Size and Share of 2.5D And 3D IC Packaging Market For AI Accelerators

2.5D and 3D IC Packaging Market for AI Accelerators (2026 - 2031)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Analysis of 2.5D And 3D IC Packaging Market For AI Accelerators by Mordor Intelligence

The 2.5D and 3D IC packaging market size is expected to increase from USD 14.84 billion in 2026 to USD 45.19 billion by 2031, growing at a 32.09% CAGR over 2026-2031. The jump from USD 11.24 billion in 2025 to USD 14.84 billion in 2026 tracks the semiconductor pivot from monolithic die scaling to heterogeneous integration, a shift magnified by foundation-model compute demand. Foundries and outsourced assembly and test (OSAT) houses are racing to add hybrid bonding lines, sub-10 µm micro-bump lithography, and redistribution-layer interposers that can sustain 10 TB/s die-to-die bandwidth. Capital intensity is unprecedented; Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) alone set a 2026 capex range of USD 52 billion-USD 56 billion, a large share of which will fund CoWoS capacity aimed at 150,000 wafers per month. Government incentives reinforce the build-out; the United States earmarked USD 1.6 billion for advanced packaging grants, while Japan and South Korea launched multi-billion-dollar subsidy programs. Generative-AI training drives the bulk of today’s demand, yet inference and enterprise on-premise clusters are the fastest-rising use cases. NVIDIA’s Blackwell GPUs, AMD’s MI350 series, and Intel’s Gaudi 3 all rely on CoWoS-L or Foveros Direct packages that couple logic tiles and HBM3E stacks at pitches under 25 µm, slashing latency while boosting bandwidth fivefold over prior generations. Tight supply, lingering yield limits above 8-high HBM, and export controls on sub-10 µm bonding tools create persistent bottlenecks, giving top foundries a pricing edge yet pulling OSATs such as ASE Technology and Amkor into margin-squeezing capex cycles. Even so, growing chiplet ecosystems under Universal Chiplet Interconnect Express (UCIe) 2.0 are widening customer choice, lowering vendor lock-in risk, and accelerating multi-die adoption across geographic clusters.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By packaging technology, 2.5D IC packaging led with 88% revenue share in 2025, while 3D IC packaging is advancing at a 32.49% CAGR through 2031.
  • By packaging platform, CoWoS held a dominant 69% share in 2025, whereas Foveros and EMIB solutions are set to expand at a 32.89% CAGR over 2026-2031.
  • By application, AI training accelerators accounted for 57% of 2025 sales, yet AI inference accelerators are forecast to grow at a 32.77% CAGR through 2031.
  • By end user, hyperscalers and cloud providers captured 73% share in 2025, while enterprise AI infrastructure is projected to log a 32.91% CAGR during 2026-2031.
  • By geography, Asia-Pacific dominated with 65% market share in 2025, whereas North America is poised to rise at a 33.09% CAGR through 2031.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Packaging Technology: 2.5D Dominates as 3D Gains Speed

2.5D IC packaging accounted for 88% of 2025 revenue, aided by CoWoS shipments to NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs. The 2.5D and 3D IC packaging market size for 2.5D solutions is anchored by multi-reticle silicon interposers that integrate logic tiles with up to eight HBM stacks. Still, 3D IC packaging is forecast to grow at a 32.49% CAGR, as vertical stacking collapses signal paths by 90% and unlocks backside power delivery. Intel’s Meteor Lake processors show 20% energy gains through PowerVia-enabled Foveros Direct, and Samsung’s X-Cube roadmap rivals that performance. Over the next five years, AI inference at the edge and thermal budgets under 500 W will push designers toward 3D topologies that minimize footprint and latency.

Adoption hurdles remain. 3D assembly requires known-good-die testing at each layer and tighter wafer-to-wafer alignment, slowing throughput compared with 2.5D interposer bonding. Yield drag persists for stacks with more than 4 active logic layers, yet suppliers are co-optimizing die design, wafer thinning, and thermal-compression steps to boost line productivity. As these kinks ease, 3D’s share of the overall 2.5D and 3D IC packaging market is set to double by 2031, even as 2.5D interposers retain primacy for memory-bound training GPUs that need massive lateral area.

2.5D and 3D IC Packaging Market for AI Accelerators: Market Share by Packaging Technology
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

By Packaging Platform: CoWoS Holds Sway amid Foveros and EMIB Expansion

CoWoS secured 69% market share in 2025, fueled by NVIDIA, AMD, and multiple hyperscaler custom chips. The 2.5D and 3D IC packaging market share commanded by CoWoS reflects early learning-curve advantages and front-end integration with TSMC’s 4 nm and 3 nm nodes. Yet Intel’s EMIB and Foveros lines are logging a 32.89% CAGR, helped by Gaudi 3, Ponte Vecchio, and external foundry customers. EMIB embeds a silicon bridge within an organic laminate, slashing package cost by 40% compared to full-area interposers. Foveros stacks dies at 10 µm pitch, cutting latency for inference workloads that prize millisecond responsiveness.

Samsung’s I-Cube introduces modular H-Cube, S-Cube, and X-Cube variants, positioning the Korean firm as a strong alternative in memory-centric designs. OSAT offerings such as Amkor SWIFT and ASE FOCoS target cost-sensitive edge AI markets where package thickness and bill-of-materials costs trump absolute bandwidth. Over time, platform diversity will allow designers to mix interposer, bridge, and fan-out modalities, selecting the lowest-cost architecture that meets workload needs.

By Application: Training Leads, Inference Accelerates

AI training accelerators accounted for 57% of 2025 revenue, as hyperscalers poured capex into foundation-model clusters. CoWoS-L packages with 10 TB/s bandwidth are now table stakes for models with more than one trillion parameters. However, inference accelerators are poised for a 32.77% CAGR, driven by the monetization of ChatGPT-like services and the rise of edge deployments in autonomous vehicles and industrial IoT. The 2.5D and 3D IC packaging market size tied to inference will widen as power envelopes shrink and latency targets tighten, giving 3D stacked logic-memory designs an edge.

High-performance computing (HPC) accelerators, while occupying a smaller portion of the market, continue to serve as critical platforms for innovation. Products like AMD’s MI325X, which features 256 GB of HBM3E memory on a 2.5D interposer, and Intel’s Ponte Vecchio, comprising 47 tiles, exemplify hybrid approaches that integrate training, inference, and HPC design requirements. These technologies enable cross-pollination of ideas and advancements across different applications. Furthermore, insights from areas such as thermal management and yield control are shared across segments, significantly accelerating learning and development cycles within the industry.

2.5D and 3D IC Packaging Market for AI Accelerators: Market Share by Application
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
2.5D and 3D IC Packaging Market for AI Accelerators: Market Share by Application

By End User: Hyperscalers Dominate, Enterprises Catch Up

Hyperscalers and cloud providers owned 73% of 2025 demand, thanks to vertical integration and deep wallets that secure long-term CoWoS allocations. The 2.5D and 3D IC packaging market is still capacity-constrained; TSMC’s lines are booked through 2026, leaving smaller customers scrambling for slots. Nonetheless, enterprise AI infrastructure is forecast to post a 32.91% CAGR because data-sovereignty rules and cost-of-ownership math push private-cloud and on-premise deployments. Dell and Hewlett-Packard Enterprise now bundle liquid-cooled MI300 and H100 nodes, easing adoption hurdles for non-hyperscaler buyers.

Research institutes and government HPC centers contribute to diversifying the high-performance computing landscape, though their procurement cycles tend to be longer than those in other sectors. Notable examples include Frontier at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Aurora at Argonne National Laboratory, both of which utilize 2.5D packaged GPUs to achieve exascale computing capabilities. These systems serve as critical benchmarks for government-supported artificial intelligence (AI) initiatives worldwide, showcasing the potential of advanced HPC technologies to drive innovation and support large-scale computational needs.

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific captured 65% of 2025 revenue, driven by Taiwan’s dominance in CoWoS technology and South Korea’s leadership in HBM production. TSMC is investing between USD 52 billion and USD 56 billion in capital expenditures through 2026, with plans to achieve a production capacity of 150,000 CoWoS wafers per month. Meanwhile, Samsung has announced a record-breaking USD 73 billion capital expenditure plan for 2026, with a significant portion allocated to hybrid-bonded HBM4 production lines. Additionally, Japan has provided a JPY 920 billion (USD 6.3 billion) subsidy for TSMC’s Kumamoto site, establishing a second major hub in Asia and reducing reliance on a single geographic location.

North America is projected to be the fastest-growing region, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 33.09%. This growth is fueled by USD 1.6 billion in CHIPS Act packaging grants and Intel’s Ohio fabrication complex, which integrates front-end lithography with advanced back-end technologies such as Foveros and EMIB.[3]Intel, “Ohio Leading-Edge Chip Factories,” intel.com Furthermore, Applied Materials’ new research center in Sunnyvale, California, and Absolics’ glass-substrate manufacturing facility in Georgia are helping to streamline critical-materials supply chains within the region.

Europe’s market share remains relatively modest; however, the EUR 43 billion (USD 47 billion) European Chips Act is now supporting the development of pilot packaging lines in Germany and France. In contrast, South America, the Middle East, and Africa are lagging but are actively pursuing OSAT partnerships to support the production of automotive and industrial chips. Early initiatives, such as Brazil’s Ceitec and the UAE’s Mubadala-backed ventures, are making progress, though large-scale interposer manufacturing capacity is expected to remain concentrated in Asia and North America through 2031.

2.5D and 3D IC Packaging Market for AI Accelerators CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

Market concentration is moderate. TSMC, Samsung, and Intel collectively dominate approximately 75% of advanced packaging capacity, yet Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test (OSAT) providers are steadily narrowing the gap. ASE Technology reported TWD 159.9 billion (USD 4.96 billion) in revenue for Q3-2024; however, its gross margin declined as the company scaled up production of FOCoS and CoWoS-like lines to meet growing demand. Meanwhile, Amkor is making significant strides by committing USD 2 billion to establish a fan-out plant in Arizona.[4]SK hynix News, “Industry’s First 12-High HBM3E,” news.skhynix.com This strategic investment aims to attract U.S.-based hyperscalers, reduce their reliance on Taipei's production queues, and strengthen Amkor's market position.

Emergent players are addressing market gaps by introducing innovative solutions. Cerebras, for instance, has eliminated the need for interposers with its wafer-scale WSE-3, which integrates an impressive 900,000 cores into a single reticle. Similarly, Tenstorrent is leveraging chiplet meshes connected via UCIe 2.0, which necessitates the development of bespoke high-density bridges. These cutting-edge architectures are compelling suppliers to innovate by creating custom substrates and advanced thermal-interface materials, thereby expanding their solution portfolios to cater to these new demands.

Geopolitical factors are significantly influencing competition within the industry. In 2026, the United States Bureau of Industry and Security extended export controls to include hybrid-bonding equipment, further restricting China's access to sub-10 µm bump-pitch technology. As a result, domestic Chinese OSAT providers, such as JCET, have shifted their focus to 20-µm fan-out lines. This strategic pivot has delayed their ability to compete in the advanced CoWoS-equivalent segment by at least 18 months, highlighting the challenges posed by these regulatory measures.

Leaders of 2.5D And 3D IC Packaging Market For AI Accelerators

  1. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited

  2. Intel Corporation

  3. ASE Technology Holding Co. Ltd.

  4. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

  5. Amkor Technology Inc.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
2.5D And 3D IC Packaging Market For AI Accelerators
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • April 2026: Samsung began building its P5 twin fab in Pyeongtaek, South Korea. The KRW 160 trillion (USD 119 billion) site targets HBM4 mass production with 12-high hybrid bonding by 2028.
  • March 2026: Intel entered volume production of the Gaudi 3 accelerator using Foveros Direct packages at 10 µm pitch, priced 30% below comparable Blackwell GPUs.
  • February 2026: TSMC secured a USD 6.6 billion syndicated loan to lift CoWoS capacity to 180,000 wafers per month by 2027.
  • January 2026: The U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security broadened export controls to sub-10 µm advanced packaging tools.

Table of Contents for Report on 2.5D And 3D IC Packaging Market For AI Accelerators

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Exploding Training Compute Requirements in Foundation Models
    • 4.2.2 Rapid AI Accelerator Refresh Cycles in Cloud Data Centers
    • 4.2.3 Heterogeneous Integration Roadmaps of Leading Foundries
    • 4.2.4 Government Funding for Advanced Packaging Capacity Expansion
    • 4.2.5 Sustainability Push Toward Lower-Power Chiplet Architectures
    • 4.2.6 Vertical AI Start-Ups Demanding Custom 3D Packages
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Yield Management Challenges Beyond 8-High HBM Stacks
    • 4.3.2 Limited Sub-10 µm Micro-Bump Supply Chain Readiness
    • 4.3.3 CapEx Intensity Straining OSAT Profitability
    • 4.3.4 Geopolitical Export Controls on Advanced Packaging Tools
  • 4.4 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
  • 4.5 Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.6 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.7 Technological Outlook
  • 4.8 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.8.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.8.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.8.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Packaging Technology
    • 5.1.1 2.5D IC Packaging
    • 5.1.2 3D IC Packaging
  • 5.2 By Packaging Platform
    • 5.2.1 CoWoS
    • 5.2.2 I-Cube
    • 5.2.3 Foveros / EMIB
    • 5.2.4 Other Custom Advanced Packaging Platforms
  • 5.3 By Application
    • 5.3.1 AI Training Accelerators
    • 5.3.2 AI Inference Accelerators
    • 5.3.3 HPC Accelerators
  • 5.4 By End-User
    • 5.4.1 Hyperscalers / Cloud Providers
    • 5.4.2 Enterprise AI Infrastructure
    • 5.4.3 Research and Government AI/HPC Centers
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.2 Germany
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 South America
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
    • 6.4.2 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
    • 6.4.3 Intel Corporation
    • 6.4.4 ASE Technology Holding Co. Ltd.
    • 6.4.5 Amkor Technology Inc.
    • 6.4.6 United Microelectronics Corporation
    • 6.4.7 Powertech Technology Inc.
    • 6.4.8 Jiangsu Changjiang Electronics Technology Co. Ltd.
    • 6.4.9 Siliconware Precision Industries Co. Ltd.
    • 6.4.10 Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
    • 6.4.11 NVIDIA Corporation
    • 6.4.12 Broadcom Inc.
    • 6.4.13 Marvell Technology Inc.
    • 6.4.14 Xilinx Inc. (AMD)
    • 6.4.15 Graphcore Ltd.
    • 6.4.16 Tenstorrent Inc.
    • 6.4.17 Cerebras Systems Inc.
    • 6.4.18 Alibaba Group Holding Limited (T-Head)
    • 6.4.19 Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. (HiSilicon)
    • 6.4.20 Google LLC (Tensor Processing Unit)

