Ecotoxicological Studies Market Size and Share

Ecotoxicological Studies Market (2026 - 2031)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Ecotoxicological Studies Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Ecotoxicological Studies Market size is estimated at USD 1.21 billion in 2026, and is expected to reach USD 1.48 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 4.03% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

Growing regulatory scrutiny and expanding ESG reporting are widening the testing funnel, yet capacity shortages at Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) hatcheries and the high cost of chronic multi-trophic protocols are holding back throughput. Europe’s tighter REACH rules, the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) broader Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) inventory, and Japan’s sediment-toxicity mandate are driving steady demand, while municipal utilities and polymer makers accelerate orders ahead of 2026 drinking-water microplastic limits. Contract research organizations (CROs) are therefore juggling a rising volume of short-cycle screening assays with a backlog of vertebrate studies that can take 18 months or longer. Competitive differentiation is shifting toward automated analytics, artificial-intelligence (AI) platforms, and organism-type specialization, allowing mid-sized laboratories to win share despite the presence of global leaders. Sponsors view the market as nondiscretionary spend, insulating revenues from broader industrial slowdowns.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By Study Type, Aquatic protocols captured 44.25% of the ecotoxicological studies market share in 2025, and pollinator assays are forecast to expand at a 6.26% CAGR through 2031. 
  • By Test Method, In vivo testing generated 55.14% of 2025 revenue, while in-silico modeling is projected to grow at a 7.77% CAGR to 2031. 
  • By end-user industry, Pharmaceutical and personal-care companies accounted for 37.22% of 2025 revenue; wastewater agencies represent the fastest-growing end-use at an 8.63% CAGR. 
  • By organism Type, Fish studies held 41.67% of 2025 revenue, yet terrestrial invertebrates and pollinators are rising at a 6.13% CAGR to 2031. 
  • By region, Europe led with 31.44% of 2025 value; Asia-Pacific is set for the quickest regional expansion at a 6.82% CAGR through 2031.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Study Type: Aquatic Protocols Dominate, Pollinator Assays Accelerate

Aquatic protocols commanded 44.25% of the ecotoxicological studies market share in 2025, underpinned by the universal use of OECD 201, 202, and 203 in chemical registrations. Pollinator testing is climbing at a 6.26% CAGR because the European Food Safety Authority now requires bumble- and solitary-bee chronic data for all new insecticides. The aquatic tranche will remain the largest through 2031, yet its growth is converging toward the market average as sponsors switch adult fish tests for embryo assays.

Sediment studies are also rising, thanks to European sediment-quality targets and microplastic rules that emphasize benthic endpoints. In contrast, avian work is stable to declining because validated in-vitro screens now cover many developmental endpoints once reserved for bird studies. CROs that specialize in pollinator colonies or sediment organisms are winning niche projects that larger labs often pass over, widening the ecosystem of mid-tier providers.

Ecotoxicological Studies Market: Market Share by Study Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Test Method: In-Silico Uptake Outpaces, In-Vivo Still Dominates

In-vivo assays delivered 55.14% of 2025 revenue, yet in-silico models are advancing at a 7.77% CAGR and represent the fastest-growing method segment. EPA’s March 2025 update of the CompTox Dashboard added predictive models for algal growth inhibition and fish embryo endpoints, achieving 85% concordance with live-organism results. In-vitro systems, such as fish gill cell-line assays, offer 72-hour turnarounds at roughly one-tenth of in-vivo costs, supporting steady adoption.

Field and mesocosm studies remain a high-value niche for post-registration monitoring. Sponsors like Bayer now screen 40% of early-stage molecules exclusively through in-silico filters before any laboratory exposure, trimming pipelines early and lowering downstream demand. Regulatory acceptance remains the main brake on wider in-silico use, yet once decision rules crystalize, annual growth could push into double digits.

By End-Use Industry: Wastewater Agencies Lead Growth, Pharma Holds Share

Pharmaceutical and personal-care companies controlled 37.22% of 2025 revenue, reflecting mandatory environmental-risk assessments for active ingredients in Europe and the United States. Wastewater utilities are growing fastest at an 8.63% CAGR, prompted by PFAS, microplastic, and drug-residue monitoring under upcoming 2026 standards. Agrochemical demand is solid but slowing as new active-ingredient pipelines shrink.

Industrial-chemical volumes continue to edge up, driven by REACH deadlines and China’s enlarged substance inventory. Academic institutes contribute only a small slice, focused on method development rather than routine screening. Over the forecast, wastewater obligations will shift the revenue mix toward municipalities and polymer manufacturers even as pharmaceuticals keep their leading share.

Ecotoxicological Studies Market: Market Share by End User
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Organism Type: Fish Still Lead, Invertebrates Gain Momentum

Fish retained 41.67% of 2025 revenue, anchored by OECD 203, 210, and 229 protocols. Terrestrial invertebrates and pollinators are expanding at a 6.13% CAGR, propelled by new European bee guidance. Aquatic invertebrates remain essential for Tier 1 screens, while algae and aquatic plants, though vital for hazard classification, contribute modest value because their tests are inexpensive and quick.

Climate-driven hatchery shortages are nudging sponsors toward fish embryo assays that need fewer live adults, easing ethical pressure and mitigating supply bottlenecks. Birds continue to lose share as in-vitro replacements mature. By 2031, fish will still command the single-largest slice, but the growth rate gap with invertebrates will keep narrowing.

Geography Analysis

Europe generated 31.44% of 2025 market value, underpinned by dense GLP infrastructure and REACH’s expanding data requirements. Germany, France, and the United Kingdom host roughly 60% of regional capacity. The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive is boosting demand for rapid screening assays as companies embed ecotoxicity earlier in product design. Southern-European labs are scaling up, leveraging lower labor costs and proximity to Mediterranean pharma clusters.

Asia-Pacific is poised for a 6.82% CAGR through 2031, the quickest regional pace. China’s updated chemical-management measures and India’s draft effluent rules have multiplied testing obligations and sparked local capacity builds. Japan and South Korea retain mature GLP networks but still outsource complex multigeneration studies to Europe or North America. Australia aligns closely with OECD guidelines and serves as a testing hub for Southeast Asia.

North America remains a major revenue pool, fueled by the expanded TSCA inventory and FDA environmental-risk directives. Canada mirrors REACH-style needs but works on shorter timetables. Mexico is harmonizing with U.S. standards, lifting demand among maquiladora chemical producers. South America and the Middle East together comprise less than 15% of value, constrained by scarce accredited labs and heavy reliance on imported testing services.

Ecotoxicological Studies Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The key players includes Eurofins Scientific, Charles River Laboratories, SGS, Bureau Veritas, and Labcorp, giving the ecotoxicological studies market a moderate concentration profile. Charles River’s 2025 portfolio review signaled a pivot toward in-vitro and computational offerings, aiming to exit high-cost vertebrate assays. Eurofins reported 4.8% growth in environmental testing for the first nine months of 2024 but cited weakness in agro-science orders.

Niche players thrive through specialization. Ibacon maintains the largest GLP earthworm and springtail colonies in Europe, cornering terrestrial contracts. Pace Analytical expanded PFAS ecotoxicity services in 2025 to capture wastewater demand. Technology is becoming decisive: labs that deploy automated imaging for Daphnia reproduction or machine-learning analytics for fish behavior can shave labor costs by up to 30%, a crucial edge as sponsors push for fixed-price deals. OECD GLP certification remains a hard gate, yet new accreditations in China, India, and South Korea are eroding the historical premium enjoyed by Western labs.

Ecotoxicological Studies Industry Leaders

  1. Charles River Laboratories

  2. Eurofins Scientific

  3. Labcorp

  4. Smithers

  5. SGS SA

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Ecotoxicological Studies Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • October 2025: Charles River Laboratories partnered with Toxys to roll out the ReproTracker in-vitro assay, enabling endocrine-disruption screens without live fish and trimming study timelines by roughly 40%.
  • October 2025: EPA updated the CompTox Dashboard with QSAR models for algal growth inhibition and fish embryo toxicity, expanding the database by 2,400 substances.
  • August 2025: Vivo Bio Tech secured an INR 10.75-crore (USD 1.3 million) contract to run full pre-clinical safety, mutagenicity, and ecotoxicology studies for an Indian pharma–agrochemical client, with submissions slated to India’s Central Insecticides Board & Registration Committee.

Table of Contents for Ecotoxicological Studies Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Stricter Global Environmental Regulations
    • 4.2.2 Rising Chemical Production in Emerging Economies
    • 4.2.3 Shift Toward Non-Animal Alternative Test Methods (NAMs)
    • 4.2.4 Corporate ESG & Sustainability Disclosure Mandates
    • 4.2.5 Microplastic-Specific Monitoring Rules (2026-Onward)
    • 4.2.6 AI-Driven Eco-Toxicogenomics Adoption in Early R&D
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High Cost & Long Duration of Chronic Multi-Trophic Studies
    • 4.3.2 Regulatory Ambiguity Around Vertebrate Testing Reductions
    • 4.3.3 Climate-Driven Shortage of GLP Fish-Hatchery Supply
    • 4.3.4 Data-Sharing Limits on Proprietary Omics Datasets
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value in USD)

  • 5.1 By Study Type
    • 5.1.1 Aquatic Ecotoxicology
    • 5.1.2 Sediment Ecotoxicology
    • 5.1.3 Terrestrial Ecotoxicology
    • 5.1.4 Avian Ecotoxicology
    • 5.1.5 Pollinator Testing
  • 5.2 By Test Method
    • 5.2.1 In Vivo Testing
    • 5.2.2 In Vitro Testing
    • 5.2.3 In Silico / Computational Modelling
    • 5.2.4 Field & Mesocosm Studies
  • 5.3 By End-Use Industry
    • 5.3.1 Agrochemicals
    • 5.3.2 Industrial Chemicals & Materials
    • 5.3.3 Pharmaceuticals & Personal Care
    • 5.3.4 Waste-water & Environmental Agencies
    • 5.3.5 Academic & Research Institutes
  • 5.4 By Organism Type
    • 5.4.1 Fish
    • 5.4.2 Aquatic Invertebrates
    • 5.4.3 Algae & Aquatic Plants
    • 5.4.4 Sediment / Benthic Organisms
    • 5.4.5 Terrestrial Invertebrates & Pollinators
    • 5.4.6 Birds
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 France
    • 5.5.2.3 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.5 Australia
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 ALS Limited
    • 6.3.2 Aqua Survey Inc.
    • 6.3.3 Aragen Life Sciences (INTOX)
    • 6.3.4 BRF (Bioscience Research Foundation)
    • 6.3.5 Bureau Veritas
    • 6.3.6 Charles River Laboratories
    • 6.3.7 EAG Laboratories
    • 6.3.8 ECOtest S.L.
    • 6.3.9 Envigo
    • 6.3.10 Eurofins Scientific
    • 6.3.11 Fera Science Ltd
    • 6.3.12 ibacon GmbH
    • 6.3.13 Intertek Group
    • 6.3.14 Labcorp (Covance)
    • 6.3.15 Microbiotests Inc.
    • 6.3.16 Noack Laboratorien
    • 6.3.17 Pace Analytical Services
    • 6.3.18 SGS SA
    • 6.3.19 Smithers
    • 6.3.20 Toxicon AB

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global Ecotoxicological Studies Market Report Scope

Ecotoxicological studies examine the harmful effects of pollutants on ecosystems, integrating ecology and toxicology to assess and predict their impact on organisms, populations, and the environment.

The Ecotoxicological Studies Market Report is segmented by Study Type, Test Method, End-Use Industry, Organism Type, and Geography. By Study Type, the market is segmented into Aquatic, Sediment, Terrestrial, Avian, and Pollinator Testing. By Test Method, the market is segmented into In Vivo, In Vitro, In Silico, and Field & Mesocosm Studies. By End-Use Industry, the market is segmented into Agrochemicals, Industrial Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals & Personal Care, Wastewater & Environmental Agencies, and Academic & Research Institutes. By Organism Type, the market is segmented into Fish, Aquatic Invertebrates, Algae & Aquatic Plants, Sediment/Benthic Organisms, Terrestrial Invertebrates & Pollinators, and Birds. By Geography, the market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East & Africa, and South America. The market report also covers the estimated market sizes and trends for 17 countries across major regions globally. Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

By Study Type
Aquatic Ecotoxicology
Sediment Ecotoxicology
Terrestrial Ecotoxicology
Avian Ecotoxicology
Pollinator Testing
By Test Method
In Vivo Testing
In Vitro Testing
In Silico / Computational Modelling
Field & Mesocosm Studies
By End-Use Industry
Agrochemicals
Industrial Chemicals & Materials
Pharmaceuticals & Personal Care
Waste-water & Environmental Agencies
Academic & Research Institutes
By Organism Type
Fish
Aquatic Invertebrates
Algae & Aquatic Plants
Sediment / Benthic Organisms
Terrestrial Invertebrates & Pollinators
Birds
By Geography
North AmericaUnited States
Canada
Mexico
EuropeGermany
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-PacificChina
Japan
India
South Korea
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East & AfricaGCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
South AmericaBrazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
By Study TypeAquatic Ecotoxicology
Sediment Ecotoxicology
Terrestrial Ecotoxicology
Avian Ecotoxicology
Pollinator Testing
By Test MethodIn Vivo Testing
In Vitro Testing
In Silico / Computational Modelling
Field & Mesocosm Studies
By End-Use IndustryAgrochemicals
Industrial Chemicals & Materials
Pharmaceuticals & Personal Care
Waste-water & Environmental Agencies
Academic & Research Institutes
By Organism TypeFish
Aquatic Invertebrates
Algae & Aquatic Plants
Sediment / Benthic Organisms
Terrestrial Invertebrates & Pollinators
Birds
By GeographyNorth AmericaUnited States
Canada
Mexico
EuropeGermany
France
United Kingdom
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-PacificChina
Japan
India
South Korea
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East & AfricaGCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
South AmericaBrazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current value of the ecotoxicological studies market?

The ecotoxicological studies market size is USD 1.21 billion in 2026 and is projected to reach USD 1.48 billion by 2031.

Which study type holds the largest revenue share?

Aquatic protocols lead with 44.25% of 2025 revenue.

Which region is growing the fastest?

Asia-Pacific is projected to expand at a 6.82% CAGR through 2031.

Why are wastewater agencies increasing their testing spend?

New PFAS and microplastic limits in 2026 drinking-water standards are driving an 8.63% CAGR in testing demand from municipal utilities.

How are CROs responding to vertebrate testing constraints?

Leading laboratories are adopting in-vitro assays and in-silico models, reducing live-animal use and shortening study timelines.

What technological shift offers the highest growth potential?

AI-driven eco-toxicogenomics, which integrates omics data with adverse-outcome pathways, is the fastest-growing test method segment.

Page last updated on: