
Structural Insulated Panels Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Structural Insulated Panels Market size is estimated at USD 623.16 million in 2026, and is expected to reach USD 842.62 million by 2031, at a CAGR of 6.22% during the forecast period (2026-2031). Growth is powered by the convergence of tighter energy-efficiency rules, accelerating off-site construction, and mounting pressure to cut operational carbon. Cost premiums that once limited adoption are now counter-balanced by faster build schedules, reduced labor exposure, and measurable reductions in heating or cooling loads. Tight lumber supply in North America, cold-chain expansions in Asia-Pacific, and affordable-housing mandates across multiple regions continue to redirect capital toward high-R-value envelope systems. Competitive strategies are shifting as foam, steel, and glass-wool suppliers integrate forward into panel fabrication, while traditional lumber players diversify into noncombustible skins. Together, these forces reinforce a steady upward trajectory for the structural insulated panels market even in an environment of volatile commodity pricing.
Key Report Takeaways
- By product, expanded polystyrene captured 79.94% of the structural insulated panels market share in 2025 and is forecast to grow at a 6.36% CAGR through 2031.
- By skin material, oriented strand board held 57.36% revenue share in 2025, while other skin materials are expected to advance at a 7.19% CAGR to 2031.
- By application, building-wall systems accounted for 59.02% of the structural insulated panels market size in 2025 and are expanding at a 6.75% CAGR to 2031.
- By end-user industry, the residential segment controlled 62.35% of 2025 revenue and is on track to post the fastest 7.02% CAGR through 2031.
- By geography, North America led with 37.27% structural insulated panels market share in 2025, whereas Asia-Pacific is projected to climb at a 7.41% CAGR up to 2031.
Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.
Global Structural Insulated Panels Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Efficiency Regulations Accelerating Adoption | +1.4% | Global, with concentrated enforcement in EU and select US states | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Expansion of Global Cold-Chain Infrastructure | +0.9% | APAC core, spill-over to MEA and South America | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Rising Affordable-Housing and Residential Remodelling | +1.6% | North America and APAC, emerging in South America | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Growing Preference for Rapid, Off-Site Construction | +1.3% | Global, early gains in North America and Northern Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Carbon-Credit Monetisation for Timber-Based Structural Insulated Panels | +0.7% | EU, California, British Columbia, and select APAC pilot zones | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Energy Efficiency Regulations Accelerating Adoption
Multiple jurisdictions are tightening thermal-transmittance limits, driving builders toward high-R-value envelopes. The 2024 revision of the European Union’s Energy Performance of Buildings Directive phases out fossil-fuel heating in new dwellings by 2028, essentially mandating super-insulated exterior walls. The U.S. Department of Energy raised wall insulation requirements by 20% for climate zones 4-7 in 2025, pushing conventional stick framing to its practical limits. California’s updated Title 24 grants compliance credits for factory-built panels that test below 1.5 ACH at 50 Pa, a threshold routinely met by structural insulated panels but seldom achieved by site-built walls. Collectively, these rules reward upfront thermal investment, synchronize builder incentives with occupant energy costs, and add momentum to the structural insulated panels market.
Expansion of Global Cold-Chain Infrastructure
Pharmaceutical distribution and perishable-food logistics continue to add temperature-controlled space at a double-digit clip. The International Air Transport Association logged an 11% year-over-year rise in cold-chain capacity in 2025, with Asia-Pacific capturing 43% of new square footage. Hyperscale grocers such as Walmart adopted insulated-panel envelopes for 14 new facilities in 2025, citing a 22% refrigeration-load cut versus masonry and spray-foam walls. Because energy expenses account for up to 40% of warehouse operating costs, the payback on higher-performance panels is swift, supporting premium pricing for vacuum-insulated cores in the structural insulated panels market.
