE Vertiv Holdings Co. ABB Ltd Eaton Corporation plc Legrand SA
Get analysis tailored to your specific needs and decision criteria.

Top 5 Data Center Power Companies

trophy
  • arrow

    Schneider Electric SE

  • arrow

    Vertiv Holdings Co.

  • arrow

    ABB Ltd

  • arrow

    Eaton Corporation plc

  • arrow

    Legrand SA

Top Data Center Power Major Players

Source: Mordor Intelligence

Data Center Power Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Data Center Power players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures

The MI Matrix can place some firms higher or lower because it rewards on the ground readiness, not just total sales size. Execution depends on whether factories, service teams, and certified designs can land quickly in the geographies where new sites are breaking ground. Impact moves with buyer trust, electrical room standardization, and proof that equipment ships on time under tight constraints. Capability signals that matter most here include switchgear and busway capacity, packaged power module depth, battery analytics maturity, and track record with high density AI loads. For teams comparing providers, start with two practical questions. Can the vendor support your target redundancy design while meeting local emissions and safety rules for generators and batteries. Can it commit to lead times for UPS, switchgear, and PDUs that align with your construction schedule and commissioning plan. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it reflects delivery ability, product motion since 2023, and execution risk.

MI Competitive Matrix for Data Center Power

The MI Matrix benchmarks top Data Center Power Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.

Share
Loading chart...

Analysis of Data Center Power Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Comprehensive positioning breakdown

Schneider Electric SE

Supply capacity deals in 2025 point to a strategy built around faster delivery of UPS and low voltage switchgear for large sites. When reliability rules tighten, buyers prefer proven designs and audited manufacturing, so Schneider Electric benefits as a leading player. US manufacturing expansion plans announced in 2024 also reduce lead time risk when switchgear and transformers are constrained. If AI racks push higher fault currents, integrated switchgear plus prefabricated skids could shorten commissioning. The biggest operational risk is execution discipline across regional plants during rapid demand spikes, which can expose quality escapes and warranty costs.

Leaders

Vertiv Holdings Co.

Capacity expansion is the clearest signal of intent, with switchgear, busway, and modular buildouts planned through the end of 2025. Vertiv, a top manufacturer, is also aligning product roadmaps to emerging 800 VDC designs, which may reduce copper and heat at very high rack densities. The 2024 launch of a compact high power density UPS supports space constrained builds where white space is scarce. If buyers shift toward packaged power trains, Vertiv can bundle power and thermal designs more tightly than many peers. A key risk is supply chain strain from rapid factory ramp ups, which can slow deliveries.

Leaders

ABB Ltd

A US campus partnership for a new medium voltage power architecture shows ABB leaning into higher voltage designs for very large builds. Fewer conversion stages can mean fewer failure points when engineered well, so that approach fits stricter uptime expectations. In 2025 ABB refreshed its UPS lineup for 415V applications, which matters for operators standardizing electrical rooms across regions and highlights the firm as a major supplier. If regulation pushes better efficiency reporting, ABB's controls and monitoring stack can help document performance at the power train level. The operational risk is long lead equipment like medium voltage gear, where any missed delivery date can idle construction crews.

Leaders

Eaton Corporation plc

Architecture work around 800 VDC for AI focused sites shows Eaton is trying to shape next generation power delivery instead of only selling boxes. Because DC systems can pair naturally with storage and fast controls, that posture can help when grid operators demand smoother load profiles. Eaton, a key participant, also added analytics upgrades for power quality monitoring in 2025, which supports earlier detection of harmful events before transformers overheat. If buyers standardize on fewer electrical room vendors, Eaton's broad catalog helps reduce integration friction. The main risk is customer hesitation if 800 VDC standards and safety practices evolve unevenly across regions.

Leaders

Legrand SA

Acquisitions in North America are a practical way to deepen busbar and power distribution capability close to major build corridors. Legrand, a top player, can ride stricter uptime expectations by reducing splice points and speeding adds and changes at the row. The company's 2024 results narrative highlighted strong momentum tied to data center demand, which supports continued investment in this segment. If open hardware standards keep spreading, Legrand's push into OCP aligned racks and power shelves can widen its design wins. The operational risk is integration speed after multiple bolt on deals, which can distract sales and service teams.

Leaders

Delta Electronics Inc.

Product breadth is expanding toward AI ready infrastructure, with 2024 and 2025 showcases covering modular UPS, lithium battery systems, and coolant distribution units. Delta Electronics can benefit when operators want fewer integration points between backup power and storage because it is a key supplier in these areas. If regional rules tighten around battery safety, Delta's focus on certified lithium systems may shorten approval cycles for energy storage inside facilities. One what if scenario is wider adoption of containerized designs where power and monitoring are pre integrated. The main operational risk is coordinating a wide catalog across regions, since certification and service readiness can lag product announcements.

Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

What should we ask before choosing a UPS and switchgear partner for a new site?

Ask for recent delivery lead times and confirmed factory capacity for your voltage and kW class. Also ask how they handle commissioning support and bypass planning for your redundancy design.

How do AI workloads change power equipment requirements inside facilities?

They increase peak density and can create sharper load swings that stress power quality. This raises the value of fast monitoring, robust protection, and designs that scale in smaller increments.

When does it make sense to consider 800 VDC power designs?

Consider it when rack power levels and copper constraints become a limiting factor in your layouts. Also confirm safety practices, training, and vendor support maturity before making it a default.

What is the simplest way to reduce downtime risk in the power train?

Standardize on audited designs and keep spare parts aligned with your installed base. Then verify that the supplier has local service coverage and documented response times.

How should we evaluate battery options for backup and energy storage?

Compare safety documentation, monitoring depth, and replacement cycles under your expected temperature profile. Also validate how the vendor detects early cell issues and manages warranty claims.

What is a practical way to compare generator providers under tighter emissions pressure?

Ask about fuel flexibility plans, controls for testing and runtime optimization, and options for lower carbon backup paths. Confirm permitting support and service capacity in your build region.


Methodology

Research approach and analytical framework

Data Sourcing & Research Approach

Data Sourcing: Used public investor materials, company press rooms, and credible journalism to capture 2023+ launches, expansions, and partnerships. Private firm scoring used observable signals such as product releases, certifications, and regional expansion activity. When direct segment figures were limited, triangulated with contracts, factory plans, and deployment indicators. Scoring stayed within the defined scope only.

Impact Parameters
1
Presence

Counts factories, service coverage, and delivery footprint for UPS, generators, switchgear, and PDUs across data center regions.

2
Brand

Reflects trust among owners, EPCs, and operators for uptime critical electrical rooms and audited commissioning practices.

3
Share

Uses relative position proxies like hyperscale wins, supply capacity deals, and repeat deployments for power trains.

Execution Scale Parameters
1
Operations

Measures committed capacity such as switchgear lines, modular build assets, and field service readiness for commissioning and maintenance.

2
Innovation

Tracks 2023+ launches in higher voltage DC, modular UPS, battery analytics, and packaged power modules for AI dense racks.

3
Financials

Assesses resilience from data center tied segments and ability to fund inventory, capacity adds, and warranty support.