5th Floor, Brigade Towers,
Financial District, Gachibowli,
Hyderabad - 500032,
The Brazil Minimally Invasive Surgery Devices Market is segmented by Products, and Application (Aesthetic, Cardiovascular, Gastrointestinal, Gynecological, Orthopedic, Urological, and Other Applications)
The market for Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) devices in Brazil is majorly driven by factors such as higher acceptance rate of minimally invasive procedures over traditional procedures, increasing prevalence of lifestyle-related and chronic disorders, and technological advancements in the MIS devices.
Minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) have been reported to cause less post-operative pain, and hence, receive smaller dosages of pain killers. As there are no cuts or stitches involved, the hospital stay is relatively shorter, and patients are not required to visit the hospital, frequently. Traditional open surgeries involve long incisions that have to be made through muscle, and these muscles take significant time to heal; whereas, MIS procedures involve smaller incisions leading to a quicker recovery. Moreover, the body scars involved in MIS are barely noticeable.
The prime advantage that MIS has over traditional open surgeries is the higher precision, owing to video-assisted equipment involved, which generate better and magnified images of the organs or body parts that are operated, and also wider acceptance rate in the old adult population, due to the relatively shorter recovery time.
These benefits and the increasing patient acceptance and preference over traditional open surgeries are driving the minimally invasive surgery devices market in Brazil.
As per the scope of this report, minimally-invasive surgical devices refer to electrosurgical systems, robot-assisted surgical systems, and surgical equipment, which are used during the minimally-invasive procedure. The minimally-invasive neurosurgery device market is growing at a significant rate, due to various benefits associated with minimally-invasive procedures, such as less recovery time, minimal pain to the patients, shortened hospital stay, and high accuracy.
|Endoscopic and Laproscopic Devices|
|Monitoring and Visualization Devices|
|Ablation and Laser Based Devices|
Report scope can be customized per your requirements. Click here.
Minimally invasive aesthetic procedures are a growing in day-to-day clinical routine. Plastic surgeons are also becoming more willing to explore them, and minimally invasive cosmetic and aesthetic procedures are now an established interdisciplinary topic. Many procedures like minimally invasive fat reduction and facelift procedures have become popular in countries like Brazil, where most aesthetic surgical procedures were done in 2017, as per a 2017 report by the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Moreover, as per a 20147 report by the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, the number of these procedures have been increasing every year. In 2016, there were a total of 2,324,245 aesthetic procedures in Brazil, which increased to 2,427,535 in 2017. Hence it is expected that the demand for minimally invasive aesthetic procedures will also grow. This will help the market growth.
To understand key trends, Download Sample Report
The market studied is moderately consolidated, owing to the presence of a few key players in the market. The companies are focusing on the technological advancement of devices, in order to gain significant market share. Some of the market players are Abbott Laboratories, GE Healthcare, Intuitive Surgical Inc., Koninklijke Philips NV, Medtronic Plc, Olympus Corporation, Siemens Healthineers, Smith & Nephew, Stryker Corporation, and Zimmer Biomet.
1.1 Study Deliverables
1.2 Study Assumptions
1.3 Scope of the Study
2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4. MARKET DYNAMICS
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Higher Acceptance Rate of Minimally-invasive Surgeries over Traditional Surgeries
4.2.2 Increasing Prevalence of Lifestyle-related and Chronic Disorders
4.2.3 Technological Advancements
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Shortage of Experienced Professionals
4.3.2 Uncertain Regulatory Framework
4.4 Porter's Five Force Analysis
4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.4.4 Threat of Substitute Products
4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
5. MARKET SEGMENTATION
5.1 By Products
5.1.1 Handheld Instruments
5.1.2 Guiding Devices
5.1.3 Electrosurgical Devices
5.1.4 Endoscopic and Laproscopic Devices
5.1.5 Monitoring and Visualization Devices
5.1.6 Ablation and Laser Based Devices
5.2 By Application
5.2.7 Other Applications
6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Company Profiles
6.1.1 Abbott Laboratories
6.1.2 GE Healthcare
6.1.3 Intuitive Surgical Inc.
6.1.4 Koninklijke Philips NV
6.1.5 Medtronic Plc
6.1.6 Olympus Corporation
6.1.7 Siemens Healthineers
6.1.8 Smith & Nephew
6.1.9 Zimmer Biomet
6.1.10 Stryker Corporation
7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS
** Subject to Availability
**Competitive Landscape Covers - Business Overview, Financials, Products and Strategies, and Recent Developments