Intrinsically Safe Equipment (IS Equipment) Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The intrinsically safe equipment market size stood at USD 3.88 billion in 2025 and is on course to reach USD 5.56 billion by 2030, advancing at a 7.45% CAGR. This expansion traces a shift from heavy flameproof housings toward digitally enabled, intrinsically safe architectures that blend regulatory compliance with Industry 4.0 connectivity. Demand accelerates as global standards tighten, mining and process industries expand, and wireless modules unlock retrofit projects once deemed uneconomic. Oil and gas operators remain the anchor customers, yet discrete manufacturers now adopt certified automation as volatile solvents enter production lines. Companies that master both certification and cybersecurity capture the most value as facility owners weigh lifecycle costs, supply-chain certainty, and predictive-maintenance capabilities when specifying new systems.
Key Report Takeaways
- By zone, Zone 1 applications held 38.72% of the intrinsically safe equipment market share in 2024, while Zone 0 devices are projected to rise at an 8.45% CAGR through 2030.
- By class, Class 1 products accounted for 62.73% of 2024 revenue in the intrinsically safe equipment market and are poised to grow at 8.88% CAGR as gas detection systems add IoT connectivity.
- By product type, sensors captured 28.94% of revenue in 2024 in the intrinsically safe equipment market and are expanding at a 7.99% CAGR as Ethernet-APL enables intrinsically safe networking.
- By end user, oil and gas operations contributed 41.62% of demand in 2024 in the intrinsically safe equipment market, yet processing and manufacturing are forecast to climb at a 8.44% CAGR on wider solvent and reactive-material use.
- By geography, North America led with 38.73% revenue in 2024 in the intrinsically safe equipment market, whereas Asia-Pacific is projected to register a 8.67% CAGR to 2030 on rapid industrialization and mining expansion
Global Intrinsically Safe Equipment (IS Equipment) Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stringent global explosion-safety regulations | +1.2% | Global, with strongest enforcement in EU and North America | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Industry 4.0-driven demand for IS sensors and instrumentation | +1.5% | APAC core, spill-over to North America and EU | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Expansion of oil and gas and mining activities | +0.9% | Middle East, Asia-Pacific, North America | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Cost-saving shift from Ex d to Ex i architectures | +0.8% | Global, with early adoption in Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Growth of wireless IS modules for remote, predictive maintenance | +1.1% | North America and EU, expanding to APAC | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Printed, ultra-low-power sensor arrays unlocking retrofit markets | +0.7% | Global, with concentration in established industrial regions | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Stringent Global Explosion-Safety Regulations
IEC 60079-11 Edition 7, released in January 2024, introduced 173 technical amendments, including tougher battery tests and a ban on catalytic sensors in Group IIC service, compelling retrofit spending across existing installations.[1]SGS Editorial Team, “Navigating the Transition from IEC 60079-11 Ed.6 to Ed.7,” SGS, sgs.com EN IEC 60079-11:2024 entered the Official Journal in December 2024, and the prior 2012 edition will be de-harmonized by December 2027, which fixes a clear window for mandatory upgrades. Multinational plants juggle ATEX and IECEx paperwork that still lacks synchronized submission schedules despite technical alignment. The regulation also broadens scope beyond equipment to cover field wiring under IEC 60079-14:2024, stimulating demand for certified installation and recertification services. Together these actions boost the intrinsically safe equipment market as operators replace non-compliant assets and lock in long-term maintenance contracts tied to the new rules.
Industry 4.0-Driven Demand for IS Sensors and Instrumentation
Digital transformation raises the need for real-time data from hazardous zones, positioning intrinsically safe sensors as frontline enablers. Ethernet-APL now carries power and data on a single twisted pair up to 1 km, letting plant owners place smart instruments in Zone 1 and Zone 2 with no performance trade-off.[2]Goutam Das, “Understanding the Impact of Changes in Intrinsic Safety Standards,” HazardEx, hazardexonthenet.net Wireless nodes reduce cabling costs and simplify retrofits, as shown by SmartPower modules that support multi-year battery life in harsh areas. Underground mines adopt these devices to stream gas levels and equipment health to surface operations centers, shifting safety from periodic checks to continuous oversight. The same architecture underpins predictive maintenance, where edge analytics detect abnormal vibrations and flag service needs before breakdowns occur. Facility owners thus gain both compliance assurance and productivity improvements, accelerating purchases across Asia-Pacific and the Gulf Cooperation Council states.
Expansion of Oil and Gas and Mining Activities
New offshore fields and unconventional plays use intrinsically safe equipment from day one to meet host-country and insurance mandates.[3]Honeywell Investor Relations, “Honeywell 2023 Annual Report,” Honeywell, honeywell.com Floating production vessels integrate certified networks for control and monitoring, while shale operations rely on portable Zone 1 radios for well-site communications. Mining expansion in China, India, and Australia drives orders for intrinsically safe Wi-Fi, wearable gas detectors, and automated ventilation controls that must survive abrasive dust, humidity, and explosive gas mixtures. Regulatory scrutiny after recent accidents raises the bar for redundant safety system deployment, turning intrinsic safety from a recommended practice into a procurement prerequisite. Portable, modular units attractive to exploration projects shorten build schedules and facilitate compliance audits, giving suppliers with flexible certification portfolios a sales edge in capital-intensive, schedule-driven ventures.
Cost-Saving Shift from Ex d to Ex i Architectures
Plant managers compare lifecycle costs and find Ex i intrinsically safe designs cheaper than flameproof Ex d enclosures once wiring, maintenance, and weight penalties are tallied. Ex i circuits need no heavy cast housings, so technicians can open enclosures for calibration without gas clearance permits, improving uptime. The economic argument intensifies where wireless radios are involved because Ex d boxes require special cable glands whereas Ex i radios integrate antennas seamlessly. Energy-efficient Ex i sensors extend battery cycles, reducing confined-space entry for replacements. When legacy Ex d parts become obsolete, owners frequently swap in Ex i replacements that deliver equal protection, lower cost, and digital connectivity in one step, fueling steady intrinsically safe equipment market growth.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| High certification cost and design complexity | -0.8% | Global, with highest impact in emerging markets | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Fragmented approval timelines across regions | -0.6% | Global, with particular challenges for multinational deployments | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Shortage of certified IS-grade electronic components | -1.1% | Global, with acute shortages in Asia-Pacific manufacturing | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Rising cybersecurity–compliance cost for IS wireless devices | -0.7% | North America and EU, expanding globally | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
High Certification Cost and Design Complexity
Gaining ATEX approval can cost EUR 15,000–50,000 per variant, and IECEx tests add USD 20,000–60,000, sums that push smaller firms out of contention. Edition 7 rule changes require additional battery stress, spark ignition, and component spacing tests, often driving multiple design revisions. Firms must also maintain ISO 9001 and QA audits to keep certificates active, embedding recurring overhead into each product line. The expense skews competition toward multinationals with in-house labs and dedicated compliance teams, concentrating intellectual property and deterring fresh entrants. Emerging-market suppliers struggle the most, as local labs lack throughput, forcing overseas testing that lengthens lead times and inflates budgets.
Shortage of Certified IS-Grade Electronic Components
Forecasters expected chip shortages to ease by 2024, yet demand for radio modules, galvanic isolators, and intrinsically safe micro-relays still exceeds supply, with lead times above 26 weeks. Each component substitution triggers partial retesting under IECEx rules, delaying product launches. Wireless device makers feel the pinch because radio front-ends need dual approval for RF compliance and intrinsic safety. Manufacturers hoard inventories, while newer entrants pay premiums or redesign boards. Some elect to postpone wireless variants, slowing the intrinsically safe equipment market despite strong customer interest. Suppliers with captive semiconductor lines or long-term allocation contracts therefore hold a competitive edge.
Segment Analysis
By Zone: Zone 1 Dominance Amid Zone 0 Innovation
Zone 1 applications commanded 38.72% of the intrinsically safe equipment market share in 2024, underscoring their ubiquity in refineries and chemical plants where explosive atmospheres arise during maintenance. Zone 1 spending remains steady as operators blend legacy wiring with new IoT-ready devices that streamline predictive maintenance. In contrast, Zone 0 displays a 8.45% CAGR as printed sensors and wireless hubs finally make real-time monitoring feasible where flammable gases persist continuously. This uptick signals a philosophical shift from isolation toward active risk mitigation, especially in subsea wells and pharmaceutical reactors where downtime costs outweigh device premiums. Zone 2 retains relevance for loading docks and warehouses needing inexpensive compliance solutions, while dust Zones 20–22 gain modest traction in food and pharma sites investing in automation. Suppliers now build modular boards that meet multiple zone requirements via firmware toggles and fuse changes, compressing development cycles and inventory.