Rising Affordable-Housing and Residential Remodeling
Governments now regard off-site fabrication as a lever to close housing gaps. In 2025 the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development launched a USD 1.2 billion grant program prioritizing panelized construction that delivers units within 12 months of site acquisition[1]U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, “Innovation in Affordable Housing Grants,” hud.gov . India’s Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana allocated INR 480 billion (USD 5.8 billion) for urban dwellings, with several states piloting insulated panels for 2026 completion targets. Remodeling also lifts demand; energy-efficiency projects reached 18% of U.S. renovation spend in 2025, up from 12% five years earlier. The residential channel therefore underpins both baseline volume and the steepest growth in the structural insulated panels market.
Growing Preference for Rapid, Off-Site Construction
Persistent labor shortages push contractors to industrialized building methods. Seventy-eight percent of U.S. general contractors ranked workforce availability as their top worry in 2025. The United Kingdom’s Construction Leadership Council aims for 25% off-site value by 2030, explicitly naming structural insulated panels as a key technology. When envelope erection drops from weeks to days, developers can shorten carrying costs and lock lower rates on construction loans, reinforcing demand in the structural insulated panels market.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Higher Upfront Costs Vs. Conventional Framing | -1.2% | Global, acute in cost-sensitive residential markets | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Substitution Threat from Advanced Prefab Wall Systems | -0.8% | North America and EU, limited penetration in APAC | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| OSB Supply Volatility (Beetle Infestation and Mill Outages) | -1.1% | North America, indirect impact on global pricing | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Higher Upfront Costs Versus Conventional Framing
Structural insulated panels carry a 15-25% material premium over stud walls with batt insulation, a hurdle for builders working on tight gross margins. A 2025 cost study by the National Association of Home Builders pegged the incremental outlay at USD 8-12 per square foot of wall area, stretching the payback period to 12-15 years in markets lacking utility rebates. Financial institutions that underwrite loans on first cost rather than lifecycle savings compound the burden, amplifying the near-term restraint on the structural insulated panels market.
Substitution Threat from Advanced Prefab Wall Systems
Cross-laminated timber, light-gauge steel panels, and autoclaved aerated concrete now compete head-to-head with foam-core assemblies. Changes to the International Building Code in 2024 lifted allowable timber heights to 18 stories, opening mid-rise opportunities formerly reserved for structural insulated panels. Prefabricated steel panels grabbed 9% of the U.S. commercial envelope market in 2025, up from 5% two years earlier, driven by noncombustible requirements in data centers and cold storage[2]American Institute of Steel Construction, “Commercial Envelope Market Report 2025,” aisc.org. These alternatives erode share in applications where fire resistance or exposed-wood aesthetics trump insulation depth.
Segment Analysis
By Product: EPS Secures Mass-Market Leadership
Expanded polystyrene panels dominated with 79.94% share in 2025 and are projected to climb at a 6.36% CAGR through 2031. EPS delivers R-3.6-4.2 per inch at 30-40% lower material cost than polyurethane, a differential central to volume adoption. Kingspan noted that EPS accounted for 62% of its insulated-panel revenue in 2025, a testament to deep residential penetration. Fire-code shifts and space constraints sustain niche demand for higher-R-value polyurethane and polyisocyanurate, but those chemistries remain secondary for commodity housing. Glass-wool cores serve fire-rated and acoustic-sensitive projects, while vacuum-insulated panels still sit at lower unit volume, confined to pharma cold chains and aerospace.
A regulatory edge also accrues to EPS because it already relies on pentane, a climate-compliant blowing agent. By contrast, polyurethane suppliers are still retooling to replace HFCs banned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 2024. That conversion introduces yield uncertainty and scrap risk, temporarily widening the cost gap in favor of EPS and further consolidating leadership in the structural insulated panels market.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Skin Material: OSB Dominance Faces Noncombustible Tailwinds
Oriented strand board commanded 57.36% segment share in 2025, underpinned by its favorable weight-to-strength profile and compatibility with conventional fastening methods. Yet the structural insulated panels market is recording a notable pivot toward noncombustible skins. Other skin materials are forecast to rise at a 7.19% CAGR to 2031 as urban fire codes stiffen. Tata Steel reported that steel-faced panels captured 14% share in Indian commercial construction by 2025, driven by cold-storage and pharmaceutical demands.
OSB’s supply swings also nurture diversification. Beetle-driven log shortages pushed some manufacturers to plywood or hybrid steel laminates, each of which demands requalification under local codes but buffers raw-material risk. Digital design workflows accelerate change; architects now specify fire rating, impact resilience, and surface finish within BIM models, empowering project teams to evaluate multiple skin options early, compressing bid windows, and widening acceptance of nontraditional facings in the structural insulated panels market.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Application: Wall Systems Anchor Volume while Cold Storage Commands Premiums
Buidling walls represented 59.02% of 2025 shipments and advance at a 6.75% CAGR through 2031. Independent testing by the U.S. Department of Energy in 2025 showed that panel walls reduced whole-building heating loads by up to 24% versus 2×6 studs with R-21 batts. That performance edge undergirds both new-build and retrofit momentum, especially in northern climates where heating bills materially influence payback. Roof panels secure the next-largest slice, favored on low-slope commercial buildings for their ability to integrate structure, vapor control, and insulation in a single component.
Cold-storage projects, though smaller in cubic meter terms, deliver outsized margin to panel suppliers. Global refrigerated capacity hit 730 million m³ in 2025, and most new builds default to panel envelopes to manage ±2 °C tolerances. Vacuum-insulated cores and stainless-steel facings—well beyond mainstream residential spec levels—fetch premium pricing yet win bids based on guaranteed temperature stability and hygiene compliance. As hyperscale grocers and biologics shippers expand, premium cold-chain requirements sustain a profitable niche inside the structural insulated panels market.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By End-user Industry: Residential Leads Both Volume and Growth
Residential absorbed 62.35% of 2025 demand and shows the swiftest 7.02% CAGR through 2031. Median build times for panelized homes in the United States compressed to 4.8 months in 2025, compared with 6.2 months for stick-frame houses. Millennials entering first-time homeownership and aging households pursuing energy-retrofit upgrades together propel volume. The 2026 tax-credit structure under the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act reimburses up to USD 1,200 for qualifying envelope improvements, a threshold panels readily exceed.
Commercial and institutional segments follow, leaning on panels to hit speed-to-occupancy targets in design-build arrangements. Industrial buyers, from manufacturers to data-center operators, look to airtight panelized envelopes to slash HVAC loads. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers now specifies panels for forward-operating bases to achieve R-30 walls in one assembly, validating performance in extreme environments and strengthening credentials across the broader structural insulated panels market.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
North America controlled 37.27% of global revenue in 2025, buoyed by U.S. and Canadian housing demand. Canada benefits further from provincial heat-loss caps that favor R-30 walls and airtightness below 2 ACH at 50 Pa. Nevertheless, beetle-induced OSB volatility and growing cross-laminated timber appeal temper North American expansion. Mexico remains an untapped frontier, where low energy costs and abundant skilled labor preserve conventional masonry, although nearshoring-driven industrial builds provide a niche opening for fast-tracked insulated envelopes.
Asia-Pacific is forecast to advance at a 7.41% CAGR, the quickest worldwide. China’s prefabricated-construction is growing with insulated panels surfacing in 18% of prefab housing starts, especially in northern provinces that enforce stringent heating-season energy caps. India’s market lifts off from a modest base but benefits from state-funded affordable-housing schemes and explosive cold-chain construction linked to pharmaceutical exports. Southeast Asian economies—from Vietnam to Indonesia—deploy panels in temperature-controlled warehouses that support rapidly expanding e-commerce grocery deliveries. Local manufacturing investments by Chinese, Indian, and multinational firms shorten lead times and buffer the structural insulated panels market against currency swings and freight costs.
