Top 5 Netherlands Wind Energy Companies
Enercon GmbH
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy SA
Mitsubishi Corp
General Electric Company
Lagerwey Wind BV
Source: Mordor Intelligence
Netherlands Wind Energy Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Netherlands Wind Energy players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can diverge from revenue ranked lists because it rewards Dutch delivery proof, service runway, and permit readiness, not only booked sales. It also reacts faster to visible signals such as Dutch port commitments, signed maintenance bases, and named turbine orders tied to specific Dutch sites. In the Netherlands, the most practical indicators are awarded offshore turbine packages, confirmed operations bases like Den Helder, and evidence of projects reaching operations such as December 2023 commissioning steps. Dutch permit conditions also shifted during 2025, with adjusted tender requirements aimed at improving project economics, which can quickly change which firms look most executable. This MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it emphasizes what can be delivered in the Netherlands under current permit and grid constraints.
MI Competitive Matrix for Netherlands Wind Energy
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Netherlands Wind Energy Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Netherlands Wind Energy Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy SA
Offshore installation milestones in 2023 shaped the Dutch reference set more than new announcements did. During 2023, Siemens Gamesa delivered the final turbine installation for Hollandse Kust Zuid, and its Netherlands leadership highlighted the local operating relevance of that buildout. It also supplied the Hollandse Kust Noord build, where turbine installation completion was confirmed during 2023 as the project moved toward operations. Siemens Gamesa, a major OEM with deep offshore roots, benefits if future Dutch permits reward proven execution at scale. One realistic upside scenario is faster repeat wins through standardized 11 MW class fleets. The operational risk is product and service reliability pressure, which can raise spare part and downtime exposure.
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
Dutch award flow since late 2023 has favored suppliers with bankable offshore delivery and ecology ready designs. Vestas secured a firm order in December 2023 to supply 52 V236 15.0 MW turbines for the Hollandse Kust West Site VI project, paired with a long service contract structure. In 2024, Vestas also won the 795 MW OranjeWind order in the Netherlands, extending its Dutch offshore footprint and service runway into the late 2020s. Vestas, a leading producer in wind turbines, is well placed if the Netherlands continues to emphasize delivery certainty and measurable ecology measures. The critical risk is port congestion and vessel scarcity, which can compress installation windows.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should a Dutch offshore wind buyer check first in a turbine partner?
Confirm named Dutch project references, a clear service plan, and port staging arrangements. Also verify warranty scope and response times for offshore access limits.
How are Dutch permit changes in 2025 affecting project choices?
The government adjusted tender requirements to improve project economics and reduce early phase downside. That tends to favor bidders with flexible designs and clear risk controls.
Why did a Dutch North Sea tender receive zero applications in 2025?
RVO stated the Nederwiek I A round received no applications, citing higher costs and slower demand growth for electricity. A new tender round was indicated for 2026.
What is the most practical way to compare offshore service capability in the Netherlands?
Look for a Dutch operations base, named staffing plans, and a documented maintenance contract model. Local access to vessels and spare parts is usually decisive.
How should buyers think about ecology driven design requirements in Dutch offshore projects?
Expect layout and turbine choices to incorporate bird and habitat measures when permits score non price criteria. Favor suppliers who can integrate detection and curtailment tools without major yield loss.
What risks most often delay Dutch wind projects after permit award?
Grid connection timing, vessel availability, and higher financing costs are recurring constraints. Policy shifts toward support mechanisms can also change final investment decisions.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Evidence was taken from company press rooms, investor updates, filings where available, and Dutch government sources. Public signals were also used for private firms, such as registry based indicators and insolvency records. Scoring focuses on Netherlands tied projects, contracts, sites, and operational footprints. When data was incomplete, multiple observable indicators were triangulated.
Dutch offices, ports, service teams, and named Dutch project roles reduce delivery risk in tight installation seasons.
Dutch lenders and permit stakeholders prefer suppliers with proven Dutch references and credible warranty structures.
Relative Dutch turbine awards and operator roles indicate who is most often selected for large Dutch sites.
Vessel access, staging capacity, and local maintenance bases determine uptime and responsiveness for Dutch assets.
New turbine platforms and ecology enabled designs can fit Dutch tender criteria and grid constrained production profiles.
Dutch projects need strong balance sheets to absorb delays, warranty costs, and higher cost of capital.