Wireless gateways certified for Zone 1 now talk to safe-area historians over single-pair Ethernet. The broader intrinsically safe equipment market therefore enjoys expanded addressable endpoints without extra cable trays. Integrators value such gateways because they reduce engineer-hours on complex barrier calculations. As standards bodies refine guidance for multi-gas, multi-dust areas, zone-crossing architectures will cement themselves as design best practices, ensuring continued double-digit shipments into Zone 0 even after the current retrofit surge subsides.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Class: Class 1 Leadership Through Gas Detection Innovation
Class 1 systems focused on gas and vapor hazards held 62.73% of 2024 revenue and are forecast to grow at a 8.88% CAGR through 2030 as methane detection, hydrogen leak monitoring, and LNG handling drive sensor upgrades. Operators retrofit pipelines with optical gas-imaging cameras linked to intrinsically safe edge boxes that perform AI-based leak quantification on site, slashing remediation time. Class 2 dust equipment finds new purchasers in biomass power plants and additive-manufacturing shops, where fine powders present ignition risks previously overlooked. The intrinsically safe equipment market size for Class 2 is projected to expand modestly as more countries adopt NFPA 652-style regulations.
Class 3 applications remain niche, serving textiles and woodworking, yet demand holds steady thanks to rising automation of cutting lines that create airborne fibers. Suppliers aim to reuse Class 1 designs by replacing gaskets and adding dust filters, saving test costs. Ethernet-APL especially benefits Class 1 because gas groups allow higher permissible power than dust, simplifying switch deployment. This compatibility further entrenches Class 1 as the proving ground for new intrinsically safe networking concepts that later trickle to dust and fiber sectors.
By Product Type: Sensors Drive Digital Transformation
Sensors generated 28.94% of 2024 revenue and continue to pace the intrinsically safe equipment market at a 7.99% CAGR. Process owners want every critical variable, pressure, vibration, volatile organic compound level, captured in real time, which multiplies sensor count per asset. Detectors focused on multispectral flame analysis win orders in LNG plants where false alarms disrupt operations. Switches and transmitters remain vital for emergency-shutdown systems, yet suppliers now embed diagnostics that advise on relay wear and loop health.
Isolators and barriers see stable demand as brownfield sites add digital loops while retaining analog instruments. LED indicators gain prominence because lower heat dissipation eases certification and extends lifespan. The overall intrinsically safe equipment market benefits from modular, software-defined transmitters that accept signal cards for temperature today, vibration tomorrow, letting plants adapt measurement strategy without recertifying enclosures. Remote firmware updates, delivered through authenticated tunnels, round out the value proposition by limiting technician trips into hazardous areas.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By End User: Processing and Manufacturing Acceleration
Oil and gas maintained 41.62% revenue share in 2024, driven by deepwater platforms, shale processing hubs, and midstream terminals that require certified devices for every pump, valve, and tank farm. Yet the processing and manufacturing segment experiences a 8.44% CAGR as electric-vehicle battery makers, paint shops, and semiconductor fabs integrate flammable solvents and dust, pushing intrinsic safety into previously non-classified zones. Plant engineers favor intrinsically safe equipment because it minimizes explosionproof ducting and simplifies maintenance, especially in ISO-clean environments where heavy enclosures add contamination risk.
Mining operations install intrinsically safe LTE routers in haul trucks and tunneling machines, bringing tele-operation within regulatory constraints and enhancing worker safety. Power and utilities adopt certified temperature sensors in biomass boilers and hydrogen blending projects, sectors that build new fuel delivery chains under tight timelines. Chemical companies, long accustomed to explosion protection, refresh devices to include predictive analytics, ensuring the intrinsically safe equipment market remains resilient even when commodity cycles soften.
Geography Analysis
North America controlled 38.73% of 2024 revenue as OSHA and NFPA rules anchored continuous modernization across shale basins, Gulf Coast refineries, and underground mines. Honeywell’s 2024 reorganization consolidated sensing and safety technologies into a single automation division, signaling that major suppliers aim to deliver unified hardware-software stacks that meet both safety and productivity needs. U.S. operators also lead in adopting intrinsically safe LTE/5G gateways, seeing the technology as a hedge against workforce shortages.
Asia-Pacific posts the fastest 8.67% CAGR through 2030, fueled by new refinery builds in China, petrochemical expansion in India, and large-scale copper and lithium mining in Australia. Governments link export licenses to IEC or ATEX compliance, steering local manufacturers toward certified components. Chinese automation vendors collaborate with European test houses to shorten certification schedules, enlarging the regional supplier ecosystem and boosting the intrinsically safe equipment market.
Europe retains a sizable installed base under the ATEX directive, and EN IEC 60079-11:2024 will likely become mandatory by 2027, driving accelerated replacements. Germany leads in advanced chemical complexes, integrating Zone-crossing sensor networks to achieve emissions targets. The United Kingdom and Norway continue to invest in offshore intervention equipment that meets both intrinsic safety and cybersecurity rules dictated by the North Sea Transition Authority. Elsewhere, Middle East NOCs deploy intrinsically safe SCADA upgrades across large gas projects, while Brazilian sugar-ethanol distilleries switch from explosionproof motors to intrinsically safe variable-frequency drives that cut energy use. Collectively these regional narratives sustain robust global demand.
Competitive Landscape
The intrinsically safe equipment market features moderate fragmentation, with long-established firms dominating certifications for multiple protection concepts and new entrants carving niches in wireless and printed sensors. Leading vendors guard supply chains by forging multi-year contracts with component foundries, insulating customers from chip shortages that have sidelined smaller rivals. Dual (ATEX + IECEx) certification is now a baseline requirement, and some suppliers add North American FM or CSA marks to simplify global project logistics.
Strategic movements highlight the convergence of intrinsic safety with operational-technology cybersecurity. Honeywell’s 2024 purchase of SCADAfence adds network anomaly detection to its gas-detection portfolio, aligning safety and security compliance in one offer. Competitors pursue similar goals via joint ventures with cybersecurity start-ups that specialize in IEC 62443 audits. Vendors also launch modular platforms where a base board, once certified, can accept application-specific sensor pods, cutting time-to-market for variants. Customers prefer such road-maps because they reduce life-cycle cost and ease migration as standards evolve.
Emerging disruptors emphasize ultra-low-power printed sensor arrays, pitching lower retrofit costs to brownfield plants under emissions pressures. Yet incumbents answer through in-house additive-manufacturing lines and partnerships with specialist fabs. As IEC TC 31 explores standards for AI-enabled inspection drones inside tanks, early investment in robotics-safe certifications could determine future leadership. Given certification hurdles and supply-chain complexity, suppliers with integrated design, test, and manufacturing resources remain best placed to defend and expand share.
Intrinsically Safe Equipment (IS Equipment) Industry Leaders
-
Fluke Corporation (Fortive Corporation)
-
OMEGA Engineering
-
R. Stahl AG
-
Honeywell International Inc.
-
Pepperl + Fuchs SE
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- June 2025: SGS issued guidance on IEC 60079-11 Edition 7 transitions, detailing 173 technical changes and urging manufacturers to conduct gap analyses.
- March 2025: IEC TC 31 began work on IEC 60079-101 to harmonize core principles across all protective methods, with task groups for AI, robotics, and hydrogen applications.
- January 2025: IEC released the IEC 60079:2025 SER package consolidating explosion-protection standards, including wireless and cybersecurity provisions.
- October 2024: Honeywell restructured into an Industrial Automation segment to integrate sensing, gas detection, and control solutions for hazardous industries.
Global Intrinsically Safe Equipment (IS Equipment) Market Report Scope
Intrinsically safe equipment is defined as "equipment and wiring which are incapable of releasing sufficient electrical or thermal energy under normal or abnormal conditions to cause ignition of a specific hazardous atmospheric mixture in its most easily ignited concentration." This is achieved by limiting the amount of power available to the electrical equipment in the hazardous area to a level below that which will ignite the gases.