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Scope of Report on 2.5D And 3D IC Packaging Market For AI Accelerators

The 2.5D and 3D IC Packaging Market for AI Accelerators refers to the global industry that designs, manufactures, and integrates advanced semiconductor packaging technologies to enable high-performance artificial intelligence (AI) computing systems. These packaging approaches, primarily 2.5D interposer-based integration and full 3D die stacking, facilitate high-bandwidth, low-latency communication between processing units, memory (such as HBM), and other chiplets, making them essential for modern AI accelerators.

The 2.5D and 3D IC Packaging Market for AI Accelerators Report is Segmented by Packaging Technology (2.5D IC Packaging, and 3D IC Packaging), Packaging Platform (CoWoS, I-Cube, Foveros and EMIB, and Other Custom Advanced Packaging Platforms), Application (AI Training Accelerators, AI Inference Accelerators, and HPC Accelerators), End-User (Hyperscalers and Cloud Providers, Enterprise AI Infrastructure, and Research and Government AI and HPC Centers), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Middle East and Africa). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

By Packaging Technology
2.5D IC Packaging
3D IC Packaging
By Packaging Platform
CoWoS
I-Cube
Foveros / EMIB
Other Custom Advanced Packaging Platforms
By Application
AI Training Accelerators
AI Inference Accelerators
HPC Accelerators
By End-User
Hyperscalers / Cloud Providers
Enterprise AI Infrastructure
Research and Government AI/HPC Centers
By Geography
North AmericaUnited States
Canada
Mexico
EuropeUnited Kingdom
Germany
France
Rest of Europe
Asia-PacificChina
Japan
India
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
South America
Middle East and Africa
By Packaging Technology2.5D IC Packaging
3D IC Packaging
By Packaging PlatformCoWoS
I-Cube
Foveros / EMIB
Other Custom Advanced Packaging Platforms
By ApplicationAI Training Accelerators
AI Inference Accelerators
HPC Accelerators
By End-UserHyperscalers / Cloud Providers
Enterprise AI Infrastructure
Research and Government AI/HPC Centers
By GeographyNorth AmericaUnited States
Canada
Mexico
EuropeUnited Kingdom
Germany
France
Rest of Europe
Asia-PacificChina
Japan
India
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
South America
Middle East and Africa

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current 2.5D and 3D IC packaging market size and its expected value by 2031?

The market stands at USD 14.84 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 45.19 billion by 2031, reflecting a 32.09% CAGR .

Which packaging platform holds the largest share today?

CoWoS leads with 69% of 2025 revenue, thanks to entrenched use in GPUs and hyperscaler custom ASICs.

Why is 3D IC packaging growing faster than 2.5D?

Vertical stacking cuts latency and footprint, pairs well with backside power delivery, and aligns with inference workloads that require compact, low-power form factors.

How will UCIe affect chiplet adoption?

The open standard enables multi-vendor chiplet ecosystems, reducing lock-in and accelerating heterogeneous integration across compute, memory, and I/O dies.

Which region is projected to grow the fastest through 2031?

North America, boosted by USD 1.6 billion in CHIPS Act subsidies, is set to post a 33.09% CAGR for advanced packaging.

What are the main technical hurdles facing HBM stack scaling?

Yield management past 8-high stacks and limited supply of sub-10 µm micro-bump and hybrid-bonding tools slow cost-effective deployment of 12-high and 16-high configurations.

Page last updated on: