Top 5 Aquafeed Companies
Cargill, Incorporated
Nutreco NV
BioMar Group
Charoen Pokphand Foods PCL.
Tongwei Co., Ltd.

Source: Mordor Intelligence
Aquafeed Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Aquafeed players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
Revenue tables often reward scale, but procurement teams also care about delivery reliability, verified sourcing, and reformulation speed when inputs change. The MI Matrix reflects those capability signals, so a firm can rank well through innovation pipeline depth, certification readiness, in scope geographic reach, and asset utilization consistency. Aquafeed buyers increasingly ask which suppliers can meet ASC Feed Standard expectations, document marine and plant ingredient due diligence, and still protect feed conversion under changing fishmeal availability. They also look for who can supply functional diets, probiotics, and precision feeding support as farms push for survival gains and lower waste. Against that backdrop, the MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it weighs real execution capacity and product momentum, not just size.
MI Competitive Matrix for Aquafeed
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Aquafeed Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Aquafeed Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Cargill, Incorporated
Scale drives resilience in Cargill's aquaculture nutrition footprint, even as some locations are reshaped. Cargill, a leading vendor, benefits from broad formulation depth and tighter marine ingredient programs, which can reduce compliance friction for large farm groups. Its decision to exit aquafeed operations in Vietnam shows portfolio discipline, yet it also highlights concentration risk when local economics turn. If regulators further tighten antibiotic and traceability rules, Cargill is positioned to standardize audits quickly. A realistic upside is faster adoption of lower fish dependency recipes, while the key risk is customer churn during footprint transitions.
Nutreco NV
R&D intensity shapes Nutreco's trajectory as farms demand measurable survival and welfare outcomes. Nutreco, a top manufacturer, can translate health research into commercial diets, as shown by Skretting's Necto functional feed launch for late 2025 availability. The new Mowi partnership also signals that large integrators will pay for formulation know how and data, not only tonnage. If carbon and deforestation linked rules tighten, Nutreco's ingredient screening becomes a stronger differentiator. The what if risk is that phytogenic claims face stricter validation requirements. Execution strength remains high, but it must protect margins during raw material swings.
BioMar Group
Profit rose even as BioMar faced lower volumes, which points to disciplined customer selection and product mix management. BioMar, a major supplier, has leaned into operational excellence and higher value formulations, and it reported an 18% EBITDA increase for 2024. Policy pressure on marine ingredients favors firms that can document transitions toward alternatives without compromising fish performance. A plausible upside is stronger demand from farms needing verifiable footprint reductions in feed. The core risk is exposure to biological shocks in key salmon regions that can reduce feed demand quickly. BioMar's moat is credible nutrition science, but it must keep specialty inputs available in tight supply cycles.
Guangdong HAID Group Co., Ltd.
Earnings improvement signals HAID's ability to convert volume growth into stronger profitability, even in volatile demand cycles. The firm, a major supplier, reported 2024 net profit growth in its annual results disclosure coverage, supporting confidence in operational control. HAID has also attracted investor attention tied to potential capital markets activity, which could fund further overseas buildouts. If traceability and sourcing audits become mandatory in more countries, HAID's challenge is harmonizing supplier systems across newer regions. The upside is expansion beyond China with localized formulas. The key risk is execution complexity across many sites, which can weaken batch consistency if governance slips.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should a buyer verify first when selecting an aquafeed provider?
Start with species specific performance evidence and batch consistency controls. Then validate how the supplier documents ingredient sourcing and handles recalls.
Which certifications matter most for export oriented aquaculture feed programs?
Prioritize certifications that cover ingredient due diligence and feed mill controls, especially for traceability. Then confirm the supplier can support farm level documentation without delays.
How can farms reduce exposure to fishmeal and fish oil volatility?
Ask suppliers for alternative protein strategies that preserve growth and survival. Also review how they qualify trimmings, algae, insect meal, or fermented proteins for continuity.
How do functional feeds differ from standard grower diets in practice?
Functional diets typically target resilience, gut health, or stress response, not only weight gain. Buyers should demand clear use windows, measurable outcomes, and limits on overuse.
What questions indicate whether a supplier can support precision feeding?
Ask whether they provide feeding curves, sensor compatible guidance, and on farm technical support. Also check if they can tune formulas to site conditions and seasonal temperatures.
What are the most common operational risks in aquafeed supply?
Raw material disruptions can change formulas quickly, which can create performance swings if QA is weak. Logistics failures and inconsistent pellet quality can also raise waste and water quality issues.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Data Sourcing: Public sources emphasized company sites, filings, annual reports, and credible journalism. Private firm signals used facilities, certifications, and disclosed partnerships. When scoped financial detail was limited, indicators were triangulated using assets, contracts, and product launches. Scoring favored 2023+ developments tied directly to aquafeed activity.
Feed mills, species coverage, and farmer support footprint determine who can supply farms across regions and cycles.
Certifications and farm performance references drive repeat buying when switching costs are high.
Volume and contract depth indicate bargaining power on raw materials and ability to smooth price spikes.
Extrusion capacity, QA labs, and logistics discipline reduce stockouts and batch variability risk.
Functional diets, novel proteins, and precision feeding tools since 2023 signal future relevance.
Aquafeed tied profitability signals ability to fund trials, compliance systems, and capacity upgrades.