The study tracks the revenue accrued through the sale of video telematics by various players in the global market. The study also tracks the key market parameters, underlying growth influencers, and major vendors operating in the industry that support the market estimations and growth rates over the forecast period. The study further analyses the overall impact of COVID-19 aftereffects and other macroeconomic factors on the market. The report’s scope encompasses market sizing and forecasts for the various market segments.
The intrinsically safe equipment market is segmented by zone (zone 0, zone 20, zone1, zone 21, zone 2, and zone 22), class (class 1, class 2, and class 3), products (sensors, detectors, switches, transmitters, isolators, LED indicators, and other products), end-user industry (oil and gas, mining, power, chemical and petrochemical, processing, and other end-user industries), and geography (North America [United States and Canada], Europe [Germany, United Kingdom, France, and Rest of Europe], Asia-Pacific [China, Japan, India, and Rest of Asia-Pacific], Latin America [Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Rest of Latin America], Middle East & Africa [Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, and Rest of Middle East & Africa]). The market sizes and forecasts are provided in terms of value (USD) for all the above segments.
| Zone 0 |
| Zone 20 |
| Zone 1 |
| Zone 21 |
| Zone 2 |
| Zone 22 |
| Class 1 |
| Class 2 |
| Class 3 |
| Sensors |
| Detectors |
| Switches |
| Transmitters |
| Isolators and Barriers |
| LED Indicators |
| Other Types |
| Oil and Gas |
| Mining |
| Power and Utilities |
| Chemical and Petrochemical |
| Processing and Manufacturing |
| Other End Users |
| North America | United States | |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Argentina | ||
| Rest of South America | ||
| Europe | Germany | |
| United Kingdom | ||
| France | ||
| Spain | ||
| Italy | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| South Korea | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | Saudi Arabia |
| United Arab Emirates | ||
| Turkey | ||
| Rest of Middle East | ||
| Africa | South Africa | |
| Nigeria | ||
| Rest of Africa | ||
| By Zone | Zone 0 | ||
| Zone 20 | |||
| Zone 1 | |||
| Zone 21 | |||
| Zone 2 | |||
| Zone 22 | |||
| By Class | Class 1 | ||
| Class 2 | |||
| Class 3 | |||
| By Product Type | Sensors | ||
| Detectors | |||
| Switches | |||
| Transmitters | |||
| Isolators and Barriers | |||
| LED Indicators | |||
| Other Types | |||
| By End User | Oil and Gas | ||
| Mining | |||
| Power and Utilities | |||
| Chemical and Petrochemical | |||
| Processing and Manufacturing | |||
| Other End Users | |||
| By Geography | North America | United States | |
| Canada | |||
| Mexico | |||
| South America | Brazil | ||
| Argentina | |||
| Rest of South America | |||
| Europe | Germany | ||
| United Kingdom | |||
| France | |||
| Spain | |||
| Italy | |||
| Rest of Europe | |||
| Asia-Pacific | China | ||
| India | |||
| Japan | |||
| South Korea | |||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | Saudi Arabia | |
| United Arab Emirates | |||
| Turkey | |||
| Rest of Middle East | |||
| Africa | South Africa | ||
| Nigeria | |||
| Rest of Africa | |||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How large is the intrinsically safe equipment market in 2025?
The intrinsically safe equipment market size reached USD 10.57 billion in 2025 and is forecast to rise to USD 14.17 billion by 2030.
Which zone classification drives the most revenue?
Zone 1 applications led with 38.72% of revenue in 2024, thanks to widespread use in oil and gas and chemical plants.
What segment is growing fastest by end user?
Processing and manufacturing posts the highest CAGR at 7.23% through 2030 as factories adopt certified automation for solvent and powder handling.
Why are wireless intrinsically safe devices gaining traction?
Wireless modules reduce cabling costs, enable predictive maintenance, and now meet updated intrinsic safety and cybersecurity standards.
Which region will see the quickest growth through 2030?
Asia-Pacific leads with a projected 7.33% CAGR, driven by new refineries, petrochemical plants, and mining projects that require certified safety equipment.
Page last updated on: