Drip Irrigation Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

Drip irrigation firms like Netafim, Jain Irrigation Systems (Rivulis), and The Toro Company compete through technological advancements, specialized regional offerings, and tailored solutions for various crop needs. Competitive positioning is influenced by service networks and adaptation to local regulations. Our analyst view emphasizes strategic procurement and innovation. Full insights are in the Drip Irrigation Report.

KEY PLAYERS
The Toro Company Lindsay Corporation Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd. (Rivulis Irrigation Ltd.) Netafim Limited (Orbia Advance Corporation) Valmont Industries Inc.
Get analysis tailored to your specific needs and decision criteria.

Top 5 Drip Irrigation Companies

trophy
  • arrow

    The Toro Company

  • arrow

    Lindsay Corporation

  • arrow

    Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd. (Rivulis Irrigation Ltd.)

  • arrow

    Netafim Limited (Orbia Advance Corporation)

  • arrow

    Valmont Industries Inc.

Top Drip Irrigation Major Players

Source: Mordor Intelligence

Drip Irrigation Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Drip Irrigation players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures

This MI Matrix can diverge from a simple sales rank because it weighs delivery capability and product fit in real buying situations. Some firms win large tenders yet struggle with parts availability, training, or controller integration once systems are installed. Others sell fewer systems but create stronger outcomes through subsurface durability, filtration performance, and reliable controls support. Buyers often ask which suppliers can scale subsurface drip quickly for permanent crops, and which ones can integrate sensors with fertigation without heavy retraining. They also want to know how to reduce clogging risk when water quality varies, while still keeping labor needs low. Mordor Intelligence's MI Matrix is more useful for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it translates visible execution signals into a comparable view of real world delivery strength.

MI Competitive Matrix for Drip Irrigation

The MI Matrix benchmarks top Drip Irrigation Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.

Share
Loading chart...

Analysis of Drip Irrigation Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Comprehensive positioning breakdown

Jain Irrigation Systems Ltd. (Rivulis Irrigation Ltd.)

Capacity choices are shaping this business more than product breadth right now. Rivulis, a leading player, benefited from completing the acquisition of Jain's International Irrigation Business in April 2023, which improved cross-region coverage and channel reach. Physical output then sped up, including a North America site in Tijuana announced in September 2024 and a large dripper facility in Israel announced in November 2025. If water rules tighten faster in Europe, the Eurodrip merger plan can help standardize supply while reducing duplication risk. Integration strain across brands is a key risk while trying to keep service quality consistent.

Leaders

The Toro Company

Software led irrigation control is becoming a clearer differentiator for Toro in managed turf settings. Toro, a major brand, strengthened its precision control story through an exclusive partnership with TerraRad, targeting automated scheduling changes inside the Lynx Central Control platform, announced February 5, 2025. The company also highlighted an "extremely dynamic environment" while reporting fiscal 2024 results, which reinforces the value of recurring parts and retrofit-friendly designs when demand shifts. If public golf budgets tighten, Toro can pivot toward compliance-driven upgrades like flow sensing and scheduling automation. Channel inventory swings are an operational risk that can amplify volume volatility and pressure service levels.

Leaders

Netafim Limited (An Orbia Business)

Product velocity is the most visible strength in Netafim's recent playbook. Netafim, a top manufacturer, launched a patented Hybrid Dripline in February 2025 aimed at reducing labor steps while improving consistency in orchards, vineyards, and protected growing. The company also pushed its GrowSphere operating system narrative in 2024 and expanded it through sensor partnerships, including Treetoscope in April 2025 for plant sensing in tree crops. If subsidies shift toward measurable water outcomes, its digital validation layer should help protect premium positioning. Adoption friction is the main risk when growers lack local setup support for integrated hardware and software bundles.

Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

Which capabilities matter most when choosing a drip irrigation vendor for commercial farms?

Focus on filtration matching, pressure regulation accuracy, and parts availability during peak season. Ask for proof of commissioning support and local training.

How should buyers compare surface versus subsurface drip options across vendors?

Subsurface choices should emphasize root intrusion prevention, clog resistance, and repair approach. Surface choices should emphasize uniformity, UV stability, and fast seasonal replacement.

What is the most common reason drip systems underperform after installation?

Poor filtration sizing and pressure mismatches are common causes. Another frequent issue is weak installer training on flushing, valve placement, and maintenance routines.

How do controllers and sensors change vendor selection?

They increase lock in, so buyers should test integration across valves, pumps, and fertigation. Favor systems that can validate outcomes with clear alerts and easy overrides.

What questions should procurement teams ask about after sales support?

Ask about lead time for emitters and fittings, warranty handling steps, and on site troubleshooting coverage. Also ask whether training is available for contractors and farm staff.

How can growers reduce clogging and maintenance cost without overspending?

Start with water testing, then right size filtration and flushing hardware before buying advanced controls. Use pressure compensating emitters where terrain varies and labor is constrained.


Methodology

Research approach and analytical framework

Data Sourcing & Research Approach

We used company investor materials, filings, and official press rooms first, then reputable trade and journalist coverage. This approach works for both public and private firms through observable signals like sites, launches, and partnerships. When direct segment numbers were unavailable, we triangulated using capacity, product updates, and channel activity within the defined scope.

Impact Parameters
1
Presence

Local stocking points and installers determine whether farms and greenhouses can expand systems during short planting windows.

2
Brand

Growers prefer proven emitters and filters because failures can reduce yield, create labor spikes, and trigger rework.

3
Share

Scale proxies matter because larger installed base drives parts pull through and distributor priority for driplines and fittings.

Execution Scale Parameters
1
Operations

Dedicated extrusion, molding, and assembly capacity supports lead times for driplines, emitters, valves, and filters.

2
Innovation

New pressure compensation, anti siphon, and digital scheduling features reduce clogging, labor, and water loss.

3
Financials

Stronger cash generation supports dealer credit, warranty support, and sustained rollout of controllers and sensors.