Hardware Encryption Market Size and Share

Hardware Encryption Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Hardware Encryption Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

 The global hardware encryption market is valued at USD 332.57 million in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 417.35 million by 2030, advancing at a 4.67% CAGR. This growth occurs while the ecosystem shifts from legacy symmetric algorithms toward quantum-resistant approaches adopted in response to rising quantum-computing threats. Mandatory federal rules, a higher incidence of zero-trust frameworks, and enterprise risk-mitigation programs are the primary factors shaping demand. The fast rollout of solid-state drives in data-center refresh cycles, combined with edge-AI inferencing needs, accelerates the deployment of hardware-based cryptography in storage controllers. Post-quantum algorithm launches and automotive mandates for encrypted electronic architectures supply additional momentum. At the same time, premium pricing, supply-chain scarcity for advanced crypto-IP cores, and export-control constraints temper overall expansion.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product category, solid state drives led with 44.1% revenue share in 2024, while the same segment posts the highest 21.5% CAGR through 2030.
  • By algorithm standard, Advanced Encryption Standard captured 62.3% of the hardware encryption market share in 2024; post-quantum algorithms record the fastest 37.6% CAGR to 2030.
  • By architecture, application-specific integrated circuits held 57.6% share of the hardware encryption market size in 2024, while system-on-chip with secure element integration expands at a 23.5% CAGR.
  • By end-use industry, consumer electronics accounted for 32.8% of the hardware encryption market size in 2024; automotive advances at a 27.8% CAGR through 2030.
  • By geography, North America controlled 38.4% revenue in 2024, whereas Asia-Pacific records the highest 22.7% CAGR.

Segment Analysis

By Product: SSD Dominance Drives Enterprise Transformation

Solid state drives held 44.1% of the hardware encryption market share in 2024 and are expanding at a 21.5% CAGR to 2030, demonstrating how performance requirements converge with cryptographic mandates. The hardware encryption market size attached to SSD shipments is projected to surpass HDD shipments before 2027 as hyperscalers refresh fleets. Samsung’s PM9C1a rolls out Device Identifier Composition Engine standards while sustaining 6,000 MB/s reads. HDDs still serve archival tiers and show slower rotation speeds but remain relevant where cost per TB matters. Seagate’s Exos X24 provides 24 TB per drive with built-in encryption for hyperscale cold storage. USB drives satisfy mobile workflows, whereas inline network encryptors protect SAN links that exceed 64 GFC and now integrate quantum-resistant functions[3]Broadcom shipped Emulex Secure Fibre Channel adapters with quantum-resistant encryption and real-time ransomware detection..

The product landscape evolves toward tighter storage-encryption coupling. Integrated solutions remove latency from external appliances and simplify key life-cycle workflows. In the automotive domain, encrypted eMMC and UFS modules also adopt the same SSD controller designs, opening cross-segment synergies. Vendors that control NAND, firmware, and cryptographic IP simultaneously are positioned to capture value when customers pursue single-vendor validation to streamline audits.

Hardware Encryption Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment Share of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Algorithm Standard: Post-Quantum Emergence Challenges AES Hegemony

Advanced Encryption Standard algorithms possessed 62.3% share in 2024 because regulators and industry bodies long endorsed AES-128 and AES-256 for bulk data. Yet the post-quantum cohort records the highest 37.6% CAGR through 2030, reflecting urgent preparation for quantum attacks. The hardware encryption market size linked to post-quantum shipments accelerates once NIST finalizes draft standards in 2025. SEALSQ demonstrated Kyber and Dilithium inside secure elements that fit the same footprint as prior RSA modules[2]SEALSQ Corp., “QS7001 Secure Element Launch,” sealsq.com. Hybrid modes that pair AES-256 with Kyber-1024 offer backward compatibility during migration.

RSA and elliptic-curve methods linger in digital-signature workflows where certification chains remain static. Intel pledged FIPS 140-3 certification across new product launches to remove procurement friction for federal buyers. As algorithm tool-chains mature, cross-vendor interoperability becomes key, pushing the hardware encryption market toward open certification suites and common APIs that hide algorithm changes from application developers.

By Architecture: SoC Integration Transforms Security Paradigms

Application-specific integrated circuits delivered 57.6% revenue in 2024 because they offer watt-efficient throughput for bulk cryptography in data-center flash arrays. The shift to system-on-chip designs with secure elements drives a superior 23.5% CAGR as IoT and automotive platforms seek single-package cost control. The hardware encryption market size captured by SoC-based designs will overtake discrete ASIC designs by 2029 if the present trajectory holds.

NXP embeds autonomous key storage inside i.MX9 processors, eliminating the need for external security chips in gateways or smart meters. FPGAs remain relevant to prototype post-quantum algorithms because bit-stream updates allow field upgrades without full silicon respins. Intel’s Total Memory Encryption provides runtime memory confidentiality inside server CPUs, removing the need for motherboard TPMs in some secure-boot chains. As more encryption moves on-die, board layouts simplify, and supply-chain validation is easier because fewer chips change between revisions.

Hardware Encryption Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By End-Use Industry: Automotive Acceleration Outpaces Consumer Growth

Consumer electronics stored 32.8% revenue in 2024 driven by default smartphone encryption and secure enclave processors in personal computers. Automotive, though smaller, advances with a 27.8% CAGR as software-defined vehicles rely on encrypted electronic control units and protected over-the-air updates. AUTOSAR’s Secure Hardware Extension sets uniform AES-128 requirements for microcontrollers that manage drivetrain safety. Vehicle manufacturers select hardware modules that pass functional safety and FIPS validations in parallel.

Government and defense sectors keep ordering high-assurance modules that meet stringent temp and tamper-proof specs. Banking and financial services align adoption timelines with PCI DSS 4.0 rules that encourage hardware-based cryptography for point-of-sale and tokenization servers. Healthcare adopts encryption for patient records as HIPAA modernization calls out hardware modules for field medical devices. Manufacturing plants protect industrial intellectual property through encrypted PLC firmware, while IT and telecom providers prefer line-rate network encryptors that combine traffic inspection with post-quantum upgrades.

Geography Analysis

North America commanded 38.4% revenue in 2024. Executive Order 14028 mandates encryption across federal systems, propelling FIPS-validated module demand GSA. Western Digital logged 119% cloud-business growth as encrypted SSDs became standard for hyperscalers. Canada’s alignment with the Cryptographic Module Validation Program extends similar requirements northward, while Mexico’s manufacturing corridor deploys secure industrial networks for cross-border trade.

Asia-Pacific posts the strongest 22.7% CAGR. Samsung’s semiconductor business generated KRW 30.1 trillion in Q4 2024, underpinned by high-bandwidth memory and server SSD lines that now default to hardware encryption. China’s critical-infrastructure law insists on localized encrypted storage in power and telecom grids. India’s financial digitization effort pushes banks to roll out FIPS-compliant HSMs for real-time payment rails. Japan’s Basic Cybersecurity Act obliges key infrastructure to adopt certified modules, fueling domestic demand. South Korea leads NAND capacity expansions that feed the worldwide hardware encryption market.

Europe gains steady traction because GDPR and the NIS 2 directive embed encryption in data-protection norms. German vehicle makers pioneer encrypted ECU communications ahead of UN R155 rules. The United Kingdom emphasizes domestically controlled encryption IP in its post-Brexit cyber strategy. Nordic governments run fully digital healthcare systems that rely on secure microcontrollers. France focuses on secure microcontroller development, while Spain and Italy roll encryption into smart-meter rollouts. Harmonized certification schemes in ETSI and ENISA streamline vendor penetration and maintain balanced growth.

Hardware Encryption Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The hardware encryption market balances between diversified storage suppliers and specialist security chip makers. Western Digital, Samsung, Micron, and Seagate embed encryption directly in drives, capitalizing on scale to pass FIPS tests quickly. Intel, Broadcom, and Marvell add cryptographic offload into processors and adapter cards to maintain data-center performance margins. Thales and SEALSQ court defense and finance buyers with certified high-assurance modules that integrate post-quantum functions.

Vertical integration remains the dominant strategy. Companies that own cryptographic IP, firmware stacks, and validation laboratories reduce time to certification and capture premium pricing. Marvell’s LiquidSecurity card gives cloud operators HSM functionality without external appliances. Patent portfolios around hybrid post-quantum schemes act as competitive shields. Supply-chain control also matters; firms with local 7 nm foundry agreements avoid export-control disruption. Start-ups targeting automotive secure gateways or edge-AI coprocessors partner with Tier-1 suppliers to overcome certification learning curves.

Market entrants differentiate on post-quantum readiness, energy efficiency, and integrated secure-boot frameworks. Strategic alliances, such as PQShield with SiFive, extend RISC-V chips into the security domain while lowering licensing costs. Acquisition activity continues as larger EDA providers, like Cadence, buy embedded security IP vendors to bundle encryption hard macros into chip-design suites. Over the next five years, certification costs and foundry scarcity could lift consolidation momentum, narrowing the field to players with end-to-end cryptographic competence.

Hardware Encryption Industry Leaders

  1. Western Digital Technologies

  2. Samsung Electronics

  3. Micron Technology, Inc.

  4. Kingston Technology Corporation

  5. Seagate Technology

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Hardware Encryption Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • May 2025: SEALSQ unveiled QS7001 secure element with Kyber and Dilithium to protect cryptocurrency wallets against quantum attacks.
  • May 2025: KIOXIA announced CM9 Series PCIe 5.0 NVMe SSDs up to 61.44 TB, offering 65% faster random writes over predecessors.
  • April 2025: Seagate introduced Exos M hard drives up to 36 TB using Mozaic 3+ HAMR, cutting power per TB by 60% in data-center racks.
  • April 2025: Micron reorganized into a dedicated Automotive and Embedded unit to align security-focused memory with vehicle connectivity.

Table of Contents for Hardware Encryption Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising SSD adoption in enterprise data-centres
    • 4.2.2 Regulatory push for encrypted storage in automotive E/E architectures
    • 4.2.3 Edge-AI proliferation demanding on-device security accelerators
    • 4.2.4 National zero-trust mandates in public clouds
    • 4.2.5 Quantum-resistant controller chip launches
    • 4.2.6 Circular-economy demand for drive-level crypto-erase
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Premium pricing versus software encryption
    • 4.3.2 Supply-chain scarcity of advanced crypto-IP cores
    • 4.3.3 Export-control restrictions on high-grade algorithms
    • 4.3.4 Firmware-level side-channel attack disclosures
  • 4.4 Evaluation of Critical Regulatory Framework
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.6.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.6.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.6.5 Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.7 Impact Assessment of Key Stakeholders
  • 4.8 Key Use Cases and Case Studies
  • 4.9 Impact on Macroeconomic Factors of the Market
  • 4.10 Investment Analysis

5. MARKET SEGMENTATION

  • 5.1 By Product
    • 5.1.1 Hard Disk Drives (HDD)
    • 5.1.2 Solid State Drives (SSD)
    • 5.1.3 Universal Serial Bus (USB) Drives
    • 5.1.4 Inline Network Encryptors
  • 5.2 By Algorithm Standard
    • 5.2.1 Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
    • 5.2.2 Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA)
    • 5.2.3 Elliptic-Curve Cryptography (ECC)
    • 5.2.4 Post-Quantum Algorithms
  • 5.3 By Architecture
    • 5.3.1 Application-Specific IC (ASIC)
    • 5.3.2 Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA)
    • 5.3.3 System-on-Chip (SoC) with Secure Element
    • 5.3.4 Trusted Platform Module (TPM)
  • 5.4 By End-Use Industry
    • 5.4.1 Consumer Electronics
    • 5.4.2 Automotive
    • 5.4.3 Government and Defense
    • 5.4.4 Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • 5.4.5 Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)
    • 5.4.6 Manufacturing
    • 5.4.7 IT and Telecom
    • 5.4.8 Others
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.2 Germany
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Nordics
    • 5.5.3.7 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 Middle East
    • 5.5.4.1.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.4.1.2 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.5.4.1.3 Turkey
    • 5.5.4.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.4.2 Africa
    • 5.5.4.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.2.2 Egypt
    • 5.5.4.2.3 Nigeria
    • 5.5.4.2.4 Rest of Africa
    • 5.5.5 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.5.1 China
    • 5.5.5.2 India
    • 5.5.5.3 Japan
    • 5.5.5.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.5.5 ASEAN
    • 5.5.5.6 Australia
    • 5.5.5.7 New Zealand
    • 5.5.5.8 Rest of Asia-Pacific

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Western Digital Technologies
    • 6.4.2 Samsung Electronics
    • 6.4.3 Micron Technology
    • 6.4.4 Kingston Technology
    • 6.4.5 Seagate Technology
    • 6.4.6 Intel Corporation
    • 6.4.7 Thales Group
    • 6.4.8 Broadcom Inc
    • 6.4.9 IBM Corporation
    • 6.4.10 NetApp Inc
    • 6.4.11 Toshiba Corporation
    • 6.4.12 Microchip Technology
    • 6.4.13 Kanguru Solutions
    • 6.4.14 Gemalto (Thales DIS)
    • 6.4.15 Maxim Integrated (ADI)
    • 6.4.16 WinMagic
    • 6.4.17 Apricorn
    • 6.4.18 Rohde & Schwarz Cybersecurity
    • 6.4.19 Futurex
    • 6.4.20 SEALSQ (WISeKey)

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-need Assessment

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the hardware encryption market as revenue generated from dedicated silicon or board-level components that encrypt data at rest or in motion within storage drives, removable media, and inline network encryptors. The definition follows the scope set out in the FIPS 140 validation program and covers both consumer-grade and enterprise-grade self-encrypting devices that ship new from the factory.

Scope Exclusion: Purely software-based cryptography, cloud key-management services, and general-purpose hardware security modules sit outside the frame of this report.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Product
    • Hard Disk Drives (HDD)
    • Solid State Drives (SSD)
    • Universal Serial Bus (USB) Drives
    • Inline Network Encryptors
  • By Algorithm Standard
    • Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
    • Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA)
    • Elliptic-Curve Cryptography (ECC)
    • Post-Quantum Algorithms
  • By Architecture
    • Application-Specific IC (ASIC)
    • Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA)
    • System-on-Chip (SoC) with Secure Element
    • Trusted Platform Module (TPM)
  • By End-Use Industry
    • Consumer Electronics
    • Automotive
    • Government and Defense
    • Healthcare and Life Sciences
    • Banking, Financial Services and Insurance (BFSI)
    • Manufacturing
    • IT and Telecom
    • Others
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • United Kingdom
      • Germany
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Nordics
      • Rest of Europe
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • Saudi Arabia
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Turkey
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Egypt
        • Nigeria
        • Rest of Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • ASEAN
      • Australia
      • New Zealand
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

We interviewed firmware architects at SSD suppliers, procurement managers for Tier-1 data-center operators in North America and APAC, and information-security consultants serving government, healthcare, and automotive clients. Their insights validated adoption rates, clarified average selling prices, and highlighted regulation-driven demand shifts that secondary sources could not fully capture.

Desk Research

Mordor analysts first collected publicly available datasets from agencies such as NIST (FIPS 140 certificates), the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security export statistics, Eurostat trade codes for encrypted drives, and customs records accessed through Volza. Additional inputs came from Trusted Computing Group white papers, SEC filings of major drive OEMs, and press releases tracked in Dow Jones Factiva. Company annual reports, investor decks, and patent families sourced via Questel rounded out trend mapping. This list is illustrative, not exhaustive, and many other publications were reviewed for corroboration.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down model begins with annual shipments of SSD, HDD, USB, and inline encryptor units published by IDC and SIA, multiplied by encryption attach rates derived from primary calls. Results are then reconciled with a bottom-up roll-up of sampled supplier revenue to refine totals. Core variables include NVMe SSD shipment growth, FIPS 140-3 certification backlog, average capacity per encrypted drive, regulatory fines linked to GDPR, and enterprise cloud storage penetration. Multivariate regression, supported by scenario analysis for regulatory tightening, projects values to 2030, with gaps in supplier disclosures filled through weighted interpolation of peer data.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Model outputs pass variance checks against independent indicators, after which a senior analyst reviews anomalies. Reports refresh yearly, while any material event, such as a new federal mandate, triggers an interim update followed by a fresh editorial pass before release.

Why Our Hardware Encryption Baseline Commands Reliability

Published figures often diverge because firms choose dissimilar scopes, pricing ladders, and refresh cadences.

Key gap drivers include whether USB tokens or full HSM appliances are bundled, if currency conversions use average or spot rates, and the aggressiveness of scenario assumptions. Mordor's disciplined segmentation and yearly refresh ensure a balanced baseline clients can trace back to explicit variables.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 332.57 million (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 359.5 million (2025) Global Consultancy A Counts self-encrypting drives only and then extrapolates limited vendor samples, omitting inline encryptors.
USD 368.11 billion (2025) Industry Research Firm B Bundles HSMs, cryptographic IP cores, and automotive security microcontrollers, leading to magnitude inflation.
USD 505.46 billion (2025) Trade Journal C Conflates all encryption-enabled silicon, including smartphone SoCs, and applies optimistic ASP progressions.

The comparison shows that when scope widens indiscriminately or validation steps are skipped, totals swing wildly. By anchoring estimates to shipment evidence, verified attach rates, and a transparent review cycle, Mordor Intelligence delivers a dependable reference point for strategic planning.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current value of the hardware encryption market?

The market stands at USD 332.57 million in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 417.35 million by 2030.

Which product segment grows the fastest?

Solid state drives show the highest 21.5% CAGR, reflecting rising data-center adoption.

Why is post-quantum cryptography important for hardware encryption?

Quantum-resistant algorithms such as Kyber and Dilithium safeguard data against future quantum-computer attacks and already appear in secure elements and printers shipping in 2025.

Which region offers the strongest growth potential?

Asia-Pacific posts the fastest 22.7% CAGR due to semiconductor manufacturing capacity, new cybersecurity laws, and expanding cloud infrastructure.

How do premium costs affect hardware encryption adoption?

Hardware options cost up to 60% more than software, delaying purchases in cost-sensitive sectors, though performance and key-management advantages often justify the investment for high-throughput workloads.

What certification is most critical for hardware encryption vendors?

FIPS 140-3 validation remains the cornerstone for federal and regulated-industry sales, driving vendors to integrate approved algorithms and undergo rigorous testing.

Page last updated on: