Bulletproof Vest Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

The bulletproof vest sector features competition among top suppliers like Point Blank Enterprises, Safariland, and Honeywell, who leverage material science, specialized designs, and strong partnerships to serve defense and law enforcement clients. Our analysis offers insights into how these companies differentiate and respond to emerging needs. Explore expanded strategic coverage in our Bulletproof Vest Report.

KEY PLAYERS
Point Blank Enterprises, Inc. Safariland, LLC Central Lake Armor Express, Inc. DuPont de Nemours, Inc. Honeywell International Inc.
Get analysis tailored to your specific needs and decision criteria.

Top 5 Bulletproof Vest Companies

trophy
  • arrow

    Point Blank Enterprises, Inc.

  • arrow

    Safariland, LLC

  • arrow

    Central Lake Armor Express, Inc.

  • arrow

    DuPont de Nemours, Inc.

  • arrow

    Honeywell International Inc.

Top Bulletproof Vest Major Players

Source: Mordor Intelligence

Bulletproof Vest Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Bulletproof Vest players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures

MI Matrix results can diverge from simple revenue ordering because operational readiness and near term compliance work often matter more than historical sales volume. The scoring leans on observable capability indicators such as verified procurement access, pace of material innovation, asset commitment to armor production, and reliability signals like certifications and repeatable configuration control. NIJ 0101.07 is already the current standard, and NIJ has also issued addenda through December 1, 2025, while maintaining the older compliant list through at least December 31, 2027 for transition. Buyers also want clarity on when NIJ listed 0101.07 models will appear and how to avoid counterfeit claims that trigger safety notices. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it weights execution signals that predict delivery outcomes.

MI Competitive Matrix for Bulletproof Vest

The MI Matrix benchmarks top Bulletproof Vest Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.

Share
Loading chart...

Analysis of Bulletproof Vest Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Comprehensive positioning breakdown

Point Blank Enterprises, Inc.

2025 Florida plant plan signals continued investment in domestic output and delivery speed. Point Blank Enterprises, a leading player, strengthens differentiation through lightweight systems tied to new aramid innovation, including an exclusive North America law enforcement agreement around Kevlar EXO in January 2024. NIJ 0101.07 transition pressure should reward firms that can re-validate designs fast while defending quality controls. If Florida hiring slips or materials tighten, lead times could rise, which would quickly stress agency trust.

Leaders

Safariland, LLC

Cadre's 2024 results signal sustained demand for armor shipments inside a broader safety equipment portfolio. Safariland, a top brand, benefits from deep relationships with law enforcement buyers and recurring procurement cycles. The NIJ 0101.07 shift adds testing uncertainty, so Safariland's advantage is process discipline and clear customer education. If large order timing turns volatile, quarterly performance can mask underlying strength, and operations planning becomes the hidden risk.

Leaders

DuPont de Nemours, Inc.

Kevlar EXO moved from lab narrative to buyer pull when DuPont linked it to new officer comfort goals. DuPont, a leading vendor in aramid, enables multiple vest brands through a platform that the company says will expand in commercialization in 2025. The Point Blank partnership adds a concrete route into state and local procurement conversations. A what if scenario is that portfolio moves reshape priorities, including the announced plan to sell the Kevlar and Nomex business to Arclin with expected close in Q1 2026.

Leaders

Honeywell International Inc.

Portfolio separation reshaped its focus, with Advanced Materials moving toward a standalone path and then a completed spin in late 2025. Honeywell, a major supplier of UHMWPE based solutions, can stay relevant by pushing composite performance and consistency across temperature and multi hit needs. Standards change is a sales tool and a risk because every performance claim will be audited more closely. If the new structure slows investment cycles, innovation pace could flatten temporarily.

Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

How should buyers validate vest compliance during the NIJ 0101.07 transition?

Check the NIJ compliant list status and require model specific documentation that matches the exact configuration. Avoid vague claims like "tested to" without traceable evidence.

What selection criteria most often separate reliable vest providers from risky ones?

Prioritize configuration control, repeatable sizing, and a clear warranty path backed by field support. Also require transparent third party lab testing and lot traceability.

How do lightweight soft vests and hard plate systems change procurement decisions?

Soft vests favor comfort and wear time, which can raise real world protection through consistent use. Hard plates add rifle threat coverage but increase weight and heat burden.

What is the most practical way to handle women specific fit requirements?

Ask for women specific panel geometry and carrier sizing, not just smaller sizes of men's cuts. Run wearer trials that include movement, vehicle seating, and extended shift wear.

What risks are rising fastest for agencies buying ballistic vests in 2025 and 2026?

Counterfeit and misrepresented products remain a real safety hazard, and enforcement actions can remove models quickly. Testing backlogs and documentation gaps can also delay deliveries.

How should buyers compare upstream material brands versus finished vest brands?

Material brands can signal performance potential, but finished system integration and stitching quality often drive outcomes. Require proof that the final assembly, not only the fiber, meets the needed standard.


Methodology

Research approach and analytical framework

Data Sourcing & Research Approach

Used company investor materials, official press rooms, and government or standards body sources where available. Private company scoring relied on visible contracts, tenders, certifications, and site commitments. When direct vest only revenue was unavailable, indicators were triangulated across contracts, product activity, and footprint. Sources were limited to the defined scope and time window.

Impact Parameters
1
Presence

Measures ability to supply agencies across regions with consistent sizing, training, and service support.

2
Brand

Reflects trust for life saving equipment, especially under NIJ transition and counterfeit concerns.

3
Share

Approximates relative position using contracts, framework awards, fiber adoption, and installed base signals.

Execution Scale Parameters
1
Operations

Captures committed plants, certified capacity, and ability to scale soft armor plus plates on schedule.

2
Innovation

Tracks post-2023 material advances, female fit systems, hybrid plates, and test readiness for NIJ 0101.07.

3
Financials

Assesses stability to fund testing, inventory, and multi year tenders without quality shortcuts.