Hydrogen Cyanide Companies: Leaders, Top & Emerging Players and Strategic Moves

Players in the HCN segment, such as INEOS and Evonik Industries AG, compete through production scale, technical expertise, and integration with downstream operations. INVISTA and Butachimie focus on strategic partnerships and use proprietary processes to reinforce their positioning. Our analyst view supports procurement teams in evaluating competitive moves. For comprehensive insights, see our Hydrogen Cyanide Report.

KEY PLAYERS
INVISTA Butachimie Evonik Industries AG INEOS Draslovka
Get analysis tailored to your specific needs and decision criteria.

Top 5 Hydrogen Cyanide Companies

trophy
  • arrow

    INVISTA

  • arrow

    Butachimie

  • arrow

    Evonik Industries AG

  • arrow

    INEOS

  • arrow

    Draslovka

Top Hydrogen Cyanide Major Players

Source: Mordor Intelligence

Hydrogen Cyanide Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence

Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Hydrogen Cyanide players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures

The MI Matrix can diverge from revenue ranking because it weights hard to observe capability signals that shape delivery confidence. Examples include the ability to run integrated sites with low incident rates, maintain high utilization through planned shutdowns, and prove compliant packaging for liquid and gas forms. It also reflects how quickly a company can adjust configuration when upstream or downstream units change, as seen in recent capacity rationalizations and restarts. Hydrogen cyanide is often made close to consumption because shipping constraints raise cost and risk. Buyers also look for audited handling programs, trained emergency response coverage, and documented product specs that stay stable across lots. These practical factors can outweigh size when deciding who is safest to qualify for long term supply. The MI Matrix by Mordor Intelligence is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone because it blends footprint, operating strength, and in scope innovation signals into one view.

MI Competitive Matrix for Hydrogen Cyanide

The MI Matrix benchmarks top Hydrogen Cyanide Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.

Share
Loading chart...

Analysis of Hydrogen Cyanide Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix

Comprehensive positioning breakdown

Evonik Industries AG

Planned 2025 maintenance windows highlight how strongly outcomes depend on disciplined shutdown planning and restart quality. Evonik, a major player, is building a pilot plant for DURAION membranes in Marl that is scheduled to go online at the end of 2025, which signals continued investment capacity in complex chemical operations. The company also completed an expansion of MetAMINO production in Singapore in 2024, increasing capacity and pointing to large scale site integration. If tighter emissions rules hit European sites first, management may lean further into efficiency upgrades and selective debottlenecking. The main operational risk is that a multi site outage or supplier disruption can cascade across linked units.

Leaders

INEOS

Co product recovery creates a structural cost advantage when hydrogen cyanide is captured from acrylonitrile operations instead of made as a standalone unit. INEOS states that hydrogen cyanide is produced and recovered as part of its nitriles system, including use into acetone cyanohydrin at Green Lake, Texas. The company, a top manufacturer, is also hosting a Trillium Renewable Chemicals demonstration plant at Green Lake, with start up due in early 2025, which may strengthen future process options. If transport rules tighten further, the integrated site model becomes even more valuable. A critical operational risk is any extended disruption at a large hub that supports multiple downstream chains.

Leaders

INVISTA

Operational reversals in Texas show how fast supply plans can change when engineering proves a new configuration is workable. INVISTA, a major supplier in nylon intermediates, announced a 2023 plan to shut down adiponitrile and then later decided to keep running its hexamethylene diamine plant at Orange, Texas by separating it from on site adiponitrile production. That shift can alter local hydrogen cyanide balance, since upstream inputs may need to be sourced differently across the chain. If customers prioritize regional redundancy, INVISTA can benefit from multi region sourcing logic, but sudden reversals can still strain buyer confidence. The main risk is execution during changeovers without safety incidents or off spec product.

Leaders

Frequently Asked Questions

What should I verify before selecting a hydrogen cyanide producer?

Confirm they can supply the required form, liquid or gas, with documented specs and lot consistency. Ask for audit history, emergency response coverage, and incident reporting practices.

When is on site production better than delivered supply?

On site production is usually favored when volumes are large or when transport risk is hard to manage. Delivered supply can fit smaller users if the supplier provides compliant packaging and trained handling support.

What safety capabilities matter most for hydrogen cyanide logistics?

Look for closed transfer systems, gas detection, and trained response teams that can meet local hazmat expectations. Make sure the supplier can support drills, documentation, and rapid escalation procedures.

How do I compare suppliers that sell cyanide derivatives rather than pure hydrogen cyanide?

Check whether the supplier is integrated into upstream hydrogen cyanide or relies on third party inputs. Integration often improves continuity during disruptions, but it can also concentrate risk at fewer sites.

What are common supply disruption triggers for hydrogen cyanide chains?

Unplanned outages, extended turnarounds, and upstream feedstock interruptions can quickly constrain availability. Regulatory actions can also slow restarts if incident investigations require revalidation.

What contract terms reduce risk for buyers of hydrogen cyanide?

Include clear outage notification timing, qualified alternate supply options, and defined quality dispute steps. Require periodic review of compliance documents and logistics procedures, not just price resets.


Methodology

Research approach and analytical framework

Data Sourcing & Research Approach

Sources prioritized company filings, investor materials, and official press rooms, plus credible named journalism and government publications. Private firms were assessed using observable signals like site actions, shutdowns, expansions, and permitting milestones. When direct volume data was unavailable, multiple proxies were triangulated within the defined scope only. Scoring emphasized post 2023 developments that change capability, reliability, or reachable customer coverage.

Impact Parameters
1
Presence

Number and proximity of HCN linked sites, terminals, or cylinder networks serving mining, nylon chain, and MMA chains across listed regions.

2
Brand

Recognition with EHS teams and plant buyers for hazardous gas handling, audits, and incident response credibility.

3
Share

Relative scale of HCN linked volumes using proxies like integrated ADN, ACH, or cyanide derivative positions in the covered regions.

Execution Scale Parameters
1
Operations

Evidence of committed reactors, recovery systems, storage, and qualified logistics for toxic and flammable materials.

2
Innovation

Post 2023 upgrades that improve containment, efficiency, recovery, or low carbon pathways connected to nitriles and related chains.

3
Financials

Ability to fund maintenance, turnarounds, and compliance investments without disrupting supply commitments.