Europe’s demand is anchored by Germany, the United Kingdom, and France. Strict near-zero-energy directives and incentive loans from Germany’s KfW bank push adoption toward Passive House-level performance. The United Kingdom targets off-site delivery to shrink its housing shortfall, explicitly including insulated panels in policy roadmaps. Eastern Europe, funded by EU structural packages, emerges as a fast-growing sub-region prioritizing deep-energy retrofits of socialist-era multifamily blocks. Southern Europe remains a relative laggard because milder climates dilute energy-savings economics, yet wildfire risk accelerates interest in fire-rated, noncombustible skins.
South America and the Middle-East and Africa collectively form a small but strategic slice. Brazil mandates panel envelopes in vaccine storage under ANVISA regulations. Saudi Arabia integrates panels into data-center shells to lower cooling loads under 50 °C desert temperatures. South Africa’s social-housing pilots trial panelized retrofits to upgrade informal settlements. Limited local fabrication capacity, import duties, and volatile currencies restrict scale but also open investment windows for early entrants aiming to capture nascent demand in the structural insulated panels market.

Competitive Landscape
Competition sits at a high concentration level as large global incumbents vie with agile regional fabricators. Kingspan and Owens Corning exploit fully integrated supply chains—from foam chemistry through lamination—to guarantee product availability and performance. Tata Steel and ArcelorMittal draw on in-house metalworks to tailor noncombustible facings for hygiene-sensitive and high-durability uses. Warranty terms evolve into differentiators; Kingspan now extends 30-year thermal guarantees, whereas Owens Corning issues third-party-verified R-value certificates. Smaller firms thrive on localized customization and faster lead times, vital where design-build contracts demand rapid iteration.
Digitalization boosts competitive reshuffling. Nucor’s BIM-enabled panel configurator, launched in 2025, trims bid-to-delivery from six to three weeks and directly links architects’ models to CNC cut lists. Start-ups leverage e-commerce to reach owner-builders with standardized kits. Innovation funnels into fire-safe hybrid skins marrying magnesium-oxide and steel, as well as vacuum-insulated cores infused with phase-change materials for temperature-sensitive logistics. Intellectual-property filings accelerate, yet commercialization remains concentrated in premium data-center and pharmaceutical cold chains, where the structural insulated panels market tolerates USD 200-plus per square meter pricing.
Structural Insulated Panels Industry Leaders
Owens Corning
Kingspan Group
Carlisle Companies Inc.
METECNO GROUP
ArcelorMittal
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Recent Industry Developments
- January 2026: Kingspan Group launched the KingRib Wall insulated metal panels (IMPs) as a new addition to its range of building solutions. The KingRib Wall panels featured external trapezoidal ribs spaced every 20 inches for the KingRib 3 and every 10 inches for the KingRib 5.
- December 2024: All Weather Insulated Panels launched FASSADE with Bellara, an insulated panel system designed for modern applications. This system integrated single-skin metal panels to support contemporary designs.
Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope
Market Definitions and Key Coverage
Our study defines the structural insulated panels (SIPs) market as the value of newly manufactured, load-bearing sandwich elements in which two structural skins, most commonly oriented strand board, plywood, or light-gauge steel, are pressure-laminated to a rigid insulation core of EPS, PUR/PIR, or mineral/glass wool. These panels are supplied to construction sites as walls, roofs, or floors and create both enclosure and structure in residential, commercial, and selected industrial buildings.
Scope exclusion: The estimate removes generic metal-faced refrigeration boards and non-structural curtain-wall composites, which are tracked separately.
Segmentation Overview
- By Product
- EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) Panels
- Rigid Polyurethane (PUR) and Rigid Polyisocyanurate (PIR) Panels
- Glass-wool Panels
- Other Products (e.g., Vacuum-insulated, etc.)
- By Skin Material
- Oriented Strand Board (OSB)
- Plywood
- Other Skin Materials (Fibre-cement Board, Galvanised Steel Sheet), etc.)
- By Application
- Building Wall
- Building Roof
- Cold Storage
- Other Applications (e.g., Data Centres, Floor and Deck, etc.)
- By End-user Industry
- Residential
- Commercial
- Industrial and Institutional
- Geography
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- South Korea
- ASEAN Countries
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Mexico
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Rest of Europe
- South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
- Middle-East and Africa
- Saudi Arabia
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle-East and Africa
- Asia-Pacific
Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation
Primary Research
Interviews with SIP manufacturers, panel installers, code consultants, and cold-chain builders across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific tested secondary findings, provided typical panel pricing, and clarified installation loss factors. Follow-up e-surveys with design engineers and modular home builders validated penetration assumptions for our forecast years.
Desk Research
Our analysts began with open datasets such as the US Census 'Construction Put in Place', Eurostat building permits, Canada Mortgage and Housing starts, UN Comtrade trade codes for SIP-related HS lines, and energy-code adoption trackers from the International Energy Agency. Company 10-Ks, investor decks, and association white papers from bodies such as the Structural Insulated Panel Association supplemented these. Paid assets, including D&B Hoovers for revenue splits and Questel for patent momentum, helped refine competitive intensity. The sources cited here illustrate the breadth consulted; many additional publications were reviewed to validate numbers and clarify definitions.
Market-Sizing & Forecasting
A top-down production-plus-trade construct establishes the base year: domestic panel output, net imports, and average selling price create the initial demand pool, which is then reconciled against housing starts and commercial floor-area completions. Select bottom-up checks, supplier revenue roll-ups and sampled ASP × volume from installer invoices, calibrate totals. Key variables feeding the model include: (1) new housing starts, (2) renovation-driven wall retrofit rates, (3) average SIP price trends, (4) cold-storage floor-area additions, and (5) OSB cost index movements. Multivariate regression projects each driver, while scenario analysis stress-tests energy-efficiency policy shifts. Any data gaps in bottom-up samples are bridged using three-year moving averages from completed projects.
Data Validation & Update Cycle
Before release, results pass two analyst reviews that flag anomalies against building material price trackers and permit data. Material divergences trigger renewed primary calls. Mordor updates the model annually and issues mid-cycle refreshes when major code changes or large plant capacity additions occur.
Why Mordor's Structural Insulated Panels Baseline Earns Trust
Published SIP estimates often diverge because firms select different panel types, apply varied price assumptions, or refresh their models on unequal cadences.
Key gap drivers include inclusion of non-structural sandwich boards, use of aggressive inflation escalators on past shipments, and single-region sampling that is then extrapolated worldwide. Mordor's scope is limited to load-bearing SIPs only, uses verified ASPs from three regions, and refreshes every twelve months, yielding a balanced global number.
Benchmark comparison
| Market Size | Anonymized source | Primary gap driver |
|---|---|---|
| USD 587.06 million (2025) | Mordor Intelligence | - |
| USD 593.1 million (2024) | Global Consultancy A | Excludes Asia-Pacific cottage segment; limited core materials tracked |
| USD 9.28 billion (2023) | Trade Journal B | Bundles generic metal-faced panels and refrigeration boards into SIP total |
| USD 11.2 billion (2023) | Regional Consultancy C | Derives value from installed area × replacement cost, inflating market size |
These contrasts show that when consistent scope, validated prices, and yearly updates are applied, Mordor's figure gives decision-makers a dependable, transparent baseline that can be traced back to clear data points and repeatable steps.
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How fast is global demand for structural insulated panels growing?
Global revenue is advancing at a 6.22% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, moving from USD 623.16 million to USD 842.62 million.
Which product core dominates insulated panel sales?
Expanded polystyrene commands 79.94% share because it offers the best cost-to-R-value balance for residential projects.
What drives adoption of panels in cold-storage facilities?
Panels tighten airtightness and cut refrigeration energy by more than 20%, delivering quick paybacks for grocers and pharmaceutical distributors.
Why are builders shifting toward noncombustible panel skins?
Urban fire-safety codes and wildfire exposure favor fiber-cement, steel, or magnesium-oxide facings that achieve Class A ratings without additional barriers.




