Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers Market Size and Share
Market Overview
| Study Period | 2020 - 2030 |
|---|---|
| Base Year For Estimation | 2024 |
| Forecast Data Period | 2025 - 2030 |
| Market Size (2025) | USD 537 Million |
| Market Size (2030) | USD 668.70 Million |
| Growth Rate (2025 - 2030) | 4.49% CAGR |
| Market Concentration | Medium |
Major Players
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0. |
|
Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers market size reached USD 537 million in 2025 and is projected to climb to USD 668.7 million by 2030 at a 4.49% CAGR. Robust demand stems from rising multi-toxin loads in European grain supplies, stricter feed-safety rules that mandate validated detoxification processes, and sustained livestock intensification across poultry and swine sectors. Climate variability, especially the warmer and wetter post-harvest window, heightens Fusarium and Aspergillus growth, prompting feed manufacturers to adopt broader-spectrum solutions that blend binders with enzymatic biotransformers. Premium pricing for multi-modal products is further supported by the push for antibiotic-free meat, which elevates the need for non-antibiotic feed safety tools. Meanwhile, precision livestock farming’s data-driven dosing capabilities help producers justify higher-value detoxifiers by aligning inclusion rates with real-time contamination risk.
Key Report Takeaways
- By sub-additive, binders held 66.4% of the Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers market share in 2024, while biotransformers are on track for the fastest 4.49% CAGR through 2030.
- By animal, poultry commanded 34.9% revenue share in 2024; swine is forecast to expand at a 4.77% CAGR to 2030.
- By geography, Spain led with 15.4% share of the Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers market size in 2024; the United Kingdom is advancing at a 5.35% CAGR through 2030.
Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rising incidence of mycotoxin contamination in European grain supply | +1.20% | Europe-wide, strongest in Central and Southern regions | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Strict EU regulations on feed safety and allowable mycotoxin levels | +0.80% | European Union plus UK alignment, spillover to Turkey and Russia | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Growth in intensive livestock production, especially poultry | +0.70% | Spain, Netherlands, Germany, and Poland | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Increasing adoption of precision livestock farming enabling targeted use of detoxifiers | +0.50% | Northern Europe, Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Emergence of multi-mycotoxin binder-biotransformation blends with lower inclusion rates | +0.60% | European Union, technology leaders in Netherlands and Germany | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Demand for antibiotic-free meat pushing integrators toward non-antibiotic feed safety solutions | +0.90% | European Union and UK, strongest in poultry-intensive regions | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Rising Incidence of Mycotoxin Contamination in European Grain Supply
Climate volatility has lengthened periods of elevated humidity and temperature during grain storage, allowing Fusarium, Aspergillus, and Penicillium species to proliferate across the supply chain. DSM-Firmenich’s 2024 survey found deoxynivalenol in 85% of Central European feed samples, while Southern regions record parallel spikes in aflatoxin and fumonisin. Romanian surveillance shows 58% of feed samples now contain all six major toxin groups simultaneously, a steep escalation from past single-toxin profiles[1]Valeria Bulgaru et al., “Trends in Mycotoxins Co-Occurrence in the Complete Feed for Farm Animals in Southern Romania During 2021–2024,” Toxins, mdpi.com. The shift toward co-occurrence scenarios forces formulators to adopt detoxifiers that function across broad toxin spectra. As grain imports from Eastern Europe rise, so does cross-regional contamination risk, amplifying demand growth. These conditions underpin the Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers market’s steady expansion as buyers prioritize validated, multi-toxin solutions.
Strict EU Regulations on Feed Safety and Allowable Mycotoxin Levels
The European Food Safety Authority’s January 2024 guidance sets rigorous efficacy and safety benchmarks for every detoxification technology EFSA. Commission Regulation EU 2023/2782 standardizes sampling protocols, elevating compliance costs and filtering out under-validated products. Acute reference doses for T-2 and HT-2 toxins now stand at 0.3 µg/kg body weight with a chronic tolerable intake of 0.02 µg/kg per day[2]Food Standards Agency Committee on Toxicity, “HBGVs Established by EFSA – Risk Assessment of T-2 and HT-2 Mycotoxins in Food,” cot.food.gov.uk. These thresholds are among the world’s strictest, pushing feed mills to favor suppliers with certified dossiers and peer-reviewed proof of toxin degradation. Because biotransformers provide enzymatic breakdown rather than temporary sequestration, they align closely with regulatory preferences, helping the sub-segment outpace traditional binders in value growth. Companies able to navigate the regulatory maze gain pricing power and brand loyalty throughout the region.
Growth in Intensive Livestock Production, Especially Poultry
European poultry feed climbed to 49.7 million metric tons in 2024, a sustained upward trend that magnifies toxin risk[3]FEFAC, “EU Compound Feed Production Market Forecast 2024,” FEFAC Newsroom, October 13, 2025, https://fefac.eu. High-density broiler houses magnify the impact of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone, triggering feed conversion losses and mortality spikes when control measures lapse. Consequently, include-rate guidelines ranging from 0.1% to 0.2% of ration weight have become standard, guaranteeing baseline demand for detoxifiers. Intensified swine operations face parallel vulnerabilities, as reproductive performance is highly sensitive to even modest toxin exposures. These pressures underpin a predictable buyer base that values steady supply, efficacy transparency, and formulation compatibility, reinforcing market resilience despite cyclical feed cost swings.
Increasing Adoption of Precision Livestock Farming Enabling Targeted Use of Detoxifiers
Digital sensors track feed quality and animal performance in real time, allowing mills to adjust detoxifier inclusion rates dynamically. Tools like Cargill’s Mycotoxin Impact Calculator integrate lab and on-farm data to calibrate dosages. Such precision raises customer willingness to pay for high-purity enzymatic biotransformers that require accurate dosing. Integrating detection and mitigation into a single software platform creates stickiness for suppliers, as switching costs grow once feed mills embed proprietary risk analytics into their formulation workflow. Automated micro-dosing further reduces labor overhead, making premium solutions cost-effective in high-volume operations across Northern Europe.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility in raw material prices inflating cost of premium toxin binders | -0.60% | Europe-wide, strongest impact in specialty clay mining regions | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Limited efficacy data under commercial farm conditions leading to buyer skepticism | -0.40% | European Union, particularly affecting newer biotransformer technologies | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Competition from alternative feed safety technologies such as UV grain treatment | -0.30% | Northern Europe, technology-advanced regions | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Supply-chain disruptions in specialty clay minerals due to tightening mining regulations | -0.50% | Southern Europe, Turkey, and Eastern European mining regions | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Volatility in Raw Material Prices Inflating Cost of Premium Toxin Binders
Bentonite and sepiolite prices fluctuate with diesel, explosives, and compliance fees, often moving 15–20% in a single quarter. European miners face mounting environmental scrutiny, driving permit delays that constrict supply. Enzymatic detoxifiers rely on fermentation substrates whose costs track energy and commodity price swings. Because detoxifiers typically represent 0.5–1.5% of a feed mill’s input costs, any sudden surge becomes highly visible to procurement managers, prompting them to reduce inclusion rates or shift toward cheaper, less effective clay blends. This price sensitivity injects short-term volatility into what is otherwise a structurally growing market.
Competition from Alternative Feed Safety Technologies Such as UV Grain Treatment
Capital-intensive UV or ozone systems offer a one-time investment that reduces ongoing additive spend, a proposition attractive to large integrated mills. Recent trials show UV can cut aflatoxin B1 levels by up to 70% without harming nutrient density, encouraging plants in Scandinavia and Germany to test such systems. Although operational complexity and energy costs temper rapid rollout, each installed unit permanently lowers additive demand for treated grain streams. Binder suppliers respond by bundling detoxifiers with monitoring services to retain customers, but the head-to-head competition adds downward pressure on long-term additive volumes in tech-savvy regions.
Segment Analysis
By Sub-Additive: Biotransformers Drive Innovation Despite Binder Dominance
Binders retained 66.4% of the Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers market share in 2024, underpinned by long-standing acceptance and cost efficiency at inclusion rates near 0.15% of feed weight. The biotransformers are expanding at a 4.49% CAGR as feed mills seek irreversible toxin degradation rather than temporary sequestration. The Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers market size for biotransformers is projected to rise from USD 180.4 million in 2025 to USD 224.9 million by 2030, reflecting heightened regulatory favor for measurable detoxification.
Biotransformer growth is propelled by enzymes targeting zearalenone, fumonisin, and ochratoxin; Aeromicrobium-derived catalysts show notable in-vitro efficacy. Premium pricing is justified by consistent performance under co-occurrence scenarios where clay effectiveness wanes. Suppliers that pair enzymes with low-dose binders in a single premix capture cross-over demand while easing formulation complexity for mills. Because the top five players hold under a significant share of total revenue, newcomers with patented enzymes still find space for disruptive entry.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Animal: Swine Growth Accelerates Amid Poultry Leadership
Poultry accounted for 34.9% of Europe's Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers market size in 2024, with broiler integrators standardizing detoxifier use to protect feed conversion ratios. Elevated DON and ZEN loads during warm, wet harvests reinforce this reliance. Swine is on a faster 4.77% CAGR trajectory. Post-ASF restocking and renewed breeding herd investments push producers to mitigate reproductive risks linked to zearalenone and fumonisin. Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers market share gains within swine are therefore projected to close the gap with poultry by 2030.
Ruminants hold a significant share; their rumen microbiota partially deactivates toxins, yet aflatoxin B1 transference to milk as aflatoxin M1 requires binders specially tested for milk safety. Aquaculture remains a niche at a minor share but sees steady uptake in recirculating systems, where stable water temperatures accelerate mycotoxin-producing molds. These dynamics diversify demand across species and reinforce steady regional growth.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
Spain led with a 15.4% share of the Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers market size in 2024, driven by its robust compound feed industry and concentration of high-density livestock in Catalonia and Andalusia[4]FEFAC, “EU Compound Feed Production Market Forecast 2025,” FEFAC Newsroom, October 13, 2025, https://fefac.eu .. Climatic conditions, particularly prolonged post-harvest warmth, incentivize multi-modal detoxification strategies blending binders with enzymes. Swine feed production grew 5% in 2024, lifting detoxifier volumes in rations tailored to mitigate zearalenone risks.
The United Kingdom’s rapid growth reflects synchronized policy and retailer pressure for antibiotic-free supply chains. The United Kingdom is advancing at a 5.35% CAGR through 2030, supported by sustained investment in biotransformation technologies. British integrators allocate larger budgets to biotransformers, which dovetail with precision feeding systems common in the Midlands and Scotland. Local research funding accelerates field validation, reducing adoption barriers that hinder uptake elsewhere.
Germany and France share a culture of rigorous feed testing, with many mills operating in-house HPLC laboratories. German suppliers bundle sensor hardware with detoxifier sales, locking-in customer relationships, while French cooperatives negotiate national procurement contracts that standardize product specifications. Eastern European adoption lags due to price sensitivity, yet regulatory convergence with the EU acquis drives gradual uptake, especially among export-oriented producers.
Competitive Landscape
The market exhibits moderate concentration; the top five suppliers controlled a significant share of revenue in 2024. DSM-Firmenich leads the market, leveraging integrated feed additive channels and a broad toxin surveillance network. Cargill, Incorporated ranks second, differentiating with data-driven advisory services anchored by a 400,000-sample toxin database and its Mycotoxin Impact Calculator.
BASF, Brenntag SE, and Adisseo collectively account for a considerable portion of the market, each emphasizing multi-modal product lines and regulatory dossier strength. Adisseo’s Mycopedia positions it as a thought leader, boosting brand equity among nutritionists. Niche firms like Olmix Group and Centafarm SRL exploit geographic or species niches, marine-based binders for aquaculture, or rumen-specific additives that larger firms overlook.
Strategic themes center on validated efficacy, integrated data solutions, and raw-material security. Players pursuing vertical integration into clay mining or enzyme fermentation aim to mitigate cost volatility. Given the low-40s combined share of leaders, consolidation is likely as multinationals acquire regionals to secure distribution and raw-material assets, especially around specialty clays threatened by regulatory curbs.
Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers Industry Leaders
-
DSM-Firmenich
-
Cargill, Incorporated.
-
Brenntag SE
-
BASF
-
Adisseo
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- December 2024: BASF established its Catalyst Development and Solids Processing Center in Ludwigshafen, Germany, with advanced process equipment to enhance R&D capabilities that support advanced mycotoxin binder and biotransformer formulations.
- March 2024: Cargill presented new research at the World Mycotoxin Forum and introduced the Mycotoxin Impact Calculator. The research showcased global mycotoxin contamination trends and their impact on poultry gut health, utilizing insights from its 400,000-sample global database.
- January 2024: The intensification of extreme weather events, increases the vulnerability of cereals to multi-mycotoxin contamination. The European Union has revised maximum levels for DON in food through Regulation (EU) 2024/1022 and continues to strengthen its regulatory framework for mycotoxins in food and feed to enhance public health protection.
Free With This Report
We provide a complimentary and exhaustive set of data points on regional and country-level metrics that present the fundamental structure of the industry. Presented in the form of 35+ free charts, the section covers difficult-to-find data of various regions on feed production through various animal categories such as Ruminants, Poultry, Swine, and Aquaculture.
List of Tables & Figures
- Figure 1:
- POPULATION OF POULTRY, NUMBER, EUROPE, 2017-2022
- Figure 2:
- POPULATION OF RUMINANTS, NUMBER, EUROPE, 2017-2022
- Figure 3:
- POPULATION OF SWINE, NUMBER, EUROPE, 2017-2022
- Figure 4:
- PRODUCTION VOLUME OF AQUACULTURE FEED, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017-2022
- Figure 5:
- PRODUCTION VOLUME OF POULTRY FEED, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017-2022
- Figure 6:
- PRODUCTION VOLUME OF RUMINANTS FEED, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017-2022
- Figure 7:
- PRODUCTION VOLUME OF SWINE FEED, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017-2022
- Figure 8:
- VOLUME OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 9:
- VALUE OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 10:
- VOLUME OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 11:
- VALUE OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 12:
- VOLUME SHARE OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 13:
- VALUE SHARE OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 14:
- VOLUME OF BINDERS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 15:
- VALUE OF BINDERS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 16:
- VALUE SHARE OF BINDERS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY ANIMAL TYPE, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 17:
- VOLUME OF BIOTRANSFORMERS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 18:
- VALUE OF BIOTRANSFORMERS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 19:
- VALUE SHARE OF BIOTRANSFORMERS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY ANIMAL TYPE, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 20:
- VOLUME OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY ANIMAL TYPE, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 21:
- VALUE OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY ANIMAL TYPE, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 22:
- VOLUME SHARE OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY ANIMAL TYPE, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 23:
- VALUE SHARE OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY ANIMAL TYPE, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 24:
- VOLUME OF AQUACULTURE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 25:
- VALUE OF AQUACULTURE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 26:
- VOLUME SHARE OF AQUACULTURE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 27:
- VALUE SHARE OF AQUACULTURE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 28:
- VOLUME OF FISH FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 29:
- VALUE OF FISH FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 30:
- VALUE SHARE OF FISH FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 31:
- VOLUME OF SHRIMP FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 32:
- VALUE OF SHRIMP FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 33:
- VALUE SHARE OF SHRIMP FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 34:
- VOLUME OF OTHER AQUACULTURE SPECIES FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 35:
- VALUE OF OTHER AQUACULTURE SPECIES FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 36:
- VALUE SHARE OF OTHER AQUACULTURE SPECIES FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 37:
- VOLUME OF POULTRY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 38:
- VALUE OF POULTRY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 39:
- VOLUME SHARE OF POULTRY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 40:
- VALUE SHARE OF POULTRY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 41:
- VOLUME OF BROILER FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 42:
- VALUE OF BROILER FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 43:
- VALUE SHARE OF BROILER FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 44:
- VOLUME OF LAYER FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 45:
- VALUE OF LAYER FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 46:
- VALUE SHARE OF LAYER FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 47:
- VOLUME OF OTHER POULTRY BIRDS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 48:
- VALUE OF OTHER POULTRY BIRDS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 49:
- VALUE SHARE OF OTHER POULTRY BIRDS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 50:
- VOLUME OF RUMINANTS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 51:
- VALUE OF RUMINANTS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 52:
- VOLUME SHARE OF RUMINANTS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 53:
- VALUE SHARE OF RUMINANTS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ANIMAL TYPE, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 54:
- VOLUME OF BEEF CATTLE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 55:
- VALUE OF BEEF CATTLE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 56:
- VALUE SHARE OF BEEF CATTLE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 57:
- VOLUME OF DAIRY CATTLE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 58:
- VALUE OF DAIRY CATTLE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 59:
- VALUE SHARE OF DAIRY CATTLE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 60:
- VOLUME OF OTHER RUMINANTS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 61:
- VALUE OF OTHER RUMINANTS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 62:
- VALUE SHARE OF OTHER RUMINANTS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 63:
- VOLUME OF SWINE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 64:
- VALUE OF SWINE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 65:
- VALUE SHARE OF SWINE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 66:
- VOLUME OF OTHER ANIMALS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 67:
- VALUE OF OTHER ANIMALS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 68:
- VALUE SHARE OF OTHER ANIMALS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 69:
- VOLUME OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY COUNTRY, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 70:
- VALUE OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY COUNTRY, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 71:
- VOLUME SHARE OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY COUNTRY, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 72:
- VALUE SHARE OF FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY COUNTRY, %, EUROPE, 2017,2023 AND 2029
- Figure 73:
- VOLUME OF FRANCE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 74:
- VALUE OF FRANCE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 75:
- VALUE SHARE OF FRANCE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 76:
- VOLUME OF GERMANY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 77:
- VALUE OF GERMANY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 78:
- VALUE SHARE OF GERMANY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 79:
- VOLUME OF ITALY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 80:
- VALUE OF ITALY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 81:
- VALUE SHARE OF ITALY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 82:
- VOLUME OF NETHERLANDS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 83:
- VALUE OF NETHERLANDS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 84:
- VALUE SHARE OF NETHERLANDS FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 85:
- VOLUME OF RUSSIA FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 86:
- VALUE OF RUSSIA FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 87:
- VALUE SHARE OF RUSSIA FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 88:
- VOLUME OF SPAIN FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 89:
- VALUE OF SPAIN FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 90:
- VALUE SHARE OF SPAIN FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 91:
- VOLUME OF TURKEY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 92:
- VALUE OF TURKEY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 93:
- VALUE SHARE OF TURKEY FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 94:
- VOLUME OF UNITED KINGDOM FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 95:
- VALUE OF UNITED KINGDOM FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 96:
- VALUE SHARE OF UNITED KINGDOM FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 97:
- VOLUME OF REST OF EUROPE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 98:
- VALUE OF REST OF EUROPE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS, USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 99:
- VALUE SHARE OF REST OF EUROPE FEED MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFIERS BY SUB ADDITIVE CATEGORIES, %, EUROPE, 2022 AND 2029
- Figure 100:
- MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES BY NUMBER OF STRATEGIC MOVES, COUNT, EUROPE, 2017 - 2023
- Figure 101:
- MOST ADOPTED STRATEGIES, COUNT, EUROPE, 2017 - 2023
- Figure 102:
- VALUE SHARE OF MAJOR PLAYERS, %, EUROPE
Europe Feed Mycotoxin Detoxifiers Market Report Scope
Binders, Biotransformers are covered as segments by Sub Additive. Aquaculture, Poultry, Ruminants, Swine are covered as segments by Animal. France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom are covered as segments by Country.
| Binders |
| Biotransformers |
| Aquaculture | Fish |
| Shrimp | |
| Other Aquaculture Species | |
| Poultry | Broiler |
| Layer | |
| Other Poultry Birds | |
| Ruminants | Beef Cattle |
| Dairy Cattle | |
| Other Ruminants | |
| Swine | |
| Other Animals |
| France |
| Germany |
| Italy |
| Netherlands |
| Russia |
| Spain |
| Turkey |
| United Kingdom |
| Rest of Europe |
| By Sub Additive | Binders | |
| Biotransformers | ||
| By Animal | Aquaculture | Fish |
| Shrimp | ||
| Other Aquaculture Species | ||
| Poultry | Broiler | |
| Layer | ||
| Other Poultry Birds | ||
| Ruminants | Beef Cattle | |
| Dairy Cattle | ||
| Other Ruminants | ||
| Swine | ||
| Other Animals | ||
| By Geography | France | |
| Germany | ||
| Italy | ||
| Netherlands | ||
| Russia | ||
| Spain | ||
| Turkey | ||
| United Kingdom | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
Market Definition
- FUNCTIONS - For the study, feed additives are considered to be commercially manufactured products that are used to enhance characteristics such as weight gain, feed conversion ratio, and feed intake when fed in appropriate proportions.
- RESELLERS - Companies engaged in reselling feed additives without value addition have been excluded from the market scope, to avoid double counting.
- END CONSUMERS - Compound feed manufacturers are considered to be end-consumers in the market studied. The scope excludes farmers buying feed additives to be used directly as supplements or premixes.
- INTERNAL COMPANY CONSUMPTION - Companies engaged in the production of compound feed as well as the manufacturing of feed additives are part of the study. However, while estimating the market sizes, the internal consumption of feed additives by such companies has been excluded.
| Keyword | Definition |
|---|---|
| Feed additives | Feed additives are products used in animal nutrition for purposes of improving the quality of feed and the quality of food from animal origin, or to improve the animals’ performance and health. |
| Probiotics | Probiotics are microorganisms introduced into the body for their beneficial qualities. (It maintains or restores beneficial bacteria to the gut). |
| Antibiotics | Antibiotic is a drug that is specifically used to inhibit the growth of bacteria. |
| Prebiotics | A non-digestible food ingredient that promotes the growth of beneficial microorganisms in the intestines. |
| Antioxidants | Antioxidants are compounds that inhibit oxidation, a chemical reaction that produces free radicals. |
| Phytogenics | Phytogenics are a group of natural and non-antibiotic growth promoters derived from herbs, spices, essential oils, and oleoresins. |
| Vitamins | Vitamins are organic compounds, which are required for normal growth and maintenance of the body. |
| Metabolism | A chemical process that occurs within a living organism in order to maintain life. |
| Amino acids | Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins and play an important role in metabolic pathways. |
| Enzymes | Enzyme is a substance that acts as a catalyst to bring about a specific biochemical reaction. |
| Anti-microbial resistance | The ability of a microorganism to resist the effects of an antimicrobial agent. |
| Anti-microbial | Destroying or inhibiting the growth of microorganisms. |
| Osmotic balance | It is a process of maintaining salt and water balance across membranes within the body's fluids. |
| Bacteriocin | Bacteriocins are the toxins produced by bacteria to inhibit the growth of similar or closely related bacterial strains. |
| Biohydrogenation | It is a process that occurs in the rumen of an animal in which bacteria convert unsaturated fatty acids (USFA) to saturated fatty acids (SFA). |
| Oxidative rancidity | It is a reaction of fatty acids with oxygen, which generally causes unpleasant odors in animals. To prevent these, antioxidants were added. |
| Mycotoxicosis | Any condition or disease caused by fungal toxins, mainly due to contamination of animal feed with mycotoxins. |
| Mycotoxins | Mycotoxins are toxin compounds that are naturally produced by certain types of molds (fungi). |
| Feed Probiotics | Microbial feed supplements positively affect gastrointestinal microbial balance. |
| Probiotic yeast | Feed yeast (single-cell fungi) and other fungi used as probiotics. |
| Feed enzymes | They are used to supplement digestive enzymes in an animal’s stomach to break down food. Enzymes also ensure that meat and egg production is improved. |
| Mycotoxin detoxifiers | They are used to prevent fungal growth and to stop any harmful mold from being absorbed in the gut and blood. |
| Feed antibiotics | They are used both for the prevention and treatment of diseases but also for rapid growth and development. |
| Feed antioxidants | They are used to protect the deterioration of other feed nutrients in the feed such as fats, vitamins, pigments, and flavoring agents, thus providing nutrient security to the animals. |
| Feed phytogenics | Phytogenics are natural substances, added to livestock feed to promote growth, aid in digestion, and act as anti-microbial agents. |
| Feed vitamins | They are used to maintain the normal physiological function and normal growth and development of animals. |
| Feed flavors and sweetners | These flavors and sweeteners help to mask tastes and odors during changes in additives or medications and make them ideal for animal diets undergoing transition. |
| Feed acidifiers | Animal feed acidifiers are organic acids incorporated into the feed for nutritional or preservative purposes. Acidifiers enhance congestion and microbiological balance in the alimentary and digestive tracts of livestock. |
| Feed minerals | Feed minerals play an important role in the regular dietary requirements of animal feed. |
| Feed binders | Feed binders are the binding agents used in the manufacture of safe animal feed products. It enhances the taste of food and prolongs the storage period of the feed. |
| Key Terms | Abbreviation |
| LSDV | Lumpy Skin Disease Virus |
| ASF | African Swine Fever |
| GPA | Growth Promoter Antibiotics |
| NSP | Non-Starch Polysaccharides |
| PUFA | Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid |
| Afs | Aflatoxins |
| AGP | Antibiotic Growth Promoters |
| FAO | The Food And Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |
| USDA | The United States Department of Agriculture |
Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence follows a four-step methodology in all our reports.
- Step-1: IDENTIFY KEY VARIABLES: In order to build a robust forecasting methodology, the variables and factors identified in Step-1 are tested against available historical market numbers. Through an iterative process, the variables required for market forecast are set and the model is built on the basis of these variables.
- Step-2: Build a Market Model: Market-size estimations for the forecast years are in nominal terms. Inflation is not a part of the pricing, and the average selling price (ASP) is kept constant throughout the forecast period.
- Step-3: Validate and Finalize: In this important step, all market numbers, variables and analyst calls are validated through an extensive network of primary research experts from the market studied. The respondents are selected across levels and functions to generate a holistic picture of the market studied.
- Step-4: Research Outputs: Syndicated Reports, Custom Consulting Assignments, Databases & Subscription Platforms
