Top 5 Peanut Oil Companies
Wilmar International Limited
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Cargill, Incorporated
AAK AB
Bunge Limited

Source: Mordor Intelligence
Peanut Oil Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Peanut Oil players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can diverge from simple size rankings because it rewards day to day reliability signals that buyers feel, not only total revenue. In peanut oil, those signals often include footprint near demand centers, ability to hold specs through crop swings, and documented food safety controls. It also reflects how quickly a company refreshes products, such as cold pressed launches, high oleic programs, or clearer frying grade segmentation. Refined peanut oil is usually preferred for high heat frying because it has a cleaner taste and higher smoke point. Unrefined peanut oil is better when aroma is the point, like dressings or finishing. For peanut allergen risk, highly refined peanut oil is treated differently than cold pressed oils in some labeling contexts, so procurement teams should confirm how each supplier documents refining and labeling. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is stronger for supplier and competitor evaluation because it blends capability, assets, and delivery execution, not just revenue tables alone.
MI Competitive Matrix for Peanut Oil
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Peanut Oil Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Peanut Oil Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Wilmar International Limited
September 2024 equity move that focused on China sharpened Wilmar's peanut oil exposure through planned stakes in Luhua. The company, a leading player, can pair scale buying with tighter quality specs for frying grades and longer shelf life SKUs. Food allergen rules and buyer audits raise the bar on traceability and label discipline, which favors groups with strong controls. If Wilmar integrates procurement and packaging more tightly, premium and foodservice volumes could rise quickly. The main risk is execution drag from complex joint venture structures and multi country compliance pressure.
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Portfolio clarity spans refined, roasted aromatic, and extract oils for frying and flavor across ADM's peanut oils range. This major supplier can win where buyers want steady specs, non GMO positioning, and dependable high heat performance. Regulations tied to allergen declaration and preventive controls increase the cost of sloppy handling, so consistent QA becomes a moat. If foodservice chains expand peanut oil frying again, ADM can benefit through bulk contracting and formulation support. A practical threat is substitution by other oils when peanut price cycles spike.
Cargill, Incorporated
WHO alignment by January 2024 across Cargill's fats and oils program reflects its push into health driven reformulation. The company, a top player, can translate that systems work into customer trust for peanut oil used in large scale frying. Policy pressure on nutrition labeling and supplier verification supports companies that can document process controls at every step. If regulators tighten limits on processing byproducts, Cargill is better positioned to adapt without service disruption. The key operational risk is that broad portfolios can dilute attention from peanut oil specific innovation.
AAK AB
2024 messaging highlights profitability goals and ongoing portfolio diversification across plant based oils and fats for AAK. This leading vendor tends to win on application know how, which matters when peanut oil is blended or tuned for texture and stability needs. Rules tied to allergen handling and customer audits push specialty formulators toward stricter documentation and cleaner changeovers. If quick service restaurants standardize frying specs across regions, AAK can grow through tailored solutions and technical support. A credible risk is volume softness if customers simplify SKUs during cost cutting cycles.
Bunge Limited
October 2025 changes after the merger signal Bunge's renewed push to explain refined oil production and processing scale. The company, a major supplier, can compete well where buyers want global sourcing options and resilient logistics for bulk peanut oil. Regulatory scrutiny on food safety systems increases the value of standardized operating playbooks across sites. If peanut supply tightens in one region, Bunge can redirect supply through its broader network and contracting discipline. The main weakness is earnings cyclicality, which can constrain sustained investment in niche peanut oil lines.
Shandong Luhua Group Co.,Ltd
High oleic cultivation and product positioning show Luhua's long cycle investment in oil performance and nutrition appeal. The firm, a top brand, can convert that agronomy work into differentiated frying stability and longer oxidation resistance for home and foodservice use. Food labeling rules and allergen awareness keep pressure on clear claims and disciplined segregation. If high oleic adoption accelerates across China, Luhua can defend pricing through visible quality differences. A key threat is crop volatility, since specialty seed programs still depend on weather and farmer economics.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should I check first when selecting a peanut oil partner for frying programs?
Confirm the oil type, refining level, and repeatable frying performance across batches. Ask for recent COA patterns and clear guidance on filtration and turnover.
When does refined peanut oil make more sense than unrefined peanut oil?
Refined peanut oil fits high heat frying and neutral taste needs. Unrefined peanut oil fits aroma forward cooking where its nutty flavor is the point.
How can buyers reduce peanut allergen risk while still using peanut oil?
Validate the refining method and request clear documentation for labeling and handling. Also confirm sanitation and cross contact controls at filling sites.
What proof points matter most for organic peanut oil sourcing?
Look for current organic certificates, traceable lot records, and a defined testing plan for contaminants. Also verify how the supplier handles mixed origin sourcing.
What signals show a peanut oil provider can serve large foodservice chains?
Multiple filling formats, stable lead times, and documented fryer guidance matter. Evidence of customer support teams and consistent logistics coverage is also important.
What near term risks can disrupt peanut oil availability and pricing?
Peanut crop volatility, freight shocks, and sudden demand shifts from foodservice can all move pricing quickly. Substitution into other oils can also change demand patterns.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
We used public company IR, filings, and press rooms first, then reputable journalist coverage and standards bodies. Private firms were assessed using facilities, certifications, product activity, and recent commercial signals. When direct peanut oil financial splits were not disclosed, we triangulated with credible segment disclosures and recent operational moves.
Peanut oil buyers value nearby refining and filling plus reliable delivery into retail and foodservice channels.
Allergy sensitive categories reward trusted naming, stable taste, and consistent labeling across pack sizes.
Higher peanut oil throughput usually means better cost leverage and steadier availability during crop cycles.
Crushing, refining, and filling capacity determine ability to meet bulk frying demand and avoid stockouts.
New high oleic, cold pressed, and frying grade options drive premiumization and reduce oxidation issues.
Strong results support working capital for seed buying, inventory buffering, and compliance investments.
