Netherlands Hyperscale Data Center Market Size and Share

Netherlands Hyperscale Data Center Market (2025 - 2031)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Netherlands Hyperscale Data Center Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Netherlands hyperscale data center market size is USD 0.800 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 3.38 billion by 2031, expanding at a 27.17% CAGR while installed capacity rises from 1.717 thousand MW to 2.232 thousand MW at a 4.47% CAGR. Value growth is propelled by AI-ready facilities that command premium pricing, rapid enterprise cloud migration, and sovereign-cloud mandates that favor locally operated infrastructure. Intensifying grid constraints in North Holland are reshaping site selection, pushing hyperscalers toward Flevoland and other provinces with available power and land. Liquid cooling adoption, GPU-centric rack densities above 50 kW, and rising interest in small modular reactors (SMRs) underline a shift toward energy-efficient, high-density designs. Competitive intensity has climbed after Oracle’s USD 1 billion commitment and continued self-build programs by major cloud providers, prompting colocation firms to differentiate through sustainability and connectivity offerings

Key Report Takeaways

  • By data center type, Hyperscale Colocation held 54% of the Netherlands hyperscale data center market share in 2024, while Hyperscaler Self-build posted the fastest 12.5% CAGR through 2031.
  • By component, IT Infrastructure commanded 46.3% share of the Netherlands hyperscale data center market size in 2024, whereas Liquid-cooling Systems advanced at an 18.2% CAGR to 2031.
  • By tier standard, Tier III captured 67% share in 2024; Tier IV recorded the highest 9.8% CAGR for 2025-2031.
  • By end-user industry, Cloud and IT represented 42.5% share in 2024, and is growing at 14.4% CAGR to 2031.
  • By data center size, Massive (Greater than 25 MW and less than equal to 60 MW) facilities held 49.8% share in 2024; Mega (Greater than 60 MW) are expanding at a 16% CAGR.

Geography Analysis

North Holland retained 38.7% share of the Netherlands hyperscale data center market in 2024, leveraging AMS-IX’s dense peering fabric and entrenched hyperscale campuses AMS-IX. TenneT’s decade-long grid freeze limits near-term expansion, inflating lease rates and prompting capacity rationing. Operators invest in micro-grid batteries, heat-reuse schemes, and rooftop PV arrays to unlock incremental power envelopes. Municipal scrutiny now mandates societal benefit statements, elongating planning cycles yet preserving the province’s premium positioning within the Netherlands hyperscale data center market.

Flevoland posts the fastest 11.7% CAGR, capitalizing on available land, lower property costs, and dark-fiber links to Amsterdam that keep latency below 2 ms. Meta’s canceled Zeewolde project reflects local activism; still, regional authorities signal openness to scaled-down campuses that align with energy-saving benchmarks. Provincial incentives on renewable integration and district-heat connections attract new entrants seeking grid headroom and pro-business permitting frameworks.

Groningen gains momentum via the government-supported AI factory slated for 2026, anchoring an emerging digital cluster in the north. The port of Eemshaven’s subsea-cable landings bolster trans-Atlantic redundancy and make the province a candidate for SMR pilots. North Brabant and South Holland see steady infill as edge computing and industrial IoT nodes proliferate. Collectively, these diversification trends de-risk capacity growth and elevate the Netherlands hyperscale data center market’s national resilience.

Segment Analysis

By Data Center Type: Self-Build Acceleration Amid Sovereignty Demands

Hyperscale Colocation maintained 54% share of the Netherlands hyperscale data center market in 2024, benefiting from established campus ecosystems that ease enterprises’ transition to hybrid cloud. These multitenant facilities exploit shared cooling and ancillary services to deliver cost-efficient footprints. Despite that dominance, the Netherlands hyperscale data center market size allocated to Self-build projects is rising at a 12.5% CAGR as cloud majors chase bespoke security postures and sovereign-cloud certifications.

