Top 5 Uganda Petroleum Products Companies
Vivo Energy Uganda Ltd
TotalEnergies SE
Nile Energy Limited
Stabex International Limited
Hass Petroleum (U) Limited
Source: Mordor Intelligence
Uganda Petroleum Products Companies Matrix by Mordor Intelligence
Our comprehensive proprietary performance metrics of key Uganda Petroleum Products players beyond traditional revenue and ranking measures
The MI Matrix can diverge from simple size rankings because it scores what buyers feel day to day, not only billed volumes. Reliability under UNOC allocation, depot access, and station level execution can move customer preference quickly, even when headline scale looks similar. Innovation also matters more now, because automation, payments, and quality controls reduce shrink and improve service consistency. Uganda's 2024 to 2025 shift to UNOC as sole importer changed how fuel reaches stations, with supply continuity tied to corridor logistics and allocation timing. The practical question for many buyers is which brand can keep products available during disruptions and still meet tighter quality checks. Mordor Intelligence's MI Matrix is better for supplier and competitor evaluation than revenue tables alone, because it blends footprint, operating readiness, and evidence of recent execution.
MI Competitive Matrix for Uganda Petroleum Products
The MI Matrix benchmarks top Uganda Petroleum Products Companies on dual axes of Impact and Execution Scale.
Analysis of Uganda Petroleum Products Companies and Quadrants in the MI Competitive Matrix
Comprehensive positioning breakdown
Vivo Energy Uganda Ltd
Shell network reached about 195 sites in 2025 for this leading service provider in Uganda fuels retail, supported by new builds and site upgrades that add food service and vehicle care. UNOC's sole import model raises the value of strong logistics planning, because corridor delays can quickly show up at the pump. If UNOC allocation tightens, Vivo can defend volumes through tighter stock controls and premium product differentiation, but brand damage is a real risk if queues return.
TotalEnergies SE
Uganda retail scale remains the anchor for this major brand, with roughly 200 service stations and two depots supporting product availability. The UNOC import shift changes the control points, so operational advantage now comes from storage discipline and last mile execution more than tender access. A sharper compliance push on licensing and fuel quality monitoring can favor operators with mature safety systems, yet public scrutiny around large oil projects can still spill into forecourt perception. If supply stabilizes through dual corridors, TotalEnergies is well placed to translate reliability into higher throughput.
Frequently Asked Questions
What should I check first when choosing a fuel station network for fleet supply in Uganda?
Start with supply reliability during corridor delays and how the company handles stock outs. Then review invoicing terms, pump calibration controls, and delivery lead times.
How can a buyer reduce the risk of poor quality fuel?
Ask for documented quality checks, sampling routines, and complaint resolution steps. Also verify whether the supplier has clear tank management practices at depots and stations.
What changed for fuel supply after UNOC became the sole importer?
More suppliers depend on a centralized import and allocation system, so timing and logistics matter more. Buyers should watch how each brand manages inventory, not only price.
What matters most for aviation and jet fuel buyers in Uganda?
Prioritize documented handling standards, filtration practices, and traceable delivery records. Also confirm contingency plans for supply interruptions during corridor congestion.
How do I compare LPG providers beyond cylinder price?
Look at cylinder safety, valve quality, and exchange availability in your operating areas. Consistent weight, clear branding, and reliable after sales support reduce safety and downtime risk.
What are the biggest near term risks for petroleum product distributors in Uganda?
Supply disruption from route congestion and tighter compliance enforcement are the main operational risks. Working capital stress rises when inventory sits longer in transit or in queues.
Methodology
Research approach and analytical framework
Data Sourcing: Public company pages, official statements, and credible journalism were prioritized, with added observable signals for private firms. Evidence focused on Uganda footprint, assets, and post 2023 developments. When hard financial splits were unavailable, the scoring used stations, depots, agreements, and documented expansions. Conflicting claims were handled by favoring official sources and cross checks.
Station count, depot access, and coverage along key corridors determine availability during congestion and allocation swings.
Recognition affects fleet contracts and retail loyalty, especially when price moves are similar across stations.
Relative scale is proxied by network size and visible bulk activity tied to Uganda sales volumes.
Storage, terminals, and trucking readiness matter because Uganda is landlocked and disruptions are frequent.
Site automation, payment tools, and quality controls reduce losses and improve customer trust.
Working capital resilience matters under allocation timing and sudden corridor delays that tie up inventory.
