Data Center Rack Power Distribution Unit (PDU) Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

PDU suppliers in the data center sector deploy varied strategies, with Schneider Electric prioritizing innovation, Legrand leveraging specialized designs, and ABB emphasizing intelligent features. Our analysts note that these providers compete through advances in energy management, custom solutions for data centers, and agile service for colocation and cloud settings. More detailed competitive analysis can be found in our Data Center Rack Power Distribution Unit (PDU) Report.

KEY PLAYERS
Schneider Electric SE Vertiv Group Corp. Eaton Corporation plc ABB Ltd Legrand SA
Get analysis tailored to your specific needs and decision criteria.

Top 5 Data Center Rack Power Distribution Unit (PDU) Companies

trophy
  • arrow

    Schneider Electric SE

  • arrow

    Vertiv Group Corp.

  • arrow

    Eaton Corporation plc

  • arrow

    ABB Ltd

  • arrow

    Legrand SA

Top Data Center Rack Power Distribution Unit (PDU) Major Players

Source: Mordor Intelligence

Data Center Rack Power Distribution Unit (PDU) Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Data Center Rack Power Distribution Unit (PDU) players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures

The MI Matrix can diverge from a pure revenue ranked top five because it weights what operators can observe in live deployments. Some firms score well due to strong rack level monitoring depth, fast configuration, and proven availability across multiple regions. Others benefit from tighter coupling with racks, sensors, and remote management software that reduces onsite labor. Reliability signals like security certifications and controlled firmware processes can also shift positions, even when unit volumes look similar. Operators often compare universal input approaches, outlet level visibility, and the ability to scale past 25 kW per rack without redesigning power paths. They also look for secure remote access, clear integration hooks, and predictable lead times for large rollouts. For supplier and competitor evaluation, the MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is more useful than revenue tables alone because it connects capability and delivery signals to real deployment needs.

MI Competitive Matrix for Data Center Rack Power Distribution Unit (PDU)

The MI Matrix benchmarks top Data Center Rack Power Distribution Unit (PDU) Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.

Share
Loading chart...

Analysis of Data Center Rack Power Distribution Unit (PDU) Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Comprehensive positioning breakdown

Schneider Electric SE

AI driven site builds are pulling rack power decisions closer to cyber and uptime risks, not just electrical sizing. IEC 62443-4-2 SL2 certification was earned by Schneider Electric for its EcoStruxure IT data center infrastructure management cybersecurity platform and its Network Management Card 3 foundation, strengthening trust signals. A realistic upside case is that more operators standardize on secure remote management while densifying racks. A practical risk is delivery timing and configuration complexity at scale, even when demand is strong, as shown by Schneider's USD 2.3 billion U.S. data center agreements announced on November 19, 2025.

Leaders

Legrand

Rack level flexibility is becoming a buying filter as global power inputs vary across builds and regions. On February 26, 2025, Legrand added a Universal Input option for its next generation intelligent rack PDUs, positioned across Server Technology PRO4X and Raritan PX4 models. The move aligns with Legrand's position as a top manufacturer and fits teams who want fewer hardware variants while still needing metering and control features near the rack. A realistic what if is faster multi region rollouts with fewer cord and plug surprises late in commissioning. The key risk is execution quality across many configurations, since one platform choice can spread quickly across multiple sites.

Leaders

Vertiv Group Corp.

High density computing is forcing rack PDUs to scale in power while staying serviceable and secure. Vertiv expanded its rack PDU portfolio for AI and HPC needs, announcing on September 2, 2025 that models are available up to 57.6 kW across regions including North America and EMEA. Security and reliability features such as secure boot and hardware based trust anchors are emphasized in its monitored rack PDU line. A strong upside is bundled wins when racks, power, and services are sourced together. A meaningful risk is component supply tightness for higher rated designs, which can delay rollouts.

Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the practical difference between metered, monitored, and switched rack PDUs?

Metered units focus on measuring power, often at input or outlet level. Monitored units add network visibility and alerts. Switched units add remote outlet control for reboots and load shedding.

When should a buyer insist on outlet level metering instead of inlet level only?

Outlet level metering helps with tenant billing, true capacity planning, and finding stranded power. It also helps identify one device causing recurring overload alarms.

What should teams look for in a universal input or interchangeable cord approach?

Look for safe mechanical keying, clear labeling, and procurement simplicity across regions. Also check whether changing input types affects monitoring accuracy or warranty terms.

How important are cybersecurity certifications for network connected rack PDUs?

They matter more each year because PDUs are now managed like other network devices. Teams should ask about secure boot, firmware signing, and vulnerability response cadence.

What features matter most for high density AI racks above roughly 25 kW?

Higher power ratings, three phase options, tighter temperature tolerance, and better telemetry become critical. Serviceability also matters, since failures can affect many expensive servers.

What are common rollout risks when standardizing on one rack PDU family?

The most common issues are lead time swings, configuration errors, and inconsistent firmware policies. Buyers should also validate accessories like sensors, locks, and mounting hardware early.


Methodology

Research approach and analytical framework

Data Sourcing & Research Approach

Data sourcing: Evidence was taken from company investor relations, official press rooms, product documentation, and credible third party journalism. Public firms used filings and dated releases, while private firms relied on observable signals like catalogs, datasheets, and certifications. When direct scoped revenue was not disclosed, scoring used shipment breadth, released SKUs, and named deployments as proxies. Signals were triangulated across multiple sources when possible.

Impact Parameters
1
Presence & Reach

More certified SKUs, regional availability, and local support reduce rollout risk across hyperscale and colocation sites.

2
Brand Authority

Rack power is safety critical, so trusted names shorten qualification cycles and simplify global standardization decisions.

3
Share

Higher installed base signals proven uptime, easier spare parts planning, and stronger ecosystem integration in live racks.

Execution Scale Parameters
1
Operational Scale

Dedicated PDU manufacturing, test capacity, and configurable assembly improve lead times for large multi site builds.

2
Innovation & Product Range

High density racks need new ratings, better security, and richer telemetry introduced since 2023.

3
Financial Health / Momentum

Stable results from rack power activity support warranty, firmware maintenance, and sustained product investment.