Oracle’s Westpoort campus exemplifies hyperscaler preference for direct control of power design, liquid-immersion suites, and AI inference clusters. Google’s fourth Dutch build follows suit, embedding renewable PPAs and proprietary airflow-containment. Colocation providers are countering with build-to-suit modules linked to meet-me rooms, pitching reduced time-to-market. Over 2025-2031, colocation is expected to retain scale advantages, yet self-build penetration will widen as regulatory complexity amplifies the strategic value of vertical integration within the Netherlands hyperscale data center market.

Netherlands Hyperscale Data Center Market: Market Share by Data Center Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Component: Liquid Cooling Revolution Drives Infrastructure Evolution

In 2024, IT Infrastructure servers, storage, and networking—captured 46.3% of spend, underlining compute-centric investment priorities. However, Liquid-cooling Systems are forecast to deliver an 18.2% CAGR, the highest across components, as AI GPUs exceed 700 W thermal-design power. Electrical Infrastructure grows steadily as operators transition to 2N UPS topologies and 48 VDC busways to support high-density racks.

Mechanical add-ons such as closed-loop dry coolers, composite piping, and leak-detection sensors are redesigned to integrate dielectric fluids. General construction budgets increase to accommodate taller halls and raised-floor zones purpose-built for liquid distribution manifolds. The component mix shift reinforces supplier opportunities in pumps, cold-plates, and facility management software that optimize temperature set-points, strengthening overall competitiveness in the Netherlands hyperscale data center market.

By Tier Standard: Tier IV Growth Reflects Mission-Critical AI Demands

Tier III sites led deployment with 67% share in 2024 thanks to balanced cost and 99.982% uptime sufficing for most SaaS and enterprise workloads. Operators favor modular Tier III builds for rapid scaling across provinces where municipal approvals prioritize energy-efficient designs. The Netherlands hyperscale data center market size attached to Tier IV, however, records a 9.8% CAGR through 2031 as AI developers and financial institutions demand 2N+1 redundancy.

Oracle integrates fault-tolerant power paths and trip-redundant cooling loops to secure contracts from banking clients bound by regulatory RTO thresholds. Premium pricing dynamics offset higher capex, sustaining ROI expectations. Colocation providers are selectively upgrading flagship halls to Tier IV, deploying twin-feed substations and predictive-maintenance analytics to justify higher leases within the Netherlands hyperscale data center market

By End-User Industry: AI/ML Cloud Emergence Reshapes Demand Patterns

Cloud and IT accounted for 42.5% of occupied MW in 2024, leveraging the country’s robust fiber spine and subsea-cable reach. Enterprises in banking, logistics, and life sciences consolidate workloads into regional availability zones to reduce latency to Frankfurt, Paris, and London. Parallelly, AI/ML Cloud workloads expand at 14.4% CAGR, driving fresh demand for on-package liquid cooling and HBM-equipped servers.

The Groningen AI factory, backed by EUR 200 million, epitomizes strategic public-private alignment toward sovereign AI capacity. Government agencies, telecom operators, and manufacturing verticals follow with proof-of-concept training clusters that piggyback on hyperscale back-bones. By 2031, AI/ML tenants are expected to narrow the share gap with traditional Cloud and IT, adding resiliency to revenue streams in the Netherlands hyperscale data center market.

Netherlands  Hyperscale  Data Center Market: Market Share by End-user Industry
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Data Center Size: Mega Facilities Drive Economies of Scale

Massive (Greater than 25 MW and less than equal to 60 MW) facilities owned 49.8% share in 2024, offering modular power blocks and phased capex deployment. These campuses balance construction risk with scalability. Conversely, Mega (greater than 60 MW) facilities capture a 16% CAGR as hyperscalers aggregate AI training clusters into single-tenant super-sites, chasing less than 1.2 PUE targets.

Meta’s canceled Zeewolde proposal illustrates public-acceptance hurdles. Yet, Vantage’s EUR 1.4 billion EMEA expansion underscores investor confidence in mega-campus economics. Large (Less than equal to 25 MW) facilities persist for edge and latency-sensitive use cases but remain a minority. The scaling dynamic widens cost differentials, compelling smaller players to specialize in compliance-led or edge-adjacent offerings within the Netherlands hyperscale data center market.

Competitive Landscape

The Netherlands hyperscale data center market hosts a moderately consolidated field led by Digital Realty, Equinix, NorthC, and global cloud providers executing self-build strategies. Digital Realty’s USD 8.4 billion Interxion takeover elevated its EMEA share to 17%, strengthening subsea cable access and cementing flagship status in Amsterdam Science Park. Equinix leverages xScale to target GPU-dense deployments, reporting 7% YoY revenue growth in 2024 despite grid bottlenecks.

Oracle’s USD 1 billion bet signifies a pivot from pure software toward infrastructure ownership, adding competitive pressure on colocation incumbents. AWS and Google deepen local footprints to uphold EU data residency, while NorthC absorbs Colt’s assets to rise as a regional champion. Sustainability emerges as a battleground: Vantage commits EUR 1.4 billion to low-carbon builds, and Data4 partners with Westinghouse on SMRs.

Netherlands Hyperscale Data Center Industry Leaders

  1. Google LLC

  2. Amazon Web Services, Inc.

  3. Meta Platforms, Inc.

  4. Oracle Corporation

  5. Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (Interxion)

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Netherlands Hypersacle Data Center Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • July 2025: Oracle announced a USD 1 billion investment to expand cloud and AI infrastructure in the Netherlands, part of a USD 3 billion regional plan.
  • June 2025: Groningen AI factory secured EUR 200 million (USD 234.01 million) government and regional funding for a 2026 supercomputer launch.
  • April 2025: Colt completed the sale of European data centers to NorthC, consolidating Dutch presence.
  • April 2025: Colt completed the sale of European data centers to NorthC, consolidating Dutch presence.
  • April 2024: Google broke ground on a USD 640 million fourth Dutch data center in Westpoort, featuring advanced cooling.

Table of Contents for Netherlands Hyperscale Data Center Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 GPU-centric AI/ML demand for greater than 50 kW racks
    • 4.2.2 Surging cloud-migration of Dutch enterprises
    • 4.2.3 Amsterdam's dense IX/peering ecosystem
    • 4.2.4 EU-GDPR and digital-sovereignty compliance needs
    • 4.2.5 SMR-powered campus pilots in Eemshaven
    • 4.2.6 District heat-reuse subsidies in North Holland
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Grid-capacity moratorium in Amsterdam metro
    • 4.3.2 Rising heat-tax and carbon levies (national)
    • 4.3.3 Land-use and zoning push-back on green-field sites
    • 4.3.4 Public opposition to farmland conversions
  • 4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook (Liquid cooling, direct-to-chip, modular builds, SMR power)

5. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) INCLUSION IN HYPERSCALE DATA CENTER (Sub-segments are subject to change depending on Availability of Data)

  • 5.1 AI Workload Impact: Rise of GPU-Packed Racks and High Thermal Load Management
  • 5.2 Rapid Shift toward 400G and 800G Ethernet - Local OEM Integration and Compatibility Demands
  • 5.3 Innovations in Liquid Cooling: Immersion and Cold Plate Trends
  • 5.4 AI-Based Data Center Management (DCIM) Adoption - Role of Cloud Providers

6. REGULATORY AND COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORK

7. KEY DATA CENTER STATISTICS

  • 7.1 Existing Hyperscale Data Center Facilities in Netherlands(in MW) (Hyperscale Self build VS Colocation)
  • 7.2 List of Upcoming Hyperscale Data Center in Netherlands
  • 7.3 List of Hyperscale Data Center Operators in Netherlands
  • 7.4 Analysis on Data Center CAPEX in Netherlands

8. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 8.1 By Data Center Type
    • 8.1.1 Hyperscale Self-build
    • 8.1.2 Hyperscale Colocation
  • 8.2 By Component
    • 8.2.1 IT Infrastructure
    • 8.2.1.1 Server Infrastructure
    • 8.2.1.2 Storage Infrastructure
    • 8.2.1.3 Network Infrastructure
    • 8.2.2 Electrical Infrastructure
    • 8.2.2.1 Power Distribution Unit
    • 8.2.2.2 Transfer Switches and Switchgears
    • 8.2.2.3 UPS Systems
    • 8.2.2.4 Generators
    • 8.2.2.5 Other Electrical Infrastructure
    • 8.2.3 Mechanical Infrastructure
    • 8.2.3.1 Cooling Systems
    • 8.2.3.2 Racks
    • 8.2.3.3 Other Mechanical Infrastructure
    • 8.2.4 General Construction
    • 8.2.4.1 Core and Shell Development
    • 8.2.4.2 Installation and Commisioning Services
    • 8.2.4.3 Design Engineering
    • 8.2.4.4 Fire Detection, Suppression and Physical Security
    • 8.2.4.5 DCIM/BMS Solutions
  • 8.3 By Tier Standard
    • 8.3.1 Tier III
    • 8.3.2 Tier IV
  • 8.4 By End-User Industry
    • 8.4.1 Cloud and IT
    • 8.4.2 Telecom
    • 8.4.3 Media and Entertainment
    • 8.4.4 Government
    • 8.4.5 BFSI
    • 8.4.6 Manufacturing
    • 8.4.7 E-Commerce
    • 8.4.8 Other End Users
  • 8.5 By Data Center Size
    • 8.5.1 Large (Less than equal to 25 MW)
    • 8.5.2 Massive (Greater than 25 MW and less than equal to 60 MW)
    • 8.5.3 Mega (Greater than 60 MW)

9. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 9.1 Market Share Analysis
  • 9.2 Company Profiles {(includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)}
    • 9.2.1 Amazon Web Services
    • 9.2.2 Microsoft Corp.
    • 9.2.3 Alphabet Inc. (Google)
    • 9.2.4 Meta Platforms Inc.
    • 9.2.5 Alibaba Group
    • 9.2.6 Tencent Holdings
    • 9.2.7 Baidu Inc.
    • 9.2.8 Oracle Corp.
    • 9.2.9 IBM Corp.
    • 9.2.10 Digital Realty (Interxion)
    • 9.2.11 Equinix Inc.
    • 9.2.12 NTT Ltd.
    • 9.2.13 CyrusOne Inc.
    • 9.2.14 Vantage Data Centers
    • 9.2.15 Quality Technology Services (QTS)
    • 9.2.16 Switch Inc.
    • 9.2.17 STACK Infrastructure
    • 9.2.18 Iron Mountain Data Centers
    • 9.2.19 Flexential Corp.
    • 9.2.20 OVHcloud
    • 9.2.21 GDS Holdings
    • 9.2.22 Scala Data Centers
    • 9.2.23 NorthC Datacenters
    • 9.2.24 Maincubes
    • 9.2.25 Dataplace
    • 9.2.26 Greenhouse Datacenters

10. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 10.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study views the Netherlands hyperscale data center market as the total yearly revenue earned by facilities that deliver at least 4 MW of contiguous IT load per building and can expand to tens of thousands of racks, whether self-built by cloud giants or leased as hyperscale colocation. We count recurring service charges, on-site support, and value-added infrastructure upgrades, all expressed in USD.

Scope Exclusion: Enterprise, edge, and colocation halls below the 4 MW threshold are left out.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Data Center Type
    • Hyperscale Self-build
    • Hyperscale Colocation
  • By Component
    • IT Infrastructure
      • Server Infrastructure
      • Storage Infrastructure
      • Network Infrastructure
    • Electrical Infrastructure
      • Power Distribution Unit
      • Transfer Switches and Switchgears
      • UPS Systems
      • Generators
      • Other Electrical Infrastructure
    • Mechanical Infrastructure
      • Cooling Systems
      • Racks
      • Other Mechanical Infrastructure
    • General Construction
      • Core and Shell Development
      • Installation and Commisioning Services
      • Design Engineering
      • Fire Detection, Suppression and Physical Security
      • DCIM/BMS Solutions
  • By Tier Standard
    • Tier III
    • Tier IV
  • By End-User Industry
    • Cloud and IT
    • Telecom
    • Media and Entertainment
    • Government
    • BFSI
    • Manufacturing
    • E-Commerce
    • Other End Users
  • By Data Center Size
    • Large (Less than equal to 25 MW)
    • Massive (Greater than 25 MW and less than equal to 60 MW)
    • Mega (Greater than 60 MW)

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed grid planners, facility engineers, and procurement leads across Amsterdam, Flevoland, and Groningen. Their insights refined ramp-up timelines, weighted average price per kilowatt, and realistic rack-density road maps that desk research could not fully capture.

Desk Research

We began with government disclosures from the Netherlands Enterprise Agency and Central Bureau of Statistics, which anchor installed megawatts and energy tariffs. Trade bodies such as the Dutch Data Center Association and Eurostat supply vacancy rates, campus counts, and utilization ratios. Patent trends accessed through Questel show immersion-cooling uptake, while OFV freight statistics hint at delivery lead times for prefabricated modules. Company filings, investor decks, and reputable press complete the price benchmarks and expansion pipelines. We also drew on D&B Hoovers for uniform operator financials, Dow Jones Factiva for deal tracking, and Volza shipment logs to validate incoming server volumes. The sources named are illustrative; many additional datasets were consulted for collection, validation, and clarification.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

The baseline value is first calculated top-down by reconciling operator-reported white space, average lease rates, and self-build capital-expense amortization. We then corroborate the total with sampled bottom-up checks on server shipments and GPU-dense rack counts. Key variables, grid-connection lead times, liquid-cooling penetration, AI workload share, renewable-power premiums, and land-use caps drive historical splits and future trajectories.

Forecasts use a blend of multivariate regression and scenario analysis, with growth elasticities tied to GDP digital-sector spend and power-availability trends. Where bottom-up gaps emerge, averages from peer campuses are statistically imputed before final reconciliation.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass a three-layer review that includes automated variance scans, peer analyst audits, and final sign-off meetings. Models refresh annually, and any major policy shift or hyperscale investment triggers an interim update so clients receive the latest view.

Why Our Netherlands Hyperscale Data Center Baseline Commands Reliability

Published estimates often diverge because firms pick different facility cut-offs, revenue components, and refresh cadences, widening totals by billions. Mordor's disciplined filter of >=4 MW halls, annualized service revenue, and mixed-method modeling yields a figure stakeholders can trace and replicate.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 0.8 bn (2025) Mordor Intelligence
USD 1.2 bn (2023) Regional Consultancy A Older baseline year and counts construction capex as revenue
USD 1.23 bn (2024) Trade Journal B Measures the entire data-center market, not hyperscale alone
USD 10.25 bn (2024) Global Consultancy C Includes hardware resale and lacks a 4 MW threshold filter

Overall, the modest gap with Regional Consultancy A reflects calendar alignment, while wider spreads stem from broader scopes. By rooting every assumption in verifiable capacity data and live tariff inputs, Mordor delivers the balanced, transparent baseline decision-makers trust.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the Netherlands hyperscale data center market?

The Netherlands hyperscale data center market size stands at USD 0.80 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 3.38 billion by 2031.

How fast is the market growing?

The market is expanding at a 27.17% CAGR in value terms, considerably faster than the 4.47% CAGR projected for installed capacity.

Which province is growing the quickest?

Flevoland records the fastest 11.7% CAGR due to land availability, favorable regulation, and proximity to Amsterdam’s fiber routes.

Why are hyperscalers adopting liquid cooling in the Netherlands?

AI and machine-learning workloads drive rack power densities above 50 kW, and liquid cooling can lower energy use by up to 40% compared with air cooling.

What impact do grid constraints in Amsterdam have on new data centers?

A decade-long moratorium on new large-consumer connections forces operators to pre-book alternative sites in Flevoland and Groningen, raising development costs.

Page last updated on: