Top 5 Europe Automotive Engine Oils Companies
BP plc
Exxon Mobil Corporation
FUCHS
Shell plc
TotalEnergies

Source: Mordor Intelligence
Europe Automotive Engine Oils Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Europe Automotive Engine Oils players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can diverge from revenue-based rankings because it rewards practical buyer outcomes, not just scale. A company can rank higher when it has broader OEM approvals, stronger workshop training, faster reformulation cycles, and more dependable in-region supply assets. It can also rank lower when sanctions, restructuring, or channel exits reduce buyer confidence, even if legacy volumes were large. In Europe, buyers increasingly ask which brands can support 0W-20 and 0W-16 adoption without workshop errors, and who can supply circular base-oil options without performance compromise. Indicators that matter include approval breadth, base oil access, distribution coverage, and evidence of post-2023 launches tied to Euro 6 and hybrid needs. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it reflects readiness for spec change, policy pressure, and execution reliability.
MI Competitive Matrix for Europe Automotive Engine Oils
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Europe Automotive Engine Oils Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Europe Automotive Engine Oils Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
BP plc
Castrol's 2024 strategy refresh signals a sharper focus on efficiency, circularity, and new mobility needs across Europe. BP, a major player in lubricants, can turn that positioning into workshop pull when EU rules push low viscosity oils and documented approvals. In December 2025, Renault After Sales launched a co-branded Renault Castrol GTX range formulated with re-refined base oils, starting with RN17 availability across its European dealer network. If re-refined inputs become a mainstream procurement requirement, BP can scale supply with OEM partners faster than many blenders. The largest operational risk is complexity in managing many OEM specs without raising service errors.
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Divestment plans in France still leave ExxonMobil intending to keep selling finished lubricants and base stocks in the country, preserving continuity for buyers. In parallel, ExxonMobil's 2025 Europe reorganization points to cost discipline and a tighter link between technical teams and manufacturing sites in the region. That setup can help when OEM approvals proliferate and customers need faster technical support for correct oil selection. If EU due diligence rules raise compliance costs, ExxonMobil may prioritize fewer, higher-value formulations. The main operational risk is losing local responsiveness during restructuring, which can open doors for faster regional specialists.
FUCHS
New Fiat and Stellantis approvals show how FUCHS keeps its passenger car portfolio aligned with fast moving European OEM requirements. In January 2024, FUCHS launched a 0W-20 oil approved for Fiat specifications and positioned it for modern turbo and hybrid needs. A 2025 product note described a 5W-30 formulated for Stellantis engines requiring a specific FPW specification, supporting workshop compliance and warranty protection. If ultra-low viscosity adoption broadens beyond premium fleets, FUCHS can extend this approval-first playbook. Risk concentrates in managing many variants without increasing channel confusion and returns.
Shell plc
Two 2024 Helix launches underline Shell's focus on meeting upgraded OEM requirements, with product rollouts explicitly planned for Europe in 2024. Shell also took a 2024 final investment decision in Germany to repurpose its Rheinland site to produce Group III base oils for high-quality lubricants, targeting about 300,000 tonnes per year capacity. In 2025, Shell and Ducati announced a co-branded motorcycle oil sold through Ducati dealers across Europe, reinforcing premium channel access. If EU rules favor lower viscosity and circular base oils, Shell can supply both branded oils and key base oil inputs. The operational risk is complex multi-site transformation without service disruption.
TotalEnergies
Circular oils moved from concept to shelf for TotalEnergies through EV3R branded offerings spanning light and heavy vehicles in Europe. In June 2024, Stellantis highlighted co-branding of Quartz EV3R 10W-40 made from regenerated base oils, positioned as a circular economy step while maintaining performance. In November 2024, TotalEnergies Lubrifiants announced Rubia EV3R for heavy-duty applications, described as available for supply in Europe in 15W-40 and 10W-30 with multiple OEM approvals. If waste-oil regeneration targets tighten, TotalEnergies can use EV3R as a defensible premium story in workshops and fleets. The biggest risk is securing consistent re-refined feedstock quality at scale.
Frequently Asked Questions
How should fleets select an engine oil partner for Euro VI and upcoming Euro VII needs?
Prioritize suppliers that can document ACEA sequences and OEM sheets for your engine list, not just viscosity grade. For heavy-duty, track ACEA Oil Sequences 2024 updates and timing for mandatory use.
Why are 0W-20 oils gaining preference in European service bays?
Lower viscosity can support efficiency targets, but only when the oil meets the exact OEM and ACEA requirements. The biggest practical risk is mis-application, which can damage aftertreatment systems or invalidate warranty.
What should buyers check when considering re-refined base oil formulations?
Ask for proof of performance equivalence claims, OEM approvals where applicable, and consistency controls on feedstock quality. Also confirm whether the supplier can scale volumes without changing the formulation mid-contract.
How do ACEA E8, E11, and F01 changes affect heavy-duty oil choices?
They introduce newer performance expectations and, for F01, viscosity-related requirements tied to fuel economy. Buyers should plan for relabeling, re-approval lead times, and workshop training before compliance deadlines.
What are the most common causes of engine oil program failures in workshops?
The top issues are wrong spec selection, poor inventory discipline across many OEM sheets, and unclear labeling at point of use. Reduce risk with supplier-led training, simplified SKU rationalization, and fitment tools.
How can procurement validate innovation claims without overpaying?
Tie premiums to measurable outputs like extended drain interval support, documented deposit control tests, and verified OEM approvals. Pilot in a controlled fleet slice, then expand only if maintenance outcomes improve.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Evidence was taken from company press rooms, investor releases, regulatory-grade standards bodies, and named journalism. Private firms were scored using observable signals like approvals, launches, and facility actions. When direct financial splits were unavailable, multiple proxies were triangulated. Scoring stayed within the Europe plus Russia scope and emphasized post-2023 developments.
Measures Europe in-region blending, retail reach, and workshop coverage across key countries.
Reflects workshop trust in approvals, label clarity, and OEM co-branding visibility in Europe.
Uses in-scope volume proxies, channel control, and installed parc alignment by country.
Captures Europe base oil access, plants, logistics, and ability to supply multiple viscosity grades.
Weighs post-2023 launches for low viscosity, hybrid suitability, and circular base-oil formulations.
Assesses resilience of Europe engine-oil related activity under cost volatility and regulation.
